Skip to content
Search AI Powered

Latest Stories

Increasing / Decreasing Costs – “Smart” Cost Decisions

Cost-cutting decisions can hurt your most valuable customers


Summary: With the uncertainty of an economic downturn, companies in 2019 will look to cut costs in an attempt to meet shareholders’ earnings expectations.  Typically, cost reduction programs are established by functional areas of the business (sourcing, supply chain, inventory, etc.) and may be tailored to certain groups of customers based on top line revenue contributions. Why is this a problem? Simply stated, not all customers are the same as it relates to their true profit contributions.  In fact, for most companies,a small minority of customers actually provide the vast majority of profits that subsidize marginal and unprofitable accounts.  

Cost cutting decisions made across a customer base can have serious, unwanted consequences.  Reduction in service levels or inventory availability for highly profitable customers can cause them to become dissatisfied and to look to your competition for alternative choices.  The end result, your cost cutting measures may actually have the unwanted effect of significant decreasing the profitable performance of your company.

Case In Point:  Prior to looking for ways to reduce operating costs, a profitable 5 Billion dollar company in Chicago decided to accurately measure the profit contribution of each customer and customer delivery location.  Their customer base comprised of 110,000 delivery locations across the United States.  Want to venture how many locations provided the vast majority of their profits?  Most people would say use the 80 / 20 rule and therefore over 20,000 customer locations.  The actual answer was less than 3%.  Without knowing this and relying on higher level revenue or gross margin information, typical cost cutting measures could have had catastrophic results.

Action:  The approach that this company used for this analysis ensured that the entire organization had confidence in the profit performance information.  As a result, the information was very actionable.  Cost reductions were implemented for the unprofitable and very marginal customers while protecting the service and support of the high yield customer group.

Takeaway:  Wholesale cost reduction programs can be dangerous.  It is imperative to identify customers that provide significant profit contributions to your bottom line and protect that business relationship.  However, determining the root cause for poor performance is equally important.  With that information in hand, cost cutting programs can be tailored to customers or customer segments to not only reduce operating expenses but also improve these customer’s margin contributions.

I would love to know your thoughts on this.  Please comment on this posting or email me at rsharpe@ci-advantage.com .

 

All the best,

Richard Sharpe

The Latest

More Stories

5 scary thoughts about disasters and disaster relief

It’s almost Halloween, and if your town is anything like mine, your neighbors’ yards are already littered with ghosts, witches and tombstones. 

Clearly some of us enjoy giving other people a scare. Just as clearly, some of us enjoy getting a scare.  

Keep ReadingShow less

Featured

Keep a clear focus on enterprise priorities.

"Spot solutions are needed to help a company get through a sudden shock, but the only way to ensure agility and resilience going forward is by addressing systemic issues in a way that is intentional and focused on the long term and brings together clear priorities, well-designed repeatable processes, robust governance, and a skilled team." - Harvard Business Review

From Low Cost to Best Cost

An article published by McKinsey & Co. in August observed, “over the past year, many companies have made structural changes to their supply networks by implementing dual or multiple sourcing strategies for critical materials and moving from global to regional networks.”

This structural change pivots on the difference between low cost and best cost.  The shift extends through Tier 1 Suppliers through lower tiers.  The intent of a low-cost supply chain strategy is to present a low price to customers. A best-cost strategy adds factors beyond cost to the equation, like risk, lead time, and responsiveness.

Keep ReadingShow less

Digital Freight Execution: Making Win-Win Connections

As global supply chains become increasingly complicated, there are now more digital connections and business collaborations in the global shipping industry than ever before. Holding freight data in opaque, disconnected silos and relying on outdated methods of communication is not just inefficient - it’s unsustainable.

The global supply chain is no longer a linear process. Whereas before it was simply about moving freight from point A to B, now there is now a multitude of options for transporting that freight, each with its own unique set of capabilities and constraints. 

Keep ReadingShow less

No wonder we are short of labor in the supply chain.

America’s posture in world trade, and the underlying supply chains, are more than robust.  According to the U.S. Census Bureau and the U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis, the United States balance of trade in goods and services deficit dropped to $70.6 billion in July.  Exports hit the highest level in real dollars since tracking began over 70 years ago.  During the recovery from Covid,, with reshoring and shifting market demands, are holding imports flat..

This success is happening despite the global disruption caused by Ukraine.  Expect our labor shortages to continue.  Expect wage pressure to continue.  Expect inflationary pressures across the supply chain to continue.

Keep ReadingShow less