In our continuing series of discussions with top supply-chain company executives, Chad Zollman, chief sales officer for TGW North America, discusses technology and the growth and impact of e-commerce on retail distribution.
David Maloney has been a journalist for more than 35 years and is currently the group editorial director for DC Velocity and Supply Chain Quarterly magazines. In this role, he is responsible for the editorial content of both brands of Agile Business Media. Dave joined DC Velocity in April of 2004. Prior to that, he was a senior editor for Modern Materials Handling magazine. Dave also has extensive experience as a broadcast journalist. Before writing for supply chain publications, he was a journalist, television producer and director in Pittsburgh. Dave combines a background of reporting on logistics with his video production experience to bring new opportunities to DC Velocity readers, including web videos highlighting top distribution and logistics facilities, webcasts and other cross-media projects. He continues to live and work in the Pittsburgh area.
Chad Zollman has served as chief sales officer for TGW North America since 2018. He is responsible for leading commercial efforts for the North American systems integration business, working closely with customers to design and implement end-to-end fulfillment solutions. Before joining TGW, he worked in the third-party logistics industry for over 20 years.
Q: How do you view the current state of the material handling market?
A: The material handling market is experiencing record-setting growth. Over the past few years, companies were contemplating automation to satisfy future demand; however, there has been an acceleration in strategic planning of two to three years due to the impacts of Covid on e-commerce business. The shift of purchasing habits in combination with labor market constraints has influenced executives to add or expand the automation content within their supply chain portfolios.
Q: What are customers' greatest needs as we emerge from the pandemic?
A: Customers are looking for flexibility—they want their automation investment to be nimble enough to meet future—and sometimes unknown—demands yet still deliver productivity and quality metrics that ensure service levels aren’t compromised.
Order profiles in distribution centers have changed over the last year, moving toward smaller orders with an increase in returns volume. If customers don’t have a fulfillment solution that can flexibly adapt to the current market needs, they constantly have to reinvent their supply chain, which equates to high costs and operational inefficiencies.
Q: Are customers asking for specific capabilities in their designs?
A: The most important design criteria for our customers are flexibility, responsiveness, and scalability. Flexibility in terms of adaptiveness: Business models change over time, and the fulfillment solution must be future-proof. Second, responsiveness in terms of speed and quality: End-consumers are expecting high service levels. Fast order processing and shipping are crucial in order to stay competitive. Lastly, scalability: At TGW, we design our end-to-end solutions based on standardized systems, which can be easily expanded with minimal impact on daily operations.
Q: Are there particular markets or trends that you feel will heavily influence future automation designs?
A: In general, e-commerce business will continue to grow. We are seeing retail and wholesale channels with flat or minimal growth trajectories. However, retail stores will never disappear, as they are an important tool for building a strong brand experience—especially for “bridge” and premium brands. In this regard, omnichannel fulfillment capability is a key success factor for retailers.
When it comes to the fashion and apparel industry, we see a strong trend toward sustainability. End-consumers are making decisions based on a brand’s philosophy and environmental footprint.
The last noteworthy trend would be the emergence of microfulfillment centers (MFCs). The MFC concept centers on proximity to consumers, decreasing the hassle of last-mile deliveries and improving the pickup experience. However, the application of the concept varies greatly depending on the physical characteristics of the inventory, temperature requirements, location (greenfield vs. brownfield), and business model (B2B vs. B2C).
Q: What would you say are the most significant advances you've seen in your time in the industry?
A: The evolution of robotic systems—specifically, robotic single-item picking. At my time with TGW, our developments in cognitive robotics have been impressive. Using machine learning algorithms, the robotics can distinguish between “right and wrong,” fixing errors autonomously. We have extended this system with the application of digital-twin technology, which facilitates shared machine learning and the prediction of system behavior.
RJW Logistics Group, a logistics solutions provider (LSP) for consumer packaged goods (CPG) brands, has received a “strategic investment” from Boston-based private equity firm Berkshire partners, and now plans to drive future innovations and expand its geographic reach, the Woodridge, Illinois-based company said Tuesday.
Terms of the deal were not disclosed, but the company said that CEO Kevin Williamson and other members of RJW management will continue to be “significant investors” in the company, while private equity firm Mason Wells, which invested in RJW in 2019, will maintain a minority investment position.
RJW is an asset-based transportation, logistics, and warehousing provider, operating more than 7.3 million square feet of consolidation warehouse space in the transportation hubs of Chicago and Dallas and employing 1,900 people. RJW says it partners with over 850 CPG brands and delivers to more than 180 retailers nationwide. According to the company, its retail logistics solutions save cost, improve visibility, and achieve industry-leading On-Time, In-Full (OTIF) performance. Those improvements drive increased in-stock rates and sales, benefiting both CPG brands and their retailer partners, the firm says.
"After several years of mitigating inflation, disruption, supply shocks, conflicts, and uncertainty, we are currently in a relative period of calm," John Paitek, vice president, GEP, said in a release. "But it is very much the calm before the coming storm. This report provides procurement and supply chain leaders with a prescriptive guide to weathering the gale force headwinds of protectionism, tariffs, trade wars, regulatory pressures, uncertainty, and the AI revolution that we will face in 2025."
A report from the company released today offers predictions and strategies for the upcoming year, organized into six major predictions in GEP’s “Outlook 2025: Procurement & Supply Chain” report.
Advanced AI agents will play a key role in demand forecasting, risk monitoring, and supply chain optimization, shifting procurement's mandate from tactical to strategic. Companies should invest in the technology now to to streamline processes and enhance decision-making.
Expanded value metrics will drive decisions, as success will be measured by resilience, sustainability, and compliance… not just cost efficiency. Companies should communicate value beyond cost savings to stakeholders, and develop new KPIs.
Increasing regulatory demands will necessitate heightened supply chain transparency and accountability. So companies should strengthen supplier audits, adopt ESG tracking tools, and integrate compliance into strategic procurement decisions.
Widening tariffs and trade restrictions will force companies to reassess total cost of ownership (TCO) metrics to include geopolitical and environmental risks, as nearshoring and friendshoring attempt to balance resilience with cost.
Rising energy costs and regulatory demands will accelerate the shift to sustainable operations, pushing companies to invest in renewable energy and redesign supply chains to align with ESG commitments.
New tariffs could drive prices higher, just as inflation has come under control and interest rates are returning to near-zero levels. That means companies must continue to secure cost savings as their primary responsibility.
Freight transportation sector analysts with US Bank say they expect change on the horizon in that market for 2025, due to possible tariffs imposed by a new White House administration, the return of East and Gulf coast port strikes, and expanding freight fraud.
“All three of these merit scrutiny, and that is our promise as we roll into the new year,” the company said in a statement today.
First, US Bank said a new administration will occupy the White House and will control the House and Senate for the first time since 2016. With an announced mandate on tariffs, taxes and trade from his electoral victory, President-Elect Trump’s anticipated actions are almost certain to impact the supply chain, the bank said.
Second, a strike by longshoreman at East Coast and Gulf ports was suspended in October, but the can was only kicked until mid-January. Shipper alarm bells are already ringing, and with peak season in full swing, the West coast ports are roaring, having absorbed containers bound for the East. However, that status may not be sustainable in the event of a prolonged strike in January, US Bank said.
And third, analyst are tracking the proliferation of freight fraud, and its reverberations across the supply chain. No longer the realm of petty criminals, freight fraudsters have become increasingly sophisticated, and the financial toll of their activities in the loss of goods, and data, is expected to be in the billions, the bank estimates.
Specifically, 48% of respondents identified rising tariffs and trade barriers as their top concern, followed by supply chain disruptions at 45% and geopolitical instability at 41%. Moreover, tariffs and trade barriers ranked as the priority issue regardless of company size, as respondents at companies with less than 250 employees, 251-500, 501-1,000, 1,001-50,000 and 50,000+ employees all cited it as the most significant issue they are currently facing.
“Evolving tariffs and trade policies are one of a number of complex issues requiring organizations to build more resilience into their supply chains through compliance, technology and strategic planning,” Jackson Wood, Director, Industry Strategy at Descartes, said in a release. “With the potential for the incoming U.S. administration to impose new and additional tariffs on a wide variety of goods and countries of origin, U.S. importers may need to significantly re-engineer their sourcing strategies to mitigate potentially higher costs.”
A measure of business conditions for shippers improved in September due to lower fuel costs, looser trucking capacity, and lower freight rates, but the freight transportation forecasting firm FTR still expects readings to be weaker and closer to neutral through its two-year forecast period.
Bloomington, Indiana-based FTR is maintaining its stance that trucking conditions will improve, even though its Shippers Conditions Index (SCI) improved in September to 4.6 from a 2.9 reading in August, reaching its strongest level of the year.
“The fact that September’s index is the strongest since last December is not a sign that shippers’ market conditions are steadily improving,” Avery Vise, FTR’s vice president of trucking, said in a release.
“September and May were modest outliers this year in a market that is at least becoming more balanced. We expect that trend to continue and for SCI readings to be mostly negative to neutral in 2025 and 2026. However, markets in transition tend to be volatile, so further outliers are likely and possibly in both directions. The supply chain implications of tariffs are a wild card for 2025 especially,” he said.
The SCI tracks the changes representing four major conditions in the U.S. full-load freight market: freight demand, freight rates, fleet capacity, and fuel price. Combined into a single index, a positive score represents good, optimistic conditions, while a negative score represents bad, pessimistic conditions.