A firm delivery date isn't enough anymore. Today's customers also want their orders delivered at a specified time. Here are 10 tips for meeting their demands without breaking the bank.
Martha Spizziri has been a writer and editor for more than 30 years. She spent 11 years at Logistics Management and was web editor at Modern Materials Handling magazine for five years, starting with the website's launch in 1996. She has long experience in developing and managing Web-based products.
It's every distribution manager's nightmare: A man escorting an urgent international shipment boards a FedEx plane on Christmas Eve. Somewhere over the Pacific, the plane crashes, and the packages are delivered late. Four years late.
The story that unfolds around Tom Hanks' character in "Cast Away" may be an extreme example of a time-definite delivery gone wrong. And it is only a movie. But deliveries get snarled in real life too. Most of the time, the holdups are not the result of plane crashes or hurricanes (though Ted Scherck, president of the Atlanta-based consulting firm The Colography Group, says you can count on one major supply chain disrup tion a year). Instead, they arise from more mundane— and more preventable—causes, like paperwork errors, miscommunication and simple lack of follow-through.
Those minor errors can have major repercussions. For one, there's the risk of angering customers. The appeal of time-definite service lies in its predictability—the promise of delivery at a specified time or within a specific time window. (Though often confused with express service, time-definite service may also include deferred service.) A customer that has lined up a receiving crew for Thursday is bound to be unhappy if the shipment doesn't show up until Friday. For another, there's the risk of financial penalties. These might be fines or detention charges levied against shippers for unnecessary holdups or delays. They can also include overspending by shippers who make poor service choices (for example, using overnight service for a non-urgent shipment).
The good news is that most of the more common mistakes are also easily avoided—in most cases, it just takes some effort and a little common sense. Here are some tips:
1. Avoid overbuying. Paying for overnight service when you only need second-day seems an obvious waste of money. Yet shippers across the country continue to use premium service as a sort of default option. "A lot of premium freight goes premium less because it needed to be expedited than because someone didn't have the freight decision rules to make the right mode and carrier selection," says Randy Garber, a vice president at the consulting firm A.T. Kearney.
Determining the right mode and carrier starts with some basic information gathering, says Jon Petticrew of ODW Logistics Inc. in Columbus, Ohio. "I always want to know what the service requirement is," says Petticrew, who is the company's vice president of operations. At a minimum, that includes the shipment's size, its weight, its origin and destination, and when it's needed.
On that last point, it's worthwhile asking whether there's some flexibility in the delivery time. If there is, the carrier may be able to save you a lot of money, says Sean O'Neil, director of time-critical services for trucker Averitt Express. "We might say 'We can get it there at noon for $2,000, but if you can make it 5: 00, I can knock it down to $1,200.'"
For similar reasons, it's also worth checking to see if there's some leeway in the choice of equipment. Jeff Curry, vice president of corporate development for expedited trucking company Express-1 Inc. in Buchanan, Mich., says one of the most common errors he sees is shippers requesting a dock-high truck when the freight might easily have been hauled in a smaller, less costly truck.
2. Avoid underbuying. Many companies don't realize it, but underbuying—that is, settling for a lower service level than you actually need—can be just as costly as overbuying. Though shippers are often reluctant to use premium-priced time-critical service, it could actually save them money. Before you rule out time-critical service, says Phil Corwin, director of marketing for UPS Supply Chain Solutions, ask yourself this question: "What are the penalties to the customer—the one who's actually manifesting the shipment and the final one?" When you add up the penalties, he says, you may find they far outweigh the premium service's added cost. Corwin cites the example of an automaker that had received several truckloads of floormat fabric that proved to be substandard. For that automaker, he says, chartering an aircraft to deliver new materials proved cheaper than shutting down the production line.
Shippers are particularly likely to confront these kinds of dilemmas during peak shipping season, adds Chuck DeLutis, vice president of new business development and special services for Roadway Express Inc. That's when they're liable to run into delays caused by port congestion or capacity shortages, he explains, leaving them to weigh the cost of premium transportation against the risks of not having a hot-selling item in stores on time. "It's important that customers understand the tradeoffs," he says, "as well as the impact of those tradeoffs."
3. Keep an open mind when choosing a mode. A few decades ago, decisions involving time-sensitive freight were simple. If it was urgent, you used air. If it wasn't, you went with a truck.
But the old rules don't always apply today. Take expedited shipments, for example. "With the great improvements in LTL and the faster transit times, you don't always need [air freight]," says Petticrew of ODW Logistics. Over the years, carriers have been extending their next-day delivery areas, he explains. "It used to be 300, 400, 500 miles," he says. "Now it's 600 or 700 miles in some cases."
Nor can you safely assume that trucking is the cheaper way to go. There are times when air service beats truck on price, says Tim Hindes, director of ground expedited services for forwarder Eagle Global Logistics (EGL). Hindes explains that with a smaller shipment of, say, 100 pounds, sending the freight on the next flight out could be more economical than shipping ground expedited.
4. Resist the temptation to estimate. "Quite often a shipper won't take the time to get the exact dimensions [of the freight]," observes Curry of Express-1. "They'll round them or guess, and that can end up costing them money." There are a couple of reasons for that, he says. "They could get the wrong size truck—they'd be charged more for a larger truck. Or maybe [the carrier will] send in a truck that's too small and they'll be unable to [take] the shipment."
5. Pay attention to packaging. When you go to determine a load's dimensions, don't forget to take packaging into account—particularly if the shipment is going by air. Many airlines have size restrictions, warns Frank Perri, executive vice president at Pilot Airfreight. If you load a shipment on a 4- by 4- by 4-foot standard skid, for example, it probably won't fit in a narrow-body passenger plane, leaving all-cargo service as your only option. Cargo-only airlines use wide-body aircraft, so size won't be a problem, but you can expect a much higher bill. "[A shipment will go for] about a third the cost if it can move on a commercial airline vs. cargo-only," Perri explains. These restrictions apply primarily to flights in the continental United States, he notes. Most overseas flights are on widebody planes—although that's starting to change.
6. Coordinate with the people on the receiving end. It's not enough to get a time-definite shipment out the door on schedule; you also have to confirm the delivery arrangements with the people on the other end. Yet many times, shippers fail to follow through with this simple task. Curry of Express-1 says he sees it all the time: "[The shipper] hasn't really checked on the other end of the shipment— their address, when they're open, when they're closed, when they're really ready for the freight." That's a risky practice, he says. Sooner or later, something goes wrong, the trucker gets delayed and the shipper is hit with detention charges.
Even something as simple as obtaining the exact dock and gate number in advance can go a long way toward cutting down on delays, Curry adds. "Sometimes with larger plants there are multiple gates and even multiple buildings within the same town," he explains. "It's real important to get that truck exactly where it's going or you may get additional stop-off charges of $50 to $100 per stop."
Shippers should also be aware that customers occasionally drop the ball when it comes to notifying their own warehouses of an incoming shipment. "There continues to be a disconnect between the buyer, who might have a certain delivery requirement, and the warehouse—when it has slots available," says Sean Monahan, a vice president at A.T. Kearney. The customer might want the shipment there on Tuesday afternoon, but then when the shipper calls the warehouse, the warehouse will say "The first appointment is Wednesday morning." So the carrier will arrive on time for the appointment, but it's still late as far as the customer is concerned. "A lot of companies are wrestling with how they can close that gap," he says.
7. Get all the facts when you negotiate rates. After you've agreed on a per-mile rate, ask the carrier how it calculates mileage. If you don't, you could be in for a nasty surprise when you receive the final bill. "We get a lot of shippers that get excited about receiving what they think is a low rate, but … the carrier's mileage platform [software] may calculate a higher number of miles," explains Express1's Curry. Mileage platforms are updated constantly as roads are added, closed and renovated, so if the software's not up to date, it could be generating unnecessarily long routes.
8. Avoid squeezing carriers on price. Soaring fuel, insurance and equipment costs have taken a toll on truckers in recent years. At the same time, rampant industry consolidation has left trucks in short supply. In a climate where the truckers have the upper hand, shippers' attempts to drive a hard bargain could backfire. If you're only willing to pay $1.25 a mile and someone else is paying $2 a mile, warns Monahan, "your driver might not show up for your load."
9. Check your shipping documents; then check them again. Errors on shipping documents almost guarantee delays. To avoid costly holdups, prepare the shipment's paperwork in advance and make sure it's complete and accurate (particularly for international shipments and shipments for which you can't risk even an hour's delay). If there are several different documents, make sure the data are consistent. "We see a lot of problems with incorrect paperwork or [documents] that contradict each other— say, with different product codes," says Corwin of UPS Supply Chain Solutions.
10. Be open with your carriers. When it comes to communicating with carriers, there's no such thing as too much information. The more details about a shipper's business a carrier can get, the better it can serve that customer, says Pilot Airfreight's Perri. "It's always helpful for us to see how they package their materials [and find out] where they'll be picked up, what time things will be ready for pickup, and what time they'll call in [to notify us] that they're ready for pickup." Any reports or spreadsheets with historical data the shipper can provide will be helpful as well, he adds.
Perri notes that communications among the various players in the airfreight industry have improved in recent years. He credits the new security regulations, which have made collaboration between shippers and forwarders a necessity. "One of the nicest things that has come about is that shippers are working with us much more closely than they have in the past on things like packaging," notes Perri. "[Shippers have] a better understanding … of some of the challenges we face … [and] how to reduce costs in the supply chain and improve service at the same time." And that's the kind of understanding that can bring about a moviestyle happy ending for any shipment.
Editor's Note: Other sources who contributed to the development of this story, but were not mentioned in the text, include Chris Monica, Eagle Global Logistics; Virginia Albanese, FedEx Custom Critical; Steve Fisher, Kendall Jackson Wine Estates; Chris Caplice, Massachusetts Institute of Technology; Peter Butler, Sky West; Richard Murphy, Murphy Warehousing; Rob Lively, Mach 1 Air Services; and Bill Villalon, APL Logistics.
The supply chain risk management firm Overhaul has landed $55 million in backing, saying the financing will fuel its advancements in artificial intelligence and support its strategic acquisition roadmap.
The equity funding round comes from the private equity firm Springcoast Partners, with follow-on participation from existing investors Edison Partners and Americo. As part of the investment, Springcoast’s Chris Dederick and Holger Staude will join Overhaul’s board of directors.
According to Austin, Texas-based Overhaul, the money comes as macroeconomic and global trade dynamics are driving consequential transformations in supply chains. That makes cargo visibility and proactive risk management essential tools as shippers manage new routes and suppliers.
“The supply chain technology space will see significant consolidation over the next 12 to 24 months,” Barry Conlon, CEO of Overhaul, said in a release. “Overhaul is well-positioned to establish itself as the ultimate integrated solution, delivering a comprehensive suite of tools for supply chain risk management, efficiency, and visibility under a single trusted platform.”
Artificial intelligence (AI) and data science were hot business topics in 2024 and will remain on the front burner in 2025, according to recent research published in AI in Action, a series of technology-focused columns in the MIT Sloan Management Review.
In Five Trends in AI and Data Science for 2025, researchers Tom Davenport and Randy Bean outline ways in which AI and our data-driven culture will continue to shape the business landscape in the coming year. The information comes from a range of recent AI-focused research projects, including the 2025 AI & Data Leadership Executive Benchmark Survey, an annual survey of data, analytics, and AI executives conducted by Bean’s educational firm, Data & AI Leadership Exchange.
The five trends range from the promise of agentic AI to the struggle over which C-suite role should oversee data and AI responsibilities. At a glance, they reveal that:
Leaders will grapple with both the promise and hype around agentic AI. Agentic AI—which handles tasks independently—is on the rise, in the form of generative AI bots that can perform some content-creation tasks. But the authors say it will be a while before such tools can handle major tasks—like make a travel reservation or conduct a banking transaction.
The time has come to measure results from generative AI experiments. The authors say very few companies are carefully measuring productivity gains from AI projects—particularly when it comes to figuring out what their knowledge-based workers are doing with the freed-up time those projects provide. Doing so is vital to profiting from AI investments.
The reality about data-driven culture sets in. The authors found that 92% of survey respondents feel that cultural and change management challenges are the primary barriers to becoming data- and AI-driven—indicating that the shift to AI is about much more than just the technology.
Unstructured data is important again. The ability to apply Generative AI tools to manage unstructured data—such as text, images, and video—is putting a renewed focus on getting all that data into shape, which takes a whole lot of human effort. As the authors explain “organizations need to pick the best examples of each document type, tag or graph the content, and get it loaded into the system.” And many companies simply aren’t there yet.
Who should run data and AI? Expect continued struggle. Should these roles be concentrated on the business or tech side of the organization? Opinions differ, and as the roles themselves continue to evolve, the authors say companies should expect to continue to wrestle with responsibilities and reporting structures.
Shippers today are praising an 11th-hour contract agreement that has averted the threat of a strike by dockworkers at East and Gulf coast ports that could have frozen container imports and exports as soon as January 16.
The agreement came late last night between the International Longshoremen’s Association (ILA) representing some 45,000 workers and the United States Maritime Alliance (USMX) that includes the operators of port facilities up and down the coast.
Details of the new agreement on those issues have not yet been made public, but in the meantime, retailers and manufacturers are heaving sighs of relief that trade flows will continue.
“Providing certainty with a new contract and avoiding further disruptions is paramount to ensure retail goods arrive in a timely manner for consumers. The agreement will also pave the way for much-needed modernization efforts, which are essential for future growth at these ports and the overall resiliency of our nation’s supply chain,” Gold said.
The next step in the process is for both sides to ratify the tentative agreement, so negotiators have agreed to keep those details private in the meantime, according to identical statements released by the ILA and the USMX. In their joint statement, the groups called the six-year deal a “win-win,” saying: “This agreement protects current ILA jobs and establishes a framework for implementing technologies that will create more jobs while modernizing East and Gulf coasts ports – making them safer and more efficient, and creating the capacity they need to keep our supply chains strong. This is a win-win agreement that creates ILA jobs, supports American consumers and businesses, and keeps the American economy the key hub of the global marketplace.”
The breakthrough hints at broader supply chain trends, which will focus on the tension between operational efficiency and workforce job protection, not just at ports but across other sectors as well, according to a statement from Judah Levine, head of research at Freightos, a freight booking and payment platform. Port automation was the major sticking point leading up to this agreement, as the USMX pushed for technologies to make ports more efficient, while the ILA opposed automation or semi-automation that could threaten jobs.
"This is a six-year détente in the tech-versus-labor tug-of-war at U.S. ports," Levine said. “Automation remains a lightning rod—and likely one we’ll see in other industries—but this deal suggests a cautious path forward."
Editor's note: This story was revised on January 9 to include additional input from the ILA, USMX, and Freightos.
Logistics industry growth slowed in December due to a seasonal wind-down of inventory and following one of the busiest holiday shopping seasons on record, according to the latest Logistics Managers’ Index (LMI) report, released this week.
The monthly LMI was 57.3 in December, down more than a percentage point from November’s reading of 58.4. Despite the slowdown, economic activity across the industry continued to expand, as an LMI reading above 50 indicates growth and a reading below 50 indicates contraction.
The LMI researchers said the monthly conditions were largely due to seasonal drawdowns in inventory levels—and the associated costs of holding them—at the retail level. The LMI’s Inventory Levels index registered 50, falling from 56.1 in November. That reduction also affected warehousing capacity, which slowed but remained in expansion mode: The LMI’s warehousing capacity index fell 7 points to a reading of 61.6.
December’s results reflect a continued trend toward more typical industry growth patterns following recent years of volatility—and they point to a successful peak holiday season as well.
“Retailers were clearly correct in their bet to stock [up] on goods ahead of the holiday season,” the LMI researchers wrote in their monthly report. “Holiday sales from November until Christmas Eve were up 3.8% year-over-year according to Mastercard. This was largely driven by a 6.7% increase in e-commerce sales, although in-person spending was up 2.9% as well.”
And those results came during a compressed peak shopping cycle.
“The increase in spending came despite the shorter holiday season due to the late Thanksgiving,” the researchers also wrote, citing National Retail Federation (NRF) estimates that U.S. shoppers spent just short of a trillion dollars in November and December, making it the busiest holiday season of all time.
The LMI is a monthly survey of logistics managers from across the country. It tracks industry growth overall and across eight areas: inventory levels and costs; warehousing capacity, utilization, and prices; and transportation capacity, utilization, and prices. The report is released monthly by researchers from Arizona State University, Colorado State University, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rutgers University, and the University of Nevada, Reno, in conjunction with the Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals (CSCMP).
As U.S. small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) face an uncertain business landscape in 2025, a substantial majority (67%) expect positive growth in the new year compared to 2024, according to a survey from DHL.
However, the survey also showed that businesses could face a rocky road to reach that goal, as they navigate a complex environment of regulatory/policy shifts and global market volatility. Both those issues were cited as top challenges by 36% of respondents, followed by staffing/talent retention (11%) and digital threats and cyber attacks (2%).
Against that backdrop, SMEs said that the biggest opportunity for growth in 2025 lies in expanding into new markets (40%), followed by economic improvements (31%) and implementing new technologies (14%).
As the U.S. prepares for a broad shift in political leadership in Washington after a contentious election, the SMEs in DHL’s survey were likely split evenly on their opinion about the impact of regulatory and policy changes. A plurality of 40% were on the fence (uncertain, still evaluating), followed by 24% who believe regulatory changes could negatively impact growth, 20% who see these changes as having a positive impact, and 16% predicting no impact on growth at all.
That uncertainty also triggered a split when respondents were asked how they planned to adjust their strategy in 2025 in response to changes in the policy or regulatory landscape. The largest portion (38%) of SMEs said they remained uncertain or still evaluating, followed by 30% who will make minor adjustments, 19% will maintain their current approach, and 13% who were willing to significantly adjust their approach.