Rising pallet-supply costs led two innovative suppliers to throw out the old playbook and design a new solution for their clients. The result: a “hybrid” pallet-supply model that slashed one customer’s costs by 31%.
Gary Frantz is a contributing editor for DC Velocity and its sister publication, Supply Chain Xchange. He is a veteran communications executive with more than 30 years of experience in the transportation and logistics industries. He's served as communications director and strategic media relations counselor for companies including XPO Logistics, Con-way, Menlo Logistics, GT Nexus, Circle International Group, and Consolidated Freightways. Gary is currently principal of GNF Communications LLC, a consultancy providing freelance writing, editorial and media strategy services. He's a proud graduate of the Journalism program at California State University–Chico.
The pallet pool business has long been the behind-the-scenes grease that lubricates the movement of literally billions of pounds of goods through the world’s supply chains. This underappreciated workhorse is the key to efficiently moving large lots of carton-based goods and other packaged and unpackaged products in and out of trucks, between production plants and distributors, within warehouses, and out to retail stores.
It is a market of two universes. In one universe is the traditional “white wood” pallet, typically purchased by a manufacturer, long relied upon by large beverage producers and consumer goods companies, and supported by third-party pallet recapture services. Manufacturers often build pallet inventories in advance so they can be deployed on demand to production lines as goods are produced.
While the manufacturer technically owns the pallets, once they get loaded and shipped out, it’s anybody’s guess when—or if—the owner will see those assets again. A pallet might sit in a retailer’s or distributor’s warehouse for several weeks or more. Or it might move “downstream” to a retail store or smaller end-user, from which it doesn’t return. “It’s a cost of doing business that is built into the price of the product. Once it’s out of [the manufacturer’s] orbit, they forget about it,” says John Vaccaro, president of South Plainfield, New Jersey-based Bettaway Pallet Systems Inc., of white wood pallets.
Practically speaking, white wood pallets often are treated much like disposable dunnage, cardboard, or packing material. Yet, at an average cost of $7 for a refurbished pallet or $14 for a new one, expenses add up quickly when you’re talking about hundreds of thousands of pallets, notes Vaccaro, whose company operates a nationwide network of pallet-supply “partner depots,” over 475 of them in North America, where white wood pallets are returned, repaired, refurbished, and staged for redeployment. Its clients include such household names as Arizona Beverage Co., maker of Arizona Iced Tea, for whom Bettaway has managed transportation and pallet logistics for nearly 30 years.
A GROWING MARKET FOR RENTALS
In the other universe is the rental market. Rather than purchase the pallet, a manufacturer or distributor rents the unit. The rental pallet provider builds and maintains a fleet of reusable pallets, tracks them through the supply chain, and then, once the pallets are unloaded at the destination distributor or warehouse, picks them up and returns them to a staging facility, where they are inspected, repaired, repainted, and put back into circulation.
Under this model, the renting entity (such as a manufacturer, big-box retailer, or distributor) pays an “issue” fee and a rent-per-day fee plus other associated costs, such as a fuel surcharge. The manufacturer also has an obligation to report to the rental pallet provider when the pallet is transferred or released to a retailer’s location and is available for return.
Demand for rental pallets grew as the retail market evolved and distributors, beverage makers, and manufacturers of other consumer goods and consumables began selling more product directly to mega-retailers like Walmart and club stores like Costco. Owning white wood pallets no longer fully met the need.
Shippers also wanted the option of a more robust and standard pallet, or “block” pallet, and a national supply and management network for those rental pallets. Enter PECO Pallet.
PECO (the name is an acronym for “Pallet Exchange Co.”) operates a closed-loop pallet pool. It builds and maintains a fleet of reusable nine-block, four-way-entry, edge-rackable pallets that can carry up to 2,800 pounds apiece.
Within its network, PECO has some 2,100 pallet-recovery locations, including 42 full-service depots and 44 sort facilities strategically located throughout the U.S. and Canada. The company maintains a rolling inventory of roughly 21 million pallets. PECO counts among its customers major food and consumer goods producers like TreeHouse Foods, Hershey’s, Dole Fresh Vegetables, The Kraft Heinz Company, and Mars.
“The manufacturer or distributor gets a high-quality pallet at the lowest landed cost,” says Joe Dagnese, PECO’s president. “The customer benefits from a highly engineered pallet, ideally suited for high-velocity automated material handling systems, providing superior efficiency as well as improved safety, utility, operational consistency, and production-line optimization.”
ENTER THE HYBRID MODEL
Convention has held that the pallet business was divided into two models: One set of customers was on the purchased white wood model, and another on the block-pallet rental model. There was little incentive to mix. Most companies don’t want to deal with both owned and rental pallets. The logistics challenges are too complex, the savings inconsistent or unverifiable.
But that didn’t stop Bettaway’s Vaccaro from pursuing just such a scheme a few years back. Despite the conventional wisdom, he believed that several of his white wood pallet pool customers could benefit financially from some type of mixed service. As their markets shifted and business grew, some of those clients were seeing steep hikes in pallet costs. Vaccaro felt that by strategically carving out specific segments of Bettaway’s business and redeploying them in a rental network, Bettaway could deliver an overall lower landed cost to serve.
One of the clients he had in mind was Arizona Beverages. Arizona’s business, already utilizing some 2 million pallets annually, was growing and requiring an increasing number of new white wood pallets, Vaccaro recalls. “Brand-new pallets come at a premium cost. When you are refreshing the pool with 10% new and 90% refurbished, you can justify it,” he explains. “But when you get up to 30% or 35% new, the math doesn’t work.”
Bettaway also had manufacturer and distributor customers with remote locations, inconsistent production, or minimal, short-term pallet needs. Those “one offs” can be costly to serve with an all-white wood solution but were ideal for a tailored rental program. And customer footprints change; some sites drop out while others are added, requiring adjustments to pallet pools. “We had to think in other terms, alternatives we had perhaps rejected in the past,” Vaccaro says. Those alternatives included partnering with an outside party to provide rental pallets for some segments of Bettaway’s business.
That led to a meeting with PECO’s Dagnese.
“It was an exercise in collaboration, innovation, and material handling engineering,” Vaccaro says of their initial talks. “We looked at the size of the prize, if we could be flexible and nimble enough, where we could potentially work together … and what it would mean for the client. We could not afford any degradation in service, quality, or reliability,” he emphasized.
Bettaway and PECO assembled a team to tackle the project. Their mission: design a system that struck a balance between the faster-moving, quick-turn products and “one-off” locations served by PECO’s rental network; and the slower-moving, often higher-volume products going to distributors or larger retailers and held for longer periods, on white wood. “Where was the point at which we got the balance just right, so we did not have a slow-moving SKU (stock-keeping unit) on a rental pallet or weren’t shipping to a non-participating distributor, where the pallet would likely get lost or not returned?” asked Vaccaro.
“The manufacturer just wants the right number of high-quality pallets at the best cost delivered on time to its facilities,” says Dagnese. “And the retailers want the pallets retrieved from their facility without delay, so they are not taking up valuable warehouse space.”
The two companies launched a pilot of a new “hybrid” or blended pallet-supply model for Arizona Beverages in August 2018, focused on high-velocity product.
The pilot proved out the concept. The hybrid model maintained high quality standards and actually improved service for some lanes and markets. On a net basis, the blended model helped Bettaway reduce overall pallet landed cost to serve, across Arizona Beverages’ network of plants and distributors, by 31%.
Another advantage was the precision fit of PECO’s highly engineered and durable pallets with Bettaway’s material handling systems. Sophisticated robot-like machines automate the loading of packaged iced-tea product onto pallets, which then move through the plant on automated conveyors, eventually arriving at the loading dock for staging onto trucks. “The pallets fit like a glove, and we had zero pallet integrity failures,” says Dagnese.
A CONCEPT PROVEN; A MARKET CREATED
Dagnese and Vaccaro are excited about the opportunity to expand the hybrid model to more shippers. “We think there are numerous co-selling opportunities with existing customers of both PECO and Bettaway,” Dagnese says.
Vaccaro agrees. “I hate the term ‘think outside the box,’ but this is really an instance where two companies came together, threw out the old playbook, and started with a clean sheet of paper to design a solution that would bring together the best of what often were considered competing services,” he says. “And in the end, the customer saved money and got a better solution.”
The supply chain risk management firm Overhaul has landed $55 million in backing, saying the financing will fuel its advancements in artificial intelligence and support its strategic acquisition roadmap.
The equity funding round comes from the private equity firm Springcoast Partners, with follow-on participation from existing investors Edison Partners and Americo. As part of the investment, Springcoast’s Chris Dederick and Holger Staude will join Overhaul’s board of directors.
According to Austin, Texas-based Overhaul, the money comes as macroeconomic and global trade dynamics are driving consequential transformations in supply chains. That makes cargo visibility and proactive risk management essential tools as shippers manage new routes and suppliers.
“The supply chain technology space will see significant consolidation over the next 12 to 24 months,” Barry Conlon, CEO of Overhaul, said in a release. “Overhaul is well-positioned to establish itself as the ultimate integrated solution, delivering a comprehensive suite of tools for supply chain risk management, efficiency, and visibility under a single trusted platform.”
Artificial intelligence (AI) and data science were hot business topics in 2024 and will remain on the front burner in 2025, according to recent research published in AI in Action, a series of technology-focused columns in the MIT Sloan Management Review.
In Five Trends in AI and Data Science for 2025, researchers Tom Davenport and Randy Bean outline ways in which AI and our data-driven culture will continue to shape the business landscape in the coming year. The information comes from a range of recent AI-focused research projects, including the 2025 AI & Data Leadership Executive Benchmark Survey, an annual survey of data, analytics, and AI executives conducted by Bean’s educational firm, Data & AI Leadership Exchange.
The five trends range from the promise of agentic AI to the struggle over which C-suite role should oversee data and AI responsibilities. At a glance, they reveal that:
Leaders will grapple with both the promise and hype around agentic AI. Agentic AI—which handles tasks independently—is on the rise, in the form of generative AI bots that can perform some content-creation tasks. But the authors say it will be a while before such tools can handle major tasks—like make a travel reservation or conduct a banking transaction.
The time has come to measure results from generative AI experiments. The authors say very few companies are carefully measuring productivity gains from AI projects—particularly when it comes to figuring out what their knowledge-based workers are doing with the freed-up time those projects provide. Doing so is vital to profiting from AI investments.
The reality about data-driven culture sets in. The authors found that 92% of survey respondents feel that cultural and change management challenges are the primary barriers to becoming data- and AI-driven—indicating that the shift to AI is about much more than just the technology.
Unstructured data is important again. The ability to apply Generative AI tools to manage unstructured data—such as text, images, and video—is putting a renewed focus on getting all that data into shape, which takes a whole lot of human effort. As the authors explain “organizations need to pick the best examples of each document type, tag or graph the content, and get it loaded into the system.” And many companies simply aren’t there yet.
Who should run data and AI? Expect continued struggle. Should these roles be concentrated on the business or tech side of the organization? Opinions differ, and as the roles themselves continue to evolve, the authors say companies should expect to continue to wrestle with responsibilities and reporting structures.
Shippers today are praising an 11th-hour contract agreement that has averted the threat of a strike by dockworkers at East and Gulf coast ports that could have frozen container imports and exports as soon as January 16.
The agreement came late last night between the International Longshoremen’s Association (ILA) representing some 45,000 workers and the United States Maritime Alliance (USMX) that includes the operators of port facilities up and down the coast.
Details of the new agreement on those issues have not yet been made public, but in the meantime, retailers and manufacturers are heaving sighs of relief that trade flows will continue.
“Providing certainty with a new contract and avoiding further disruptions is paramount to ensure retail goods arrive in a timely manner for consumers. The agreement will also pave the way for much-needed modernization efforts, which are essential for future growth at these ports and the overall resiliency of our nation’s supply chain,” Gold said.
The next step in the process is for both sides to ratify the tentative agreement, so negotiators have agreed to keep those details private in the meantime, according to identical statements released by the ILA and the USMX. In their joint statement, the groups called the six-year deal a “win-win,” saying: “This agreement protects current ILA jobs and establishes a framework for implementing technologies that will create more jobs while modernizing East and Gulf coasts ports – making them safer and more efficient, and creating the capacity they need to keep our supply chains strong. This is a win-win agreement that creates ILA jobs, supports American consumers and businesses, and keeps the American economy the key hub of the global marketplace.”
The breakthrough hints at broader supply chain trends, which will focus on the tension between operational efficiency and workforce job protection, not just at ports but across other sectors as well, according to a statement from Judah Levine, head of research at Freightos, a freight booking and payment platform. Port automation was the major sticking point leading up to this agreement, as the USMX pushed for technologies to make ports more efficient, while the ILA opposed automation or semi-automation that could threaten jobs.
"This is a six-year détente in the tech-versus-labor tug-of-war at U.S. ports," Levine said. “Automation remains a lightning rod—and likely one we’ll see in other industries—but this deal suggests a cautious path forward."
Editor's note: This story was revised on January 9 to include additional input from the ILA, USMX, and Freightos.
Logistics industry growth slowed in December due to a seasonal wind-down of inventory and following one of the busiest holiday shopping seasons on record, according to the latest Logistics Managers’ Index (LMI) report, released this week.
The monthly LMI was 57.3 in December, down more than a percentage point from November’s reading of 58.4. Despite the slowdown, economic activity across the industry continued to expand, as an LMI reading above 50 indicates growth and a reading below 50 indicates contraction.
The LMI researchers said the monthly conditions were largely due to seasonal drawdowns in inventory levels—and the associated costs of holding them—at the retail level. The LMI’s Inventory Levels index registered 50, falling from 56.1 in November. That reduction also affected warehousing capacity, which slowed but remained in expansion mode: The LMI’s warehousing capacity index fell 7 points to a reading of 61.6.
December’s results reflect a continued trend toward more typical industry growth patterns following recent years of volatility—and they point to a successful peak holiday season as well.
“Retailers were clearly correct in their bet to stock [up] on goods ahead of the holiday season,” the LMI researchers wrote in their monthly report. “Holiday sales from November until Christmas Eve were up 3.8% year-over-year according to Mastercard. This was largely driven by a 6.7% increase in e-commerce sales, although in-person spending was up 2.9% as well.”
And those results came during a compressed peak shopping cycle.
“The increase in spending came despite the shorter holiday season due to the late Thanksgiving,” the researchers also wrote, citing National Retail Federation (NRF) estimates that U.S. shoppers spent just short of a trillion dollars in November and December, making it the busiest holiday season of all time.
The LMI is a monthly survey of logistics managers from across the country. It tracks industry growth overall and across eight areas: inventory levels and costs; warehousing capacity, utilization, and prices; and transportation capacity, utilization, and prices. The report is released monthly by researchers from Arizona State University, Colorado State University, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rutgers University, and the University of Nevada, Reno, in conjunction with the Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals (CSCMP).
As U.S. small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) face an uncertain business landscape in 2025, a substantial majority (67%) expect positive growth in the new year compared to 2024, according to a survey from DHL.
However, the survey also showed that businesses could face a rocky road to reach that goal, as they navigate a complex environment of regulatory/policy shifts and global market volatility. Both those issues were cited as top challenges by 36% of respondents, followed by staffing/talent retention (11%) and digital threats and cyber attacks (2%).
Against that backdrop, SMEs said that the biggest opportunity for growth in 2025 lies in expanding into new markets (40%), followed by economic improvements (31%) and implementing new technologies (14%).
As the U.S. prepares for a broad shift in political leadership in Washington after a contentious election, the SMEs in DHL’s survey were likely split evenly on their opinion about the impact of regulatory and policy changes. A plurality of 40% were on the fence (uncertain, still evaluating), followed by 24% who believe regulatory changes could negatively impact growth, 20% who see these changes as having a positive impact, and 16% predicting no impact on growth at all.
That uncertainty also triggered a split when respondents were asked how they planned to adjust their strategy in 2025 in response to changes in the policy or regulatory landscape. The largest portion (38%) of SMEs said they remained uncertain or still evaluating, followed by 30% who will make minor adjustments, 19% will maintain their current approach, and 13% who were willing to significantly adjust their approach.