Today's new wireless security devices can't guarantee thieves won't get their hands on your cargo. But they definitely raise the odds that you'll get your stuff back promptly.
John Johnson joined the DC Velocity team in March 2004. A veteran business journalist, John has over a dozen years of experience covering the supply chain field, including time as chief editor of Warehousing Management. In addition, he has covered the venture capital community and previously was a sports reporter covering professional and collegiate sports in the Boston area. John served as senior editor and chief editor of DC Velocity until April 2008.
You could say it was close ... but no cigars. To the thieves planning a big heist
last summer, it looked like a simple enough job. They'd move in over the weekend, break into the parked
truck carrying $50,000 worth of cigars and discreetly remove the stogies, leaving the rest of the LTL shipment intact. But their carefully laid plans went up in smoke when the cigars' owner, who was monitoring his goods from a remote location, detected tampering to the trailer and notified the FBI.
Things didn't go much better for two rings of thieves on the Eastern Seaboard last year. This past fall, a fencing ring was caught with $250,000 worth of stolen designer clothing when New Jersey State Police raided the
warehouse where they were handing off their plunder. Just months earlier, thieves loading their haul ($300,000
worth of high-end apparel) after breaking into a Windsor, Conn., warehouse were apprehended when state and
local police burst onto the scene.
In all three cases, what gave the thieves away were wireless cargo security devices—covert asset trackers
compact enough to be tucked into a pallet of laptops or carton of prescription drugs (or even an informant's pocket). In an emergency, they can be activated to
beam real-time location data from wherever they may be—on the open road, at a truck stop or even inside a building—via cellular tower triangulation and GPS (global positioning system) satellite technology. Law enforcement officials can track their whereabouts with pinpoint accuracy, significantly boosting prospects for the goods' prompt recovery.
Wireless cargo tracking systems are not new. Trucking companies have used satellite tracking to keep tabs on their fleet vehicles for years. But satellite signals cannot reach all locations, making the systems less than foolproof. The new tracking devices get around that problem by employing both cellular towers and GPS technology to transmit location data. And because the devices don't need to "see the sky" to determine location, they can operate in places that traditional GPS cannot.
The new asset trackers also have an advantage in that they're much less readily detectable than the tracking devices installed in trucks. Thieves have no way of knowing which pallets or cartons harbor the devices, and they're unlikely to spend time sifting through the packages to find them.
The technology is still in its infancy, however. It remains to be seen if wireless security solutions (also
known as location-based systems) will provide the long-
awaited breakthrough in deterring cargo theft—a problem estimated at anywhere from $10 billion to $50 billion in the United States alone. In the meantime, law enforcement officials say they're happy to have the high-tech help. "Some of the newer GPS type of tracking systems are definitely a boon to law enforcement," says special agent Steve Siegel, a spokesman for the FBI. "If you can put some kind of tracking device into a pallet of goods or in cargo containers that can be tracked from a distance, it's a definite benefit to law enforcement and a deterrent for criminals."
As Siegel sees it, the main benefit isn't so much theft prevention as asset recovery. Oftentimes, law enforcement officials don't hear about a theft until hours, days or weeks after it's occurred, forcing them to play a frustrating game of catchup. But with access to real-time location information, they can move right in. "Anytime you can recover something in a short ... time," says Siegel, "it's a benefit to law enforcement."
Spyware in a good sense
The market appears to be embracing the technology. The two major players, Bulldog Technologies of Richmond, British Columbia, and SC-integrity/KRI of Bothell, Wash., both report booming sales. In the past several months alone, Bulldog Technologies has signed contracts with pharmaceutical giant Pfizer, retailer Barnes & Noble, carrier Shadow Lines Transportation, and a Fortune 500 food manufacturer that won't discuss its plans because it believes using the covert tracking devices will give it a competitive advantage.
Bulldog Technologies' entry into the market is a system called MiniBOSS, which at 4 by 3 by 2 inches and weighing just 6 ounces, falls on the small end of the tracking device spectrum. The unit is designed to work in conjunction with the Bulldog Security Gateway, a proprietary automatic vehicle location software program that lets a user track his quarry's movement using a standard PC.
Bulldog's tracking service offers users more than disembodied geographic coordinates, however. Its application provides a link to Google Earth that lets customers see an actual satellite photograph of the tracker's exact location. The satellite photograph is overlaid onto a road map, allowing users to identify places and roads by name. Michael Olsen, Bulldog's vice president of sales, tells of a customer who pulled off the highway and called in to challenge the Bulldog staff to tell him where he was. "We located him with the MiniBOSS, and using Google Earth, we were able to tell him that he was at a truck stop, parked in the parking lot," Olsen reports. "We could actually see a picture of the trailers. Although [it was] a stored photograph and not real time, it gave us fantastic insight into the actual layout of the area."
Bulldog's competitor, SC-integrity/KRI, is also bullish on its growth prospects. The company expects business to increase exponentially in the next 24 months. It reports that its SC-tracker devices are currently in use throughout the United States with more than 30 member companies, including shippers and manufacturers, carriers, third-party logistics service providers, retailers, and law enforcement agencies. (SC-integrity/KRI refers to its customers as members because of their shared network agreements.) The company expects to triple its member base and increase the number of units deployed twelve-fold in 2006. It has even greater expectations for 2007; SC-integrity's projections call for a whopping 30-fold increase in the number of units in the field.
Both tracker makers like to point out that their devices have applications beyond just security. Bulldog, for example, notes that its tracker can perform other monitoring tasks, such as measuring temperatures for temperature-controlled deliveries.
In fact, those non-security related applications might someday eclipse security when it comes to driving sales. King Rogers, executive vice president at SC-integrity/KRI, reports that one of his company's clients, a national carrier, plans to use the trackers to help it hone its delivery time estimates. "Obviously, if the proof of concept plays out for predicting ETA times, and we think it will, the security aspect of the system becomes just an add-on feature because it pays for itself by virtue of being able to predict ETAs," says Rogers. "We are talking about an evolving technology that ... is probably going to be the hottest technology in the supply chain over the next couple of years, not only for security reasons but for supply chain management opportunities."
Of course, all this capability comes at a price. According to previously published reports, the SC-integrity systems cost about $1,500 per unit, not including a monthly fee for network airtime associated with tracking. Bulldog Technologies' tracker costs about $700. Monthly fees for the service, according to Olsen, can run up to $80 a month, depending on usage. Both companies say prices will drop as technology improves and more companies sign on. In the meantime, they note, lower insurance premiums can help offset the costs.
Not so fast
Not everyone is convinced that the covert asset tracking devices will revolutionize cargo security. Naysayers point out that criminals, too, keep up with technological advances, and are probably already at work figuring out ways to disable the trackers' signals. A motivated thief might also be able to subvert the device by breaking up a shipment into small lots.
The systems' cost may also hamper their adoption. "In the conversations I've had with clients about wireless cargo security, the products do not seem to be gaining a great deal of popularity at this point," says Barry Brandman, president of Danbee Investigations, a Midland Park, N.J., company that provides investigative, loss prevention and security consulting services to many of the top names in the logistics industry. "There still seem to be some serious reservations about cost, reliability, [and] electronic compatibility."
There may be technical difficulties as well. "Some people believe that there are still a lot of technical kinks that need to be worked out," Brandman adds, "and they haven't been able to convince their executive committees that the expense justified the gains." All that could change quickly if the manufacturers succeed in debugging the bugs, however. If they do, cargo thieves will be the first to feel the sting.
Artificial intelligence (AI) and data science were hot business topics in 2024 and will remain on the front burner in 2025, according to recent research published in AI in Action, a series of technology-focused columns in the MIT Sloan Management Review.
In Five Trends in AI and Data Science for 2025, researchers Tom Davenport and Randy Bean outline ways in which AI and our data-driven culture will continue to shape the business landscape in the coming year. The information comes from a range of recent AI-focused research projects, including the 2025 AI & Data Leadership Executive Benchmark Survey, an annual survey of data, analytics, and AI executives conducted by Bean’s educational firm, Data & AI Leadership Exchange.
The five trends range from the promise of agentic AI to the struggle over which C-suite role should oversee data and AI responsibilities. At a glance, they reveal that:
Leaders will grapple with both the promise and hype around agentic AI. Agentic AI—which handles tasks independently—is on the rise, in the form of generative AI bots that can perform some content-creation tasks. But the authors say it will be a while before such tools can handle major tasks—like make a travel reservation or conduct a banking transaction.
The time has come to measure results from generative AI experiments. The authors say very few companies are carefully measuring productivity gains from AI projects—particularly when it comes to figuring out what their knowledge-based workers are doing with the freed-up time those projects provide. Doing so is vital to profiting from AI investments.
The reality about data-driven culture sets in. The authors found that 92% of survey respondents feel that cultural and change management challenges are the primary barriers to becoming data- and AI-driven—indicating that the shift to AI is about much more than just the technology.
Unstructured data is important again. The ability to apply Generative AI tools to manage unstructured data—such as text, images, and video—is putting a renewed focus on getting all that data into shape, which takes a whole lot of human effort. As the authors explain “organizations need to pick the best examples of each document type, tag or graph the content, and get it loaded into the system.” And many companies simply aren’t there yet.
Who should run data and AI? Expect continued struggle. Should these roles be concentrated on the business or tech side of the organization? Opinions differ, and as the roles themselves continue to evolve, the authors say companies should expect to continue to wrestle with responsibilities and reporting structures.
Shippers today are praising an 11th-hour contract agreement that has averted the threat of a strike by dockworkers at East and Gulf coast ports that could have frozen container imports and exports as soon as January 16.
The agreement came late last night between the International Longshoremen’s Association (ILA) representing some 45,000 workers and the United States Maritime Alliance (USMX) that includes the operators of port facilities up and down the coast.
Details of the new agreement on those issues have not yet been made public, but in the meantime, retailers and manufacturers are heaving sighs of relief that trade flows will continue.
“Providing certainty with a new contract and avoiding further disruptions is paramount to ensure retail goods arrive in a timely manner for consumers. The agreement will also pave the way for much-needed modernization efforts, which are essential for future growth at these ports and the overall resiliency of our nation’s supply chain,” Gold said.
The next step in the process is for both sides to ratify the tentative agreement, so negotiators have agreed to keep those details private in the meantime, according to identical statements released by the ILA and the USMX. In their joint statement, the groups called the six-year deal a “win-win,” saying: “This agreement protects current ILA jobs and establishes a framework for implementing technologies that will create more jobs while modernizing East and Gulf coasts ports – making them safer and more efficient, and creating the capacity they need to keep our supply chains strong. This is a win-win agreement that creates ILA jobs, supports American consumers and businesses, and keeps the American economy the key hub of the global marketplace.”
The breakthrough hints at broader supply chain trends, which will focus on the tension between operational efficiency and workforce job protection, not just at ports but across other sectors as well, according to a statement from Judah Levine, head of research at Freightos, a freight booking and payment platform. Port automation was the major sticking point leading up to this agreement, as the USMX pushed for technologies to make ports more efficient, while the ILA opposed automation or semi-automation that could threaten jobs.
"This is a six-year détente in the tech-versus-labor tug-of-war at U.S. ports," Levine said. “Automation remains a lightning rod—and likely one we’ll see in other industries—but this deal suggests a cautious path forward."
Editor's note: This story was revised on January 9 to include additional input from the ILA, USMX, and Freightos.
Logistics industry growth slowed in December due to a seasonal wind-down of inventory and following one of the busiest holiday shopping seasons on record, according to the latest Logistics Managers’ Index (LMI) report, released this week.
The monthly LMI was 57.3 in December, down more than a percentage point from November’s reading of 58.4. Despite the slowdown, economic activity across the industry continued to expand, as an LMI reading above 50 indicates growth and a reading below 50 indicates contraction.
The LMI researchers said the monthly conditions were largely due to seasonal drawdowns in inventory levels—and the associated costs of holding them—at the retail level. The LMI’s Inventory Levels index registered 50, falling from 56.1 in November. That reduction also affected warehousing capacity, which slowed but remained in expansion mode: The LMI’s warehousing capacity index fell 7 points to a reading of 61.6.
December’s results reflect a continued trend toward more typical industry growth patterns following recent years of volatility—and they point to a successful peak holiday season as well.
“Retailers were clearly correct in their bet to stock [up] on goods ahead of the holiday season,” the LMI researchers wrote in their monthly report. “Holiday sales from November until Christmas Eve were up 3.8% year-over-year according to Mastercard. This was largely driven by a 6.7% increase in e-commerce sales, although in-person spending was up 2.9% as well.”
And those results came during a compressed peak shopping cycle.
“The increase in spending came despite the shorter holiday season due to the late Thanksgiving,” the researchers also wrote, citing National Retail Federation (NRF) estimates that U.S. shoppers spent just short of a trillion dollars in November and December, making it the busiest holiday season of all time.
The LMI is a monthly survey of logistics managers from across the country. It tracks industry growth overall and across eight areas: inventory levels and costs; warehousing capacity, utilization, and prices; and transportation capacity, utilization, and prices. The report is released monthly by researchers from Arizona State University, Colorado State University, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rutgers University, and the University of Nevada, Reno, in conjunction with the Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals (CSCMP).
The overall national industrial real estate vacancy rate edged higher in the fourth quarter, although it still remains well below pre-pandemic levels, according to an analysis by Cushman & Wakefield.
Vacancy rates shrunk during the pandemic to historically low levels as e-commerce sales—and demand for warehouse space—boomed in response to massive numbers of people working and living from home. That frantic pace is now cooling off but real estate demand remains elevated from a long-term perspective.
“We've witnessed an uptick among firms looking to lease larger buildings to support their omnichannel fulfillment strategies and maintain inventory for their e-commerce, wholesale, and retail stock. This trend is not just about space, but about efficiency and customer satisfaction,” Jason Tolliver, President, Logistics & Industrial Services, said in a release. “Meanwhile, we're also seeing a flurry of activity to support forward-deployed stock models, a strategy that keeps products closer to the market they serve and where customers order them, promising quicker deliveries and happier customers.“
The latest figures show that industrial vacancy is likely nearing its peak for this cooling cycle in the coming quarters, Cushman & Wakefield analysts said.
Compared to the third quarter, the vacancy rate climbed 20 basis points to 6.7%, but that level was still 30 basis points below the 10-year, pre-pandemic average. Likewise, overall net absorption in the fourth quarter—a term for the amount of newly developed property leased by clients—measured 36.8 million square feet, up from the 33.3 million square feet recorded in the third quarter, but down 20% on a year-over-year basis.
In step with those statistics, real estate developers slowed their plans to erect more buildings. New construction deliveries continued to decelerate for the second straight quarter. Just 85.3 million square feet of new industrial product was completed in the fourth quarter, down 8% quarter-over-quarter and 48% versus one year ago.
Likewise, only four geographic markets saw more than 20 million square feet of completions year-to-date, compared to 10 markets in 2023. Meanwhile, as construction starts remained tempered overall, the under-development pipeline has continued to thin out, dropping by 36% annually to its lowest level (290.5 million square feet) since the third quarter of 2018.
Despite the dip in demand last quarter, the market for industrial space remains relatively healthy, Cushman & Wakefield said.
“After a year of hesitancy, logistics is entering a new, sustained growth phase,” Tolliver said. “Corporate capital is being deployed to optimize supply chains, diversify networks, and minimize potential risks. What's particularly encouraging is the proactive approach of retailers, wholesalers, and 3PLs, who are not just reacting to the market, but shaping it. 2025 will be a year characterized by this bias for action.”
Under terms of the deal, Sick and Endress+Hauser will each hold 50% of a joint venture called "Endress+Hauser SICK GmbH+Co. KG," which will strengthen the development and production of analyzer and gas flow meter technologies. According to Sick, its gas flow meters make it possible to switch to low-emission and non-fossil energy sources, for example, and the process analyzers allow reliable monitoring of emissions.
As part of the partnership, the product solutions manufactured together will now be marketed by Endress+Hauser, allowing customers to use a broader product portfolio distributed from a single source via that company’s global sales centers.
Under terms of the contract between the two companies—which was signed in the summer of 2024— around 800 Sick employees located in 42 countries will transfer to Endress+Hauser, including workers in the global sales and service units of Sick’s “Cleaner Industries” division.
“This partnership is a perfect match,” Peter Selders, CEO of the Endress+Hauser Group, said in a release. “It creates new opportunities for growth and development, particularly in the sustainable transformation of the process industry. By joining forces, we offer added value to our customers. Our combined efforts will make us faster and ultimately more successful than if we acted alone. In this case, one and one equals more than two.”
According to Sick, the move means that its current customers will continue to find familiar Sick contacts available at Endress+Hauser for consulting, sales, and service of process automation solutions. The company says this approach allows it to focus on its core business of factory and logistics automation to meet global demand for automation and digitalization.
Sick says its core business has always been in factory and logistics automation, which accounts for more than 80% of sales, and this area remains unaffected by the new joint venture. In Sick’s view, automation is crucial for industrial companies to secure their productivity despite limited resources. And Sick’s sensor solutions are a critical part of industrial automation, which increases productivity through artificial intelligence and the digital networking of production and supply chains.