no problem's too technical: interview with Richard Sharpe
It took a little time for Richard Sharpe to get in touch with his inner engineer. But once he did, he discovered a passion for devising technical solutions to knotty supply chain problems. The rest is history.
Mitch Mac Donald has more than 30 years of experience in both the newspaper and magazine businesses. He has covered the logistics and supply chain fields since 1988. Twice named one of the Top 10 Business Journalists in the U.S., he has served in a multitude of editorial and publishing roles. The leading force behind the launch of Supply Chain Management Review, he was that brand's founding publisher and editorial director from 1997 to 2000. Additionally, he has served as news editor, chief editor, publisher and editorial director of Logistics Management, as well as publisher of Modern Materials Handling. Mitch is also the president and CEO of Agile Business Media, LLC, the parent company of DC VELOCITY and CSCMP's Supply Chain Quarterly.
When a well-intentioned person once suggested he switch his course of collegiate study from pre-med to industrial engineering, Richard Sharpe was taken aback. "I'm not sure if I want to drive a train," he told his astonished advisor.
He laughs when he recounts that story, noting that his path took an ironic twist soon afterward. Despite his initial skepticism, Sharpe did look into industrial engineering, and once he learned more about it, he realized that was exactly what he wanted to be doing. After earning both undergraduate and graduate degrees in that discipline, he applied his engineering skills out in the field, analyzing and solving technical problems for the likes of AT&T and the U.S. Navy. Later, he co-founded an Atlanta-based logistics technology consultancy, Competitive Logistics LLC, of which he's now president and CEO.
Today, Sharpe also serves on the board of directors for Datatrac Corp., the Warehousing Education and Research Council (WERC), Georgia Tech's Executive Masters in International Logistics (EMIL) program and as a director for Feeding Children Better Logistics Solutions (a three-way partnership with the ConAgra Foundation, America's Second Harvest and Competitive Logistics).
Sharpe recently shared his insights into the logistics profession and the technologies that support it with DC VELOCITY Editorial Director Mitch Mac Donald.
Q: What was your first experience solving a technical engineering problem?
A: Back when I was earning my graduate degree in industrial systems engineering from Georgia Tech, I became part of a two-person team that worked with the sponsoring professor to build the first interactive scheduling routine for the U.S. Navy. Basically, we helped them replace that system of moving ships using those long sticks across a table map that you see in the movies. It was truly an interactive scheduling routine focused on assigning ships to coverage areas in the Atlantic while maximizing crews' time in port.
Q: Did that experience lead to a job with the military when you finished graduate school?
A: No. When I finished at Tech, my first assignment was with AT&T.We built an interactive planning system to allow them to schedule job shop manufacturing operations for all of the component parts used for the phone system. That's approximately 6,000 major parts. They had no way to accurately predict how much space they were going to need in the facility and how much capacity they'd need to meet sales requirements five years out. I applied the research that we did at Tech to that problem and we solved it for them.
Q: That must have required a fairly comprehensive look at their operation.
A: It was extremely extensive. This was a problem that had never been solved before. The results of our analysis gave them the number of machines they were going to need in the job shop operation as well as projected space requirements for each year going out five years. It also supported their efforts to streamline operations in the days prior to the breakup of the Bell system. I was fortunate to find a mentor in the system—a gentleman who was selected by what later became Bell South Corp. to oversee the regulated side of Bell South's logistics and supply chain management operations to make sure they were in compliance with the law.
Q: That put you on more of a logistics-based career path?
A: It really did. At that time, no one had ERP [enterprise resource planning] systems in place to support logistics. Bell didn't have a common repository of data and information to drive the operational systems from a common platform, so we built one.We actually built a system that would serve as a single source of information for the operational systems associated with purchasing, material management, warehousing, transportation, cataloging and ordering.
Q: Sounds like an early version of an integrated supply chain management system. Of course, you were doing it before anyone had heard the term "supply chain," right?
A: That's correct. This was before the term had even been coined. It was a common informational repository that was basically the driver for the supply chain operation. It covered 100,000 different products and 15,000 vendors.
Q: Sounds like the ultimate logistics system challenge?
A: It was really a wonderful opportunity because we were translating these systems from theory into very detailed practice. The operation, again, wasn't just a matter of seeing that the product was in the right place at the right time; we had to demonstrate conformance to the rules of the AT&T breakup as ordered by the courts, or find ourselves in violation of the law. So there were both legal and operational requirements to meet.
Q: With all the legal compliance issues to consider, did you even have time to worry about how all this was affecting customer service?
A: Well, the customer always remained the operating company's focus, simply because you have to keep the phone system operational. That was a given. The issue was making sure you were sourcing correctly from your vendors and that the products were actually being ordered and stored and delivered to meet the operating companies' needs. The other big issue was keeping costs down. I can't quote the exact number, but the process we put in place to assure compliance with court mandates also yielded a very significant efficiency gain.
Q: How long did you remain at Bell?
A: I spent eight years there and I realized during that time, that what I really enjoyed doing was acting as a bridge between the worlds of supply chain management and technology. I recognized that I could understand the business world and translate its requirements into a technical environment and I could understand the technical environment and translate that back to the business world.
Q: That emerged as a very important skill set coming into the 1990s. The tech wave was starting to hit the beach and people were being told: "You need to understand what technology can do for you because if you don't fully exploit its capabilities, you're in trouble."
A: That's exactly right. So I went over to a six-person shop whose name you won't immediately recognize. At the time that I joined it, the company was called Computer Aided Planning and Scheduling; it was later renamed CAPS Logistics.
Q: There's one we know!
A: They had done a great job in building innovative technology. Their primary customer base was the U.S. government in military crisis deployment systems. There were no commercial customers at that point.
Q: You came in as the company's president?
A: Initially I served as the group's vice president of consulting. But before the close of my second year there, I was asked to serve as president and to join the board of directors. We looked at the application of the technology.
Again, they were looking at crisis deployments with regard to both the Air Force and the Army. But that was about to change. They actually had a commercial offering in development; they just didn't have a commercial customer to showcase.We looked at what they were doing and the people who had expressed interest.Within a year of my arrival there, we landed a contract with one of the world's largest soft drink companies. It was the first national deployment of routing and scheduling technology in the world.
Q: Was much of the expertise you gained serving the U.S. Defense agencies, like the Army and Air Force, transferable to this commercial work?
A: It actually was somewhat different. Back in those days, people were still thinking about large applications, about running operations research applications on mainframes. We were starting to move to the PC, you know, the early Windows application releases. What was really interesting at that time was the emergence of the GUI [graphical user interface] aspect, the actual visualization of what all that math was accomplishing.
Q: I'm going to guess that this soft drink company was blown away by this capability.
A: Well, back in those days, there were just a few players in the market. With the technology for that rollout in hand, we were looking to implement it in over 200 sites and that had never been done before.
Q: What else did you accomplish at CAPS?
A: We began to provide solutions for problems associated with network design, transportation planning, routing and scheduling—helping clients decide where to store products, how to source them, how to service customers, from what facilities, and how to use assets effectively, whether it was a dedicated fleet, a manufacturing plant, or a warehouse. When I left in 1997 after seven-plus years there, we had 16 percent of the Fortune 500 as active customers and we were 140 employees strong.
Q: Wow. From a six-person shop in 1991 to almost 25 times that size in just seven years.
A: It was a good run, and a good time to be in that corner of the logistics field.
Q: What came next?
A: It was becoming increasingly clear to me that people were starting to recognize technology's potential. But I had also observed that all too often people were looking to the technology as the answer to their problems in and of itself. That's where they got into trouble.
So we decided we wanted to start a business to help people get the return on their investment they're really looking for as well as help them cut implementation time.We built a new company, Competitive Logistics, that would focus on "people, process and technology," or P.P.T. Today, what we do is offer expertise on key technologies and in helping folks think about how they can get the maximum advantage from them—but only as an enabling tool, as one leg of that three-legged "people, process and technology" stool.
Q: I 'll bet you had also seen cases where a company failed to be sure these elements were properly interrelated, and it ended up underperforming.
A: Absolutely. Busy people tend to look to technology for immediate relief to their operating problems, but unfortunately, it's not the silver bullet. The technology is absolutely an essential component for solving many problems, but unfortunately, most people tend to discount the importance of thinking through the people issues.
Q: Do most potential clients recognize that technology is just one of the three components or do most of them expect the technology to solve their problems for them?
A: It's a little bit of both. We make a point of telling new clients, "The problem you're facing here can be addressed by using this type of technology … but you have to recognize that all the technology is going to do is enable you to perform the operation in a way that is different from what you do today." You still have to address the people whom you are going to ask to take on that solution. You've got to make sure that they are actually embracing the technology and being empowered by it so they can ultimately take ownership of the technology you provide. For a lot of people, particularly when it comes to ERP, hearing the words "process change" sets off alarm bells in their heads because they're thinking about process re-engineering. We have to reassure them that while their processes may require adjustments, more often than not, it's just that. It is an adjustment or tweak to an existing process versus a total redesign.
Q: What are the most important skills you've acquired over the course of your career?
A: Analytical and communication skills, thinking through a business problem and explaining the various options and their potential gains and risks.
Q: Let's switch gears.What does your "crystal ball" show regarding the future of logistics operations? What's the next big thing?
A: From a business perspective, the future hinges largely on how well companies remain focused on their own customers when launching supply chain initiatives. The bottom line is that it's the customer that ultimately matters. It's no longer acceptable to rely on metrics that focus on cost efficiencies and gains without understanding what financial impact those initiatives are having on the customer itself.
I also think inventory optimization is going to become a very big area. The existing technology was developed to automate traditional inventory deployment strategies—managing the flow of raw materials to manufacturing and moving finished goods from manufacturing to warehouses. Today, though, there is new technology that allows managers to address inventory questions across the entire supply chain, that lets them look at what those inventory deployment strategies should be for each of those segments based on customer demand.
It's very new. It's very exciting. It hasn't really caught on yet, but it is something that people are going to want, especially when they see that you can truly reduce the amount of inventory that you have in any one of those segments: finished goods, raw goods, inventory in process, any of those areas. The savings go right to the bottom line.
Q: What it comes down to is it's a financial measure?
A: That's exactly right. I think that's going to be very exciting for people. Another big challenge is building a justifiable value proposition around RFID. With RFID, the trick will be to make smart use of intelligent data. RFID will provide people with information that is meaningful in a timely way. The tough part will be figuring out how to use it. I think that's what a lot of people are going to be focused on: Now that I have the ability to capture this information about this product, how do I integrate that into the decisions I make and the way I manage the operation to gain competitive advantage?
Q: Information can be powerful, but information isn't automatically powerful.
A: It is not knowledge. You have to be able to use it. And as folks figure out how to use this information, believe that the distribution center will play an increasingly critical role in how well they can carry out their competitive strategies. I say that because if you think about the problems most companies face—putting a postponement strategy in place, say, or offering what's being termed "mass customization of one," or simply meeting each customer's specific demands for display-ready merchandise or special labeling or whatever—where's the most logical place to do that? The distribution center. The DC is no longer just for storing and handling product. It's the ideal venue for performing value-added services—even when it comes to processing returns, since it often represents the closest point to the customer. Therefore, in many cases, it's the most logical place for a lot of those activities to occur. The DC will continue to be one place where supply chain information is translated into specific benefits to a company's customers and shareholders.
E-commerce activity remains robust, but a growing number of consumers are reintegrating physical stores into their shopping journeys in 2024, emphasizing the need for retailers to focus on omnichannel business strategies. That’s according to an e-commerce study from Ryder System, Inc., released this week.
Ryder surveyed more than 1,300 consumers for its 2024 E-Commerce Consumer Study and found that 61% of consumers shop in-store “because they enjoy the experience,” a 21% increase compared to results from Ryder’s 2023 survey on the same subject. The current survey also found that 35% shop in-store because they don’t want to wait for online orders in the mail (up 4% from last year), and 15% say they shop in-store to avoid package theft (up 8% from last year).
“Retail and e-commerce continue to evolve,” Jeff Wolpov, Ryder’s senior vice president of e-commerce, said in a statement announcing the survey’s findings. “The emergence of e-commerce and growth of omnichannel fulfillment, particularly over the past four years, has altered consumer expectations and behavior dramatically and will continue to do so as time and technology allow.
“This latest study demonstrates that, while consumers maintain a robust
appetite for e-commerce, they are simultaneously embracing in-person shopping, presenting an impetus for merchants to refine their omnichannel strategies.”
Other findings include:
• Apparel and cosmetics shoppers show growing attraction to buying in-store. When purchasing apparel and cosmetics, shoppers are more inclined to make purchases in a physical location than they were last year, according to Ryder. Forty-one percent of shoppers who buy cosmetics said they prefer to do so either in a brand’s physical retail location or a department/convenience store (+9%). As for apparel shoppers, 54% said they prefer to buy clothing in those same brick-and-mortar locations (+9%).
• More customers prefer returning online purchases in physical stores. Fifty-five percent of shoppers (+15%) now say they would rather return online purchases in-store–the first time since early 2020 the preference to Buy Online Return In-Store (BORIS) has outweighed returning via mail, according to the survey. Forty percent of shoppers said they often make additional purchases when picking up or returning online purchases in-store (+2%).
• Consumers are extremely reliant on mobile devices when shopping in-store. This year’s survey reveals that 77% of consumers search for items on their mobile devices while in a store, Ryder said. Sixty-nine percent said they compare prices with items in nearby stores, 58% check availability at other stores, 31% want to learn more about a product, and 17% want to see other items frequently purchased with a product they’re considering.
Ryder said the findings also underscore the importance of investing in technology solutions that allow companies to provide customers with flexible purchasing options.
“Omnichannel strength is not a fad; it is a strategic necessity for e-commerce and retail businesses to stay competitive and achieve sustainable success in 2024 and beyond,” Wolpov also said. “The findings from this year’s study underscore what we know our customers are experiencing, which is the positive impact of integrating supply chain technology solutions across their sales channels, enabling them to provide their customers with flexible, convenient options to personalize their experience and heighten customer satisfaction.”
Transportation industry veteran Anne Reinke will become president & CEO of trade group the Intermodal Association of North America (IANA) at the end of the year, stepping into the position from her previous post leading third party logistics (3PL) trade group the Transportation Intermediaries Association (TIA), both organizations said today.
Meanwhile, TIA today announced that insider Christopher Burroughs would fill Reinke’s shoes as president & CEO. Burroughs has been with TIA for 13 years, most recently as its vice president of Government Affairs for the past six years, during which time he oversaw all legislative and regulatory efforts before Congress and the federal agencies.
Before her four years leading TIA, Reinke spent two years as Deputy Assistant Secretary with the U.S. Department of Transportation and 16 years with CSX Corporation.
Krish Nathan is the Americas CEO for SDI Element Logic, a provider of turnkey automation solutions and sortation systems. Nathan joined SDI Industries in 2000 and honed his project management and engineering expertise in developing and delivering complex material handling solutions. In 2014, he was appointed CEO, and in 2022, he led the search for a strategic partner that could expand SDI’s capabilities. This culminated in the acquisition of SDI by Element Logic, with SDI becoming the Americas branch of the company.
A native of the U.K., Nathan received his bachelor’s degree in manufacturing engineering from Coventry University and has studied executive leadership at Cranfield University.
Q: How would you describe the current state of the supply chain industry?
A: We see the supply chain industry as very dynamic and exciting, both from a growth perspective and from an innovation perspective. The pandemic hangover is still impacting decisions to nearshore, and that has resulted in a spike in business for us in both the USA and Mexico. Adding new technology to our portfolio has been a significant contributor to our continued expansion.
Q: Distributors were making huge tech investments during the pandemic simply to keep up with soaring consumer demand. How have things changed since then?
A: The consumer demand for e-commerce certainly appears to have cooled since the pandemic high, but our clients continue to see steady growth. Growth, combined with low unemployment and high labor costs, continues to make automation a good investment for many companies.
Q: Robotics are still in high demand for material handling applications. What are some of the benefits of these systems?
A: As an organization, we are investing heavily in software that will allow Element Logic to offer solutions for robotic picking that are hardware-agnostic. We have had success deploying unit picking for order fulfillment solutions and unit placing of items onto tray-based sorters.
From a benefit point of view, we’ve seen the consistency of a given operation improve. For example, the placement accuracy of a product onto a tray is far higher from a robotic arm than from a person. In order fulfillment applications, two of the biggest benefits are reliability and hours of operation. The robots don't call in sick, and they are happy to work 22 hours a day!
Q: SDI Element Logic offers a wide range of automated solutions, including automated storage and sortation equipment. What criteria should distributors use to determine what type of system is right for them?
A: There are a significant number of factors to consider when thinking about automation. In my experience, automation pays for itself in three key ways: It saves space, it increases the efficiency of labor, and it improves accuracy. So evaluating which of these will be [most] beneficial and quantifying the associated savings will lead to a “right sized” investment in technology.
Another important factor to consider is product mix. With a small SKU (stock-keeping unit) base, often automation doesn’t make sense. And with a huge SKU base, there will be products that don’t lend themselves to automation.
With any significant investment, you need to partner with an organization that has deep experience with the technologies that are being considered and … in-depth knowledge of the process that is being automated.
Q: How can a goods-to-person system reduce the amount of labor needed to fill orders?
A: In most order picking operations, there is a considerable amount of walking between pick faces to find the SKUs associated with a given order or set of orders. Goods-to-person eliminates the walking and allows the operator to just pick. I have seen studies that [show] that 75% of the time [required] to assemble an order in a manual picking environment is walking or “non-picking” time. So eliminating walking will reduce the amount of labor needed.
The goods-to-person approach also fits perfectly with robotic picking, so even the actual picking aspect of order assembly can be automated in some instances. For these reasons, [automation offers] a significant opportunity to reduce the labor needed to fulfill a customer order.
Q: If you could pick one thing a company should do to improve its distribution center operations, what would it be?
A: Evaluate. Evaluate the opportunities for improving by considering automation. In my experience, the challenge most companies have is recognizing that automation is an alternative. The barrier to entry is far lower than most people think!
Toyota Material Handling and its nationwide network of dealers showcased their commitment to improving their local communities during the company’s annual “Lift the Community Day.” Since 2021, Toyota associates have participated in an annual day-long philanthropic event held near Toyota’s Columbus, Indiana, headquarters. This year, the initiative expanded to include participation from Toyota’s dealers, increasing the impact on communities throughout the U.S. A total of 324 Toyota associates completed 2,300 hours of community service during this year’s event.
The PMMI Foundation, the charitable arm of PMMI, The Association for Packaging and Processing Technologies, awarded nearly $200,000 in scholarships to students pursuing careers in the packaging and processing industry. Each year, the PMMI Foundation provides academic scholarships to students studying packaging, food processing, and engineering to underscore its commitment to the future of the packaging and processing industry.
Truck leasing and fleet management services provider Fleet Advantage hosted its “Kids Around the Corner Foundation” back-to-school backpack drive in July. During the event, company associates assembled 200 backpacks filled with essential school supplies for high school-age students. The backpacks were then delivered to Henderson Behavioral Health’s Youth & Family Services location in Tamarac, Florida.
For the past seven years, third-party logistics service specialist ODW Logistics has provided logistics support for the Pelotonia Ride Weekend, a campaign to raise funds for cancer research at The Ohio State University’s Comprehensive Cancer Center–Arthur G. James Cancer Hospital and Richard J. Solove Research Institute. As in the past, ODW provided inventory management services and transportation for the riders’ bicycles at this year’s event. In all, some 7,000 riders and 3,000 volunteers participated in the ride weekend.
After years in the military, service members and their spouses can find the transition to civilian life difficult. For many, a valuable support on that journey is the U.S. Department of Defense (DOD) SkillBridge program. During their final 180 days of service, participants in the program are connected with companies that provide them with civilian work experience and training. There is no cost to those companies while the service member continues receiving military compensation and benefits.
Both sides benefit from the program. “We’re proud to work with SkillBridge to give back to our military veterans for the bravery and sacrifices they’ve made for all of us,” Troy Pederson, director of training and development at LiftOne, a Hyster-Yale dealer and established SkillBridge employer, said in a release. “In the last year, we’ve helped 10 SkillBridge interns transition from military to civilian life, and the value and positive impact of the program can’t be overstated. At LiftOne, we’ve gained so much from the experience and diverse mix of technical and leadership skills of our SkillBridge candidates.”