Should companies continue to follow a just-in-time inventory management strategy? Or should they go back to holding safety stock just in case stockouts occur? The answer is a little bit of both.
Jonathan Byrnes (jlbyrnes@mit.edu) is a senior lecturer at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) and is founder and chairman of Profit Isle, a SaaS profit-analytics Enterprise Profit Management company. He is author of Islands of Profit in a Sea of Red Ink and co-author, with Profit Isle CEO John Wass, of Choose Your Customer: How to Compete Against the Digital Giants and Thrive.
John Wass is CEO of Profit Isle and former senior vice president of Staples. He is a co-author of the recently published book, Choose Your Customer: How to Compete Against the Digital Giants and Thrive.
A November Wall Street Journal headline declared, “Companies Grapple with Post-Pandemic Inventories Dilemma.” The first paragraph read, “Companies are wrestling with how big their inventories should be, since the pandemic highlighted the danger of having both too much and too little stored away.” According to the article, the most important inventory question facing managers today is whether their supply chains should be just-in-time (with low inventories) or just-in-case (with high inventories).
Two important principles will enable managers to answer this question today:
The right amount of inventory for a particular product serving a specific customer depends on the customer’s profitability and the product’s demand pattern (in other words, is demand steady or erratic); and
The right definition of excellent service is always keeping your promises to your customers, but you don’t have to (and should not) make the same promises to all customers.
In other words, the right answer to the just-in-time vs. just-in-case question is both; companies should run multiple parallel supply chains with the supply chain structure and inventory strategy tailored to the specific customer and product.
In the past, this was impossible to do because companies did not have adequate information on customer profitability and product demand patterns. Instead they had to watch broad aggregate financial metrics like revenue, gross margin, and cost. They also had to monitor aggregate supply chain metrics like the percent of complete on-time order shipments. As a result, service intervals (the time between when an order is received and when the customer receives the shipment) were typically the same for all customers. In that era, it made sense to have broad, companywide policies for inventory management, like just-in-time vs just-in-case.
But today, advance analytics and business intelligence tools, such as an enterprise profit management (EPM) system, can provide profitability metrics down to the transaction level. These systems can produce the profit and demand variance information needed to set the right inventory and service intervals for every product ordered by every customer. Because an EPM system tracks every order, managers can determine both every customer’s demand variance (order pattern) for every product they purchase and every customer’s profitability. This enables astute managers to make the right service interval promises to each customer for each product, which provides the basis for determining the right inventory levels for each customer-product set.
Managers across industries who use EPM systems typically find a characteristic customer profitability pattern:
20% of their customers typically generate about 150% of the company’s profits. These “Profit Peak” customers are their large, high-profit accounts. For these customers, the objective is to flawlessly meet their needs and find ways to create service innovations that grow these relationships.
30% percent of their customers are large, money-losing accounts that end up eroding about 50% of the profits gained from the “Profit Peak” customers. In our experience, the problem with these “Profit Drain” customers is rarely that they are being offered below-market pricing but rather that they are accruing excessively high operating costs. For example, the customer may be ordering too frequently or holding excessive safety stock. In many cases, these practices are costly for both companies but can often be easily reversed.
50% of their customers are small accounts that produce minimal profit but consume about 50% of a company’s resources. For these “Profit Desert” customers, the goal is to reduce the operating costs associated with serving them while growing the few that are development prospects.
When a company is able to identify which of the three profitability categories a customer falls into and what the demand/order pattern for the product is, it finally becomes feasible and practical to tailor its inventory strategy to the customer. The company can now individualize (and keep) its customer service promises.
Make the right promises
Figure 1 presents a matrix that shows example service intervals that a company might promise to its customers. The columns represent profit-based customer segments, while the rows represent steady- vs. variable-demand patterns.
[Figure 1] What service interval should you be providing? Enlarge this image
Profit Peak customers and steady-demand products: Your Profit Peak customers provide your core profitability. Your most important supply chain task is to give each profit peak customer what it needs every time (unless supply chain disruptions make this impossible for a time). Their service interval is set at one-day (or less).
The amount of inventory needed for your profit peak customers depends on their demand variance. (Actually, it depends on the degree to which you can forecast their demand; a customer may have a lot of variance, but if you can forecast it, you can plan your inventory purchases to match the customer’s demand peaks and valleys.)
High-profit customers with steady demand products (for example, major urban hospitals buying IV solutions) only require low inventory levels. Their supply chains should be “flow-through pipelines” with minimal inventory at each point. (In other words, inventory should be replenished at a steady rate at every point in the supply chain to match the customer’s steady volume of consumption. You should only hold just enough safety stock inventory to meet emergencies.)
Profit Peak customers with variable-demand products: High-profit customers with variable-demand products (for example, major urban hospitals trying a new type of safety glasses) warrant a lot of safety stock. For these critical customers, you need to carry enough just-in-case inventory to ensure that they will almost never run out of product.
If the local distribution center (DC) runs low on one of these products, you should expedite shipments from a central facility at no cost to the customer. Their service interval is set at one day, as well.
Profit Drain customers with steady-demand products: Profit Drain customers with steady-demand products (for example, distant mid-sized hospitals purchasing IV solutions) also require only low levels of inventory. They also should have flow-through pipeline supply chains. However, their steady demand means that you will not have to carry safety stock locally. If local stock is tight, they should have lower priority than your Profit Peak customers.
Here, the service interval again should be one day, with the understanding that it will stretch to two to three days on the rare occasions that your local DC is low on stock and reserving product for your Profit Peak customers. If they insist on getting faster service in these unusual occasions, they should bear the cost of expediting the product from a central warehouse.
Profit Drain customers with variable-demand products. If a large, money-losing customer has erratic demand for a product (for example, a distantly located mid-sized hospital buying fashionable flowered gowns), it is not necessary to hold high levels of local safety stock. Instead, you should set a service interval (perhaps three days) that enables you to bring stock in from a central warehouse. The safety stock inventories of these products in the local DC should be reserved for your higher priority Profit Peak customers.
Profit Desert customers with steady-demand products: Your Profit Desert segment is comprised of numerous small customers. Typically, the top quartile of this segment (arrayed in descending order by profit) is quite profitable, the bottom quartile is quite unprofitable, and the middle quartiles produce negligible profits. Although the aggregate demand is stable, the demand for a local DC serving these customers can be very unpredictable.
The top quartile Profit Desert customers should get priority on order fulfillment over the other three quartiles. The service interval for steady-demand products (for example, consumables ordered by small machine shops) might be set at three days. In most cases, your top quartile Profit Desert customers will receive their orders in one day, but if your large Profit Peak and Profit Drain customers have a surge in demand, the three-day service interval provides ample time to bring product in from a central warehouse while still meeting your service commitments. The other three quartiles of Profit Desert customers would typically have a three-day service interval.
Profit Desert customers with variable-demand products: The service interval for variable-demand products sold to customers in the Profit Desert segment (for example, a specialized machine tool needed by a small machine shop for an occasional project) might be set at five days. This will provide ample time to bring product in from a central warehouse while giving priority on DC stock to the Profit Peak and Profit Drain customers. Because the majority of products typically have variable demand, this will greatly reduce your overall inventory costs while maintaining your high service levels. If a Profit Desert customer needs a product quickly, it should pay the cost of expediting the product from a central warehouse.
Manage your account relationships
Tailoring your service intervals to match customer profitability and demand pattern will help you keep your inventory low while keeping your service level high. If you don’t tailor your inventory strategy, you risk facing stockouts for your Profit Peak customers or carrying expensive safety stock for the Profit Drain and Profit Desert customers (which is not economically justified). The key is to be clear in advance about the “rules” of how you will serve your customers. If you always keep these promises, your service level will be 100%.
This process might raise concerns that customers will leave for other suppliers with uniformly short service intervals. However, this is often not the case. Most major customers have their own in-house inventories and are simply issuing periodic replenishment orders. Oftentimes if the service interval is a few days, the customer can adequately plan for this. The real reason why most customers want very fast deliveries is that they do not trust the supplier to meet its commitments, and the reason why most suppliers can’t meet their commitments is because they make the same short-interval commitments to every customer. If you keep your service commitments 100% of the time (and accommodate the occasional actual emergency need), your customers will be fully satisfied. If your customers do complain about your service intervals, they have the option of working with you to bring your return on serving them up to a level that warrants a shorter service interval.
Moreover, the differentiated process described above commits to one-day (or less) service intervals for all Profit Peak customers on all products and even for Profit Drain customers’ steady products. Most Profit Drain customers can tolerate a short wait for variable-demand products, especially for periodic restocking orders. Your Profit Drain and Profit Desert customers should pay compensatory prices if they want uniformly quick service and not require you to make your Profit Peak customers cross-subsidize the losses that they cause.
Manage your supply chain(s)
This process of carrying the right inventory for each customer segment is very manageable. We have described only six business segments: Profit Peak customers, Profit Drain customers, and Profit Desert customers—each with ether steady or erratic demand.
In complex companies, this matrix can be expanded to address more customer segments (for example, special development accounts) and product types (for example, mission-critical parts). However, increasing the complexity quickly makes the system much more difficult to manage and maintain.
By tailoring their inventory strategy to the customer-profit segment, managers can boost their profitability by providing the right set of incentives for each segment:
Profit Peak customers get consistently fast service, with constant priority on inventory;
Profit Drain customers get appropriate service promises, which are always kept, and they have an incentive to engage with you to bring your profitability on serving them to Profit Peak levels (giving them priority on inventory);
Profit Desert customers get appropriate service promises, which they can rely on, and they have an incentive to grow their business and profitability to Profit Peak status.
This practical process enables you to define multiple parallel supply chains, each appropriate for a distinct business segment. This is the key to setting the right inventory level for each product, aligning them with your changing business, and using your supply chain to fuel your profitable growth.
RJW Logistics Group, a logistics solutions provider (LSP) for consumer packaged goods (CPG) brands, has received a “strategic investment” from Boston-based private equity firm Berkshire partners, and now plans to drive future innovations and expand its geographic reach, the Woodridge, Illinois-based company said Tuesday.
Terms of the deal were not disclosed, but the company said that CEO Kevin Williamson and other members of RJW management will continue to be “significant investors” in the company, while private equity firm Mason Wells, which invested in RJW in 2019, will maintain a minority investment position.
RJW is an asset-based transportation, logistics, and warehousing provider, operating more than 7.3 million square feet of consolidation warehouse space in the transportation hubs of Chicago and Dallas and employing 1,900 people. RJW says it partners with over 850 CPG brands and delivers to more than 180 retailers nationwide. According to the company, its retail logistics solutions save cost, improve visibility, and achieve industry-leading On-Time, In-Full (OTIF) performance. Those improvements drive increased in-stock rates and sales, benefiting both CPG brands and their retailer partners, the firm says.
"After several years of mitigating inflation, disruption, supply shocks, conflicts, and uncertainty, we are currently in a relative period of calm," John Paitek, vice president, GEP, said in a release. "But it is very much the calm before the coming storm. This report provides procurement and supply chain leaders with a prescriptive guide to weathering the gale force headwinds of protectionism, tariffs, trade wars, regulatory pressures, uncertainty, and the AI revolution that we will face in 2025."
A report from the company released today offers predictions and strategies for the upcoming year, organized into six major predictions in GEP’s “Outlook 2025: Procurement & Supply Chain” report.
Advanced AI agents will play a key role in demand forecasting, risk monitoring, and supply chain optimization, shifting procurement's mandate from tactical to strategic. Companies should invest in the technology now to to streamline processes and enhance decision-making.
Expanded value metrics will drive decisions, as success will be measured by resilience, sustainability, and compliance… not just cost efficiency. Companies should communicate value beyond cost savings to stakeholders, and develop new KPIs.
Increasing regulatory demands will necessitate heightened supply chain transparency and accountability. So companies should strengthen supplier audits, adopt ESG tracking tools, and integrate compliance into strategic procurement decisions.
Widening tariffs and trade restrictions will force companies to reassess total cost of ownership (TCO) metrics to include geopolitical and environmental risks, as nearshoring and friendshoring attempt to balance resilience with cost.
Rising energy costs and regulatory demands will accelerate the shift to sustainable operations, pushing companies to invest in renewable energy and redesign supply chains to align with ESG commitments.
New tariffs could drive prices higher, just as inflation has come under control and interest rates are returning to near-zero levels. That means companies must continue to secure cost savings as their primary responsibility.
Freight transportation sector analysts with US Bank say they expect change on the horizon in that market for 2025, due to possible tariffs imposed by a new White House administration, the return of East and Gulf coast port strikes, and expanding freight fraud.
“All three of these merit scrutiny, and that is our promise as we roll into the new year,” the company said in a statement today.
First, US Bank said a new administration will occupy the White House and will control the House and Senate for the first time since 2016. With an announced mandate on tariffs, taxes and trade from his electoral victory, President-Elect Trump’s anticipated actions are almost certain to impact the supply chain, the bank said.
Second, a strike by longshoreman at East Coast and Gulf ports was suspended in October, but the can was only kicked until mid-January. Shipper alarm bells are already ringing, and with peak season in full swing, the West coast ports are roaring, having absorbed containers bound for the East. However, that status may not be sustainable in the event of a prolonged strike in January, US Bank said.
And third, analyst are tracking the proliferation of freight fraud, and its reverberations across the supply chain. No longer the realm of petty criminals, freight fraudsters have become increasingly sophisticated, and the financial toll of their activities in the loss of goods, and data, is expected to be in the billions, the bank estimates.
Specifically, 48% of respondents identified rising tariffs and trade barriers as their top concern, followed by supply chain disruptions at 45% and geopolitical instability at 41%. Moreover, tariffs and trade barriers ranked as the priority issue regardless of company size, as respondents at companies with less than 250 employees, 251-500, 501-1,000, 1,001-50,000 and 50,000+ employees all cited it as the most significant issue they are currently facing.
“Evolving tariffs and trade policies are one of a number of complex issues requiring organizations to build more resilience into their supply chains through compliance, technology and strategic planning,” Jackson Wood, Director, Industry Strategy at Descartes, said in a release. “With the potential for the incoming U.S. administration to impose new and additional tariffs on a wide variety of goods and countries of origin, U.S. importers may need to significantly re-engineer their sourcing strategies to mitigate potentially higher costs.”
A measure of business conditions for shippers improved in September due to lower fuel costs, looser trucking capacity, and lower freight rates, but the freight transportation forecasting firm FTR still expects readings to be weaker and closer to neutral through its two-year forecast period.
Bloomington, Indiana-based FTR is maintaining its stance that trucking conditions will improve, even though its Shippers Conditions Index (SCI) improved in September to 4.6 from a 2.9 reading in August, reaching its strongest level of the year.
“The fact that September’s index is the strongest since last December is not a sign that shippers’ market conditions are steadily improving,” Avery Vise, FTR’s vice president of trucking, said in a release.
“September and May were modest outliers this year in a market that is at least becoming more balanced. We expect that trend to continue and for SCI readings to be mostly negative to neutral in 2025 and 2026. However, markets in transition tend to be volatile, so further outliers are likely and possibly in both directions. The supply chain implications of tariffs are a wild card for 2025 especially,” he said.
The SCI tracks the changes representing four major conditions in the U.S. full-load freight market: freight demand, freight rates, fleet capacity, and fuel price. Combined into a single index, a positive score represents good, optimistic conditions, while a negative score represents bad, pessimistic conditions.