Large software vendors that once cared only about reeling in the big ones are discovering something the smaller WMS vendors have known all along: There's good fishing to be had among the small and medium-sized companies too.
When the phone rang in Margaret Adat's suburban Toronto office on a recent afternoon, she was startled to find a sales rep from the world's largest software company on the line. Adat works for Gentec International, a Markham, Ontario, company that distributes photographic and electronic accessories. Her company's solidly on the growth track (its sales have quadrupled since its founding in 1990), but it's hardly a corporate heavyweight. Yet here was SAP, purveyor of supply chain software to the likes of Colgate-Palmolive and Kraft Foods, inquiring whether it could interest her in a new warehouse management system.
Until recently, warehouse management systems (WMS) were strictly for the big guys. If you didn't have a million bucks to spare (not to mention a battalion of eager IT people to program and maintain your system), you could only dream about a system of your own. Software makers designed their systems with big fish in mind; the little guys were on their own.
But years of fishing have depleted the stocks of big fish. Facing a future of revenues limited to maintenance and upgrades, WMS vendors have turned their attention to a market segment they had long overlooked—small and medium-sized manufacturers, wholesalers and retailers. Many began to market WMS systems scaled down for the smaller fry. And in the process, industry powerhouses like Manhattan Associates (which reported $196.8 million in 2003 revenues) and even billion-dollar SAP discovered what the smaller vendors like HighJump, Radio Beacon, Yantra and Red Prairie had known all along: There's good fishing to be had among small and medium sized companies.
Meanwhile, there's simply more demand from small and medium-sized customers. Business has changed for even the tiniest company if it ships products to very large customers, the Wal-Marts, Targets and Albertsons of the world. Big retailers now demand that suppliers—whatever their size—comply with detailed labeling, packing and shipping requirements or risk being hit with costly charge-backs or even losing the business. "The smaller companies are being forced to compete on the same field of play as the larger companies," says Bobby Collins, vice president of mid-market at Atlanta-based Manhattan Associates. "Even someone shipping 50 boxes a week has to have the right labels on them, or he gets a bill," agrees Dale Jeffries, president of Radio Beacon, a small WMS vendor based in Toronto. "Five years ago, he would have thrown people at the problem," Jeffries adds. "Now, he can get a WMS."
Life support
That's good news indeed, because throwing people at warehouse problems is no longer an option for many mid-sized players. Up until five years ago, Roger Wadsworth of Restaurant Equippers Inc. dealt with surging demand by adding people to get the orders out. But eventually he ran out of room. As staffers struggled to keep operations afloat in an overcrowded facility, accuracy and efficiency plummeted. "We had an order error rate of 7 percent, which was not tolerable," says Wadsworth, who is general manager of the 100-employee company, which distributes everything from salt shakers to freezer chests. "So we had to make [order pickers] work smarter and more efficiently." That meant venturing into scary waters to search for a WMS. And not just any WMS—Wadsworth needed one that could consolidate a shipment consisting of three forks and an eight-burner range but not cost an arm and a leg.
A few days at a trade show netted Wadsworth three prospects, all small vendors that specialized in small and medium-sized customers. But he held off making a decision until he and his team could personally interview each vendor's support people. Without the luxury of an internal IT staff, Restaurant Equippers must rely on the vendor to solve integration and other issues, he explains. "We live and die by that support."
As Wadsworth had foreseen, the interviews helped narrow the field. After one meeting, he recalls asking a colleague: "Was there anyone in that room who you'd want to pick up the phone if you called for support?" "No!" replied the colleague without hesitation. Wadsworth crossed that vendor off the list.
Wadsworth's interviews with the support people at HighJump Software, by contrast, went swimmingly. He ended up buying the Warehouse Advantage system from the Eden Prairie, Minn.-based vendor now owned by 3M (HighJump had $31 million in revenues in 2003, according to Hoovers Inc.). It was the company's support staff that sealed the deal, he admits. "The reason we bought HighJump," he explains, "was not the bells and whistles—although they had what we wanted without a lot of customization—but [that] we were more confident with the people we were talking with."
Beta fish?
Wadsworth is not alone in his insistence on high-quality tech support. When Margaret Adat of Gentec International began searching for a WMS 10 years ago, she confined her search to companies within reach of her Toronto-area office to ensure she could get help quickly if needed. At the time, the company had just added low-value cables and connectors to its line of photographic accessories, which meant it was on a drive to streamline its picking operations. "We had to be very efficient because it takes the same amount of effort to pick a $1.95 cable as it does to pick a $500 lens," she explains.
There was just one problem: At that time, nobody had figured out how to make a WMS work for a small outfit. But Adat, who is Gentec's chief financial officer and executive vice president, was not to be deterred in her quest. She found a local company, Radio Beacon, and agreed to become a beta tester of its new system. Adat figured she didn't have much to lose: Radio Beacon's system didn't require full integration with Gentec's enterprise resource planning (ERP) system, which meant she could drop them fairly easily if things didn't work out.
That Adat is still using Radio Beacon's system 10 years later is testimony to its success. Of course, things have changed a bit in a decade's time. Although in the early days the vendor's proximity to its customers was important, for example, today Radio Beacon performs upgrades and maintenance remotely, via the Internet, Adat says. "Now, just about the only time I see them come in is when they're demonstrating the software to someone else."
Though she may not see much of her vendor, Adat remains happy with her choice. "It was reasonably priced for what we were getting," she says. "And the payback came pretty quickly."
In the years following its pilot with Gentec, Radio Beacon steadily built up its market share among small and medium- sized companies by tying its services to widely used distribution and accounting software packages. Integrating its software with programs like Microsoft Business Solutions 'Great Plains, Solomon, Navision and Axapta systems has allowed it to provide high-end functionality scaled down to a reasonable price. But recently it went one better: rather than requiring small customers to buy its full WMS package, the company has broken the various functions into modules that clients can buy separately. "Before, if they wanted dessert, they had to buy the whole meal," says Jeffries. "Now they can skip the entrée." Not surprisingly, that's proved a big draw for the small and the budget conscious. Today, the average client for Radio Beacon manages a 100,000-square-foot warehouse operated by 10 people, Jeffries says. "That's our sweet spot."
The one that got away
That's not to imply that the smaller software vendors concentrate solely on the smaller customers, however. HighJump, for one, has landed some very big fish. Today it serves not just Restaurant Equippers, but customers like Circuit City and Verizon. Radio Beacon has contracts with the U.S. Social Security Administration and the U.S. Marines. Does Wadsworth worry that smaller companies like his will be forced to take a back seat to these larger customers? Not at all. Though he admits that he'll never need 1.75 million square feet of warehouse space like some of HighJump's clients ("We could sell every piece of restaurant equipment needed in the country and wouldn't need that [much] space"),Wadsworth says he likes having the assurance that his system can be scaled up as his business grows.
But just as the smaller vendors have been out casting for big fish, many big vendors have been out angling for smaller fry. Bobby Collins at Manhattan Associates says Manhattan always has an eye out for small customers, not least because they often become large customers—he cites long-time customer Patagonia Inc., the Ventura, Calif., outdoor clothing company whose 2002 revenues topped $220 million, as a case in point. "Some of our largest clients today started as small," Collins says.
But not all of the smaller fish can be lured away by the big guys.When SAP called Adat in hopes of interesting her in a new WMS, she didn't bite. "Frankly, it would take a lot for me to leave Radio Beacon," she says. Looks like SAP will have to write Gentec off as the little one that got away.
tips for swimming with the sharks
Roger Wadsworth emerged from his latest venture into the scary WMS waters triumphant. His choice, HighJump's warehousing management system, has proved an excellent fit with his operation. But Wadsworth, who's been involved in choosing and programming supply chain management systems since the '60s (first at discounter Gold Circle Stores, a division of Federated, and later at Madison's of Columbus, Ohio), says he's had his share of bad experiences. To help other small and medium-sized companies looking for their first WMS avoid some common mistakes, Wadsworth offers this advice:
Insist on meeting the potential vendor's support staff. There's no substitute for a face-to-face interview with the people who will provide the technical support. The installation's success depends on these people, he warns; make sure you can work with them.
Arrange for a tour. The only way to know what you're getting is to actually see the system in action. Wadsworth, who regularly shepherds potential HighJump customers through his facility, strongly recommends that potential buyers tour another customer's site.
Scrutinize the vendor's financials. Why risk getting stuck with an orphaned system a few years down the road? Look for a vendor that's likely to be around for the long term. Wadsworth knows of a company that skimped on the background checks and bought software from a vendor that subsequently went under. "Now they're stuck with a system with no support," he says, "and they can't upgrade it for something like RFID."
Make sure you're quoted the full price up front. "You don't want to get into a situation where you're quoted a price but, to get everything done, they start adding on and adding on," Wadsworth cautions. "Of course [cost is] important to everybody, but it's more important for small companies [to avoid] those budget surprises. [You don't want] to get into a situation where you've got $100,000 invested already and you can't pull the plug on it."
The consulting firm Accenture has acquired Staufen AG, a German management consulting firm, saying the move will expand Accenture’s capabilities to drive operational excellence and competitiveness in manufacturing and supply chains.
Specifically, adding Staufen will help Accenture serve clients in discrete manufacturing industries including automotive, aerospace and defense, industrial goods, and medical equipment.
According to Accenture it made the deal because manufacturers are under pressure to mitigate supply chain disruptions, geopolitical tensions, and fluctuating tariffs while staying abreast of rapid technological advances. To meet those needs, Staufen brings expertise in helping clients optimize their entire value chains, drive value with digital manufacturing initiatives, and improve overall businesses performance.
Staufen’s service portfolio includes solutions for Industry 4.0, supply chain management, and organizational change as well as data-driven tools, continuous improvement techniques, and lean management principles. Its approach enhances clients’ product design, shopfloor processes, time to market, and sustainability efforts, reducing costs, eliminating inefficiencies, and optimizing production capacity, the company said.
“Manufacturers must continuously improve their entire value chains to stay competitive,” Matthias Hégelé, Accenture’s supply chain and operations lead for Germany, Austria, and Switzerland, said in a release.
“The acquisition of Staufen aligns with our strategy to reinvent supply chains and manufacturing for clients. We will combine Staufen’s proven expertise in operational excellence and value chain transformation with our capabilities in digital technologies, such as AI, generative AI, digital twins and supply chain and manufacturing software platforms, to help clients transform their core value chains, improving efficiency and productivity, supporting sustainable practices, and building resilient, autonomous systems,” Hégelé said.
Part of the reason for that situation is that companies can’t adjust to tariffs overnight by finding new suppliers. “Supply chains are complex. Retailers continue to engage in diversification efforts. Unfortunately, it takes significant time to move supply chains, even if you can find available capacity,” NRF Vice President for Supply Chain and Customs Policy Jonathan Gold said in a release.
“While we support the need to address the fentanyl crisis at our borders, new tariffs on China and other countries will mean higher prices for American families,” Gold said. “Retailers have engaged in mitigation strategies to minimize the potential impact of tariffs, including frontloading of some products, but that can lead to increased challenges because of added warehousing and related costs. We hope to resolve our outstanding border security issues as quickly as possible because there will be a significant impact on the economy if increased tariffs are maintained and expanded.”
Hackett Associates Founder Ben Hackett said tariffs on Canada and Mexico would initially have minimal impact at ports because most imports from either country move by truck, rail or pipeline. In the long term, tariffs on goods that receive final manufacturing in Canada or Mexico but originate elsewhere could prompt an increase in direct maritime imports to the U.S. In the meantime, port cargo “could be badly hit” if tariffs on overseas Asian and European nations increase prices and prompt consumers to buy less, he said.
“At this stage, the situation is fluid, and it’s too early to know if the tariffs will be implemented, removed or further delayed,” Hackett said. “As such, our view of North American imports has not changed significantly for the next six months.”
U.S. ports covered by Global Port Tracker handled 2.14 million twenty-foot equivalent units (TEUs) in December, although the Port of New York and New Jersey and the Port of Miami have yet to report final data. That was down 0.9% from November but up 14.4% year over year, and would be the busiest December on record. For the year, December brought 2024 to a total of 25.5 million TEU, up 14.8% from 2023 and the highest level since 2021’s record of 25.8 million TEU during the pandemic.
Global Port Tracker provides historical data and forecasts for the U.S. ports of Los Angeles/Long Beach, Oakland, Seattle and Tacoma on the West Coast; New York/New Jersey, Port of Virginia, Charleston, Savannah, Port Everglades, Miami and Jacksonville on the East Coast, and Houston on the Gulf Coast.
Having reported on the supply chain world for some 25 years, I've seen technologies come and go. Many were once touted as the best thing since sliced bread but either failed to live up to the hype or else had to simmer a few years before they caught on.
Remember the hoopla surrounding dot-com retail? In the late 1990s, we were told that stores as we knew them would eventually go away, to be totally replaced by online shopping. The ease and convenience of e-commerce made that a reasonable expectation. But in March 2000, the bubble burst, and a host of online retailers closed their virtual doors forever. Of course, online shopping is still very much with us, and its share of total retail sales is growing by the year. Maybe we'll get to that retail seventh heaven someday, but it's taking much longer than originally predicted.
Then there's RFID (radio-frequency identification). These small electronic tags were going to replace barcodes largely because of the vast amount of data they can hold and their capacity to update information.
In 2003, Walmart famously demanded that its top 100 suppliers affix RFID tags to all pallets and cases shipped to its DCs. We figured that if Walmart had gone all in on RFID, the rest of the industry would automatically follow. Well, not so fast. It's true that after years of stutter-step progress, Walmart today is more heavily invested in RFID than ever. But in the rest of the world, the humble barcode is still king.
A more recently hyped technology is blockchain. It was actually conceived back in 1982 but remained just a concept until 2008, when a person (or persons) using the name "Satoshi Nakamoto" created an actual blockchain to serve as the public distributed ledger for cryptocurrency transactions. Blockchain was expected to revolutionize the way supply chain partners do business. But it, too, has been a bit slow to take off, and it's still unclear how the blockchain story will play out.
That brings us to the latest potentially game-changing technology: artificial intelligence (AI). In some ways, AI is really just data analytics on steroids. Supply chains have relied on data analytics for decades—the difference now is the promise of greater accuracy and better simulations. Will it ultimately change everything we do in supply chain management? Maybe. But it may take a while. A November report from workplace tools developer Slack showed that AI adoption rates among U.S. workers had slowed in the last quarter, while a recent analysis of open supply chain jobs by software integration specialist Cleo found that only 2% of open jobs required AI skills.
So is AI just another fad or a truly transformative technology? It appears we'll need a few good use cases before we can make that call.
Economic activity in the logistics industry expanded in January, growing at its fastest clip in more than two years, according to the latest Logistics Managers’ Index (LMI) report, released this week.
The LMI jumped nearly five points from December to a reading of 62, reflecting continued steady growth in the U.S. economy along with faster-than-expected inventory growth across the sector as retailers, wholesalers, and manufacturers attempted to manage the uncertainty of tariffs and a changing regulatory environment. The January reading represented the fastest rate of expansion since June 2022, the LMI researchers said.
An LMI reading above 50 indicates growth across warehousing and transportation markets, and a reading below 50 indicates contraction. The LMI has remained in the mid- to high 50s range for most of the past year, indicating moderate, consistent growth in logistics markets.
Inventory levels rose 8.5 points from December, driven by downstream retailers stocking up ahead of the Trump administration’s potential tariffs on imports from Mexico, Canada, and China. Those increases led to higher costs throughout the industry: inventory costs, warehousing prices, and transportation prices all expanded to readings above 70, indicating strong growth. This occurred alongside slowing growth in warehousing and transportation capacity, suggesting that prices are up due to demand rather than other factors, such as inflation, according to the LMI researchers.
The LMI is a monthly survey of logistics managers from across the country. It tracks industry growth overall and across eight areas: inventory levels and costs; warehousing capacity, utilization, and prices; and transportation capacity, utilization, and prices. The report is released monthly by researchers from Arizona State University, Colorado State University, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rutgers University, and the University of Nevada, Reno, in conjunction with the Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals (CSCMP).
As commodities go, furniture presents its share of manufacturing and distribution challenges. For one thing, it's bulky. Second, its main components—wood and cloth—are easily damaged in transit. Third, much of it is manufactured overseas, making for some very long supply chains with all the associated risks. And finally, completed pieces can sit on the showroom floor for weeks or months, tying up inventory dollars and valuable retail space.
In other words, the furniture market is ripe for disruption. And John "Jay" Rogers wants to be the catalyst. In 2022, he cofounded a company that takes a whole new approach to furniture manufacturing—one that leverages the power of 3D printing and robotics. Rogers serves as CEO of that company, Haddy, which essentially aims to transform how furniture—and all elements of the "built environment"—are designed, manufactured, distributed, and, ultimately, recycled.
Rogers graduated from Princeton University and went to work for a medical device startup in China before moving to a hedge fund company, where he became a Chartered Financial Analyst (CFA). After that, he joined the U.S. Marine Corps, serving eight years in the infantry. Following two combat tours, he earned an MBA from the Harvard Business School and became a consultant for McKinsey & Co.
During this time, he founded Local Motors, a next-generation vehicle manufacturer that launched the world's first 3D-printed car, the Strati, in 2014. In 2021, he brought the technology to the furniture industry to launch Haddy. The father of four boys, Rogers is also a director of the RBR Foundation, a philanthropic organization focused on education and health care.
Rogers spoke recently with DC Velocity Group Editorial Director David Maloney on an episode of the "Logistics Matters" podcast.
Q: Could you tell us about Haddy and how this unique company came to be?
A: Absolutely. We have believed in the future of distributed digital manufacturing for a long time. The world has gone from being heavily globalized to one where lengthy supply chains are a liability—thanks to factors like the growing risk of terrorist attacks and the threat of tariffs. At the same time, there are more capabilities to produce things locally. Haddy is an outgrowth of those general trends.
Adoption of the technologies used in 3D printing has been decidedly uneven, although we do hear about applications like tissue bioprinting and food printing as well as the printing of trays for dental aligners. At Haddy, we saw an opportunity to take advantage of large-scale structural printing to approach the furniture and furnishings industry. The technology and software that make this possible are already here.
Q: Furniture is a very mature market. Why did you see this as a market that was ripe for disruption?
A:The furniture market has actually been disrupted many times in the last 200 years. The manufacturing of furniture for U.S. consumption originally took place in England. It then moved to Boston and from there to New Amsterdam, the Midwest, and North Carolina. Eventually, it went to Taiwan, then China, and now Vietnam, Indonesia, and Thailand. And each of those moves brought some type of disruption.
Other disruptions have been based on design. You can look at things like the advent of glue-laminated wood with Herman Miller, MillerKnoll, and the Eames [furniture design and manufacturing] movement. And you can look at changes in the way manufacturing is powered—the move from manual operations to machine-driven operations powered by steam and electricity. So the furniture industry has been continuously disrupted, sometimes by labor markets and sometimes by machines and methods.
What's happening now is that we're seeing changes in the way that labor is applied in furniture manufacturing. Furniture has traditionally been put together by human hands. But today, we have an opportunity to reassign those hands to processes that take place around the edges of furniture production. The hands are now directing robotics through programming and design; they're not actually making the furniture.
And so, we see this mature market as being one that's been continuously disrupted during the last 200 years. And this disruption now has a lot to do with changing the way that labor interacts with the making of furniture.
Q: How do your 3D printers actually create the furniture?
A:All 3D printing is not the same. The 3D printers we use are so-called "hybrid" systems. When we say hybrid, what we mean is that they're not just printers—they are holders, printers, polishers, and cutters, and they also do milling and things like that. We measure things and then print things, which is the additive portion. Then we can do subtractive and polishing work—re-measuring, moving, and printing parts again. And so, these hybrid systems are the actual makers of the furniture.
Q: What types of products are you making?
A: We've started with hardline or case goods, as they're sometimes known, for both residential and commercial use—cabinets, wall bookshelves, freestanding bookshelves, tables, rigid chairs, planters, and the like. Basically, we've been concentrating on products that don't have upholstery.
It's not that upholstery isn't necessary in furniture, as it is used in many pieces. But right now, we have found that digital furniture manufacturing becomes analog again when you have to factor in the sewing process. And so, to move quickly and fully leverage the advantages of digital manufacturing, we're sticking to the hardline groups, except for a couple of pieces that we have debuted that have 3D-printed cushions, which are super cool.
Q: Of course, 3D printers create objects in layers. What types of materials are you running through your 3D printers to create this furniture?
A: We use recycled materials, primarily polymer composites—a bio-compostable polymer or a synthetic polymer. We look for either recycled or bio-compostable [materials], which we then reinforce with fibers and fillers, and that's what makes them composites. To create the bio-compostables, we marry them with bio-fibers, such as hemp or bamboo. For synthetic materials, we marry them with things like glass or carbon fibers.
Q: Does producing goods via 3D printing allow you to customize products easily?
A: Absolutely. The real problem in the furniture and furnishings industries is that when you tool up to make something with a jig, a fixture, or a mold, you tend to be less creative because you now feel you have to make and sell a lot of that item to justify the investment.
One of the great promises of 3D printing is that it doesn't have a mold and doesn't require tooling. It exists in the digital realm before it becomes physical, and so customization is part and parcel of the process.
I would also add that people aren't necessarily looking for one-off furniture. Just because we can customize doesn't mean we're telling customers that once we've delivered a product, we break the digital mold, so to speak. We still feel that people like styles and trends created by designers, but the customization really allows enterprise clients—like businesses, retailers, and architects—to think more freely.
Customization is most useful in allowing people to "iterate" quickly. Our designers can do something digitally first without having to build a tool, which frees them to be more creative. Plus, because our material is fully recyclable, if we print something for the first time and find it doesn't work, we can just recycle it. So there's really no penalty for a failed first printing—in fact, those failures bring their own rewards in the form of lessons we can apply in future digital and physical iterations.
Q: You currently produce your furniture in an automated microfactory in Florida, with plans to set up several more. Could you talk a little about what your microfactory looks like and how you distribute the finished goods?
A: Our microfactory is a 30,000-square-foot box that mainly contains the robots that make our furniture along with shipping docks. But we don't intend for our microfactories to be storage warehouses and trans-shipment facilities like the kind you'd typically see in the furniture industry—all of the trappings of a global supply chain. Instead, a microfactory is meant to be a site where you print the product, put it on a dock, and then ship it out. So a microfactory is essentially an enabler of regional manufacturing and distribution.
Q: Do you manufacture your products on a print-to-order basis as opposed to a print-to-stock model?
A: No. We may someday get to the point where we receive an order digitally, print it, and then send it out on a truck the next day. But right now, we aren't set up to do a mini-delivery to one customer out of a microfactory.
We are an enterprise company that partners with architects, designers, builders, and retailers, who then distribute our furnishings to their customers. We are not trying to go direct-to-consumer at this stage. It's not the way a microfactory is set up to distribute goods.
Q: You've mentioned your company's use of recycled materials. Could you talk a little bit about other ways you're looking to reduce waste and help support a circular economy?
A: Yes. Sustainability and a circular economy are really something that you have to plan for. In our case, our plans call for moving toward a distributed digital manufacturing model, where we establish microfactories in various regions around the world to serve customers within a 10-hour driving radius of the factory. That is a pretty large area, so we could cover the United States with just four or five microfactories.
That also means that we can credibly build our recycling network as part of our microfactory setup. As I mentioned, we use recycled polymer stock in our production, so we're keeping that material out of a landfill. And then we tell our enterprise customers that while the furniture they're buying is extremely durable, when they're ready to run a special and offer customers a credit for turning in their used furniture, we'll buy back the material. Buying back that material actually reduces our costs because it's already been composited and created and recaptured. So our microfactory network is well designed for circularity in concert with our enterprise customers.