We use cookies to provide you with a better experience. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies in accordance with our Cookie Policy.
  • INDUSTRY PRESS ROOM
  • ABOUT
  • CONTACT
  • MEDIA FILE
  • Create Account
  • Sign In
  • Sign Out
  • My Account
Free Newsletters
  • MAGAZINE
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Digital Edition
    • Subscribe
    • Newsletters
    • Mobile Apps
  • TRANSPORTATION
  • MATERIAL HANDLING
  • TECHNOLOGY
  • LIFT TRUCKS
  • PODCAST ETC
    • Podcast
    • Webcasts
    • Blogs
      • One-Off Sound Off
      • Global Logistics and Risk
      • Empowering Your Performance Edge
      • Analytics & Big Data
      • Submit your blog post
    • Events
    • White Papers
    • Industry Press Room
      • Upload Your News
    • New Products
      • Upload Your Product News
    • Conference Guides
    • Conference Reports
    • Newsletters
    • Mobile Apps
  • DCV-TV
    • DCV-TV 1: News
    • DCV-TV 2: Case Studies
    • DCV-TV 3: Webcasts
    • DCV-TV 4: Viewer Contributed
    • DCV-TV 5: Solution Profiles
    • ProMat 2023
    • Upload Your Video
  • MAGAZINE
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Digital Edition
    • Subscribe
    • Newsletters
    • Mobile Apps
  • TRANSPORTATION
  • MATERIAL HANDLING
  • TECHNOLOGY
  • LIFT TRUCKS
  • PODCAST ETC
    • Podcast
    • Webcasts
    • Blogs
      • One-Off Sound Off
      • Global Logistics and Risk
      • Empowering Your Performance Edge
      • Analytics & Big Data
      • Submit your blog post
    • Events
    • White Papers
    • Industry Press Room
      • Upload Your News
    • New Products
      • Upload Your Product News
    • Conference Guides
    • Conference Reports
    • Newsletters
    • Mobile Apps
  • DCV-TV
    • DCV-TV 1: News
    • DCV-TV 2: Case Studies
    • DCV-TV 3: Webcasts
    • DCV-TV 4: Viewer Contributed
    • DCV-TV 5: Solution Profiles
    • ProMat 2023
    • Upload Your Video
Home » rebellion brewing against Customs' proposed "10+2" rule
newsworthy

rebellion brewing against Customs' proposed "10+2" rule

February 1, 2008
DC Velocity Staff
No Comments

When U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) finally issued a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking for the so-called "10+2" rule on Jan. 2, U.S. importers were disappointed—but not surprised—by the contents of that proposal. As they had feared, the proposed rule failed to include most of the recommendations they had presented over the past year.

Formally known as the "Importer Security Filing and Additional Carrier Requirements," the proposed rule places new legal burdens on importers and ocean carriers to submit data they currently do not provide to the agency. Ocean carriers will have to provide two new pieces of information: container-status messages and stowage plans showing the location of cargo on board vessels bound for the United States. Shipping lines already submit two dozen other data elements to CBP.

Importers or their agents, who already provide detailed shipment information on their entry summaries, will be required to submit 10 additional data elements:

  • Manufacturer (or supplier) name and address
  • Seller (or owner) name and address
  • Buyer (or owner) name and address
  • Ship-to name and address
  • Container stuffing location
  • Consolidator (stuffer) name and address
  • Importer of Record number/foreign trade zone (FTZ) applicant identification number
  • Consignee number(s)
  • Country of origin
  • Commodity Harmonized Tariff Schedule number

The data must be electronically submitted at least 24 hours prior to vessel load- ing at the foreign port of origin.

Importers, customs brokers, and other international traders have expressed concerns about the rule, which was mandated by the SAFE Port Act of 2006. Among other things, they've questioned whether the security filing falls under the definition of "customs business" and therefore must be transacted by a licensed customs broker (it does not, but many people think it should); whether filings could be amended for goods that are sold in transit (they can); and whether CBP might use information obtained in security filings for commercial enforcement purposes (the agency says it will not). That's just a tiny sampling of the issues that have been raised; CBP's Commercial Operations Advisory Committee alone recommended more than three dozen changes. Only about one-third of them made it into the proposed rule.

Now a rebellion against 10+2 appears to be brewing. According to a trade compliance expert who's active in several industry groups, a movement to ask Congress or President Bush to intervene is picking up momentum.

Among the complaints: Some importers believe the rule goes beyond the legislation's intent by placing legal liability on the importer to obtain complete, accurate information from overseas sources, even though it may be impossible to obtain or verify that information by the pre-sailing deadline. Furthermore, compliance will be costly: The federal Office of Management and Budget has estimated that the 10+2 rule could cost industry between $350 million and $600 million annually. Critics say that estimate is too low, in part because it doesn't take into account the cost of the inevitable delays and longer cycle times.

The proposal is open for public comment until March 3, 2008, but CBP is under no obligation to adopt the recommendations it receives. Based on their experiences so far, the compliance expert notes, few people expect the results of the next round of rulemaking to be much different from the first.

Transportation Regulation/Government Global Logistics Safety & Security
    • Related Articles

      Customs begins enforcing 10 + 2 rule with gentler touch than expected

      GTM Suite support for the 10+2 rule

      10 + 2 = big changes

    Recent Articles by DC Velocity Staff

    Union Pacific will support paid sick leave for its 5,600 locomotive engineers

    Lift truck industry celebrates National Forklift Safety Day 2023 with special offers, events, and recommendations

    Machine learning makes its mark

    You must login or register in order to post a comment.

    Report Abusive Comment

    Most Popular Articles

    • Union Pacific agrees to provide more predictable schedules for union rail workers

    • Schneider National opens innovation center at Wisconsin headquarters

    • DHL Supply Chain will expand Locus Robotics fleet to 5,000 AMRs

    • Trucking companies face “modestly unfavorable” outlook heading into 2024

    • E-commerce 3PL gains $100 million funding for its network of Mexican warehouses

    Now Playing on DCV-TV

    B0d646ac 1d71 44f7 9c47 80a0858638b7

    Improve Overhead Access with Custom VRCs

    DCV-TV 4: Viewer Contributed
    Tackling high-reach storage challenges is easy with Autoquip Lifts. We offer a wide variety of design features for Vertical Reciprocating Conveyors, or VRCs, to safely transfer materials from multiple levels based on the client’s specific needs. Don’t know where to start? We can create the perfect hydraulic or...

    FEATURED WHITE PAPERS

    • How to Use Economic Uncertainty to Gain Competitive Ground with Automation

    • Exploring Customized Forklift Solutions

    • Exploring the Future of Labor Management With Capacity Planning

    • Three layers of forklift safety: Promoting operating best practices

    View More

    Subscribe to DC Velocity Magazine

    GET YOUR FREE SUBSCRIPTION
    • SUBSCRIBE
    • NEWSLETTERS
    • ADVERTISING
    • CUSTOMER CARE
    • CONTACT
    • ABOUT
    • STAFF
    • PRIVACY POLICY

    Copyright ©2023. All Rights ReservedDesign, CMS, Hosting & Web Development :: ePublishing