Art van Bodegraven was, among other roles, chief design officer for the DES Leadership Academy. He passed away on June 18, 2017. He will be greatly missed.
With all our focus on good/better/best practices and their integration with the concept of holistic supply chains, we sometimes put customer service on the mental back burner. But without customer service as an integral component, what's the point of supply chain excellence?
It's not simply about reducing or managing costs; that's too easy and too simplistic. Customer service is the reason that supply chains exist: right thing, right place, right network, right time, right way, right price, right attitude.
What customers need—and sometimes have the audacity to expect—is driven by their product and order profiles (which can change over time), their needs, their demands of the moment (which often relate to their needs), and how they must deliver to satisfy their own customers. It is, as we have previously written, customer service that drives how supply chains are built, determining such things as distribution network structures, inventory holdings and deployment practices, transport modes and use, and sourcing and supplier integration.
These fundamentals are true whether one provides goods or services, and whether the arena is business-to-business (B2B) or business-to-consumer (B2C) commerce. Those who get all those rights right, will prosper. Those who don't, won't. But ultimate demise may be a while in coming.
THE LATEST CASE(S)
Your fearlessly adventurous reporters were not caught up in the much-ballyhooed and over-hyped overload at parcel carriers trying to meet impossible demand peaks for Christmas. And, in truth, those "failures" were not the consequence of deliberate actions to contain costs or to pretend to have a customer service commitment when the real wish was for the customer to go away quietly after paying.
But the spotlight has helped intensify our thinking about the criticality of customer service, both genuine and ersatz, in business success in the Age of the Supply Chain. And we have had our own service contretemps in the recent past. FedEx and UPS are certainly not bad actors in the customer service melodrama. And a few companies have built staggering reputations and cult-like followings on nth-degree customer service. They, in general, are succeeding wildly. We refrain from naming them, lest we omit a deserving candidate, but the industry verticals represented include automotive, general retail, apparel, manufacturing, hospitality, specialty retail, communications, entertainment, and business services—and, yes, supply chain management.
THE DARK SIDE
There, sadly, are too many no-service or not-quite-service providers lurking in the thickets of competitive commerce. These are the outfits that have a formal customer service function because it is required, whether by regulators, by license grantors, by competitors' practices, or by the demands of customer perception. Many of these great pretenders try to get by with slogans, outrageous claims, charismatic spokesmodels, and loads of advertising. But they do reveal core corporate cultures when facing (or avoiding) service stress.
Do they not realize that protected territories for single provider services are a fading remnant of the past? That unique products and processes lose uniqueness or patent protection over time? That there are competitors in all dimensions of products and services who can and will differentiate based on technology, reliability, service, cost, quality, integration, whatever? But treating customers like unworthies of somewhat diminished capacity is not a strategically successful course for sustainable revenue and profit building. And too many companies fail to respect their customers, whether businesses or individuals.
More breaking news: We know the truth, and others are catching on rapidly. The days of the rapacious hucksters are numbered. We only wish we knew the number and could plan accordingly.
THE MANY FLAVORS OF CUSTOMER SERVICE
Putting aside the unseemly details of our specific recent adventure, which was not excellent, this is ultimately about the role of customer service in supply chain performance and enterprise success. So, what can customer service do for you, and what can it do to you?
First, recognize that customer service encompasses all relationships and interactions between your organization and your customers (including your internal customers); it is not limited to the functionality of a specific box on the org chart. Customer service is the totality of a buyer's experience with the seller—order placement, product inquiry, problem-solving, tech support, returns, image and appearance, transaction accuracy, order fulfillment performance, community relations, general ease of doing business, interpersonal relationships, value, collaboration in products and processes, and on and on.
Here's what's at stake when you make decisions about the what, why, and how of your customer service:
Middling-to-poor customer service can undermine—even ruin—excellent operational supply chain performance.
Exquisite customer service can overcome the short-term impacts of marketplace events, e.g., floods, famine, conflict, earthquake, tsunami, shortages.
Robust customer service can mitigate customer reaction to sporadic failures in supply chain execution.
No amount or quality of customer service can make up for frequent and continuous supply chain failure.
Superb customer service can enhance customer relationships, protect business volume, and help build business growth with existing customers.
Dynamite customer service can generate business growth through current customers' word-of-mouth endorsement.
Shabby, shoddy, ineffective, or otherwise negative customer service can drive customers into the waiting arms of ardent and loving competitors—at incredible velocity.
The flip side of word-of-mouth endorsements is that news of bad customer service travels at least six times as fast as testimonials for good customer service.
THE COST OF CUSTOMER SERVICE
Those who see it as an investment understand that the payoffs of customer retention, business protection, and sales growth are huge. Those who see it as a cost, a necessary evil in doing business (or an onerous requirement imposed by regulators), think customer service represents an opportunity to trim costs, or to get by with either a minimum or a faux function that minimizes the expense involved.
What the beady-eyed cost managers fail to see is the economic damage visited upon the enterprise by lost business volume, by lost customers, and by the rise of competitors with a longer-range vision—and an understanding of customer service as a competitive weapon, a differentiator.
At its best, in addition to the short-term and tangible business results, customer service can provide a window into what customers think, want, and need as they plan how to succeed in their own markets and with their customers.
AND THE FUTURE HOLDS?
Potentially fatal diseases seldom develop without signs and symptoms. We'd submit that eventual business failure is a likely consequence of some combination of supply chain failures and customer service shortcomings, pretenses, implosions, or mediocrity.
As holiday shoppers blitz through the final weeks of the winter peak shopping season, a survey from the postal and shipping solutions provider Stamps.com shows that 40% of U.S. consumers are unaware of holiday shipping deadlines, leaving them at risk of running into last-minute scrambles, higher shipping costs, and packages arriving late.
The survey also found a generational difference in holiday shipping deadline awareness, with 53% of Baby Boomers unaware of these cut-off dates, compared to just 32% of Millennials. Millennials are also more likely to prioritize guaranteed delivery, with 68% citing it as a key factor when choosing a shipping option this holiday season.
Of those surveyed, 66% have experienced holiday shipping delays, with Gen Z reporting the highest rate of delays at 73%, compared to 49% of Baby Boomers. That statistical spread highlights a conclusion that younger generations are less tolerant of delays and prioritize fast and efficient shipping, researchers said. The data came from a study of 1,000 U.S. consumers conducted in October 2024 to understand their shopping habits and preferences.
As they cope with that tight shipping window, a huge 83% of surveyed consumers are willing to pay extra for faster shipping to avoid the prospect of a late-arriving gift. This trend is especially strong among Gen Z, with 56% willing to pay up, compared to just 27% of Baby Boomers.
“As the holiday season approaches, it’s crucial for consumers to be prepared and aware of shipping deadlines to ensure their gifts arrive on time,” Nick Spitzman, General Manager of Stamps.com, said in a release. ”Our survey highlights the significant portion of consumers who are unaware of these deadlines, particularly older generations. It’s essential for retailers and shipping carriers to provide clear and timely information about shipping deadlines to help consumers avoid last-minute stress and disappointment.”
For best results, Stamps.com advises consumers to begin holiday shopping early and familiarize themselves with shipping deadlines across carriers. That is especially true with Thanksgiving falling later this year, meaning the holiday season is shorter and planning ahead is even more essential.
According to Stamps.com, key shipping deadlines include:
December 13, 2024: Last day for FedEx Ground Economy
December 18, 2024: Last day for USPS Ground Advantage and First-Class Mail
December 19, 2024: Last day for UPS 3 Day Select and USPS Priority Mail
December 20, 2024: Last day for UPS 2nd Day Air
December 21, 2024: Last day for USPS Priority Mail Express
Measured over the entire year of 2024, retailers estimate that 16.9% of their annual sales will be returned. But that total figure includes a spike of returns during the holidays; a separate NRF study found that for the 2024 winter holidays, retailers expect their return rate to be 17% higher, on average, than their annual return rate.
Despite the cost of handling that massive reverse logistics task, retailers grin and bear it because product returns are so tightly integrated with brand loyalty, offering companies an additional touchpoint to provide a positive interaction with their customers, NRF Vice President of Industry and Consumer Insights Katherine Cullen said in a release. According to NRF’s research, 76% of consumers consider free returns a key factor in deciding where to shop, and 67% say a negative return experience would discourage them from shopping with a retailer again. And 84% of consumers report being more likely to shop with a retailer that offers no box/no label returns and immediate refunds.
So in response to consumer demand, retailers continue to enhance the return experience for customers. More than two-thirds of retailers surveyed (68%) say they are prioritizing upgrading their returns capabilities within the next six months. In addition, improving the returns experience and reducing the return rate are viewed as two of the most important elements for businesses in achieving their 2025 goals.
However, retailers also must balance meeting consumer demand for seamless returns against rising costs. Fraudulent and abusive returns practices create both logistical and financial challenges for retailers. A majority (93%) of retailers said retail fraud and other exploitive behavior is a significant issue for their business. In terms of abuse, bracketing – purchasing multiple items with the intent to return some – has seen growth among younger consumers, with 51% of Gen Z consumers indicating they engage in this practice.
“Return policies are no longer just a post-purchase consideration – they’re shaping how younger generations shop from the start,” David Sobie, co-founder and CEO of Happy Returns, said in a release. “With behaviors like bracketing and rising return rates putting strain on traditional systems, retailers need to rethink reverse logistics. Solutions like no box/no label returns with item verification enable immediate refunds, meeting customer expectations for convenience while increasing accuracy, reducing fraud and helping to protect profitability in a competitive market.”
The research came from two complementary surveys conducted this fall, allowing NRF and Happy Returns to compare perspectives from both sides. They included one that gathered responses from 2,007 consumers who had returned at least one online purchase within the past year, and another from 249 e-commerce and finance professionals from large U.S. retailers.
The “series A” round was led by Andreessen Horowitz (a16z), with participation from Y Combinator and strategic industry investors, including RyderVentures. It follows an earlier, previously undisclosed, pre-seed round raised 1.5 years ago, that was backed by Array Ventures and other angel investors.
“Our mission is to redefine the economics of the freight industry by harnessing the power of agentic AI,ˮ Pablo Palafox, HappyRobotʼs co-founder and CEO, said in a release. “This funding will enable us to accelerate product development, expand and support our customer base, and ultimately transform how logistics businesses operate.ˮ
According to the firm, its conversational AI platform uses agentic AI—a term for systems that can autonomously make decisions and take actions to achieve specific goals—to simplify logistics operations. HappyRobot says its tech can automate tasks like inbound and outbound calls, carrier negotiations, and data capture, thus enabling brokers to enhance efficiency and capacity, improve margins, and free up human agents to focus on higher-value activities.
“Today, the logistics industry underpinning our global economy is stretched,” Anish Acharya, general partner at a16z, said. “As a key part of the ecosystem, even small to midsize freight brokers can make and receive hundreds, if not thousands, of calls per day – and hiring for this job is increasingly difficult. By providing customers with autonomous decision making, HappyRobotʼs agentic AI platform helps these brokers operate more reliably and efficiently.ˮ
RJW Logistics Group, a logistics solutions provider (LSP) for consumer packaged goods (CPG) brands, has received a “strategic investment” from Boston-based private equity firm Berkshire partners, and now plans to drive future innovations and expand its geographic reach, the Woodridge, Illinois-based company said Tuesday.
Terms of the deal were not disclosed, but the company said that CEO Kevin Williamson and other members of RJW management will continue to be “significant investors” in the company, while private equity firm Mason Wells, which invested in RJW in 2019, will maintain a minority investment position.
RJW is an asset-based transportation, logistics, and warehousing provider, operating more than 7.3 million square feet of consolidation warehouse space in the transportation hubs of Chicago and Dallas and employing 1,900 people. RJW says it partners with over 850 CPG brands and delivers to more than 180 retailers nationwide. According to the company, its retail logistics solutions save cost, improve visibility, and achieve industry-leading On-Time, In-Full (OTIF) performance. Those improvements drive increased in-stock rates and sales, benefiting both CPG brands and their retailer partners, the firm says.
"After several years of mitigating inflation, disruption, supply shocks, conflicts, and uncertainty, we are currently in a relative period of calm," John Paitek, vice president, GEP, said in a release. "But it is very much the calm before the coming storm. This report provides procurement and supply chain leaders with a prescriptive guide to weathering the gale force headwinds of protectionism, tariffs, trade wars, regulatory pressures, uncertainty, and the AI revolution that we will face in 2025."
A report from the company released today offers predictions and strategies for the upcoming year, organized into six major predictions in GEP’s “Outlook 2025: Procurement & Supply Chain” report.
Advanced AI agents will play a key role in demand forecasting, risk monitoring, and supply chain optimization, shifting procurement's mandate from tactical to strategic. Companies should invest in the technology now to to streamline processes and enhance decision-making.
Expanded value metrics will drive decisions, as success will be measured by resilience, sustainability, and compliance… not just cost efficiency. Companies should communicate value beyond cost savings to stakeholders, and develop new KPIs.
Increasing regulatory demands will necessitate heightened supply chain transparency and accountability. So companies should strengthen supplier audits, adopt ESG tracking tools, and integrate compliance into strategic procurement decisions.
Widening tariffs and trade restrictions will force companies to reassess total cost of ownership (TCO) metrics to include geopolitical and environmental risks, as nearshoring and friendshoring attempt to balance resilience with cost.
Rising energy costs and regulatory demands will accelerate the shift to sustainable operations, pushing companies to invest in renewable energy and redesign supply chains to align with ESG commitments.
New tariffs could drive prices higher, just as inflation has come under control and interest rates are returning to near-zero levels. That means companies must continue to secure cost savings as their primary responsibility.