A champion of end-to-end collaboration: interview with Jeff LeClair
Jeff LeClair learned the value of collaboration early in his career, lessons that have stayed with him throughout his 30 years in manufacturing and supply chain management.
Peter Bradley is an award-winning career journalist with more than three decades of experience in both newspapers and national business magazines. His credentials include seven years as the transportation and supply chain editor at Purchasing Magazine and six years as the chief editor of Logistics Management.
Jeff LeClair declares that his business roots are firmly embedded in the Toyota Production System. He spent the early part of his career with Toyota and has carried the lessons he learned there with him throughout his 30-year business career as a manufacturing and supply chain executive—lessons about processes, but lessons, too, about the critical role of trust and collaboration across the supply chain.
Before taking on his current position of vice president of operations and supply chain for Basin Industries and president of SteelTech, he spent several years in supply chain management with Caterpillar. In all of his management roles, he says, he strives to focus on a total-cost value chain approach to reduce costs, improve stability, and create competitive advantage.
Basin Industries is an industrial manufacturing holding and operating company focused on acquiring, operating, and developing equipment and equipment components manufacturers in numerous heavy industrial markets worldwide. SteelTech is an industrial fabrication company specializing in high-volume customized racking and container solutions for automotive and industrial customers.
LeClair spoke recently with Editorial Director Peter Bradley.
Q: You are a strong advocate of end-to-end supply chain collaborative processes. What do you mean by true collaboration in the supply chain and why is that important?
A: It really is about understanding what each other needs to be successful and providing that. Sometimes, customers don't know there are some better options or, I will say, better opportunities. These may be cheaper or they may be more expensive, but there are better ways of doing it. So, understanding is the first step. You can provide what they really need to be successful, and not just what they want.
I do believe customers will value your solution if they understand that you are, one, being truthful, and two, thinking about what makes them successful versus selling. Sometimes, selling is just saying yes and providing a product they really don't need or is really not right for them. Our value proposition actually delivers a lot more value for them in meeting their customer goals. It is not about always saying yes.
Q: Let me ask you to look back upstream. Give me your view of what collaboration means with your suppliers.
A: Well, the first step is developing a common understanding of what we need to be successful and how the supplier can help me. I share with my suppliers our customers' expectations, everything from leadtimes to bottom-line dollars. What I have done is use this "common goals" format, where I incorporate these key indicators in our metrics and they see exactly what I am doing. Then we have a review. I do this every quarter.
Just like a good employee or team member, you are really aware all the time and there are no surprises and you are working on it together. It is a cooperative venture versus saying, "Now give me a 5-percent reduction in price." I believe that common goals actually create a lot more value than just a price proposition. By doing this with our suppliers, you develop a long-term relationship and you develop a trust with your suppliers.
Q: How do you build trust with both your customers and your suppliers?
A: That is probably the hardest thing and yet the easiest thing—the hardest thing to start but the easiest thing to maintain once you have laid the foundation. You have to expose your weaknesses. As a supplier, the hardest thing to tell your potential or current customers is that you have a weakness and you need help. That could be anything from not meeting the customers' goals on timing to not having enough pieces to satisfy their demand. It could be that you can't deal with this cost and here are the reasons why. It puts you in a little bit of a vulnerable spot, certainly, and most people don't want to share their weaknesses.
The other side of it, however, once you do commit, you can then say to the customer "This is what I can do, and I can guarantee 100 percent success." You then have to deliver exactly what you committed to. I think the customers will value that because you're going to be delivering exactly what you said you would. There are no surprises. For the long term, the customer and the supplier both believe what you are saying because it is very transparent.
I will give you a comparison. I have several friends in Japan who are senior executives and many in the U.S. I ask them, "How do you balance your workload?" The Japanese typically will tell you they spend 50 to 75 percent of their time with the supply base because they see it as an extension of their business. And yet, you talk with some of my U.S. peers and they don't go out to (visit) their suppliers, because they don't see it as an extension of their business.
My goal is really to develop our suppliers to be part of the team, the big picture team. I can actually tell my customers that I know there is not going to be disruption in the supply chain for them because I have already committed and I have already received the same commitment out of my suppliers.
Q: How do you persuade suppliers and customers that are new to this approach?
A: Truthfully, in North America, this is a very difficult discussion. I do have these discussions all the time. I will just say that in my supply base, most of them are very reluctant. They are always protecting themselves because in their experience, other customers have only worried about one thing—short-term financials. So it is a very difficult discussion, but this change has to happen. It has to be initiated by me as a customer. So I have to take the first step by showing that I'm going to honor what I say to them. And I have had success doing that. Trust starts to be developed once they see that I am willing to take the first step and I'm not going to fire them over some small discrepancy and that I am willing to work with them to improve.
Q: So, maybe that first time they mess up and they are honest with you, you don't fire them but say, "OK, let's fix it ..."
A: Exactly. It's that step. I've had the opportunity in my latest role to start working with our suppliers, and I've offered to go out to see their facilities and learn more about their operations. I feel that it really helps my suppliers to see that I understand what issues and opportunities they're facing and then sit down with them and develop this "common goal" approach. We've had some really good successes. I can also share that a couple of suppliers don't believe in this. I understand their initial position, but the long-term success of our business is going to be based on that fundamental collaboration and trusting each other. I believe the long-term approach is best to develop strategic partnerships in business.
Artificial intelligence (AI) and data science were hot business topics in 2024 and will remain on the front burner in 2025, according to recent research published in AI in Action, a series of technology-focused columns in the MIT Sloan Management Review.
In Five Trends in AI and Data Science for 2025, researchers Tom Davenport and Randy Bean outline ways in which AI and our data-driven culture will continue to shape the business landscape in the coming year. The information comes from a range of recent AI-focused research projects, including the 2025 AI & Data Leadership Executive Benchmark Survey, an annual survey of data, analytics, and AI executives conducted by Bean’s educational firm, Data & AI Leadership Exchange.
The five trends range from the promise of agentic AI to the struggle over which C-suite role should oversee data and AI responsibilities. At a glance, they reveal that:
Leaders will grapple with both the promise and hype around agentic AI. Agentic AI—which handles tasks independently—is on the rise, in the form of generative AI bots that can perform some content-creation tasks. But the authors say it will be a while before such tools can handle major tasks—like make a travel reservation or conduct a banking transaction.
The time has come to measure results from generative AI experiments. The authors say very few companies are carefully measuring productivity gains from AI projects—particularly when it comes to figuring out what their knowledge-based workers are doing with the freed-up time those projects provide. Doing so is vital to profiting from AI investments.
The reality about data-driven culture sets in. The authors found that 92% of survey respondents feel that cultural and change management challenges are the primary barriers to becoming data- and AI-driven—indicating that the shift to AI is about much more than just the technology.
Unstructured data is important again. The ability to apply Generative AI tools to manage unstructured data—such as text, images, and video—is putting a renewed focus on getting all that data into shape, which takes a whole lot of human effort. As the authors explain “organizations need to pick the best examples of each document type, tag or graph the content, and get it loaded into the system.” And many companies simply aren’t there yet.
Who should run data and AI? Expect continued struggle. Should these roles be concentrated on the business or tech side of the organization? Opinions differ, and as the roles themselves continue to evolve, the authors say companies should expect to continue to wrestle with responsibilities and reporting structures.
Shippers today are praising an 11th-hour contract agreement that has averted the threat of a strike by dockworkers at East and Gulf coast ports that could have frozen container imports and exports as soon as January 16.
The agreement came late last night between the International Longshoremen’s Association (ILA) representing some 45,000 workers and the United States Maritime Alliance (USMX) that includes the operators of port facilities up and down the coast.
Details of the new agreement on those issues have not yet been made public, but in the meantime, retailers and manufacturers are heaving sighs of relief that trade flows will continue.
“Providing certainty with a new contract and avoiding further disruptions is paramount to ensure retail goods arrive in a timely manner for consumers. The agreement will also pave the way for much-needed modernization efforts, which are essential for future growth at these ports and the overall resiliency of our nation’s supply chain,” Gold said.
The next step in the process is for both sides to ratify the tentative agreement, so negotiators have agreed to keep those details private in the meantime, according to identical statements released by the ILA and the USMX. In their joint statement, the groups called the six-year deal a “win-win,” saying: “This agreement protects current ILA jobs and establishes a framework for implementing technologies that will create more jobs while modernizing East and Gulf coasts ports – making them safer and more efficient, and creating the capacity they need to keep our supply chains strong. This is a win-win agreement that creates ILA jobs, supports American consumers and businesses, and keeps the American economy the key hub of the global marketplace.”
The breakthrough hints at broader supply chain trends, which will focus on the tension between operational efficiency and workforce job protection, not just at ports but across other sectors as well, according to a statement from Judah Levine, head of research at Freightos, a freight booking and payment platform. Port automation was the major sticking point leading up to this agreement, as the USMX pushed for technologies to make ports more efficient, while the ILA opposed automation or semi-automation that could threaten jobs.
"This is a six-year détente in the tech-versus-labor tug-of-war at U.S. ports," Levine said. “Automation remains a lightning rod—and likely one we’ll see in other industries—but this deal suggests a cautious path forward."
Editor's note: This story was revised on January 9 to include additional input from the ILA, USMX, and Freightos.
Logistics industry growth slowed in December due to a seasonal wind-down of inventory and following one of the busiest holiday shopping seasons on record, according to the latest Logistics Managers’ Index (LMI) report, released this week.
The monthly LMI was 57.3 in December, down more than a percentage point from November’s reading of 58.4. Despite the slowdown, economic activity across the industry continued to expand, as an LMI reading above 50 indicates growth and a reading below 50 indicates contraction.
The LMI researchers said the monthly conditions were largely due to seasonal drawdowns in inventory levels—and the associated costs of holding them—at the retail level. The LMI’s Inventory Levels index registered 50, falling from 56.1 in November. That reduction also affected warehousing capacity, which slowed but remained in expansion mode: The LMI’s warehousing capacity index fell 7 points to a reading of 61.6.
December’s results reflect a continued trend toward more typical industry growth patterns following recent years of volatility—and they point to a successful peak holiday season as well.
“Retailers were clearly correct in their bet to stock [up] on goods ahead of the holiday season,” the LMI researchers wrote in their monthly report. “Holiday sales from November until Christmas Eve were up 3.8% year-over-year according to Mastercard. This was largely driven by a 6.7% increase in e-commerce sales, although in-person spending was up 2.9% as well.”
And those results came during a compressed peak shopping cycle.
“The increase in spending came despite the shorter holiday season due to the late Thanksgiving,” the researchers also wrote, citing National Retail Federation (NRF) estimates that U.S. shoppers spent just short of a trillion dollars in November and December, making it the busiest holiday season of all time.
The LMI is a monthly survey of logistics managers from across the country. It tracks industry growth overall and across eight areas: inventory levels and costs; warehousing capacity, utilization, and prices; and transportation capacity, utilization, and prices. The report is released monthly by researchers from Arizona State University, Colorado State University, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rutgers University, and the University of Nevada, Reno, in conjunction with the Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals (CSCMP).
The overall national industrial real estate vacancy rate edged higher in the fourth quarter, although it still remains well below pre-pandemic levels, according to an analysis by Cushman & Wakefield.
Vacancy rates shrunk during the pandemic to historically low levels as e-commerce sales—and demand for warehouse space—boomed in response to massive numbers of people working and living from home. That frantic pace is now cooling off but real estate demand remains elevated from a long-term perspective.
“We've witnessed an uptick among firms looking to lease larger buildings to support their omnichannel fulfillment strategies and maintain inventory for their e-commerce, wholesale, and retail stock. This trend is not just about space, but about efficiency and customer satisfaction,” Jason Tolliver, President, Logistics & Industrial Services, said in a release. “Meanwhile, we're also seeing a flurry of activity to support forward-deployed stock models, a strategy that keeps products closer to the market they serve and where customers order them, promising quicker deliveries and happier customers.“
The latest figures show that industrial vacancy is likely nearing its peak for this cooling cycle in the coming quarters, Cushman & Wakefield analysts said.
Compared to the third quarter, the vacancy rate climbed 20 basis points to 6.7%, but that level was still 30 basis points below the 10-year, pre-pandemic average. Likewise, overall net absorption in the fourth quarter—a term for the amount of newly developed property leased by clients—measured 36.8 million square feet, up from the 33.3 million square feet recorded in the third quarter, but down 20% on a year-over-year basis.
In step with those statistics, real estate developers slowed their plans to erect more buildings. New construction deliveries continued to decelerate for the second straight quarter. Just 85.3 million square feet of new industrial product was completed in the fourth quarter, down 8% quarter-over-quarter and 48% versus one year ago.
Likewise, only four geographic markets saw more than 20 million square feet of completions year-to-date, compared to 10 markets in 2023. Meanwhile, as construction starts remained tempered overall, the under-development pipeline has continued to thin out, dropping by 36% annually to its lowest level (290.5 million square feet) since the third quarter of 2018.
Despite the dip in demand last quarter, the market for industrial space remains relatively healthy, Cushman & Wakefield said.
“After a year of hesitancy, logistics is entering a new, sustained growth phase,” Tolliver said. “Corporate capital is being deployed to optimize supply chains, diversify networks, and minimize potential risks. What's particularly encouraging is the proactive approach of retailers, wholesalers, and 3PLs, who are not just reacting to the market, but shaping it. 2025 will be a year characterized by this bias for action.”
Under terms of the deal, Sick and Endress+Hauser will each hold 50% of a joint venture called "Endress+Hauser SICK GmbH+Co. KG," which will strengthen the development and production of analyzer and gas flow meter technologies. According to Sick, its gas flow meters make it possible to switch to low-emission and non-fossil energy sources, for example, and the process analyzers allow reliable monitoring of emissions.
As part of the partnership, the product solutions manufactured together will now be marketed by Endress+Hauser, allowing customers to use a broader product portfolio distributed from a single source via that company’s global sales centers.
Under terms of the contract between the two companies—which was signed in the summer of 2024— around 800 Sick employees located in 42 countries will transfer to Endress+Hauser, including workers in the global sales and service units of Sick’s “Cleaner Industries” division.
“This partnership is a perfect match,” Peter Selders, CEO of the Endress+Hauser Group, said in a release. “It creates new opportunities for growth and development, particularly in the sustainable transformation of the process industry. By joining forces, we offer added value to our customers. Our combined efforts will make us faster and ultimately more successful than if we acted alone. In this case, one and one equals more than two.”
According to Sick, the move means that its current customers will continue to find familiar Sick contacts available at Endress+Hauser for consulting, sales, and service of process automation solutions. The company says this approach allows it to focus on its core business of factory and logistics automation to meet global demand for automation and digitalization.
Sick says its core business has always been in factory and logistics automation, which accounts for more than 80% of sales, and this area remains unaffected by the new joint venture. In Sick’s view, automation is crucial for industrial companies to secure their productivity despite limited resources. And Sick’s sensor solutions are a critical part of industrial automation, which increases productivity through artificial intelligence and the digital networking of production and supply chains.