Mark Solomon joined DC VELOCITY as senior editor in August 2008, and was promoted to his current position on January 1, 2015. He has spent more than 30 years in the transportation, logistics and supply chain management fields as a journalist and public relations professional. From 1989 to 1994, he worked in Washington as a reporter for the Journal of Commerce, covering the aviation and trucking industries, the Department of Transportation, Congress and the U.S. Supreme Court. Prior to that, he worked for Traffic World for seven years in a similar role. From 1994 to 2008, Mr. Solomon ran Media-Based Solutions, a public relations firm based in Atlanta. He graduated in 1978 with a B.A. in journalism from The American University in Washington, D.C.
If you're a trucker or private fleet manager looking for a predictably priced alternative source of fuel, truck maker Navistar International Corp. and natural gas advocate Clean Energy Fuels Corp. think they have a deal for you.
Ironically, how good that deal turns out to be will depend on doing one's best to predict the unpredictable.
In early February, Lisle, Ill.-based Navistar and Seal Beach, Calif.-based Clean Energy, cofounded by energy baron T. Boone Pickens, unveiled a joint program to provide incentives to truck owners, renters, and lessors to purchase new and more expensive vehicles powered by liquefied natural gas (LNG) or compressed natural gas (CNG), both of which are considered cheaper and more environmentally friendly than traditional diesel fuel.
Under the program, a user would agree to purchase a gas-powered vehicle manufactured by Navistar and then commit for five years to buying 1,000 gallons of natural gas per month. In return, Clean Energy would offer the user a $500 monthly rebate, which, over the five-year span, would offset the estimated $28,000 per-unit differential between buying a gas-powered truck and purchasing a new diesel-powered vehicle.
In addition, the user would pay for its natural gas fill-ups at a price 60 cents a gallon below the prevailing price of diesel fuel as calculated each week by the Department of Energy's Energy Information Administration (EIA). As of April 9, the national average price for a gallon of diesel fuel stood at $4.148, according to EIA data. Thus, a customer would pay $3.55 a gallon for the first 1,000 gallons consumed during the month.
Users who need to buy in quantities that exceed the 1,000-gallon threshold in any given month would be charged Clean Energy's "retail" rate, which currently stands a shade below $2.90 a gallon, the company said.
Big savings potential
Based on estimates that a typical solo long-haul driver logs 12,000 miles a month, the program could deliver monthly savings of $1,200 per month between the rebate and the savings at fill-up, according to the companies. LNG-powered vehicles can run about 400 miles on a full tank. Vehicles powered by heavier CNG wouldn't get the same range with a full trailerload. Such vehicles are better suited to shorter trips within urban areas where they return to the same depot each day.
For fleet owners and operators uninterested in participating in the program, the alternative would be to pay for the gas-powered vehicles out of pocket and fill up at the pump at prevailing prices for either LNG or CNG. Based on the stunningly wide differential between natural gas and crude oil prices, that option, at least for now, sounds like the better bang for the buck.
Natural gas futures contracts are today trading at $1.98 per million British thermal units (BTUs). Futures prices have fallen about 50 percent in the past 12 months due to a mild North American winter that depressed energy demand and an increase in domestic exploration and development that has led to an abundance of gas inventories. More than 80 percent of natural gas consumed in the United States is domestically produced. The balance is imported from Canada.
By contrast, West Texas Intermediate (WTI) oil futures prices, which are more influenced by global demand and by geopolitical factors, have hovered in the $103-a-barrel range for several months. Brené crude (a sweet, light crude oil), considered the world's benchmark, is trading at a 20 percent premium to WTI.
The current differential of "52 times" between market prices for natural gas and WTI oil is unprecedented; the ratio is historically between six and 12, according to Clean Energy. Many analysts believe the combination of factors that have already affected natural gas supply and demand could cause futures prices to fall even further in 2012 and beyond.
The market price for natural gas translates into a pump price of $2.50 a gallon for LNG and $2.25 for CNG.
Market uncertainties
James N. Harger, Clean Energy's chief marketing officer, said the company is marketing the service to companies skeptical that such a wide price gap between oil and natural gas will persist in the years ahead. From 1990 through 2012, natural gas futures prices averaged $4.01 per million BTU, reaching an all-time high of $15.35 in December 2005 in the wake of hurricanes Katrina and Rita that shut off natural gas supply flows along the Gulf Coast, and hitting a record low of $1.05 in January 1992.
Each $1 per million BTU increase in natural gas prices would equal a 14- to 15-cent per-gallon price hike at the pump, according to Clean Energy's estimates. Thus, a spike to levels midway between the historical high and low price ranges could significantly narrow the gap between oil and natural gas, and make the Navistar-Clean Energy initiative more attractive, Harger said.
Perhaps mindful of all the market uncertainties, Clean Energy said it would allow customers to opt out of the agreement at any time without penalties, Harger said.
Navistar spokesman Stephen C. Schrier said the company will in late summer unveil a gas-powered line of vehicles in the mid-sized category. It plans to roll out gas-powered trucks in the heavy-duty, or "Class 8," category sometime in 2013, he said.
The natural gas highway
The initiative is the latest effort by Pickens, who turns 84 next month, to wean the nation off of imported oil and to use more natural gas. Several years ago, Pickens proposed a plan to invest $1 trillion in wind farms that would eventually replace natural gas as a primary energy source. Natural gas supplies would then be freed up to power trucks and other heavy-duty equipment. The proposal has made little headway due to the logistical challenges in locating wind turbines in congested urban areas.
Clean Energy operates hundreds of natural gas fueling stations nationwide and has a strong presence among intra-city transit agencies and waste-hauling companies, both of which have vehicles that operate in local service and depart from and return to the same locations each day.
The company is building what it calls "America's Natural Gas Highway," a national network of truck refueling stations. Harger said the company expects to have 70 stations operational by year-end and another 80 built by the end of 2013. A high-density gas-refueling infrastructure is considered the key to a successful transition by truck fleets from petroleum to natural gas consumption.
At this point, no companies have signed up for the joint program. Jerry Moyes, CEO of Phoenix-based Swift Transportation Co., the nation's largest truckload carrier by sales, attended the Feb. 1 program launch event at Navistar's Lisle headquarters in Lisle. According to published reports, Moyes said Swift is testing 16 natural gas-powered trucks, and said the success of the program depends on the density of the refueling infrastructure.
Generative AI (GenAI) is being deployed by 72% of supply chain organizations, but most are experiencing just middling results for productivity and ROI, according to a survey by Gartner, Inc.
That’s because productivity gains from the use of GenAI for individual, desk-based workers are not translating to greater team-level productivity. Additionally, the deployment of GenAI tools is increasing anxiety among many employees, providing a dampening effect on their productivity, Gartner found.
To solve those problems, chief supply chain officers (CSCOs) deploying GenAI need to shift from a sole focus on efficiency to a strategy that incorporates full organizational productivity. This strategy must better incorporate frontline workers, assuage growing employee anxieties from the use of GenAI tools, and focus on use-cases that promote creativity and innovation, rather than only on saving time.
"Early GenAI deployments within supply chain reveal a productivity paradox," Sam Berndt, Senior Director in Gartner’s Supply Chain practice, said in the report. "While its use has enhanced individual productivity for desk-based roles, these gains are not cascading through the rest of the function and are actually making the overall working environment worse for many employees. CSCOs need to retool their deployment strategies to address these negative outcomes.”
As part of the research, Gartner surveyed 265 global respondents in August 2024 to assess the impact of GenAI in supply chain organizations. In addition to the survey, Gartner conducted 75 qualitative interviews with supply chain leaders to gain deeper insights into the deployment and impact of GenAI on productivity, ROI, and employee experience, focusing on both desk-based and frontline workers.
Gartner’s data showed an increase in productivity from GenAI for desk-based workers, with GenAI tools saving 4.11 hours of time weekly for these employees. The time saved also correlated to increased output and higher quality work. However, these gains decreased when assessing team-level productivity. The amount of time saved declined to 1.5 hours per team member weekly, and there was no correlation to either improved output or higher quality of work.
Additional negative organizational impacts of GenAI deployments include:
Frontline workers have failed to make similar productivity gains as their desk-based counterparts, despite recording a similar amount of time savings from the use of GenAI tools.
Employees report higher levels of anxiety as they are exposed to a growing number of GenAI tools at work, with the average supply chain employee now utilizing 3.6 GenAI tools on average.
Higher anxiety among employees correlates to lower levels of overall productivity.
“In their pursuit of efficiency and time savings, CSCOs may be inadvertently creating a productivity ‘doom loop,’ whereby they continuously pilot new GenAI tools, increasing employee anxiety, which leads to lower levels of productivity,” said Berndt. “Rather than introducing even more GenAI tools into the work environment, CSCOs need to reexamine their overall strategy.”
According to Gartner, three ways to better boost organizational productivity through GenAI are: find creativity-based GenAI use cases to unlock benefits beyond mere time savings; train employees how to make use of the time they are saving from the use GenAI tools; and shift the focus from measuring automation to measuring innovation.
According to Arvato, it made the move in order to better serve the U.S. e-commerce sector, which has experienced high growth rates in recent years and is expected to grow year-on-year by 5% within the next five years.
The two acquisitions follow Arvato’s purchase three months ago of ATC Computer Transport & Logistics, an Irish firm that specializes in high-security transport and technical services in the data center industry. Following the latest deals, Arvato will have a total U.S. network of 16 warehouses with about seven million square feet of space.
Terms of the deal were not disclosed.
Carbel is a Florida-based 3PL with a strong focus on fashion and retail. It offers custom warehousing, distribution, storage, and transportation services, operating out of six facilities in the U.S., with a footprint of 1.6 million square feet of warehouse space in Florida (2), Pennsylvania (2), California, and New York.
Florida-based United Customs Services offers import and export solutions, specializing in remote location filing across the U.S., customs clearance, and trade compliance. CTPAT-certified since 2007, United Customs Services says it is known for simplifying global trade processes that help streamline operations for clients in international markets.
“With deep expertise in retail and apparel logistics services, Carbel and United Customs Services are the perfect partners to strengthen our ability to provide even more tailored solutions to our clients. Our combined knowledge and our joint commitment to excellence will drive our growth within the US and open new opportunities,” Arvato CEO Frank Schirrmeister said in a release.
And many of them will have a budget to do it, since 51% of supply chain professionals with existing innovation budgets saw an increase earmarked for 2025, suggesting an even greater emphasis on investing in new technologies to meet rising demand, Kenco said in its “2025 Supply Chain Innovation” survey.
One of the biggest targets for innovation spending will artificial intelligence, as supply chain leaders look to use AI to automate time-consuming tasks. The survey showed that 41% are making AI a key part of their innovation strategy, with a third already leveraging it for data visibility, 29% for quality control, and 26% for labor optimization.
Still, lingering concerns around how to effectively and securely implement AI are leading some companies to sidestep the technology altogether. More than a third – 35% – said they’re largely prevented from using AI because of company policy, leaving an opportunity to streamline operations on the table.
“Avoiding AI entirely is no longer an option. Implementing it strategically can give supply chain-focused companies a serious competitive advantage,” Kristi Montgomery, Vice President, Innovation, Research & Development at Kenco, said in a release. “Now’s the time for organizations to explore and experiment with the tech, especially for automating data-heavy operations such as demand planning, shipping, and receiving to optimize your operations and unlock true efficiency.”
Among the survey’s other top findings:
there was essentially three-way tie for which physical automation tools professionals are looking to adopt in the coming year: robotics (43%), sensors and automatic identification (40%), and 3D printing (40%).
professionals tend to select a proven developer for providing supply chain innovation, but many also pick start-ups. Forty-five percent said they work with a mix of new and established developers, compared to 39% who work with established technologies only.
there’s room to grow in partnering with 3PLs for innovation: only 13% said their 3PL identified a need for innovation, and just 8% partnered with a 3PL to bring a technology to life.
Volvo Autonomous Solutions will form a strategic partnership with autonomous driving technology and generative AI provider Waabi to jointly develop and deploy autonomous trucks, with testing scheduled to begin later this year.
The announcement came two weeks after autonomous truck developer Kodiak Robotics said it had become the first company in the industry to launch commercial driverless trucking operations. That milestone came as oil company Atlas Energy Solutions Inc. used two RoboTrucks—which are semi-trucks equipped with the Kodiak Driver self-driving system—to deliver 100 loads of fracking material on routes in the Permian Basin in West Texas and Eastern New Mexico.
Atlas now intends to scale up its RoboTruck deployment “considerably” over the course of 2025, with multiple RoboTruck deployments expected throughout the year. In support of that, Kodiak has established a 12-person office in Odessa, Texas, that is projected to grow to approximately 20 people by the end of Q1 2025.
Women are significantly underrepresented in the global transport sector workforce, comprising only 12% of transportation and storage workers worldwide as they face hurdles such as unfavorable workplace policies and significant gender gaps in operational, technical and leadership roles, a study from the World Bank Group shows.
This underrepresentation limits diverse perspectives in service design and decision-making, negatively affects businesses and undermines economic growth, according to the report, “Addressing Barriers to Women’s Participation in Transport.” The paper—which covers global trends and provides in-depth analysis of the women’s role in the transport sector in Europe and Central Asia (ECA) and Middle East and North Africa (MENA)—was prepared jointly by the World Bank Group, the Asian Development Bank (ADB), the German Agency for International Cooperation (GIZ), the European Investment Bank (EIB), and the International Transport Forum (ITF).
The slim proportion of women in the sector comes at a cost, since increasing female participation and leadership can drive innovation, enhance team performance, and improve service delivery for diverse users, while boosting GDP and addressing critical labor shortages, researchers said.
To drive solutions, the researchers today unveiled the Women in Transport (WiT) Network, which is designed to bring together transport stakeholders dedicated to empowering women across all facets and levels of the transport sector, and to serve as a forum for networking, recruitment, information exchange, training, and mentorship opportunities for women.
Initially, the WiT network will cover only the Europe and Central Asia and the Middle East and North Africa regions, but it is expected to gradually expand into a global initiative.
“When transport services are inclusive, economies thrive. Yet, as this joint report and our work at the EIB reveal, few transport companies fully leverage policies to better attract, retain and promote women,” Laura Piovesan, the European Investment Bank (EIB)’s Director General of the Projects Directorate, said in a release. “The Women in Transport Network enables us to unite efforts and scale impactful solutions - benefiting women, employers, communities and the climate.”