We use cookies to provide you with a better experience. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies in accordance with our Cookie Policy.
  • ::COVID-19 COVERAGE::
  • INDUSTRY PRESS ROOM
  • ABOUT
  • CONTACT
  • MEDIA FILE
  • Create Account
  • Sign In
  • Sign Out
  • My Account
Free Newsletters
  • MAGAZINE
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Digital Edition
    • Subscribe
    • Newsletters
    • Mobile Apps
  • TRANSPORTATION
  • MATERIAL HANDLING
  • TECHNOLOGY
  • LIFT TRUCKS
  • PODCAST ETC.
    • Podcast
    • Blogs
      • Analytics & Big Data
      • Best Practices
      • Dispatches
      • Empowering Your Performance Edge
      • Logistics Problem Solving
      • One-Off Sound Off
      • Public Sector Logistics
      • Two Sides of the Logistics Coin
      • Submit your blog post
    • Events
    • White Papers
    • Industry Press Room
      • Upload Your News
    • New Products
      • Upload Your Product News
    • Conference Guides
    • Conference Reports
    • Newsletters
    • Mobile Apps
  • DCV-TV
    • DCV-TV 1: News
    • DCV-TV 2: Case Studies
    • DCV-TV 3: Webcasts
    • DCV-TV 4: Viewer Contributed
    • DCV-TV 5: Solution Profiles
    • MODEX 2020
    • Upload Your Video
  • MAGAZINE
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Digital Edition
    • Subscribe
    • Newsletters
    • Mobile Apps
  • TRANSPORTATION
  • MATERIAL HANDLING
  • TECHNOLOGY
  • LIFT TRUCKS
  • PODCAST ETC.
    • Podcast
    • Blogs
      • Analytics & Big Data
      • Best Practices
      • Dispatches
      • Empowering Your Performance Edge
      • Logistics Problem Solving
      • One-Off Sound Off
      • Public Sector Logistics
      • Two Sides of the Logistics Coin
      • Submit your blog post
    • Events
    • White Papers
    • Industry Press Room
      • Upload Your News
    • New Products
      • Upload Your Product News
    • Conference Guides
    • Conference Reports
    • Newsletters
    • Mobile Apps
  • DCV-TV
    • DCV-TV 1: News
    • DCV-TV 2: Case Studies
    • DCV-TV 3: Webcasts
    • DCV-TV 4: Viewer Contributed
    • DCV-TV 5: Solution Profiles
    • MODEX 2020
    • Upload Your Video
Home » After the voting, UPS, Teamsters look to quell rank-and-file's fire
newsworthy

After the voting, UPS, Teamsters look to quell rank-and-file's fire

June 26, 2013
Mark B. Solomon
No Comments

UPS Inc. and Teamsters union leadership have work to do.

Although a final tally won't be available until later today, it is almost certain that workers in UPS' small-package unit will approve a five-year collective bargaining agreement covering 235,000 employees. But the projected 53-percent margin of approval is the narrowest in the history of UPS-Teamster contracts, which date back to the 1930s. In addition, the rank-and-file rejected 18 local and regional attachments to the national contract, known in labor lingo as "supplements" or "riders." That is believed to be the largest number rejected in any contract negotiated by the Teamsters in its 110-year existence.

The 12,000 or so workers at UPS Freight took a much harder line, rejecting their five-year contract proposal outright by an overwhelming vote of 4,244 to 1,897.

The outcomes are stinging blows to the Atlanta-based shipping and logistics giant, which sought to begin contract talks nearly a year earlier than normal in the hope of reaching an accord long before the July 31 deadline for both compacts. It is also a sharp rebuke to Teamster leadership, which negotiated the deals, and to leaders of union locals that blessed them before putting the ball in the rank-and-file's court.

The defeat of the UPS Freight contract sends the two sides back to the bargaining table. On the small-package side, the work will focus on convincing members in the areas covered by the 18 rejected supplements to change their votes. The national agreement can't be finalized until all supplements are ratified by the affected members. Should a supplement be rejected a second time, both sides resume negotiations. On a third go-round, a strike authorization vote can be taken.

No one expects either contract to be renegotiated from scratch.

COMPLICATED TASK
Contract renegotiations will be complicated by fierce opposition in key regions. Local 89 in Louisville, Ky.—which represents about 9,300 small-package workers and is the largest Teamster local in the UPS system—rejected the master agreement by a 3,388-to-483 vote and the supplement 3,520 to 441. In Ohio, the master and supplemental agreement went down by about a two-to-one margins. Workers in the Southwest shot down both measures by a margin of roughly 2.5 to 1.

Given the amount of work ahead and the short time in which to do it, it appears unlikely the contracts will be ratified by the July 31 deadlines, according to Ken Paff, national organizer for Teamsters for a Democratic Union (TDU), a dissident group that often clashes with Teamster leadership.

In a statement yesterday, UPS said it is "committed to quickly resolving remaining issues on UPS Freight and supplemental agreements." The company said the developments of the past 24 hours are "part of the normal negotiating process" and said it was confident the issues would soon be resolved.

A separate statement from the Teamsters did not share the same optimistic tone. "While the National Master contract was approved, the union today informed the company that the agreement covering UPS Freight employees and some local agreements will require additional negotiation," according to the statement.

The biggest bone of contention in the small-package accord is language calling for 140,000 members to move from a company-sponsored health insurance plan to one falling under the joint trusteeship of employers like UPS and the Teamsters. Critics of the plan said that it will result in substantial benefit cuts and that the language is unclear as to how the transition would be executed. Small-package workers will not be required to make out-of-pocket contributions to their health insurance premiums.

Under the proposed agreement, full- and part-time workers in the parcel unit would get $3.90 per hour in wage increases over the contract's life. Hourly pay for UPS's starting part-time pre-loaders and sorters would rise to $11 from $8.50; all others would receive an increase to $10 an hour. The agreement requires UPS to create 2,350 full-time jobs over the next three years by combining part-time positions into full-time slots.

UPS Freight workers would receive $2.50 per hour in wage hikes over the five-year period. The gap between wage hikes at the two operations was a factor in UPS Freight workers rejecting the agreement.

One of the union's main grievances is the issue of driver subcontracting. UPS Freight subcontracts about half its driving work, according to union officials. Judging by the one-sided nature of the UPS Freight contract vote, the rank-and-file were not convinced that language in the new contract eliminates or reduces subcontracting.

In the contract, UPS Freight proposed the creation of a "line-haul driver" division designed to curb the practice. However, in a communiqué last month to members, leaders of Local 89 in Louisville said the proposal falls short of its objective. In addition, new hires in the division would earn 20 cents less per mile than other members, local officials said.

Transportation Air Trucking Less-than-Truckload
KEYWORDS International Brotherhood of Teamsters (IBT) UPS
  • Related Articles

    Teamster local bosses approve contracts with UPS, UPS Freight; rank-and-file vote to come

    Teamsters, UPS Freight to meet Jan. 6 to discuss imminent contract proposal

    With one-month reprieve, ABF and its pugnacious rank-and-file retreat to separate corners

Marksolomon
Mark Solomon joined DC VELOCITY as senior editor in August 2008, and was promoted to his current position on January 1, 2015. He has spent more than 30 years in the transportation, logistics and supply chain management fields as a journalist and public relations professional. From 1989 to 1994, he worked in Washington as a reporter for the Journal of Commerce, covering the aviation and trucking industries, the Department of Transportation, Congress and the U.S. Supreme Court. Prior to that, he worked for Traffic World for seven years in a similar role. From 1994 to 2008, Mr. Solomon ran Media-Based Solutions, a public relations firm based in Atlanta. He graduated in 1978 with a B.A. in journalism from The American University in Washington, D.C.

Recent Articles by Mark Solomon

Coming together for road safety: interview with Joshua Girard

Off the rails

Freight rate spikes shaking up the C-suite

You must login or register in order to post a comment.

Report Abusive Comment

Most Popular Articles

  • Cold chain giant Lineage Logistics buys its own rail operator

  • Biden names dozens of senior leaders to DOT, including FMCSA and FRA

  • Outlook 2021: What’s in store for logistics supply chain?

  • Cushman & Wakefield Brokers Sale of 170 Acres plus Lease for 1MSF Build-to-Suit for Home Improvement Retailer in Commerce City, CO.

  • Thriving in the long haul: interview with Colin Yankee

Now Playing on DCV-TV

Sick agv demo thumbnail

Optimize Load Handling Tasks with Industrial Mobile Robots

DCV-TV 4: Viewer Contributed
Intelligent sensors detect the presence of goods, check for empty shelves, or the correct alignment on the mobile platform towards the freight. The solutions range from simple detection sensors, thorough measuring devices, and 2D LiDAR sensors.

FEATURED WHITE PAPERS

  • Proven Benefits: A Compendium of Slotting Optimization Success Snapshots

  • Bridging Information Gaps in Dock and Yard Operations

  • How Intelligent Sensor Solutions Turn Data Into Action

  • Order picking Solutions: Understanding Your Options

View More

Subscribe to DC Velocity Magazine

GET YOUR FREE SUBSCRIPTION
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • NEWSLETTERS
  • ADVERTISING
  • CUSTOMER CARE
  • CONTACT
  • ABOUT
  • STAFF
  • PRIVACY POLICY

Copyright ©2021. All Rights ReservedDesign, CMS, Hosting & Web Development :: ePublishing