Skip to content
Search AI Powered

Latest Stories

U.S. regulators approve merger of Canadian Pacific and Kansas City Southern

STB will require combined railroads to meet conditions on competitive rates, environmental impacts, worker protections, passenger rail.

CP locomotive-8.jpeg

Canadian Pacific Railway (CP) got a conditional green light today from federal regulators to complete a $31 billion merger with the U.S. freight rail line Kansas City Southern (KCS), clearing the way for the two companies to create what they call the first single-line rail network linking the U.S., Mexico, and Canada.

The deal had been approved by both companies’ stockholders in December 2021, following a protracted fight over a rival bid for KCS from fellow freight carrier Canadian National that was turned aside by U.S. antitrust regulators.


Following those votes, the transaction had been on ice pending approval by the U.S. Surface Transportation Board (STB), which issued its decision today. As part of its approval, the STB will require what it calls an “unprecedented” seven-year oversight period and contains conditions designed to mitigate environmental impacts, preserve competition, protect railroad workers, and promote efficient passenger rail. If all those conditions are met, the STB said it anticipates that the merger will result in overall improvements in safety and the reduction of carbon emissions.

The two railroads cheered the STB decision, saying it authorizes CP to exercise control of KCS as early as April 14, beginning a three-year process to achieve full integration of CP and KCS and unlock the benefits of the combination, Canadian Pacific said. That combined company will operate approximately 20,000 miles of rail and employ close to 20,000 people.

"These benefits are unparalleled for our employees, rail customers, communities and the North American economy at a time when the supply chains of these three great nations have never needed it more," CP President and CEO Keith Creel said in a release. "A combined CPKC will connect North America through a unique rail network able to enhance competition, provide improved reliable rail service, take trucks off public roads and improve rail safety by expanding CP's industry-leading safety practices."

Feds say merger maintains competition

To reach its decision, the STB said it reviewed nearly 2,000 comments and other filings, held a seven-day public hearing, and assigned its Board’s Office of Environmental Analysis to hold seven public meetings and produce a Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS). 

As a result of that research process, the STB said it concluded that the merger would preserve competition within the industry, since the combined companies—to be known as Canadian Pacific Kansas City (CPKC)—will continue to be the smallest Class I railroad, with a network that is a few thousand route miles shorter than the next smallest Class I and half the size of the Western railroads.

Other Class I railroads had challenged the merger based on monopoly concerns, but the STB said those complaints were “simply seeking conditions and other remedies that appear aimed at protecting their own traffic from competition with CPKC and at limiting the ability of the combined CPKC to meet its potential.” 

According to the STB, that potential will include reduced travel time for traffic moving over the single-line service by eliminating the need for the two now-separate CP and KCS systems to interchange traffic moving from one system to the other. “This will enhance efficiency, which in turn will enable the new CPKC system to better compete for traffic with the other larger Class I carriers,” the STB said.

The STB also found that CPKC’s potential customers approve of the move, saying “There is substantial (though not unanimous) shipper support for this transaction—the Board has received more than 450 support letters.” To protect shippers’ interests, the STB said it had imposed numerous conditions to preserve existing rail service options at affected “gateways”—the interchange points between CPKC and other railroads—that allow shippers to require CPKC to justify any rate increases that are greater than inflation.

STB sees environmental improvement

Aside from the business implications, the STB also found that a combined CPKC would be able to attract 64,000 truckloads from the roads to rail each year, helping to reduce road congestion, create fewer emissions, and improve transportation safety.

The board also pointed to last month’s derailment and toxic spill by a Norfolk Southern train in East Palestine, Ohio, saying the merger would improve industry safety overall since “rail is by far the safest means of transporting any freight, including hazardous materials.”

The STB said it had also studied community concerns about train lengths, and found that the merged companies would actually run shorter trains in the future and would meet a rule that trains must avoid blocking public crossings longer than ten minutes. The STB cited the two companies’ estimate that their average train length would decrease from approximately 9,551 feet (1.8 miles) if there was no merger to 7,726 feet (1.4 miles) after the merger.

 

 

The Latest

More Stories

warehouse workers with freight pallets

NMFTA prepares to change freight classification rules in 2025

The way that shippers and carriers classify loads of less than truckload (LTL) freight to determine delivery rates is set to change in 2025 for the first time in decades, introducing a new approach that is designed to support more standardized practices.

Those changes to the National Motor Freight Classification (NMFC) are necessary because the current approach is “complex and outdated,” according to industry group the National Motor Freight Traffic Association (NMFTA).

Keep ReadingShow less

Featured

car dashboard lights

Forrester forecasts technology trends for 2025

Business leaders in the manufacturing and transportation sectors will increasingly turn to technology in 2025 to adapt to developments in a tricky economic environment, according to a report from Forrester.

That approach is needed because companies in asset-intensive industries like manufacturing and transportation quickly feel the pain when energy prices rise, raw materials are harder to access, or borrowing money for capital projects becomes more expensive, according to researcher Paul Miller, vice president and principal analyst at Forrester.

Keep ReadingShow less

Something new for you

Regular online readers of DC Velocity and Supply Chain Xchange have probably noticed something new during the past few weeks. Our team has been working for months to produce shiny new websites that allow you to find the supply chain news and stories you need more easily.

It is always good for a media brand to undergo a refresh every once in a while. We certainly are not alone in retooling our websites; most of you likely go through that rather complex process every few years. But this was more than just your average refresh. We did it to take advantage of the most recent developments in artificial intelligence (AI).

Keep ReadingShow less
FTR trucking conditions chart

In this chart, the red and green bars represent Trucking Conditions Index for 2024. The blue line represents the Trucking Conditions Index for 2023. The index shows that while business conditions for trucking companies improved in August of 2024 versus July of 2024, they are still overall negative.

Image courtesy of FTR

Trucking sector ticked up slightly in August, but still negative

Buoyed by a return to consistent decreases in fuel prices, business conditions in the trucking sector improved slightly in August but remain negative overall, according to a measure from transportation analysis group FTR.

FTR’s Trucking Conditions Index improved in August to -1.39 from the reading of -5.59 in July. The Bloomington, Indiana-based firm forecasts that its TCI readings will remain mostly negative-to-neutral through the beginning of 2025.

Keep ReadingShow less
trucks parked in big lot

OOIDA cheers federal funding for truck parking spots

A coalition of truckers is applauding the latest round of $30 million in federal funding to address what they call a “national truck parking crisis,” created when drivers face an imperative to pull over and stop when they cap out their hours of service, yet can seldom find a safe spot for their vehicle.

The Biden Administration yesterday took steps to address that problem by including parking funds in its $4.2 billion in money from the National Infrastructure Project Assistance (Mega) grant program and the Infrastructure for Rebuilding America (INFRA) grant program, both of which are funded by the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law.

Keep ReadingShow less