When they think about relocating offshore operations to Mexico, most companies focus on the supply chain benefits. What they should be looking at are the challenges.
James Cooke is a principal analyst with Nucleus Research in Boston, covering supply chain planning software. He was previously the editor of CSCMP?s Supply Chain Quarterly and a staff writer for DC Velocity.
Not so long ago, Asia was the clear destination of choice for companies looking to set up offshore manufacturing operations. Now that's starting to change. In recent months, a number of U.S.-based companies in the consumer electronics, telecommunications, and pharmaceutical industries have quietly closed up shop overseas and relocated their operations to a country much closer to home: Mexico.
"In the past year to 18 months—partly as a result of the economic crisis—we have seen more companies making the decision to outsource their logistics or manufacturing operations to Mexico," says Larry Malanga, president of the third-party logistics service provider Mexflex Logistics, S.A. de C.V.
Although wages and currency fluctuations play a role, it's clear that the desire to cut freight costs and transit times weighs heavily in these decisions. "From the cost of fuel and resources, you minimize a great deal with being in Mexico," says Larry Monaghan, who's the department head for logistics at LG Electronics, which makes products like cell phones and plasma TVs in Mexico for U.S. consumption.
Mexico may have the edge over Asia when it comes to freight costs and delivery times, but it's not without its logistics challenges. Take infrastructure, for example. "Public roads with a few exceptions are in bad shape," says Rolando García, who works on the strategic planning team for contact center management company Teleperformance in Monterrey, Mexico. Bad roads cause wear and tear on trucks, García says, so anyone planning to operate trucks in Mexico should be prepared to make frequent equipment repairs.
And that's just one example. Companies can expect to encounter a number of other obstacles as they start laying the groundwork for operations in Mexico. That's why Monaghan and the other experts interviewed for this article urge businesses to familiarize themselves with the potential troublespots and think about how they're going to address them beforehand.
Overcoming hurdles
One of the biggest considerations for companies looking to manufacture in Mexico is how they'll transport the Mexico-made goods to U.S. markets. To someone unfamiliar with doing business in Mexico, that might sound like a straightforward decision—either hire a Mexican trucker to deliver the goods in the United States or send a U.S. carrier into Mexico to pick them up. But it's not that simple.
To begin with, using a Mexican trucker to make deliveries in the United States would be illegal. Although it agreed to give Mexican truckers full and free access to U.S. highways as part of the North American Free Trade Agreement (which took effect in 1994), the United States has yet to deliver on that promise. At this writing, Mexican truckers are banned from U.S. highways beyond a 50-mile border zone. That means that once a Mexican trucker hauls a cargo trailer to the border, he has to hand it off to a U.S. carrier.
The second option—hiring a U.S. carrier to pick up goods in Mexico—is perfectly legal, but few companies actually go this route. For one thing, it's difficult to find a trucker that's willing to do so—U.S. carriers have been hesitant to go into Mexico, partly out of safety concerns. García reports that for the past two years, Mexico has been experiencing an unprecedented crime wave. Rather than send trucks into the country, most U.S. carriers choose to interchange cargo at the border with a Mexican counterpart.
That means that along with hiring a U.S. carrier, a company has to find a trustworthy Mexican trucking partner—a process that's complicated by a lack of big-name truckers in that country. Although U.S. carriers have begun buying ownership stakes in some Mexican transport providers, most Mexican truckers are still "mom and pop" operations, Monaghan says. He adds that shippers can learn a lot about the rigor of a potential partner's security practices by asking detailed questions about the trucker's hiring procedures. Quality carriers collect a lot of personal information on drivers and their background, including pictures of the driver and the driver's family, he says.
To further safeguard their shipments, Monaghan advises shippers to put reinforced locks on their trailers. He also suggests monitoring the carrier's travel time to the border. "If it takes too long to reach the destination, you have to wonder if anything was compromised," he says. It's critical for companies to keep tabs on carriers because the importer who's listed as the shipper of record bears the responsibility for any breach.
Where available, trains offer a somewhat safer alternative to trucks, even though the transit times are longer, according to Monaghan. "There are [fewer] security issues with rail because the train is always moving," he explains.
Border lines
Another factor to take into account when planning a move to Mexico is the potential for delays at the border. Due to U.S. concerns over smuggling and illegal immigration, customs clearance can be time-consuming. David Morgan, chief executive officer of D.W. Morgan Co. Inc., reports that it has taken some of its customers 16 to 20 hours to clear customs. "The main bottleneck for Mexico-U.S. shipping is the border," he says.
To speed up the customs clearance process, Monaghan urges companies manufacturing in Mexico to join the Customs-Trade Partnership Against Terrorism (C-TPAT), a voluntary supply chain security program run by U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP). (Essentially, C-TPAT members agree to police their own supply chains in exchange for expedited clearance.) That applies to their transportation partners as well. "Make sure to use carriers that are C-TPAT certified as they can get across the border faster," Monaghan says. He also encourages companies to make use of C-TPAT experts who can put together programs to ensure compliance.
Another way to ease border crossing headaches is to use a qualified freight forwarder, customs broker, or third-party logistics service provider. "There are several cross-border agents that are good at handling the required documentation and customs issues to facilitate the crossing process," says Malanga. He recommends choosing agents that have existing alliances with transportation providers.
Help wanted!
The challenges associated with logistics operations in Mexico aren't limited to the mechanics of moving freight. Another issue is staffing. Many companies have run into difficulty recruiting and hiring qualified people to work in operations south of the border. Although businesses can usually find what they're looking for in major cities like Mexico City, Guadalajara, and Monterrey, that's not the case in smaller cities, García says.
Companies unable to find local expertise may be able to "import" talent. In certain cases, Mexico does allow businesses to bring in foreign workers, Monaghan says. Otherwise, their best bet is to train and develop local talent, he says. Monaghan notes that online training can be a good way to bring supply chain personnel up to speed quickly.
A head start
Given the potential difficulties, the experts interviewed for this article urge companies planning a move to Mexico to begin working out the details well in advance. García of Teleperformance recommends the team approach—establishing a core project team that includes both company executives and local experts to oversee the transition. "In my personal experience, the best practice is to hire the local key players months ahead of the go-live and send them to the home country for training," he says.
Whether a company chooses to form a team or not, the important thing is to set up its own "infrastructure" of transportation and logistics partners as well as qualified local personnel. "It's not like you can find a factory in Mexico and start shipping," says Monaghan. "You need to do your homework. It's not a decision to be made without understanding all that's involved."
“The past year has been unprecedented, with extreme weather events, heightened geopolitical tension and cybercrime destabilizing supply chains throughout the world. Navigating this year’s looming risks to build a secure supply network has never been more critical,” Corey Rhodes, CEO of Everstream Analytics, said in the firm’s “2025 Annual Risk Report.”
“While some risks are unavoidable, early notice and swift action through a combination of planning, deep monitoring, and mitigation can save inventory and lives in 2025,” Rhodes said.
In its report, Everstream ranked the five categories by a “risk score metric” to help global supply chain leaders prioritize planning and mitigation efforts for coping with them. They include:
Drowning in Climate Change – 90% Risk Score. Driven by shifting climate patterns and record-high temperatures, extreme weather events are a dominant risk to the supply chain due to concerns such as flooding and elevated ocean temperatures.
Geopolitical Instability with Increased Tariff Risk – 80% Risk Score. These threats could disrupt trade networks and impact economies worldwide, including logistics, transportation, and manufacturing industries. The following major geopolitical events are likely to impact global trade: Red Sea disruptions, Russia-Ukraine conflict, Taiwan trade risks, Middle East tensions, South China Sea disputes, and proposed tariff increases.
More Backdoors for Cybercrime – 75% Risk Score. Supply chain leaders face escalating cybersecurity risks in 2025, driven by the growing reliance on AI and cloud computing within supply chains, the proliferation of IoT-connected devices, vulnerabilities in sub-tier supply chains, and a disproportionate impact on third-party logistics providers (3PLs) and the electronics industry.
Rare Metals and Minerals on Lockdown – 65% Risk Score. Between rising regulations, new tariffs, and long-term or exclusive contracts, rare minerals and metals will be harder than ever, and more expensive, to obtain.
Crackdown on Forced Labor – 60% Risk Score. A growing crackdown on forced labor across industries will increase pressure on companies who are facing scrutiny to manage and eliminate suppliers violating human rights. Anticipated risks in 2025 include a push for alternative suppliers, a cascade of legislation to address lax forced labor issues, challenges for agri-food products such as palm oil and vanilla.
That number is low compared to widespread unemployment in the transportation sector which reached its highest level during the COVID-19 pandemic at 15.7% in both May 2020 and July 2020. But it is slightly above the most recent pre-pandemic rate for the sector, which was 2.8% in December 2019, the BTS said.
For broader context, the nation’s overall unemployment rate for all sectors rose slightly in December, increasing 0.3 percentage points from December 2023 to 3.8%.
On a seasonally adjusted basis, employment in the transportation and warehousing sector rose to 6,630,200 people in December 2024 — up 0.1% from the previous month and up 1.7% from December 2023. Employment in transportation and warehousing grew 15.1% in December 2024 from the pre-pandemic December 2019 level of 5,760,300 people.
The largest portion of those workers was in warehousing and storage, followed by truck transportation, according to a breakout of the total figures into separate modes (seasonally adjusted):
Warehousing and storage rose to 1,770,300 in December 2024 — up 0.1% from the previous month and up 0.2% from December 2023.
Truck transportation fell to 1,545,900 in December 2024 — down 0.1% from the previous month and down 0.4% from December 2023.
Air transportation rose to 578,000 in December 2024 — up 0.4% from the previous month and up 1.4% from December 2023.
Transit and ground passenger transportation rose to 456,000 in December 2024 — up 0.3% from the previous month and up 5.7% from December 2023.
Rail transportation remained virtually unchanged in December 2024 at 150,300 from the previous month but down 1.8% from December 2023.
Water transportation rose to 74,300 in December 2024 — up 0.1% from the previous month and up 4.8% from December 2023.
Pipeline transportation rose to 55,000 in December 2024 — up 0.5% from the previous month and up 6.2% from December 2023.
The supply chain risk management firm Overhaul has landed $55 million in backing, saying the financing will fuel its advancements in artificial intelligence and support its strategic acquisition roadmap.
The equity funding round comes from the private equity firm Springcoast Partners, with follow-on participation from existing investors Edison Partners and Americo. As part of the investment, Springcoast’s Chris Dederick and Holger Staude will join Overhaul’s board of directors.
According to Austin, Texas-based Overhaul, the money comes as macroeconomic and global trade dynamics are driving consequential transformations in supply chains. That makes cargo visibility and proactive risk management essential tools as shippers manage new routes and suppliers.
“The supply chain technology space will see significant consolidation over the next 12 to 24 months,” Barry Conlon, CEO of Overhaul, said in a release. “Overhaul is well-positioned to establish itself as the ultimate integrated solution, delivering a comprehensive suite of tools for supply chain risk management, efficiency, and visibility under a single trusted platform.”
Shippers today are praising an 11th-hour contract agreement that has averted the threat of a strike by dockworkers at East and Gulf coast ports that could have frozen container imports and exports as soon as January 16.
The agreement came late last night between the International Longshoremen’s Association (ILA) representing some 45,000 workers and the United States Maritime Alliance (USMX) that includes the operators of port facilities up and down the coast.
Details of the new agreement on those issues have not yet been made public, but in the meantime, retailers and manufacturers are heaving sighs of relief that trade flows will continue.
“Providing certainty with a new contract and avoiding further disruptions is paramount to ensure retail goods arrive in a timely manner for consumers. The agreement will also pave the way for much-needed modernization efforts, which are essential for future growth at these ports and the overall resiliency of our nation’s supply chain,” Gold said.
The next step in the process is for both sides to ratify the tentative agreement, so negotiators have agreed to keep those details private in the meantime, according to identical statements released by the ILA and the USMX. In their joint statement, the groups called the six-year deal a “win-win,” saying: “This agreement protects current ILA jobs and establishes a framework for implementing technologies that will create more jobs while modernizing East and Gulf coasts ports – making them safer and more efficient, and creating the capacity they need to keep our supply chains strong. This is a win-win agreement that creates ILA jobs, supports American consumers and businesses, and keeps the American economy the key hub of the global marketplace.”
The breakthrough hints at broader supply chain trends, which will focus on the tension between operational efficiency and workforce job protection, not just at ports but across other sectors as well, according to a statement from Judah Levine, head of research at Freightos, a freight booking and payment platform. Port automation was the major sticking point leading up to this agreement, as the USMX pushed for technologies to make ports more efficient, while the ILA opposed automation or semi-automation that could threaten jobs.
"This is a six-year détente in the tech-versus-labor tug-of-war at U.S. ports," Levine said. “Automation remains a lightning rod—and likely one we’ll see in other industries—but this deal suggests a cautious path forward."
Editor's note: This story was revised on January 9 to include additional input from the ILA, USMX, and Freightos.
Under terms of the deal, Sick and Endress+Hauser will each hold 50% of a joint venture called "Endress+Hauser SICK GmbH+Co. KG," which will strengthen the development and production of analyzer and gas flow meter technologies. According to Sick, its gas flow meters make it possible to switch to low-emission and non-fossil energy sources, for example, and the process analyzers allow reliable monitoring of emissions.
As part of the partnership, the product solutions manufactured together will now be marketed by Endress+Hauser, allowing customers to use a broader product portfolio distributed from a single source via that company’s global sales centers.
Under terms of the contract between the two companies—which was signed in the summer of 2024— around 800 Sick employees located in 42 countries will transfer to Endress+Hauser, including workers in the global sales and service units of Sick’s “Cleaner Industries” division.
“This partnership is a perfect match,” Peter Selders, CEO of the Endress+Hauser Group, said in a release. “It creates new opportunities for growth and development, particularly in the sustainable transformation of the process industry. By joining forces, we offer added value to our customers. Our combined efforts will make us faster and ultimately more successful than if we acted alone. In this case, one and one equals more than two.”
According to Sick, the move means that its current customers will continue to find familiar Sick contacts available at Endress+Hauser for consulting, sales, and service of process automation solutions. The company says this approach allows it to focus on its core business of factory and logistics automation to meet global demand for automation and digitalization.
Sick says its core business has always been in factory and logistics automation, which accounts for more than 80% of sales, and this area remains unaffected by the new joint venture. In Sick’s view, automation is crucial for industrial companies to secure their productivity despite limited resources. And Sick’s sensor solutions are a critical part of industrial automation, which increases productivity through artificial intelligence and the digital networking of production and supply chains.