More importers are trying to bypass ocean shipping backlogs by shifting to air, but they’re encountering capacity constraints, congestion, and delays there too.
Contributing Editor Toby Gooley is a writer and editor specializing in supply chain, logistics, and material handling, and a lecturer at MIT's Center for Transportation & Logistics. She previously was Senior Editor at DC VELOCITY and Editor of DCV's sister publication, CSCMP's Supply Chain Quarterly. Prior to joining AGiLE Business Media in 2007, she spent 20 years at Logistics Management magazine as Managing Editor and Senior Editor covering international trade and transportation. Prior to that she was an export traffic manager for 10 years. She holds a B.A. in Asian Studies from Cornell University.
With inventories low and ocean shipping backlogs delaying imports of consumer goods for weeks or even months, many U.S. importers are shifting from ocean to air. Normally, that would be an effective, if expensive, strategy, but as the COVID-19 pandemic grinds on, it has exacerbated some of the very problems shippers were trying to avoid: capacity constraints, congestion, and delayed deliveries.
In October 2021, international shipments (measured in cargo tonne-kilometers) were up 10.4% compared to October 2019, according to the International Air Transport Association (IATA). (IATA made its comparisons to pre-pandemic traffic.) Capacity was 8% lower than in October 2019, still problematic but a big improvement over the precipitous drop seen in early 2020. Capacity constraints are “slowly resolving” as increased passenger travel brings more belly capacity for cargo online, IATA said, but Director General Willie Walsh warned in early December that if governments’ reactions to the omicron variant dampen travel demand, “capacity issues will become more acute.”
For North American air cargo shippers in particular the situation remains very challenging as a confluence of issues slows shipments and raises costs, said Brandon Fried, executive director of the Airforwarders Association, at the Coalition of New England Companies for Trade (CONECT) Trade & Transportation Conference in Newport, R.I. Only about 25–30% of trans-Pacific cargo capacity has been restored so far, keeping rates high, he said. Charters for 747 freighter aircraft that had been around $750,000 reportedly jumped as high as $2 million but are starting to show signs of drifting downward, Fried said.
Air carriers are doing what they can to maintain or increase capacity. According to Fried, approximately 120,000 passenger aircraft flights have flown freight-only since the pandemic began. At Chicago’s O’Hare International Airport some freighters from China land, unload, and take off again, returning the next day with more consumer goods. To reduce congestion and keep cargo moving quickly, more airlines are landing at secondary airports like Hartford, Conn., Pittsburgh, Pa., and Rickenbacker International outside Columbus, Ohio—so many, he said, that Rickenbacker, which caters to air cargo, had to cap the number of flights it accepts.
Moreover, labor shortages related to the pandemic and to the time-consuming, difficult task of qualifying for and receiving security credentials are causing flight cancellations and slowing cargo processing. Inbound shipments often do not move out of cargo facilities quickly, which creates congestion; one conference attendee said it has been taking seven to 14 days to get international cargo out of John F. Kennedy International Airport in New York. A lack of investment in cargo infrastructure at major airports has exacerbated those bottlenecks, Fried added, noting that hours-long lines at some airports are chasing truckers away.
As if the pandemic-related difficulties weren’t enough, in 2021 the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO), a United Nations agency that provides technical expertise and recommends aviation policies for member governments to adopt, eliminated a program that specified security controls for all-cargo aircraft that differed from those for passenger aircraft. Since then, the U.S. Transportation Security Administration (TSA) has required physical screening of all international cargo on freighter aircraft.
“We are getting it done,” but it’s not easy, and Fried’s group as well as other forwarders’ organizations, integrated carriers, airlines, and shippers have been meeting with TSA on ways to expedite screening. One success: TSA is allowing approved third-party K-9 handlers to use dogs to screen for explosives and other contraband. That’s proving helpful, Fried said, but there likely aren’t enough approved, trained dogs and handlers to fully meet screening needs now or in the future. Less successful was TSA’s proposal for “secure packing facilities” that would exempt e-commerce companies that met very stringent security standards from some of the screening requirements. According to Fried, the “bar was set so high” that only one company is trying to implement the standards.
Economic activity in the logistics industry expanded in November, continuing a steady growth pattern that began earlier this year and signaling a return to seasonality after several years of fluctuating conditions, according to the latest Logistics Managers’ Index report (LMI), released today.
The November LMI registered 58.4, down slightly from October’s reading of 58.9, which was the highest level in two years. The LMI is a monthly gauge of business conditions across warehousing and logistics markets; a reading above 50 indicates growth and a reading below 50 indicates contraction.
“The overall index has been very consistent in the past three months, with readings of 58.6, 58.9, and 58.4,” LMI analyst Zac Rogers, associate professor of supply chain management at Colorado State University, wrote in the November LMI report. “This plateau is slightly higher than a similar plateau of consistency earlier in the year when May to August saw four readings between 55.3 and 56.4. Seasonally speaking, it is consistent that this later year run of readings would be the highest all year.”
Separately, Rogers said the end-of-year growth reflects the return to a healthy holiday peak, which started when inventory levels expanded in late summer and early fall as retailers began stocking up to meet consumer demand. Pandemic-driven shifts in consumer buying behavior, inflation, and economic uncertainty contributed to volatile peak season conditions over the past four years, with the LMI swinging from record-high growth in late 2020 and 2021 to slower growth in 2022 and contraction in 2023.
“The LMI contracted at this time a year ago, so basically [there was] no peak season,” Rogers said, citing inflation as a drag on demand. “To have a normal November … [really] for the first time in five years, justifies what we’ve seen all these companies doing—building up inventory in a sustainable, seasonal way.
“Based on what we’re seeing, a lot of supply chains called it right and were ready for healthy holiday season, so far.”
The LMI has remained in the mid to high 50s range since January—with the exception of April, when the index dipped to 52.9—signaling strong and consistent demand for warehousing and transportation services.
The LMI is a monthly survey of logistics managers from across the country. It tracks industry growth overall and across eight areas: inventory levels and costs; warehousing capacity, utilization, and prices; and transportation capacity, utilization, and prices. The report is released monthly by researchers from Arizona State University, Colorado State University, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rutgers University, and the University of Nevada, Reno, in conjunction with the Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals (CSCMP).
"After several years of mitigating inflation, disruption, supply shocks, conflicts, and uncertainty, we are currently in a relative period of calm," John Paitek, vice president, GEP, said in a release. "But it is very much the calm before the coming storm. This report provides procurement and supply chain leaders with a prescriptive guide to weathering the gale force headwinds of protectionism, tariffs, trade wars, regulatory pressures, uncertainty, and the AI revolution that we will face in 2025."
A report from the company released today offers predictions and strategies for the upcoming year, organized into six major predictions in GEP’s “Outlook 2025: Procurement & Supply Chain” report.
Advanced AI agents will play a key role in demand forecasting, risk monitoring, and supply chain optimization, shifting procurement's mandate from tactical to strategic. Companies should invest in the technology now to to streamline processes and enhance decision-making.
Expanded value metrics will drive decisions, as success will be measured by resilience, sustainability, and compliance… not just cost efficiency. Companies should communicate value beyond cost savings to stakeholders, and develop new KPIs.
Increasing regulatory demands will necessitate heightened supply chain transparency and accountability. So companies should strengthen supplier audits, adopt ESG tracking tools, and integrate compliance into strategic procurement decisions.
Widening tariffs and trade restrictions will force companies to reassess total cost of ownership (TCO) metrics to include geopolitical and environmental risks, as nearshoring and friendshoring attempt to balance resilience with cost.
Rising energy costs and regulatory demands will accelerate the shift to sustainable operations, pushing companies to invest in renewable energy and redesign supply chains to align with ESG commitments.
New tariffs could drive prices higher, just as inflation has come under control and interest rates are returning to near-zero levels. That means companies must continue to secure cost savings as their primary responsibility.
Freight transportation sector analysts with US Bank say they expect change on the horizon in that market for 2025, due to possible tariffs imposed by a new White House administration, the return of East and Gulf coast port strikes, and expanding freight fraud.
“All three of these merit scrutiny, and that is our promise as we roll into the new year,” the company said in a statement today.
First, US Bank said a new administration will occupy the White House and will control the House and Senate for the first time since 2016. With an announced mandate on tariffs, taxes and trade from his electoral victory, President-Elect Trump’s anticipated actions are almost certain to impact the supply chain, the bank said.
Second, a strike by longshoreman at East Coast and Gulf ports was suspended in October, but the can was only kicked until mid-January. Shipper alarm bells are already ringing, and with peak season in full swing, the West coast ports are roaring, having absorbed containers bound for the East. However, that status may not be sustainable in the event of a prolonged strike in January, US Bank said.
And third, analyst are tracking the proliferation of freight fraud, and its reverberations across the supply chain. No longer the realm of petty criminals, freight fraudsters have become increasingly sophisticated, and the financial toll of their activities in the loss of goods, and data, is expected to be in the billions, the bank estimates.
The move delivers on its August announcement of a fleet renewal plan that will allow the company to proceed on its path to decarbonization, according to a statement from Anda Cristescu, Head of Chartering & Newbuilding at Maersk.
The first vessels will be delivered in 2028, and the last delivery will take place in 2030, enabling a total capacity to haul 300,000 twenty foot equivalent units (TEU) using lower emissions fuel. The new vessels will be built in sizes from 9,000 to 17,000 TEU each, allowing them to fill various roles and functions within the company’s future network.
In the meantime, the company will also proceed with its plan to charter a range of methanol and liquified gas dual-fuel vessels totaling 500,000 TEU capacity, replacing existing capacity. Maersk has now finalized these charter contracts across several tonnage providers, the company said.
The shipyards now contracted to build the vessels are: Yangzijiang Shipbuilding and New Times Shipbuilding—both in China—and Hanwha Ocean in South Korea.
Specifically, 48% of respondents identified rising tariffs and trade barriers as their top concern, followed by supply chain disruptions at 45% and geopolitical instability at 41%. Moreover, tariffs and trade barriers ranked as the priority issue regardless of company size, as respondents at companies with less than 250 employees, 251-500, 501-1,000, 1,001-50,000 and 50,000+ employees all cited it as the most significant issue they are currently facing.
“Evolving tariffs and trade policies are one of a number of complex issues requiring organizations to build more resilience into their supply chains through compliance, technology and strategic planning,” Jackson Wood, Director, Industry Strategy at Descartes, said in a release. “With the potential for the incoming U.S. administration to impose new and additional tariffs on a wide variety of goods and countries of origin, U.S. importers may need to significantly re-engineer their sourcing strategies to mitigate potentially higher costs.”