Skip to content
Search AI Powered

Latest Stories

newsworthy

FDA classifies brokers as shippers in final rules on food transport safety

Brokers oppose the language, but say they are prepared to play the cards they've been dealt.

The mantra of U.S. freight brokers is that they're not shippers. Brokers arrange the transportation of their customers' goods. But the freight belongs to somebody else, and brokers never touch the shipments or the equipment used to haul them.

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has other ideas. In publishing its long-awaited final rules last Tuesday on the sanitary transportation of human and animal food, the agency did what the brokers asked it not to do: Classify them as shippers.


This means brokers must comply with the regulations as if they were the shippers. The food producers are indemnified once they turn over their shipments to the broker. The producers will instruct the broker on the requirements for the product's safe carriage and handling. However, the responsibility of guaranteeing a clean shipping environment—and the corresponding liability if the ball is dropped during transportation—rests with the broker.

In broad strokes, brokers will be tasked with establishing controls for the transport of food that comes in contact with the environment. (The rule exempts the transport of frozen foods as well as food completely enclosed in containers, unless temperature controls are required.) Brokers must also notify the carrier and cargo loader of the conditions the shipping equipment needs to be in to achieve compliance. For example, brokers must certify in writing that a trailer has been precooled to a proper temperature, although there is nothing that said the freight itself must be precooled.

Failure to comply with the rules could lead to civil and criminal penalties if folks are sickened by food that went bad during transport. It could also leave brokers exposed to significant out-of-pocket costs—not to mention the inherent aggravation of tangling with insurance companies—if food becomes adulterated while in transit.

Chris Burroughs, senior government affairs manager for the trade group Transportation Intermediaries Association (TIA), said that although the industry knew it had a key role to play in the process, it felt the manufacturer should be classified as the shipper because it had the deepest knowledge of the product's characteristics. Despite that, the industry is prepared for the regulations because it already follows many of the practices the FDA outlined, Burroughs said.

Food is a huge and established commodity for brokers, though TIA could not quantify its size.

Brokers will "embrace this, and (will) be prepared to educate our shipper partners and ourselves on how to best comply," said Robert Kemp, president and CEO of DRT Transportation LLC, a broker based in Lebanon, Pa. That doesn't mean Kemp's looking forward to the experience. "This ruling is just another example of the government getting in the middle of the intermediary business, without really fully understanding what we do," he said in an e-mail today.

Implementing the law

The final rules, which implement the Food Safety and Modernization Act signed into law in 2011, represent the FDA's first foray into regulating transportation. For larger companies, the rules take effect one year after their publication date, which is expected to be early to mid-June. Smaller companies, defined as shippers with less than $27.5 million in revenues and carriers with fewer than 500 employees, would get two years from the publication date to comply.

Ironically, the FDA said in January 2013, when it first proposed the regulations, that it had no plans to add more layers to current sanitary food practices. The agency said at the time that its goal was to ensure that the status quo wouldn't trigger unnecessary risks to the food supply chain. In a statement issued when the rules became final, the FDA said it wants to "prevent practices during transportation" that could jeopardize food safety. Robert D. Moseley, an attorney for the law firm Smith Moore Leatherwood LLP, said in a note published Monday on the firm's website that the final rules are not as broad-based as what was first proposed.

There are a host of exemptions. For example, the rules do not apply to Mexican or Canadian firms shipping food through the U.S., as long as the food doesn't enter U.S. distribution. Shippers, carriers, and receivers of milk products that are inspected under a separate program are also exempt. Waivers were also granted to the unloaders of the goods, though the receivers of the product must still comply.

The FDA dropped its requirement for specific monitoring technology to be installed on or in the trailer, leaving it up to the broker and carrier to determine the devices to be used. Brokers will also not be liable for products, such as chocolate and butter, whose characteristics may change during transportation but wouldn't present a hazard if consumed in its altered form.

In two more breaks for brokers, the FDA said one batch of spoiled product would not render the entire load adulterated. The agency added that deviations in temperature between what appears on the bill of lading and what is actually recorded in transit or upon arrival must be "material," and not incidental, for the shipper to be liable.

TIA said in its 2014 comments to the proposed rule that a full load would be considered adulterated even if there was a mere 0.5-percent deviation in temperature levels, and that the broker would be on the hook for the total cost. Currently, the burden of proof falls on the producer and, at worst, the broker would be responsible for a portion of the cost of the damaged goods, according to the group.

The FDA has also left open the possibility that a shipper or carrier can rebut a charge of contamination if it can get a qualified individual to attest that the circumstances surrounding the transportation did not render the freight unsafe. Noting the provision, Moseley advised that it "would be a good time to get a retired FDA inspector on speed dial."

The Latest

More Stories

Clorox partnership helps suppliers meet carbon reduction targets

Clorox partnership helps suppliers meet carbon reduction targets

Consumer packaged goods (CPG) provider The Clorox Co. has partnered with Manufacture 2030 (M2030) to help Clorox's suppliers meet their carbon reduction targets and advance the company's long-term goal of reaching net-zero emissions by 2050.

In addition to its flagship Clorox bleach product, Oakland, California-based Clorox manages a diverse catalog of brands including Hidden Valley Ranch, Glad, Pine-Sol, Burt’s Bees, Kingsford, Scoop Away, Fresh Step, 409, Brita, Liquid Plumr, and Tilex.

Keep ReadingShow less

Featured

U.S. map with drought risk

Everstream Analytics quantifies how climate risk affects supply chains

Supply chain risk analytics company Everstream Analytics has launched a product that can quantify the impact of leading climate indicators and project how identified risk will impact customer supply chains.

Expanding upon the weather and climate intelligence Everstream already provides, the new “Climate Risk Scores” tool enables clients to apply eight climate indicator risk projection scores to their facilities and supplier locations to forecast future climate risk and support business continuity.

Keep ReadingShow less
packaging supplies plastic films

Innotex Packaging launched from merger of three companies

The investment firm LongueVue Capital has bundled three shipping product companies together to create Innotex Packaging Solutions, calling it an integrated flexible packaging solutions provider that unites Summit Plastics, ClearView Packaging, and Fredman Packaging.

According to New Orleans-based LongueVue, the “strategic rebranding” brings together the complementary capabilities of these three companies to form a vertically integrated flexible packaging leader with expertise in blown film production, flexographic printing, adhesive laminations, and converting.

Keep ReadingShow less
Stampin’ Up!’s Riverton, Utah, distribution center

Stampin’ Up!’s Riverton, Utah, distribution center

Picking reimagined

What happens when your warehouse technology upgrade turns into a complete process overhaul? That may sound like a headache to some, but for leaders at paper crafting company Stampin’ Up! it’s been a golden opportunity—especially when it comes to boosting productivity. The Utah-based direct marketing company has increased its average pick rate by more than 70% in the past year and a half. And it’s all due to a warehouse management system (WMS) implementation that opened the door to process changes and new technologies that are speeding its high-velocity, high-SKU (stock-keeping unit) order fulfillment operations.

The bottom line: Stampin’ Up! is filling orders faster than ever before, with less manpower, since it shifted to an easy-to-use voice picking system that makes adapting to seasonal product changes and promotions a piece of cake. Here’s how.

Keep ReadingShow less
autostore AS/RS at toyota materal handling site

New AutoStore AS/RS at Toyota Material Handling’s DC will increase parts volume and fulfillment speed

With its new AutoStore automated storage and retrieval (AS/RS) system, Toyota Material Handling Inc.’s parts distribution center, located at its U.S. headquarters campus in Columbus, Indiana, will be able to store more forklift and other parts and move them more quickly. The new system represents a major step toward achieving TMH’s goal of next-day parts delivery to 98% of its customers in the U.S. and Canada by 2030, said TMH North America President and CEO Brett Wood at the launch event on October 28. The upgrade to the DC was designed, built, and installed through a close collaboration between TMH, AutoStore, and Bastian Solutions, the Toyota-owned material handling automation designer and systems integrator that is a cornerstone of the forklift maker’s Toyota Automated Logistics business unit. The AS/RS is Bastian’s 100th AutoStore installation in North America.

TMH’s AutoStore system deploys 28 energy-efficient robotic shuttles to retrieve and deliver totes from within a vertical storage grid. To expedite processing, artificial intelligence (AI)-enhanced software determines optimal storage locations based on whether parts are high- or low-demand items. The shuttles, each independently controlled and selected based on shortest distance to the stored tote, swiftly deliver the ordered parts to four picking ports. Each port can process up to 175 totes per hour; the company’s initial goal is 150 totes per hour, with room to grow. The AS/RS also eliminates the need for order pickers to walk up to 10 miles per day, saving time, boosting picking accuracy, and improving ergonomics for associates.

Keep ReadingShow less