Stuck in neutral: Stubborn freight recession has truckers searching for an upshift
A post-pandemic hangover of excess capacity coupled with tepid industrial production is dampening demand and short-circuiting a return to growth for truckers. A bright spot: Inflation is moderating, and consumers keep spending. And maybe the Fed will finally cut interest rates.
Gary Frantz is a contributing editor for DC Velocity and its sister publication CSCMP's Supply Chain Quarterly, and a veteran communications executive with more than 30 years of experience in the transportation and logistics industries. He's served as communications director and strategic media relations counselor for companies including XPO Logistics, Con-way, Menlo Logistics, GT Nexus, Circle International Group, and Consolidated Freightways. Gary is currently principal of GNF Communications LLC, a consultancy providing freelance writing, editorial and media strategy services. He's a proud graduate of the Journalism program at California State University–Chico.
Jason Seidl has been in the trucking business for the better part of 30 years, first working on the front lines in freight operations, then moving to the investment community, where today he’s managing director and senior transportation analyst for investment firm TD Cowen. Through all that time and all the different business cycles he’s experienced, he hasn’t witnessed anything like the current market cycle. “I’ve never seen a downturn that’s lasted this long,” Seidl says.
Part of the reason, he believes, is the “crazy period” the markets lived through during the pandemic and post-pandemic cycles, and the supply chain crises that resulted.
“A ton of carriers rushed in [to the truckload market] and would have left earlier, but they are hanging in longer because of an infusion of government stimulus money,” which helped shore up their balance sheets and enabled them to weather the downturn.
The other piece: “There are more brokers in the market today with better technology, and that has provided [truckload] carriers with other options to find freight, all of which has kept them in the market longer than they normally would have [stayed].”
Andy Dyer, president of transportation management for nonasset-based third-party service provider AFS Logistics, agrees. “We lived through a post-pandemic demand bubble the likes of which most of us had never seen,” he says, recalling a time when trucks were so scarce, he was posting loads at $9 a mile. “The bubble hit, capacity surged to meet it, and even though demand is starting to normalize, we are still oversupplied.”
He echoes Seidl’s point about the rising role of brokers and other nonasset-based intermediaries. “Back in the 1990s, brokering in the freight space accounted for 5% of transactions,” he says. “Post-pandemic, that’s now over 20%. I am convinced that absent a seismic demand event, we will not get corrected on the price side until we have a meaningful and sustained supply side correction.”
It’s a sluggish market where industrial production is weak, with the monthly ISM (Institute for Supply Management) report in June again going negative, marking 19 out of the last 20 months with a score of under 50, which is considered in contraction territory. Yet “the consumer looks OK … for now,” says Seidl.
CAUTIOUS OPTIMISM
Interviews with fleet operators confirm that they’re essentially all facing those challenges but also reveal some cautious optimism that the bottom has been reached and the market is about to turn. “For the truckload segment, demand has yet to truly break out, and further attrition of excess capacity is still needed,” said Adam Miller, chief executive officer at Knight-Swift Holdings Inc., the nation’s largest truckload carrier, in the company’s recent second-quarter earnings call.
And while he noted that the company has a long way to go to return to its target performance levels, Miller sees reason for hope. “It is starting to feel like the bottom is behind us for this cycle,” he said, adding “if trends over the past few months continue, we should see demand building as we exit the third quarter and some return of seasonal activity for the fourth quarter for the first time in years.”
It has been a tough economy for truckers, yet at less-than-truckload (LTL) carrier Old Dominion Freight Line (ODFL), the news isn’t all bad. “We are managing to grow our market share, and we do that by providing what customers perceive as solid value for their transportation dollar,” says Greg Plemmons, ODFL’s executive vice president and chief operating officer. “We have established a premium offering, and the good news is there is always a market for quality service,” he adds.
The toughest task? Managing in an environment where costs across the board continue to rise. “We feel the same inflationary pressures as our customers—and we all—do,” Plemmons says. Nevertheless, he notes that as the year has proceeded, ODFL has been able to secure “modest” rate increases—“maybe a bit less in 2024 in terms of percentage with our contract customers, but still solid.”
And while it’s always difficult to call a market turn, “we feel like we are bottoming out as an industry,” with growth returning “to something we’re more accustomed to” in the second half of the year and into 2025, Plemmons adds. “My crystal ball is a little fuzzy right now, but if conversations we’re having with customers are any indication, they are feeling more optimistic [today] than they have in the past year and a half.”
ODFL isn’t letting its foot off the investment gas pedal, either. Its CapEx for this year will come in at around $750 million between rolling stock, facilities, IT, freight handling equipment, and other needs, according to Plemmons. This year, the company is opening six new service centers, ending the year with 261 terminals, which represents an increase of about 9% in capacity for the network. It also has some 100 real estate projects under way or on the drawing board. “It’s never a dull moment” on the real estate side, he says. “You can’t wait around until you need them; you have to start well in advance.”
Plemmons says ODFL strives to maintain “about 25% excess capacity [now closer to 30%], so maybe we are the best positioned to handle a turn in the economy when it comes—and it certainly will come.”
A “MODEST” RECOVERY ON THE HORIZON?
With economic headlines providing a mixed bag of news—signs of the economy’s resilience, the prospect of weaker employment and wage growth, and the likelihood of a larger and earlier Fed rate cut—these economic issues are inevitably entering more conversations, notes Avery Vise, vice president of trucking for FTR Transportation Intelligence.
“Putting aside the headlines, our overall forecast is for a pretty modest recovery this year,” with 2024 volumes up 1.6% year over year—“solid but nothing to be excited about,” Vise says. He adds that he sees next year shaping up to be a bit stronger, with growth on the order of 2.4%.
The big issue, as it has been for the past two years, continues to be overcapacity. “We still have something on the order of 95,000 more for-hire carriers [primarily truckload operators with no more than two trucks] today than before the pandemic, about 37% more.” That increase in the carrier population also accounts for “the majority of the roughly 250,000 more drivers in the market today versus prepandemic,” Vise adds. “There is still a lot of excess capacity to match up against increasing freight demand.”
Yet he believes “we are in the mechanics of recovery.” He cites FTR’s estimates of “active” utilization (i.e., the utilization of trucks with drivers), which is FTR’s core metric for assessing market tightness and which represents a measure of the number of trucks needed to haul the freight that’s available. “That’s coming off a trough [last year] and has been trending up most of this year,” he notes.
He expects that by this year’s fourth quarter, “we will be in line with the 10-year average for utilization of 92%.” Vise further projects that in the first and second quarters of 2025, active utilization industrywide will reach 95%. “And that is when you get significant upward pressure on rates,” he notes.
STRUCTURAL CHANGES UPENDING THE MARKET
Then there are the effects of structural factors that are changing the market long term, what Vise calls “a permanent shift in capacity from larger to smaller carriers operating in the spot market on behalf of brokers.” It’s a fundamental change in how the market operates, he says, adding “it’s not just that we have overcapacity but why?”
A lot of that has to do with the rise of intermediaries—brokers and freight forwarders—using flexible and more sophisticated digital freight platforms. “They have visibility they’ve never had before into where those small carriers are, what hours of service they have available and when, their preferred routes and loads, and where they want to go next.”
Vise cites as well some revealing data on empty miles from the annual truck costing report published by ATRI (the American Transportation Research Institute). “The average empty mile percentage for the entire for-hire industry was somewhere between 14% and 15%,” he notes. “But empty miles for smaller carriers was lower, 10%.”
“That’s counterintuitive. Technology has changed that,” he’s observed. “You [the small one- or two-truck carrier] can program in your ‘wish list’ of loads, which then pop up [on your smartphone] based on the preferences you set up and the algorithms behind the app.”
These digital planning and execution tools are not just conveniently available on a driver’s smartphone, they’re also extremely effective at quickly and accurately matching loads to trucks in near real time. “Drivers have more ability to find the loads they want faster. If you can get one or two more loads a week and cut down on empty miles, that can offset the impact of stagnant rates,” Vise says.
All in all, planning and forecasting for truckers has become that much more fluid and difficult, fraught with more uncertainty than ever, Vise says. “Everyone wants to analyze the market based on what’s happened in the past, but that’s not working,” he explains. “There have been so many structural changes that people have not dealt with before; that makes relying on historical norms inaccurate, if not downright dangerous.”
GETTING AHEAD OF THE CURVE
Two other carriers that aren’t letting the stubborn freight recession curtail their expansion plans are LTL truckers A. Duie Pyle and Estes Express Lines.
“Rates are relatively stable, and there is decent pricing discipline in the market,” notes John Luciani, chief operating officer of LTL solutions for Pyle, adding that over the first half of the year, the carrier’s shipment count per day was up about 11%. “Retail is probably driving a lot of the activity right now. Shipment size is down, while bill [of lading] count is up. [Retailers are] buying [and shipping] in smaller quantities as inventory levels continue to contract.”
At the same time, “customers are clawing back some of the accessorial [charges] and are really focused on minimizing costs where they can,” Luciani adds. And they are testing the market. “Customers who have volume are leveraging that. We are seeing some rate pressure from customers taking their business out to bid,” he notes.
That’s not stopping Pyle from growing its network. The Northeast-focused carrier has added 77 doors at its Maspeth, New York, facility to complement capacity at its New York City terminal in the Bronx. It also bought new terminal properties in Camp Hill and Erie, Pennsylvania; Rochester, New York; and Bridgeport, West Virginia. It will end the year with 34 terminals, and a workforce of 1,200 pickup and delivery drivers and 400 linehaul drivers serving the Northeast U.S.
Webb Estes, president and chief operating officer at LTL carrier Estes Express Lines, has a simple definition of a freight recession: “when freight [volume] is less than it was the year before.”
In the current environment, “it feels more like we just came off a mountaintop of demand. We were on a really big high for a couple of years,” he recalls. Now, Estes is dealing with a market where “we are trying to figure out what the new normal is.”
The last two years have brought unprecedented challenges for a company Webb’s great grandfather founded four generations ago, in 1931. “After [living] through the Covid onslaught, then a booming market, then YRC going out of business, and then a cyberattack, we feel we can handle whatever comes our way,” he notes. “We have built a gritty and resilient team that thrives on challenge.”
Estes was a big participant in the auction for YRC’s assets. The company ended up acquiring (by purchase or lease assumption) 36 terminal properties as well as purchasing 6,800 YRC trailers, which have nearly all been rebranded with Estes livery.
The company has added 24% more dock doors to its network over the past three years. So far this year, Estes has brought online an additional 452 doors and plans to get that number up to 1,430 by the end of the year. That’s from building and acquiring new terminals as well as expansions at existing facilities.
“We have been able to create the capacity we needed to respond to customers in the post-YRC environment,” Estes notes. The company will end the year with a network of 280 terminals supporting 22,000 employees operating 10,400 tractors and 40,000 trailers.
As for peak season, “the only nuance about this peak season is that it will be shorter,” Estes says. “Thanksgiving is on the 28th, so we have five fewer days [between Thanksgiving and Christmas] than last year. This year will have the shortest window between [the two holidays].”
LOOK AHEAD, NOT BACK
All downcycles eventually flip. Yet in the view of Jim Fields, chief operating officer for LTL carrier Pitt Ohio, the key is “to look forward, not back, regardless of what is happening to the economy.”
Fields and his team are focused on two primary objectives to improve the business and cement the support of Pitt Ohio’s customers: strategically applying technology that further digitizes the business—particularly automating back-office functions and eliminating wasteful manual work like rekeying data or scanning documents—and hiring and retaining the best team of people possible.
Even with technology increasingly automating many parts of trucking, “this is still a people business,” emphasizes Fields. “We want the best, most professional, safest drivers. Dock workers who take care of the freight as if it were their own. Managers and supervisors who help our employees grow and succeed, and who treat them with respect.
“We want to take advantage of the different skill sets of our employees to advance the capabilities of the company and the services we provide to customers,” Fields adds. “When we’re successful at that, we all win.”
Most of the apparel sold in North America is manufactured in Asia, meaning the finished goods travel long distances to reach end markets, with all the associated greenhouse gas emissions. On top of that, apparel manufacturing itself requires a significant amount of energy, water, and raw materials like cotton. Overall, the production of apparel is responsible for about 2% of the world’s total greenhouse gas emissions, according to a report titled
Taking Stock of Progress Against the Roadmap to Net Zeroby the Apparel Impact Institute. Founded in 2017, the Apparel Impact Institute is an organization dedicated to identifying, funding, and then scaling solutions aimed at reducing the carbon emissions and other environmental impacts of the apparel and textile industries.
The author of this annual study is researcher and consultant Michael Sadowski. He wrote the first report in 2021 as well as the latest edition, which was released earlier this year. Sadowski, who is also executive director of the environmental nonprofit
The Circulate Initiative, recently joined DC Velocity Group Editorial Director David Maloney on an episode of the “Logistics Matters” podcast to discuss the key findings of the research, what companies are doing to reduce emissions, and the progress they’ve made since the first report was issued.
A: While companies in the apparel industry can set their own sustainability targets, we realized there was a need to give them a blueprint for actually reducing emissions. And so, we produced the first report back in 2021, where we laid out the emissions from the sector, based on the best estimates [we could make using] data from various sources. It gives companies and the sector a blueprint for what we collectively need to do to drive toward the ambitious reduction [target] of staying within a 1.5 degrees Celsius pathway. That was the first report, and then we committed to refresh the analysis on an annual basis. The second report was published last year, and the third report came out in May of this year.
Q: What were some of the key findings of your research?
A: We found that about half of the emissions in the sector come from Tier Two, which is essentially textile production. That includes the knitting, weaving, dyeing, and finishing of fabric, which together account for over half of the total emissions. That was a really important finding, and it allows us to focus our attention on the interventions that can drive those emissions down.
Raw material production accounts for another quarter of emissions. That includes cotton farming, extracting gas and oil from the ground to make synthetics, and things like that. So we now have a really keen understanding of the source of our industry’s emissions.
Q: Your report mentions that the apparel industry is responsible for about 2% of global emissions. Is that an accurate statistic?
A: That’s our best estimate of the total emissions [generated by] the apparel sector. Some other reports on the industry have apparel at up to 8% of global emissions. And there is a commonly misquoted number in the media that it’s 10%. From my perspective, I think the best estimate is somewhere under 2%.
We know that globally, humankind needs to reduce emissions by roughly half by 2030 and reach net zero by 2050 to hit international goals. [Reaching that target will require the involvement of] every facet of the global economy and every aspect of the apparel sector—transportation, material production, manufacturing, cotton farming. Through our work and that of others, I think the apparel sector understands what has to happen. We have highlighted examples of how companies are taking action to reduce emissions in the roadmap reports.
Q: What are some of those actions the industry can take to reduce emissions?
A: I think one of the positive developments since we wrote the first report is that we’re seeing companies really focus on the most impactful areas. We see companies diving deep on thermal energy, for example. With respect to Tier Two, we [focus] a lot of attention on things like ocean freight versus air. There’s a rule of thumb I’ve heard that indicates air freight is about 10 times the cost [of ocean] and also produces 10 times more greenhouse gas emissions.
There is money available to invest in sustainability efforts. It’s really exciting to see the funding that’s coming through for AI [artificial intelligence] and to see that individual companies, such as H&M and Lululemon, are investing in real solutions in their supply chains. I think a lot of concrete actions are being taken.
And yet we know that reducing emissions by half on an absolute basis by 2030 is a monumental undertaking. So I don’t want to be overly optimistic, because I think we have a lot of work to do. But I do think we’ve got some amazing progress happening.
Q: You mentioned several companies that are starting to address their emissions. Is that a result of their being more aware of the emissions they generate? Have you seen progress made since the first report came out in 2021?
A: Yes. When we published the first roadmap back in 2021, our statistics showed that only about 12 companies had met the criteria [for setting] science-based targets. In 2024, the number of apparel, textile, and footwear companies that have set targets or have commitments to set targets is close to 500. It’s an enormous increase. I think they see the urgency more than other sectors do.
We have companies that have been working at sustainability for quite a long time. I think the apparel sector has developed a keen understanding of the impacts of climate change. You can see the impacts of flooding, drought, heat, and other things happening in places like Bangladesh and Pakistan and India. If you’re a brand or a manufacturer and you have operations and supply chains in these places, I think you understand what the future will look like if we don’t significantly reduce emissions.
Q: There are different categories of emission levels, depending on the role within the supply chain. Scope 1 are “direct” emissions under the reporting company’s control. For apparel, this might be the production of raw materials or the manufacturing of the finished product. Scope 2 covers “indirect” emissions from purchased energy, such as electricity used in these processes. Scope 3 emissions are harder to track, as they include emissions from supply chain partners both upstream and downstream.
Now companies are finding there are legislative efforts around the world that could soon require them to track and report on all these emissions, including emissions produced by their partners’ supply chains. Does this mean that companies now need to be more aware of not only what greenhouse gas emissions they produce, but also what their partners produce?
A: That’s right. Just to put this into context, if you’re a brand like an Adidas or a Gap, you still have to consider the Scope 3 emissions. In particular, there are the so-called “purchased goods and services,” which refers to all of the embedded emissions in your products, from farming cotton to knitting yarn to making fabric. Those “purchased goods and services” generally account for well above 80% of the total emissions associated with a product. It’s by far the most significant portion of your emissions.
Leading companies have begun measuring and taking action on Scope 3 emissions because of regulatory developments in Europe and, to some extent now, in California. I do think this is just a further tailwind for the work that the industry is doing.
I also think it will definitely ratchet up the quality requirements of Scope 3 data, which is not yet where we’d all like it to be. Companies are working to improve that data, but I think the regulatory push will make the quality side increasingly important.
Q: Overall, do you think the work being done by the Apparel Impact Institute will help reduce greenhouse gas emissions within the industry?
A: When we started this back in 2020, we were at a place where companies were setting targets and knew their intended destination, but what they needed was a blueprint for how to get there. And so, the roadmap [provided] this blueprint and identified six key things that the sector needed to do—from using more sustainable materials to deploying renewable electricity in the supply chain.
Decarbonizing any sector, whether it’s transportation, chemicals, or automotive, requires investment. The Apparel Impact Institute is bringing collective investment, which is so critical. I’m really optimistic about what they’re doing. They have taken a data-driven, evidence-based approach, so they know where the emissions are and they know what the needed interventions are. And they’ve got the industry behind them in doing that.
The global air cargo market’s hot summer of double-digit demand growth continued in August with average spot rates showing their largest year-on-year jump with a 24% increase, according to the latest weekly analysis by Xeneta.
Xeneta cited two reasons to explain the increase. First, Global average air cargo spot rates reached $2.68 per kg in August due to continuing supply and demand imbalance. That came as August's global cargo supply grew at its slowest ratio in 2024 to-date at 2% year-on-year, while global cargo demand continued its double-digit growth, rising +11%.
The second reason for higher rates was an ocean-to-air shift in freight volumes due to Red Sea disruptions and e-commerce demand.
Those factors could soon be amplified as e-commerce shows continued strong growth approaching the hotly anticipated winter peak season. E-commerce and low-value goods exports from China in the first seven months of 2024 increased 30% year-on-year, including shipments to Europe and the US rising 38% and 30% growth respectively, Xeneta said.
“Typically, air cargo market performance in August tends to follow the July trend. But another month of double-digit demand growth and the strongest rate growths of the year means there was definitely no summer slack season in 2024,” Niall van de Wouw, Xeneta’s chief airfreight officer, said in a release.
“Rates we saw bottoming out in late July started picking up again in mid-August. This is too short a period to call a season. This has been a busy summer, and now we’re at the threshold of Q4, it will be interesting to see what will happen and if all the anticipation of a red-hot peak season materializes,” van de Wouw said.
The report cites data showing that there are approximately 1.7 million workers missing from the post-pandemic workforce and that 38% of small firms are unable to fill open positions. At the same time, the “skills gap” in the workforce is accelerating as automation and AI create significant shifts in how work is performed.
That information comes from the “2024 Labor Day Report” released by Littler’s Workplace Policy Institute (WPI), the firm’s government relations and public policy arm.
“We continue to see a labor shortage and an urgent need to upskill the current workforce to adapt to the new world of work,” said Michael Lotito, Littler shareholder and co-chair of WPI. “As corporate executives and business leaders look to the future, they are focused on realizing the many benefits of AI to streamline operations and guide strategic decision-making, while cultivating a talent pipeline that can support this growth.”
But while the need is clear, solutions may be complicated by public policy changes such as the upcoming U.S. general election and the proliferation of employment-related legislation at the state and local levels amid Congressional gridlock.
“We are heading into a contentious election that has already proven to be unpredictable and is poised to create even more uncertainty for employers, no matter the outcome,” Shannon Meade, WPI’s executive director, said in a release. “At the same time, the growing patchwork of state and local requirements across the U.S. is exacerbating compliance challenges for companies. That, coupled with looming changes following several Supreme Court decisions that have the potential to upend rulemaking, gives C-suite executives much to contend with in planning their workforce-related strategies.”
Stax Engineering, the venture-backed startup that provides smokestack emissions reduction services for maritime ships, will service all vessels from Toyota Motor North America Inc. visiting the Toyota Berth at the Port of Long Beach, according to a new five-year deal announced today.
Beginning in 2025 to coincide with new California Air Resources Board (CARB) standards, STAX will become the first and only emissions control provider to service roll-on/roll-off (ro-ros) vessels in the state of California, the company said.
Stax has rapidly grown since its launch in the first quarter of this year, supported in part by a $40 million funding round from investors, announced in July. It now holds exclusive service agreements at California ports including Los Angeles, Long Beach, Hueneme, Benicia, Richmond, and Oakland. The firm has also partnered with individual companies like NYK Line, Hyundai GLOVIS, Equilon Enterprises LLC d/b/a Shell Oil Products US (Shell), and now Toyota.
Stax says it offers an alternative to shore power with land- and barge-based, mobile emissions capture and control technology for shipping terminal and fleet operators without the need for retrofits.
In the case of this latest deal, the Toyota Long Beach Vehicle Distribution Center imports about 200,000 vehicles each year on ro-ro vessels. Stax will keep those ships green with its flexible exhaust capture system, which attaches to all vessel classes without modification to remove 99% of emitted particulate matter (PM) and 95% of emitted oxides of nitrogen (NOx). Over the lifetime of this new agreement with Toyota, Stax estimated the service will account for approximately 3,700 hours and more than 47 tons of emissions controlled.
“We set out to provide an emissions capture and control solution that was reliable, easily accessible, and cost-effective. As we begin to service Toyota, we’re confident that we can meet the needs of the full breadth of the maritime industry, furthering our impact on the local air quality, public health, and environment,” Mike Walker, CEO of Stax, said in a release. “Continuing to establish strong partnerships will help build momentum for and trust in our technology as we expand beyond the state of California.”
That result showed that driver wages across the industry continue to increase post-pandemic, despite a challenging freight market for motor carriers. The data comes from ATA’s “Driver Compensation Study,” which asked 120 fleets, more than 150,000 employee drivers, and 14,000 independent contractors about their wage and benefit information.
Drilling into specific categories, linehaul less-than-truckload (LTL) drivers earned a median annual amount of $94,525 in 2023, while local LTL drivers earned a median of $80,680. The median annual compensation for drivers at private carriers has risen 12% since 2021, reaching $95,114 in 2023. And leased-on independent contractors for truckload carriers were paid an annual median amount of $186,016 in 2023.
The results also showed how the demographics of the industry are changing, as carriers offered smaller referral and fewer sign-on bonuses for new drivers in 2023 compared to 2021 but more frequently offered tenure bonuses to their current drivers and with a greater median value.
"While our last study, conducted in 2021, illustrated how drivers benefitted from the strongest freight environment in a generation, this latest report shows professional drivers' earnings are still rising—even in a weaker freight economy," ATA Chief Economist Bob Costello said in a release. "By offering greater tenure bonuses to their current driver force, many fleets appear to be shifting their workforce priorities from recruitment to retention."