Peter Bradley is an award-winning career journalist with more than three decades of experience in both newspapers and national business magazines. His credentials include seven years as the transportation and supply chain editor at Purchasing Magazine and six years as the chief editor of Logistics Management.
Omnichannel has become an omnipresent topic of conversation among retailers and their suppliers. Questions ranging from the seemingly simple (What exactly is it?) to the complex (How do I get there?) abound.
Retailers are seeing an omnichannel strategy as an imperative, driven by the rapid growth of online sales and fierce competition from online giants like Amazon. "Store visits are down, while e-commerce is growing by double digits," says Jerry Koch, director of corporate marketing and product management for Intelligrated, an automated material handling technology provider that works with customers on omnichannel implementations.
Bob Babel, vice president of systems engineering for Forte, a firm that designs and builds distribution centers for its customers in addition to developing warehouse execution software, says, "Almost every customer of ours thinks e-commerce will grow by 10, 25, 30, 40 percent. You can fall behind very quickly."
Consumers, Koch says, have learned to expect a perfect order—delivered on time, where and when they want it, at a price they are willing to pay. Meeting those demands while controlling costs means getting a lot of pieces in order.
That creates real complexities for retailers with respect to inventory management, fulfillment operations, and store management. But the end goal, Koch says, is always the same: "You want to find the best way to delight the customer at the lowest cost to serve."
GET THE INVENTORY RIGHT
The first step to achieving that is knowing exactly what it is you have to sell and exactly where it is. That creates two closely linked requirements—dead-on accurate inventory and clear visibility into it across the entire network of DCs, stores, and even suppliers.
"The first thing you need to think about is visibility to inventory," says Michael Khodl, vice president of Dematic, a supplier of automated material handling and logistics systems. "What that [translates to] is the need for a software system to bring visibility to inventory wherever it exists. I think that's the biggest challenge."
Koch agrees. "You want a view of inventory across all your locations and in the stores," he says.
That's particularly challenging at the store level, where inventory accuracy is typically much lower than at the DCs, Khodl adds. And it's vastly complicated by the fact that it requires not a snapshot, but a real-time view into all of the inventory. That's not easy. "When you bring in the stores, you have a measurement of real time that is different," Koch says. "If I do direct-to-consumer, the inventory I'm going to fulfill from is a dynamic thing. No longer can I be on a traditional plan-execute-monitor-report system. I have to be transaction-based with up-to-date information for each transaction."
A view of inventory alone is not enough. Determining where to position inventory is a crucial part of the strategy development, says Koch. Expand stores' backrooms? Use central or regional DCs? Rely on third parties? Have suppliers fulfill e-commerce orders? Consolidate inventory within a DC or segregate store-bound goods from those designated for e-commerce? All of those questions must be addressed as part of an omnichannel implementation.
But the answers vary markedly. The solution for a fashion retailer will be different from the solution for a general merchandise retailer or a grocer. And even businesses in the same sector will have different issues to address. "That's a philosophy discussion inside the customer's operation," Khodl says.
Koch cites one customer he recently visited that is looking to combine wholesale fulfillment, store replenishment, and e-commerce in its operations, with orders varying from heavy boxes to individual items or "eaches," and without adding new real estate. "That's not an isolated discussion," he says. "It's one playing out among different folks in that circumstance: How do I leverage my assets—the buildings doing fulfillment—and leverage my inventory? The discussions center on what software can help me and how my [material handling] equipment can help me."
DIFFICULT DECISIONS
Developing a strategy for responding to these changing requirements can be difficult. Babel says the major issue for most retailers faced with growing e-commerce demand is the need to bring "each" picking into DCs that previously shipped full cases or split cases to stores. For DC managers, he says, that often means making tough calls, such as whether to add the labor needed for "each" picking or make sizable investments in automated solutions such as goods-to-person systems.
And the question of whether and how to fulfill online orders from stores can be a difficult one as well. For one thing, there's the matter of how to best allocate store labor. Consumers expect fast and accurate shipment of online orders. But a clerk boxing an order in the backroom is not meeting another consumer expectation: service on the store floor.
"How you manage the fulfillment process in the stores is an open discussion, and I think it's often forgotten about," Khodl says. It creates multiple issues for store management—including who will pick, pack, and ship orders; what shipping supplies to keep in the backroom; and how to manage cutoff times. It also raises questions for DCs shipping to stores—such as how frequent those shipments should be. The complexity of fulfilling e-commerce orders from stores has led many retailers to decide not to engage in the order-online/ship-from-store piece of omnichannel.
That's distinct from order-online/pick-up-at-store, in which consumers can have visibility into store inventory and reserve an item, a much simpler piece for store management and one that has rapidly become widespread. But as retailers move toward giving consumers the option to order online and pick up at the store, they should be aware of the repercussions upstream, Babel says. "There are various permutations," he says. It might mean picking from store inventory. Or it could mean boxing an item at the DC and including it in a shipment going to the store. Or it could mean that picking from store inventory triggers a replenishment order at the DC. Whichever way it plays out, filling orders at the store might require more frequent shipments to stores. In other cases, he says, retailers are asking suppliers to manage some e-commerce fulfillment from their facilities. "If you decide to go to servicing e-commerce from a DC associated with manufacturing, that's a big change for the manufacturer," he says.
OMNISCIENT SYSTEMS?
Putting all the pieces together—inventory management and visibility, a fulfillment strategy that has inventory in the right place at the right time, integrating DC and store operations—requires robust systems. Retailers face the challenge of blending multiple systems—corporate enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems, DCs' warehouse management systems, stores' inventory systems—to provide a single view of inventory and then creating a single fulfillment engine. "That's our number one challenge," Khodl says. "It's a data challenge. It's not a fulfillment challenge."
"Systems are evolving toward making decisions dynamically versus having long batching and planning cycles," says Koch.
Referring again to his recent customer visit, Koch says the systems discussion centered on how software should view inventory—as a shared pool for all channels or as a single pool. "Our answer is that you have to look at it as a shared pool that you are going to execute orders against, and you don't care if it's case, "each," direct to consumer, or shipped to the store," he says. "You can plan your execution against it and make your allocations against the same inventory pool."
But that's not universally accepted. Babel says customers vary in how they approach the issue. "We have clients that upon receipt are separating inventory and allocating for the e-commerce business." Others, he says, are having suppliers break down shipments to separate goods bound for stores from those destined for e-commerce so that they're segregated when they arrive at the DC. That option, he acknowledges, may be available only to large retailers with enough clout to demand that service from suppliers.
Omnichannel implementation, retailers have come to understand, allows them to strengthen their hand in the battle for consumer hearts and dollars by taking advantage of assets the big online giants don't have—their stores. Yet implementing the strategy remains a daunting challenge.
"I don't know if anyone has quite figured it out," Khodl says. "Everyone is searching."
The supply chain risk management firm Overhaul has landed $55 million in backing, saying the financing will fuel its advancements in artificial intelligence and support its strategic acquisition roadmap.
The equity funding round comes from the private equity firm Springcoast Partners, with follow-on participation from existing investors Edison Partners and Americo. As part of the investment, Springcoast’s Chris Dederick and Holger Staude will join Overhaul’s board of directors.
According to Austin, Texas-based Overhaul, the money comes as macroeconomic and global trade dynamics are driving consequential transformations in supply chains. That makes cargo visibility and proactive risk management essential tools as shippers manage new routes and suppliers.
“The supply chain technology space will see significant consolidation over the next 12 to 24 months,” Barry Conlon, CEO of Overhaul, said in a release. “Overhaul is well-positioned to establish itself as the ultimate integrated solution, delivering a comprehensive suite of tools for supply chain risk management, efficiency, and visibility under a single trusted platform.”
Artificial intelligence (AI) and data science were hot business topics in 2024 and will remain on the front burner in 2025, according to recent research published in AI in Action, a series of technology-focused columns in the MIT Sloan Management Review.
In Five Trends in AI and Data Science for 2025, researchers Tom Davenport and Randy Bean outline ways in which AI and our data-driven culture will continue to shape the business landscape in the coming year. The information comes from a range of recent AI-focused research projects, including the 2025 AI & Data Leadership Executive Benchmark Survey, an annual survey of data, analytics, and AI executives conducted by Bean’s educational firm, Data & AI Leadership Exchange.
The five trends range from the promise of agentic AI to the struggle over which C-suite role should oversee data and AI responsibilities. At a glance, they reveal that:
Leaders will grapple with both the promise and hype around agentic AI. Agentic AI—which handles tasks independently—is on the rise, in the form of generative AI bots that can perform some content-creation tasks. But the authors say it will be a while before such tools can handle major tasks—like make a travel reservation or conduct a banking transaction.
The time has come to measure results from generative AI experiments. The authors say very few companies are carefully measuring productivity gains from AI projects—particularly when it comes to figuring out what their knowledge-based workers are doing with the freed-up time those projects provide. Doing so is vital to profiting from AI investments.
The reality about data-driven culture sets in. The authors found that 92% of survey respondents feel that cultural and change management challenges are the primary barriers to becoming data- and AI-driven—indicating that the shift to AI is about much more than just the technology.
Unstructured data is important again. The ability to apply Generative AI tools to manage unstructured data—such as text, images, and video—is putting a renewed focus on getting all that data into shape, which takes a whole lot of human effort. As the authors explain “organizations need to pick the best examples of each document type, tag or graph the content, and get it loaded into the system.” And many companies simply aren’t there yet.
Who should run data and AI? Expect continued struggle. Should these roles be concentrated on the business or tech side of the organization? Opinions differ, and as the roles themselves continue to evolve, the authors say companies should expect to continue to wrestle with responsibilities and reporting structures.
Shippers today are praising an 11th-hour contract agreement that has averted the threat of a strike by dockworkers at East and Gulf coast ports that could have frozen container imports and exports as soon as January 16.
The agreement came late last night between the International Longshoremen’s Association (ILA) representing some 45,000 workers and the United States Maritime Alliance (USMX) that includes the operators of port facilities up and down the coast.
Details of the new agreement on those issues have not yet been made public, but in the meantime, retailers and manufacturers are heaving sighs of relief that trade flows will continue.
“Providing certainty with a new contract and avoiding further disruptions is paramount to ensure retail goods arrive in a timely manner for consumers. The agreement will also pave the way for much-needed modernization efforts, which are essential for future growth at these ports and the overall resiliency of our nation’s supply chain,” Gold said.
The next step in the process is for both sides to ratify the tentative agreement, so negotiators have agreed to keep those details private in the meantime, according to identical statements released by the ILA and the USMX. In their joint statement, the groups called the six-year deal a “win-win,” saying: “This agreement protects current ILA jobs and establishes a framework for implementing technologies that will create more jobs while modernizing East and Gulf coasts ports – making them safer and more efficient, and creating the capacity they need to keep our supply chains strong. This is a win-win agreement that creates ILA jobs, supports American consumers and businesses, and keeps the American economy the key hub of the global marketplace.”
The breakthrough hints at broader supply chain trends, which will focus on the tension between operational efficiency and workforce job protection, not just at ports but across other sectors as well, according to a statement from Judah Levine, head of research at Freightos, a freight booking and payment platform. Port automation was the major sticking point leading up to this agreement, as the USMX pushed for technologies to make ports more efficient, while the ILA opposed automation or semi-automation that could threaten jobs.
"This is a six-year détente in the tech-versus-labor tug-of-war at U.S. ports," Levine said. “Automation remains a lightning rod—and likely one we’ll see in other industries—but this deal suggests a cautious path forward."
Editor's note: This story was revised on January 9 to include additional input from the ILA, USMX, and Freightos.
Logistics industry growth slowed in December due to a seasonal wind-down of inventory and following one of the busiest holiday shopping seasons on record, according to the latest Logistics Managers’ Index (LMI) report, released this week.
The monthly LMI was 57.3 in December, down more than a percentage point from November’s reading of 58.4. Despite the slowdown, economic activity across the industry continued to expand, as an LMI reading above 50 indicates growth and a reading below 50 indicates contraction.
The LMI researchers said the monthly conditions were largely due to seasonal drawdowns in inventory levels—and the associated costs of holding them—at the retail level. The LMI’s Inventory Levels index registered 50, falling from 56.1 in November. That reduction also affected warehousing capacity, which slowed but remained in expansion mode: The LMI’s warehousing capacity index fell 7 points to a reading of 61.6.
December’s results reflect a continued trend toward more typical industry growth patterns following recent years of volatility—and they point to a successful peak holiday season as well.
“Retailers were clearly correct in their bet to stock [up] on goods ahead of the holiday season,” the LMI researchers wrote in their monthly report. “Holiday sales from November until Christmas Eve were up 3.8% year-over-year according to Mastercard. This was largely driven by a 6.7% increase in e-commerce sales, although in-person spending was up 2.9% as well.”
And those results came during a compressed peak shopping cycle.
“The increase in spending came despite the shorter holiday season due to the late Thanksgiving,” the researchers also wrote, citing National Retail Federation (NRF) estimates that U.S. shoppers spent just short of a trillion dollars in November and December, making it the busiest holiday season of all time.
The LMI is a monthly survey of logistics managers from across the country. It tracks industry growth overall and across eight areas: inventory levels and costs; warehousing capacity, utilization, and prices; and transportation capacity, utilization, and prices. The report is released monthly by researchers from Arizona State University, Colorado State University, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rutgers University, and the University of Nevada, Reno, in conjunction with the Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals (CSCMP).
As U.S. small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) face an uncertain business landscape in 2025, a substantial majority (67%) expect positive growth in the new year compared to 2024, according to a survey from DHL.
However, the survey also showed that businesses could face a rocky road to reach that goal, as they navigate a complex environment of regulatory/policy shifts and global market volatility. Both those issues were cited as top challenges by 36% of respondents, followed by staffing/talent retention (11%) and digital threats and cyber attacks (2%).
Against that backdrop, SMEs said that the biggest opportunity for growth in 2025 lies in expanding into new markets (40%), followed by economic improvements (31%) and implementing new technologies (14%).
As the U.S. prepares for a broad shift in political leadership in Washington after a contentious election, the SMEs in DHL’s survey were likely split evenly on their opinion about the impact of regulatory and policy changes. A plurality of 40% were on the fence (uncertain, still evaluating), followed by 24% who believe regulatory changes could negatively impact growth, 20% who see these changes as having a positive impact, and 16% predicting no impact on growth at all.
That uncertainty also triggered a split when respondents were asked how they planned to adjust their strategy in 2025 in response to changes in the policy or regulatory landscape. The largest portion (38%) of SMEs said they remained uncertain or still evaluating, followed by 30% who will make minor adjustments, 19% will maintain their current approach, and 13% who were willing to significantly adjust their approach.