We use cookies to provide you with a better experience. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies in accordance with our Cookie Policy.
  • INDUSTRY PRESS ROOM
  • ABOUT
  • CONTACT
  • MEDIA FILE
  • Create Account
  • Sign In
  • Sign Out
  • My Account
Free Newsletters
  • MAGAZINE
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Digital Edition
    • Subscribe
    • Newsletters
    • Mobile Apps
  • TRANSPORTATION
  • MATERIAL HANDLING
  • TECHNOLOGY
  • LIFT TRUCKS
  • PODCAST ETC
    • Podcast
    • Webcasts
    • Blogs
      • One-Off Sound Off
      • Global Logistics and Risk
      • Empowering Your Performance Edge
      • Analytics & Big Data
      • Submit your blog post
    • Events
    • White Papers
    • Industry Press Room
      • Upload Your News
    • New Products
      • Upload Your Product News
    • Conference Guides
    • Conference Reports
    • Newsletters
    • Mobile Apps
  • DCV-TV
    • DCV-TV 1: News
    • DCV-TV 2: Case Studies
    • DCV-TV 3: Webcasts
    • DCV-TV 4: Viewer Contributed
    • DCV-TV 5: Solution Profiles
    • Parcel Forum 2022
    • MODEX 2022
    • Upload Your Video
  • MAGAZINE
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Digital Edition
    • Subscribe
    • Newsletters
    • Mobile Apps
  • TRANSPORTATION
  • MATERIAL HANDLING
  • TECHNOLOGY
  • LIFT TRUCKS
  • PODCAST ETC
    • Podcast
    • Webcasts
    • Blogs
      • One-Off Sound Off
      • Global Logistics and Risk
      • Empowering Your Performance Edge
      • Analytics & Big Data
      • Submit your blog post
    • Events
    • White Papers
    • Industry Press Room
      • Upload Your News
    • New Products
      • Upload Your Product News
    • Conference Guides
    • Conference Reports
    • Newsletters
    • Mobile Apps
  • DCV-TV
    • DCV-TV 1: News
    • DCV-TV 2: Case Studies
    • DCV-TV 3: Webcasts
    • DCV-TV 4: Viewer Contributed
    • DCV-TV 5: Solution Profiles
    • Parcel Forum 2022
    • MODEX 2022
    • Upload Your Video
Home » Appeals court panel denies AFMS bid to rehear parcel antitrust decision
newsworthy

Appeals court panel denies AFMS bid to rehear parcel antitrust decision

November 1, 2017
DC Velocity Staff
No Comments

A leading parcel consultancy's seven-and-a-half-year quest to prove that UPS Inc. and FedEx Corp. violated federal antitrust laws by boycotting its business has been akin to pushing a legal rock uphill. Yesterday, the rock may have crashed down for good.

A three-judge panel of the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals declined AFMS LLC's request to rehear its decision last August finding in favor of Atlanta-based UPS and Memphis-based FedEx that neither engaged in anti-competitive behavior by excluding AFMS from contract negotiations on behalf of its shipper customers and working directly with the shippers themselves.

The panel noted in yesterday's decision that none of the other circuit judges requested a vote on a rehearing before the full court. The news of yesterday's decision was first reported on Competition Law360, a legal web site.

Portland, Ore.-based AFMS, one of the oldest parcel consultants, vowed to take its case up the judicial ladder after a federal district court in May 2015 threw out its motion against FedEx and UPS. The district court ruled that AFMS' claim had no standing on antitrust grounds because it was not a shipper but a consultant that didn't ship parcels. Because of that, AFMS could not have suffered harm due to the carriers' allegedly anticompetitive behavior, the court ruled. As such, the court found that AFMS failed to demonstrate a "relevant market" for services that could have been discriminated against.

In its August's ruling, a divided appellate panel relied on the lower court's reasoning. However, Judge Stephen Reinhardt dissented, saying AFMS may have made a persuasive case for the "existence of a market regarding shipping consultation services, rate negotiations, and/or a combination of the two."

AFMS did not respond to an e-mailed request for comment on yesterday's decision.

The legal battle dates back to August 2010, when AFMS sued the carriers on grounds they colluded to boycott third-party consultants who negotiated rate discounts on behalf of their shipper clients. AFMS also alleged that FedEx and UPS threatened shippers who continued to use intermediaries with the loss of their rate discounts. AFMS said the carriers' actions destroyed the ability of consultants to compete in the marketplace, and that many suffered severe drops in revenue and income stemming from the carriers' strategies.

UPS and FedEx had argued that it was legal to work directly with shippers. The carriers said that they were not deliberately excluding consultants but that they would work—or not work—with consultants at the carriers' discretion.

AFMS had a mostly amicable 17-year relationship with FedEx and UPS until early 2010, when the carriers terminated their agreements with AFMS and began dealing directly with its shipper clients. In October 2009, the carriers announced changes in their relationships with all consultants. The changes effectively led to a boycott of intermediaries that focused on rate negotiations.

Since then, many consultants have continued to advise shippers on pricing tactics. However, they work behind the scenes rather than appearing at the negotiating table.

Transportation Parcel & Postal Carriers
KEYWORDS AFMS Logistics Management Group FedEx UPS
  • Related Articles

    Court denies bid by driver group to re-hear decision upholding ELD mandate

    Is AFMS out of legal ammo in wake of court's ruling in parcel antitrust case?

    Labor's Day: Appeals court panel's ruling in FedEx case could change rules of the game

Recent Articles by DC Velocity Staff

Companies to grow investments in energy-transition solutions, emissions reduction

Cargo imports forecast to sink near three-year low in February

Air cargo demand slumped in 2022 after “extraordinary” levels in 2021

You must login or register in order to post a comment.

Report Abusive Comment

Most Popular Articles

  • Schneider welcomes first battery-electric truck

  • Fred Smith is not worried about Amazon

  • RJW LOGISTICS GROUP EXPANDS RETAIL LOGISTICS OPERATION TO DALLAS

  • Researchers: Ships can look to Mother Nature for energy-saving ideas

  • Maersk deploys indoor drones for warehouse inventory counts

Now Playing on DCV-TV

C8c3bc6b a91d 4181 a18f 35f288257630

ACPaQ: Fast and reliable automated mixed case palletizer

DCV-TV 4: Viewer Contributed
Fully Automated Mixed Case Palletizing ACPaQ is a universally applicable solution for fully automated order picking of mixed case pallets based on customers‘ requirements. Its software allows you to customize the palletizing order to increase efficiency during in-store replenishment. The mixed case palletizer...

FEATURED WHITE PAPERS

  • The five best applications for robotic lift trucks in warehouse environments

  • Fulfillment Facility Improved Efficiencies by 4x

  • 3PLs: Complete Orders Faster with Flexible Automation

  • Reusable Packaging for the New Wave of Supply Chain Automation

View More

Subscribe to DC Velocity Magazine

GET YOUR FREE SUBSCRIPTION
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • NEWSLETTERS
  • ADVERTISING
  • CUSTOMER CARE
  • CONTACT
  • ABOUT
  • STAFF
  • PRIVACY POLICY

Copyright ©2023. All Rights ReservedDesign, CMS, Hosting & Web Development :: ePublishing