Mark Solomon joined DC VELOCITY as senior editor in August 2008, and was promoted to his current position on January 1, 2015. He has spent more than 30 years in the transportation, logistics and supply chain management fields as a journalist and public relations professional. From 1989 to 1994, he worked in Washington as a reporter for the Journal of Commerce, covering the aviation and trucking industries, the Department of Transportation, Congress and the U.S. Supreme Court. Prior to that, he worked for Traffic World for seven years in a similar role. From 1994 to 2008, Mr. Solomon ran Media-Based Solutions, a public relations firm based in Atlanta. He graduated in 1978 with a B.A. in journalism from The American University in Washington, D.C.
UPS Inc. has long faced challenges to optimize its vast U.S. surface transportation network. On one hand, it deals with traffic surges that put its network under stress and forces it to pay exorbitant rates to have others move its shipments. On the other, it struggles with empty miles and missed backhaul opportunities.
That could explain why the Atlanta-based giant was willing to spend $1.8 billion in cash and debt to acquire Chicago-based truckload and less-than-truckload (LTL) broker Coyote Logistics LLC. The deal, announced this morning, is the largest in UPS's 108-year history and the biggest pure brokerage deal ever. Beyond the headlines is the profound change the deal may bring to UPS's system by finally reducing the network variability that has bugged the company for decades.
For UPS, the deal has two parts: First, it adds an important arrow to its product quiver. UPS plans to stand back and let Coyote do its thing, which is to arrange transportation of more than 6,000 daily loads for shipper customers. UPS can now come to market with a portfolio that includes truckload brokerage, and can position itself as more of a lead logistics provider than it has in the past. Sources close to the deal said UPS's desire to boost its competitive position at the bidding table, or to compete with a company like C.H. Robinson Worldwide Inc., the nation's leading broker and a big third-party logistics provider, were not the primary drivers behind its purchase.
Others find that rationale hard to swallow. "Robinson needs to pay attention. They are no longer swinging the biggest bat," said Michael P. Regan, founder of TranzAct Technologies Inc., a consultancy and audit firm based in Elmhurst, Ill. Robinson was unavailable to comment. Regan said other freight brokers also should be concerned because Coyote now has the deepest pockets in U.S. transportation behind it. UPS generated $3.3 billion in free cash flow in the first half of 2015 and is on track this year to break the $60 billion annual-revenue barrier.
The problem of maintaining Coyote's freewheeling culture and keeping an organizational firewall between the two companies was not lost on UPS. In the statement announcing the deal, UPS said: "Coyote possesses significant industry knowledge, intellectual property, [and] employee talent, and has a strong company culture." Coyote will operate as a UPS subsidiary and will stay in its Chicago home base, and husband-and-wife cofounders Jeff and Marianne Silver will remain in charge for what appears to be an open-ended period, though there remains some question as to how long an entrepreneurial couple like the Silvers can comfortably coexist in UPS's bureaucracy.
FILLING THE GAPS
The second, and perhaps most relevant, part of the deal is the role Coyote will play to help fill the gaps in UPS's road network. Each day, UPS moves tens of millions of parcels and freight across its ground system. In addition, shipments booked to move "air" freight often move on the ground, depending on the distance and the delivery windows. A network so large and complex inevitably suffers from the plague of "variability," where supply and demand are not always in proper alignment. The result can be less-than-optimal utilization of the company's fleet, at least by UPS's standards.
UPS has longstanding relationships with many truckload carriers to move shipments that, for whatever reason, can't go on its equipment. Those relationships will remain in place, and UPS will continue to be responsible for purchasing space. It also uses Coyote to broker shipments.
The plan under the acquisition is for Coyote to serve as an adviser of sorts, leveraging its expertise and technology to enhance truckload-shipment visibility for UPS, thus identifying new opportunities and reducing UPS's network variability. In effect, Coyote's goal is not to do UPS's job, but to help UPS do a better job. UPS CEO David Abney said in the statement that UPS expects to realize as much as $150 million a year of "annual operating synergies," ranging from better backhaul utilization to increased cross-selling opportunities.
Coyote has also helped behind the scenes to support UPS's capacity needs during prior holiday peak seasons, a period when demand goes on steroids and the pressure on UPS's system is immense. During the 2013 peak, when bad weather and an avalanche of last-minute shipments from e-tailing giant Amazon.com gummed up its air network, UPS paid dearly to reroute packages to truckload carriers for rush delivery. Chastened by the 2013 problems, UPS ramped up its operational spending for the 2014 peak, only to find that it overinvested for expected volumes that never materialized.
In January, Abney disclosed that the company would not meet its fourth-quarter earnings estimates due to the higher costs associated with the peak ramp-up. Abney also said at the time that UPS would implement "new pricing strategies" for the upcoming holiday cycle. That could mean the implementation of so-called surge pricing, similar to the system that ride-sharing firm Uber employs during its peak riding periods. If so, Coyote's skills and clout could allow UPS to push through surge pricing while keeping its line-haul rates in check, said Jett McCandless, founder and CEO of CarrierDirect LLC, a logistics consulting and sales company.
The emergence of UPS in a segment that it has largely avoided is likely to spark another wave of consolidation among brokers, who are unaccustomed to a company like this in their midst. The $50-billion-a-year business has a handful of big players, but is composed mostly of small companies, many of which are profitable but lack the resources to move up the ladder.
McCandless, who at 36 is one of the industry's "young turks," sees transportation and brokerage becoming "agnostic," with technology being the key differentiator. As a result, the next five years will witness major consolidation as the smaller companies, lacking the technology and robust carrier relationships, lose out to the large "one-stop shops" and are either acquired or fold their tents, said McCandless.
However, this cycle will beget another phase in years 6 through 10, as big players effectively become too big to adequately serve a broad shipper base, McCandless said. New, smaller niche providers will then step into the breach, pick up the slack, and expand the number of providers in the market, he predicted.
Artificial intelligence (AI) and data science were hot business topics in 2024 and will remain on the front burner in 2025, according to recent research published in AI in Action, a series of technology-focused columns in the MIT Sloan Management Review.
In Five Trends in AI and Data Science for 2025, researchers Tom Davenport and Randy Bean outline ways in which AI and our data-driven culture will continue to shape the business landscape in the coming year. The information comes from a range of recent AI-focused research projects, including the 2025 AI & Data Leadership Executive Benchmark Survey, an annual survey of data, analytics, and AI executives conducted by Bean’s educational firm, Data & AI Leadership Exchange.
The five trends range from the promise of agentic AI to the struggle over which C-suite role should oversee data and AI responsibilities. At a glance, they reveal that:
Leaders will grapple with both the promise and hype around agentic AI. Agentic AI—which handles tasks independently—is on the rise, in the form of generative AI bots that can perform some content-creation tasks. But the authors say it will be a while before such tools can handle major tasks—like make a travel reservation or conduct a banking transaction.
The time has come to measure results from generative AI experiments. The authors say very few companies are carefully measuring productivity gains from AI projects—particularly when it comes to figuring out what their knowledge-based workers are doing with the freed-up time those projects provide. Doing so is vital to profiting from AI investments.
The reality about data-driven culture sets in. The authors found that 92% of survey respondents feel that cultural and change management challenges are the primary barriers to becoming data- and AI-driven—indicating that the shift to AI is about much more than just the technology.
Unstructured data is important again. The ability to apply Generative AI tools to manage unstructured data—such as text, images, and video—is putting a renewed focus on getting all that data into shape, which takes a whole lot of human effort. As the authors explain “organizations need to pick the best examples of each document type, tag or graph the content, and get it loaded into the system.” And many companies simply aren’t there yet.
Who should run data and AI? Expect continued struggle. Should these roles be concentrated on the business or tech side of the organization? Opinions differ, and as the roles themselves continue to evolve, the authors say companies should expect to continue to wrestle with responsibilities and reporting structures.
Shippers today are praising an 11th-hour contract agreement that has averted the threat of a strike by dockworkers at East and Gulf coast ports that could have frozen container imports and exports as soon as January 16.
The agreement came late last night between the International Longshoremen’s Association (ILA) representing some 45,000 workers and the United States Maritime Alliance (USMX) that includes the operators of port facilities up and down the coast.
Details of the new agreement on those issues have not yet been made public, but in the meantime, retailers and manufacturers are heaving sighs of relief that trade flows will continue.
“Providing certainty with a new contract and avoiding further disruptions is paramount to ensure retail goods arrive in a timely manner for consumers. The agreement will also pave the way for much-needed modernization efforts, which are essential for future growth at these ports and the overall resiliency of our nation’s supply chain,” Gold said.
The next step in the process is for both sides to ratify the tentative agreement, so negotiators have agreed to keep those details private in the meantime, according to identical statements released by the ILA and the USMX. In their joint statement, the groups called the six-year deal a “win-win,” saying: “This agreement protects current ILA jobs and establishes a framework for implementing technologies that will create more jobs while modernizing East and Gulf coasts ports – making them safer and more efficient, and creating the capacity they need to keep our supply chains strong. This is a win-win agreement that creates ILA jobs, supports American consumers and businesses, and keeps the American economy the key hub of the global marketplace.”
The breakthrough hints at broader supply chain trends, which will focus on the tension between operational efficiency and workforce job protection, not just at ports but across other sectors as well, according to a statement from Judah Levine, head of research at Freightos, a freight booking and payment platform. Port automation was the major sticking point leading up to this agreement, as the USMX pushed for technologies to make ports more efficient, while the ILA opposed automation or semi-automation that could threaten jobs.
"This is a six-year détente in the tech-versus-labor tug-of-war at U.S. ports," Levine said. “Automation remains a lightning rod—and likely one we’ll see in other industries—but this deal suggests a cautious path forward."
Editor's note: This story was revised on January 9 to include additional input from the ILA, USMX, and Freightos.
Logistics industry growth slowed in December due to a seasonal wind-down of inventory and following one of the busiest holiday shopping seasons on record, according to the latest Logistics Managers’ Index (LMI) report, released this week.
The monthly LMI was 57.3 in December, down more than a percentage point from November’s reading of 58.4. Despite the slowdown, economic activity across the industry continued to expand, as an LMI reading above 50 indicates growth and a reading below 50 indicates contraction.
The LMI researchers said the monthly conditions were largely due to seasonal drawdowns in inventory levels—and the associated costs of holding them—at the retail level. The LMI’s Inventory Levels index registered 50, falling from 56.1 in November. That reduction also affected warehousing capacity, which slowed but remained in expansion mode: The LMI’s warehousing capacity index fell 7 points to a reading of 61.6.
December’s results reflect a continued trend toward more typical industry growth patterns following recent years of volatility—and they point to a successful peak holiday season as well.
“Retailers were clearly correct in their bet to stock [up] on goods ahead of the holiday season,” the LMI researchers wrote in their monthly report. “Holiday sales from November until Christmas Eve were up 3.8% year-over-year according to Mastercard. This was largely driven by a 6.7% increase in e-commerce sales, although in-person spending was up 2.9% as well.”
And those results came during a compressed peak shopping cycle.
“The increase in spending came despite the shorter holiday season due to the late Thanksgiving,” the researchers also wrote, citing National Retail Federation (NRF) estimates that U.S. shoppers spent just short of a trillion dollars in November and December, making it the busiest holiday season of all time.
The LMI is a monthly survey of logistics managers from across the country. It tracks industry growth overall and across eight areas: inventory levels and costs; warehousing capacity, utilization, and prices; and transportation capacity, utilization, and prices. The report is released monthly by researchers from Arizona State University, Colorado State University, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rutgers University, and the University of Nevada, Reno, in conjunction with the Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals (CSCMP).
The overall national industrial real estate vacancy rate edged higher in the fourth quarter, although it still remains well below pre-pandemic levels, according to an analysis by Cushman & Wakefield.
Vacancy rates shrunk during the pandemic to historically low levels as e-commerce sales—and demand for warehouse space—boomed in response to massive numbers of people working and living from home. That frantic pace is now cooling off but real estate demand remains elevated from a long-term perspective.
“We've witnessed an uptick among firms looking to lease larger buildings to support their omnichannel fulfillment strategies and maintain inventory for their e-commerce, wholesale, and retail stock. This trend is not just about space, but about efficiency and customer satisfaction,” Jason Tolliver, President, Logistics & Industrial Services, said in a release. “Meanwhile, we're also seeing a flurry of activity to support forward-deployed stock models, a strategy that keeps products closer to the market they serve and where customers order them, promising quicker deliveries and happier customers.“
The latest figures show that industrial vacancy is likely nearing its peak for this cooling cycle in the coming quarters, Cushman & Wakefield analysts said.
Compared to the third quarter, the vacancy rate climbed 20 basis points to 6.7%, but that level was still 30 basis points below the 10-year, pre-pandemic average. Likewise, overall net absorption in the fourth quarter—a term for the amount of newly developed property leased by clients—measured 36.8 million square feet, up from the 33.3 million square feet recorded in the third quarter, but down 20% on a year-over-year basis.
In step with those statistics, real estate developers slowed their plans to erect more buildings. New construction deliveries continued to decelerate for the second straight quarter. Just 85.3 million square feet of new industrial product was completed in the fourth quarter, down 8% quarter-over-quarter and 48% versus one year ago.
Likewise, only four geographic markets saw more than 20 million square feet of completions year-to-date, compared to 10 markets in 2023. Meanwhile, as construction starts remained tempered overall, the under-development pipeline has continued to thin out, dropping by 36% annually to its lowest level (290.5 million square feet) since the third quarter of 2018.
Despite the dip in demand last quarter, the market for industrial space remains relatively healthy, Cushman & Wakefield said.
“After a year of hesitancy, logistics is entering a new, sustained growth phase,” Tolliver said. “Corporate capital is being deployed to optimize supply chains, diversify networks, and minimize potential risks. What's particularly encouraging is the proactive approach of retailers, wholesalers, and 3PLs, who are not just reacting to the market, but shaping it. 2025 will be a year characterized by this bias for action.”
Under terms of the deal, Sick and Endress+Hauser will each hold 50% of a joint venture called "Endress+Hauser SICK GmbH+Co. KG," which will strengthen the development and production of analyzer and gas flow meter technologies. According to Sick, its gas flow meters make it possible to switch to low-emission and non-fossil energy sources, for example, and the process analyzers allow reliable monitoring of emissions.
As part of the partnership, the product solutions manufactured together will now be marketed by Endress+Hauser, allowing customers to use a broader product portfolio distributed from a single source via that company’s global sales centers.
Under terms of the contract between the two companies—which was signed in the summer of 2024— around 800 Sick employees located in 42 countries will transfer to Endress+Hauser, including workers in the global sales and service units of Sick’s “Cleaner Industries” division.
“This partnership is a perfect match,” Peter Selders, CEO of the Endress+Hauser Group, said in a release. “It creates new opportunities for growth and development, particularly in the sustainable transformation of the process industry. By joining forces, we offer added value to our customers. Our combined efforts will make us faster and ultimately more successful than if we acted alone. In this case, one and one equals more than two.”
According to Sick, the move means that its current customers will continue to find familiar Sick contacts available at Endress+Hauser for consulting, sales, and service of process automation solutions. The company says this approach allows it to focus on its core business of factory and logistics automation to meet global demand for automation and digitalization.
Sick says its core business has always been in factory and logistics automation, which accounts for more than 80% of sales, and this area remains unaffected by the new joint venture. In Sick’s view, automation is crucial for industrial companies to secure their productivity despite limited resources. And Sick’s sensor solutions are a critical part of industrial automation, which increases productivity through artificial intelligence and the digital networking of production and supply chains.