If reverse logistics were simply a matter of easing the pain in the retail and wholesale sectors, it would be challenge enough. But there's a lot more to reverse logistics today.
Art van Bodegraven was, among other roles, chief design officer for the DES Leadership Academy. He passed away on June 18, 2017. He will be greatly missed.
The term "reverse logistics" may be relatively new, but the basic concept is not. Even decades ago, it wasn't uncommon for distribution centers to contain a returns processing function. You could spot them right away because all the people were moving with the speed and purpose of extras in a George Romero film. They clearly weren't happy about having to deal with returns. Neither was management.
Businesses still hate the hassle of dealing with returns, but returns remain a fact of retail life. And the numbers are staggering—anywhere from 10 to 30 percent or more of merchandise is returned annually, depending on the product category. In one business, the returns rate is 100 percent. Can you guess the business? (It's tuxedo rental.)
For most people, "returns" means taking a garish tie back to a department store after Christmas, or sending the size 8 sweater that doesn't fit a size 12 body back to the catalog retailer. But it's not just apparel that gets returned. Beyond clothing, there's electronics, books and magazines, greeting cards, processed foods, auto parts, anything sold at The Home Depot, and so on.
If reverse logistics (RL) were simply a matter of easing the pain in the retail and wholesale sectors, it would be challenge enough. But there's a lot more to reverse logistics today. Besides returns, reverse logistics managers have responsibility for a host of other R-factors: Repairs and Refurbishment, Recycling, Recovery and Recalls. Let's take a closer look at them:
Repairs and Refurbishment. Some items are returned at the customer's whim. Others—electrics, electronics, auto parts and technology components, among them—are returned because they don't work. If these items, which range in value from a few dollars to more than $100,000 per unit, are repairable, they're typically sent out to be fixed and readied for resale. (Sometimes it turns out that the item wasn't broken or defective at all—in which case, it's simply repackaged and readied for resale.)
As for the disposition of these repaired/refurbished items, their fate varies. Some are resold at retail stores, others are resold through alternate (usually discount) channels, and still others are reinstalled in different operating configurations (more on that later).
Recovery. In reverse logistics, "recovery" refers to the process of turning products into their component parts or materials for reuse in other products or reintroduction into production processes. It might mean disassembly for component reuse, wire stripping for raw plastics, transforming telephone cable into granulated copper, or even isolating components and melting them down into basic elements.
Recycling. Though many of the processes are similar, "recycling" is different from "recovery" in that it's largely driven by federal, state or local regulations and mandates.
Even foreign environmental policies may play a role. Take the European Union's environmental directives, for example. Though they don't have the force of law in the United States, the rules are still having an impact on this country. Most domestic electronics manufacturers have adopted the EU standards rather than try to manage their domestic and international supply chains separately. It's worth noting that the EU's Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment (WEEE) and Restriction of Hazardous Substances (RoHS) directives make corporations responsible for end-of-lifecycle product disposition. Imagine the RL supply chain planning required to come up with effective solutions to that!
Recalls. The topic of recalls is much too complex to cover here. For now, we'll just note that more industries, companies and products than ever before have become vulnerable to recall actions. Any company that faces even the remotest chance of a recall should have a reverse logistics recall plan and should test that plan periodically—just the way you would conduct a fire drill.
Challenges in RL supply chains Unfortunately, the reverse logistics chain is not simply the outbound chain stood on its head. Along with the usual logistics challenges, reverse supply chain managers face some added complications. For example, they rarely receive much warning of RL arrivals; they're likely to end up shipping quantities of one, as opposed to more economical truckloads; and they often have to ship goods to destinations other than the manufacturing source.
On top of that, there's the challenge of designing the network: deciding where to collect the returns, where to process them, and where to redistribute from. Intake requires some planning as well. With the exception of retail giants like Sears, few companies have local outlets nationwide where they can accept returns. That's opened the door for a host of new services— like the new combinations of FedEx/Kinko's, UPS/MBE, and DHL/OfficeMax—that can reach most of the nation's population. This need may finally provide a genuine value-adding role for the U.S. Postal Service.
Once they've collected the returns, managers must decide what to do with them. It used to be a simple matter of sending them back to the factory. But times have changed. Today, deciding which disposal route to take has become a complex analytical question. And we do mean complex. First, you have to weigh the many disposition options. In addition to recovery and recycling, they include liquidation; resale in offshore or secondary markets; resale at auctions, in outlet stores, or in employee or company stores; and donation to charities. Then you have to factor in the product's age, quality, condition, style and seasonality, potential liability risks, repackaging requirements, and whether "de-kitting" will be required. Other factors may come into play as well. For example, saturation in one channel may force a product's diversion into an alternate channel.
Reverse logistics is not just a matter of getting stuff back, either. Managing the process involves a host of other tasks as well. They include returns authorization management; collection, sorting and testing; transportation and distribution; warehousing and storage; spare parts management; replacement management; warranty and service contract management; remanufacturing or refurbishment; redistribution and resale; end-of-life management; and IT management. Small wonder that a whole sub-industry of third parties specializing in reverse logistics has sprung up. They range from suppliers that offer software to companies that will take over the entire returns process, from providing customers with preprinted labels to handling final disposition of the merchandise.
Secrets of success Though it's not always easy to convince companies of this, reverse logistics can be made to work well. It is working well for those who've invested in learning how to make it work.
As for how to make it work, we've identified several keys to success. Here's what you need: dedicated (separate) management and organization; independent processing/storage facilities; strong IT support; accurate, up-to-date data; good process design and staff training; strategic context (often overlooked, but vital); and a solid dollars-andcents business case.
With these, you've got a better than fighting chance. Without them, you may never realize the potential of reverse logistics in your organization.
Editor's note: For more information, contact the Reverse Logistics Executive Council (www.rlec.com), which is a collaboration of manufacturers, retailers and academics, or the Reverse Logistics Association (www.reverselogisticstrends.com), which is a trade association of third-party service providers.
States across the Southeast woke up today to find that the immediate weather impacts from Hurricane Helene are done, but the impacts to people, businesses, and the supply chain continue to be a major headache, according to Everstream Analytics.
The primary problem is the collection of massive power outages caused by the storm’s punishing winds and rainfall, now affecting some 2 million customers across the Southeast region of the U.S.
One organization working to rush help to affected regions since the storm hit Florida’s western coast on Thursday night is the American Logistics Aid Network (ALAN). As it does after most serious storms, the group continues to marshal donated resources from supply chain service providers in order to store, stage, and deliver help where it’s needed.
Support for recovery efforts is coming from a massive injection of federal aid, since the White House declared states of emergency last week for Alabama, Florida, Georgia, North Carolina, and South Carolina. Affected states are also supporting the rush of materials to needed zones by suspending transportation requirement such as certain licensing agreements, fuel taxes, weight restrictions, and hours of service caps, ALAN said.
E-commerce activity remains robust, but a growing number of consumers are reintegrating physical stores into their shopping journeys in 2024, emphasizing the need for retailers to focus on omnichannel business strategies. That’s according to an e-commerce study from Ryder System, Inc., released this week.
Ryder surveyed more than 1,300 consumers for its 2024 E-Commerce Consumer Study and found that 61% of consumers shop in-store “because they enjoy the experience,” a 21% increase compared to results from Ryder’s 2023 survey on the same subject. The current survey also found that 35% shop in-store because they don’t want to wait for online orders in the mail (up 4% from last year), and 15% say they shop in-store to avoid package theft (up 8% from last year).
“Retail and e-commerce continue to evolve,” Jeff Wolpov, Ryder’s senior vice president of e-commerce, said in a statement announcing the survey’s findings. “The emergence of e-commerce and growth of omnichannel fulfillment, particularly over the past four years, has altered consumer expectations and behavior dramatically and will continue to do so as time and technology allow.
“This latest study demonstrates that, while consumers maintain a robust
appetite for e-commerce, they are simultaneously embracing in-person shopping, presenting an impetus for merchants to refine their omnichannel strategies.”
Other findings include:
• Apparel and cosmetics shoppers show growing attraction to buying in-store. When purchasing apparel and cosmetics, shoppers are more inclined to make purchases in a physical location than they were last year, according to Ryder. Forty-one percent of shoppers who buy cosmetics said they prefer to do so either in a brand’s physical retail location or a department/convenience store (+9%). As for apparel shoppers, 54% said they prefer to buy clothing in those same brick-and-mortar locations (+9%).
• More customers prefer returning online purchases in physical stores. Fifty-five percent of shoppers (+15%) now say they would rather return online purchases in-store–the first time since early 2020 the preference to Buy Online Return In-Store (BORIS) has outweighed returning via mail, according to the survey. Forty percent of shoppers said they often make additional purchases when picking up or returning online purchases in-store (+2%).
• Consumers are extremely reliant on mobile devices when shopping in-store. This year’s survey reveals that 77% of consumers search for items on their mobile devices while in a store, Ryder said. Sixty-nine percent said they compare prices with items in nearby stores, 58% check availability at other stores, 31% want to learn more about a product, and 17% want to see other items frequently purchased with a product they’re considering.
Ryder said the findings also underscore the importance of investing in technology solutions that allow companies to provide customers with flexible purchasing options.
“Omnichannel strength is not a fad; it is a strategic necessity for e-commerce and retail businesses to stay competitive and achieve sustainable success in 2024 and beyond,” Wolpov also said. “The findings from this year’s study underscore what we know our customers are experiencing, which is the positive impact of integrating supply chain technology solutions across their sales channels, enabling them to provide their customers with flexible, convenient options to personalize their experience and heighten customer satisfaction.”
Transportation industry veteran Anne Reinke will become president & CEO of trade group the Intermodal Association of North America (IANA) at the end of the year, stepping into the position from her previous post leading third party logistics (3PL) trade group the Transportation Intermediaries Association (TIA), both organizations said today.
Meanwhile, TIA today announced that insider Christopher Burroughs would fill Reinke’s shoes as president & CEO. Burroughs has been with TIA for 13 years, most recently as its vice president of Government Affairs for the past six years, during which time he oversaw all legislative and regulatory efforts before Congress and the federal agencies.
Before her four years leading TIA, Reinke spent two years as Deputy Assistant Secretary with the U.S. Department of Transportation and 16 years with CSX Corporation.
Two European companies are among the most recent firms to put autonomous last-mile delivery to the test with a project in Bern, Switzerland, that debuted this month.
Swiss transportation and logistics company Planzer has teamed up with fellow Swiss firm Loxo, which develops autonomous driving software solutions, for a two-year pilot project in which a Loxo-equipped, Planzer parcel delivery van will handle last-mile logistics in Bern’s city center.
The project coincides with Swiss regulations on autonomous driving that are expected to take effect next spring.
Referred to as “Planzer–Dynamic Micro-Hub w LOXO,” the project aims to address both sustainability issues and traffic congestion in urban areas.
The delivery vehicle, a Volkswagen ID. Buzz battery-electric minivan, will feature Loxo’s Level 4 Digital Driver navigation software, a highly automated solution that allows driverless operation. The van was retrofitted to include space for two swap boxes for parcel storage.
During the two-year pilot phase, Loxo’s Digital Driver will navigate a commercial vehicle several times a day from Planzer’s railway center to various logistics points in Bern's city center. There, the parcels will be reloaded onto small electric vehicles and delivered to end customers by Planzer’s parcel delivery staff.
Following the completion of the pilot phase, Planzer and Loxo will build on the program for rollout in other Swiss cities, the companies said.
The partners said the project addresses the increasing requirements of urban supply chains and aims to ensure the “scalability of their disruptive solution.” With largely emission-free delivery, it contributes to greater levels of sustainability for the city as a living space, they also said.
“The uniqueness of this project lies in the fact that it will have a direct impact on society,” Planzer’s CEO and Chairman Nils Planzer said in a statement announcing the project. “We didn't just want to integrate automated technology into existing systems, we wanted to develop a completely new concept and a new business model.”
As the hours tick down toward a “seemingly imminent” strike by East Coast and Gulf Coast dockworkers, experts are warning that the impacts of that move would mushroom well-beyond the actual strike locations, causing prevalent shipping delays, container ship congestion, port congestion on West coast ports, and stranded freight.
However, a strike now seems “nearly unavoidable,” as no bargaining sessions are scheduled prior to the September 30 contract expiration between the International Longshoremen’s Association (ILA) and the U.S. Maritime Alliance (USMX) in their negotiations over wages and automation, according to the transportation law firm Scopelitis, Garvin, Light, Hanson & Feary.
The facilities affected would include some 45,000 port workers at 36 locations, including high-volume U.S. ports from Boston, New York / New Jersey, and Norfolk, to Savannah and Charleston, and down to New Orleans and Houston. With such widespread geography, a strike would likely lead to congestion from diverted traffic, as well as knock-on effects include the potential risk of increased freight rates and costly charges such as demurrage, detention, per diem, and dwell time fees on containers that may be slowed due to the congestion, according to an analysis by another transportation and logistics sector law firm, Benesch.
The weight of those combined blows means that many companies are already planning ways to minimize damage and recover quickly from the event. According to Scopelitis’ advice, mitigation measures could include: preparing for congestion on West coast ports, taking advantage of intermodal ground transportation where possible, looking for alternatives including air transport when necessary for urgent delivery, delaying shipping from East and Gulf coast ports until after the strike, and budgeting for increased freight and container fees.
Additional advice on softening the blow of a potential coastwide strike came from John Donigian, senior director of supply chain strategy at Moody’s. In a statement, he named six supply chain strategies for companies to consider: expedite certain shipments, reallocate existing inventory strategically, lock in alternative capacity with trucking and rail providers , communicate transparently with stakeholders to set realistic expectations for delivery timelines, shift sourcing to regional suppliers if possible, and utilize drop shipping to maintain sales.