Contributing Editor Toby Gooley is a writer and editor specializing in supply chain, logistics, and material handling, and a lecturer at MIT's Center for Transportation & Logistics. She previously was Senior Editor at DC VELOCITY and Editor of DCV's sister publication, CSCMP's Supply Chain Quarterly. Prior to joining AGiLE Business Media in 2007, she spent 20 years at Logistics Management magazine as Managing Editor and Senior Editor covering international trade and transportation. Prior to that she was an export traffic manager for 10 years. She holds a B.A. in Asian Studies from Cornell University.
For the first time, the weight of a lift truck operator will determine the type of safety lanyards
and harnesses that workers may use to prevent and limit falls from man-up lift trucks, according to a
new standard that takes effect Feb. 23.
The standard, developed by the Industrial Truck Standards Development Foundation and accepted by the American National Standards Institute (ANSI), also makes fixed-length,
nonabsorbing lanyards obsolete. Only energy-absorbing or self-retracting lanyards will now be allowed.
All man-up trucks, whether new or already in service, must comply with the new standard, which is outlined in
clause 4.17 of the ANSI/ITSDF B56.1 standard
(Safety Standard for Low-Lift and High-Lift Trucks).
As of Feb. 23, an operator weighing less than 220 lbs. may use:
A body belt with a self-retracting lanyard
A full-body harness with an energy-absorbing lanyard (maximum 6 feet in length)
A full-body harness with a self-retracting lanyard
An operator weighing between 220 and 310 lbs. may use:
A full-body harness with an energy-absorbing lanyard (maximum 6 feet)
A full-body harness with a self-retracting lanyard
An operator weighing between 311 and 400 lbs. may use:
A full-body harness with a self-retracting lanyard
The new standard specifically states that lift trucks' capacity must be reduced by the weight of
any operator weighing more than 220 lbs., and that self-retracting lanyards used by an operator weighing
more than 310 lbs. must be rated for that operator's weight.
These concerns have come to the fore as operators' average weight has been rising in recent years,
according to Ron Grisez, manager of product safety for Crown Equipment Corp. Grisez served on the subcommittee
task group that updated the standard.
Until now, operators of man-up trucks like order pickers and turret trucks were allowed to use a fixed-length
lanyard to anchor themselves to the operator compartment. But, unlike the self-retracting and energy-absorbing lanyards
available today, fixed-length lanyards cannot absorb any of the force of the body weight in a fall, said Grisez.
Energy-absorbing devices will also limit the length of a fall, and self-retracting lanyards may prevent a fall altogether,
Grisez said. "Fixed-length lanyards have been performing well, but decelerating devices will limit the arresting forces
dramatically," he added.
OSHA WEIGHS IN
Some safety experts question whether body belts are appropriate for use on elevated industrial trucks,
saying that the belts will limit but may not prevent falls. It appears that the Occupational Safety and
Health Administration (OSHA) has similar reservations.
In a Dec. 12, 2002, letter of interpretation, the agency noted that it considers a body belt and
lanyard to be the minimum protection required to protect employees from falling from elevated powered
industrial truck platforms. However, the letter went on to say, "OSHA's newer standards which address
fall hazards call for the use of body harnesses rather than body belts when used as part of a personal
fall arrest system. OSHA has determined in these rulemakings that there are hazards associated with body
belts that are greatly reduced by the substitution of body harnesses. Accordingly, we believe that body
harnesses rather than body belts are the appropriate form of fall protection for employees working on elevated
powered industrial truck platforms."
And in a June 28, 2004, letter of
interpretation, the agency reiterated that although industry standards allow the use of a body belt with a lanyard,
"OSHA strongly encourages employers to use body harnesses in place of body belts."
More information about the ANSI/ITSDF standard is available at www.itsdf.org/pB56.asp, or from the appropriate lift truck
dealer.
EDITOR'S NOTE: This article was updated on Feb. 18, 2013, to include more information.
RJW Logistics Group, a logistics solutions provider (LSP) for consumer packaged goods (CPG) brands, has received a “strategic investment” from Boston-based private equity firm Berkshire partners, and now plans to drive future innovations and expand its geographic reach, the Woodridge, Illinois-based company said Tuesday.
Terms of the deal were not disclosed, but the company said that CEO Kevin Williamson and other members of RJW management will continue to be “significant investors” in the company, while private equity firm Mason Wells, which invested in RJW in 2019, will maintain a minority investment position.
RJW is an asset-based transportation, logistics, and warehousing provider, operating more than 7.3 million square feet of consolidation warehouse space in the transportation hubs of Chicago and Dallas and employing 1,900 people. RJW says it partners with over 850 CPG brands and delivers to more than 180 retailers nationwide. According to the company, its retail logistics solutions save cost, improve visibility, and achieve industry-leading On-Time, In-Full (OTIF) performance. Those improvements drive increased in-stock rates and sales, benefiting both CPG brands and their retailer partners, the firm says.
"After several years of mitigating inflation, disruption, supply shocks, conflicts, and uncertainty, we are currently in a relative period of calm," John Paitek, vice president, GEP, said in a release. "But it is very much the calm before the coming storm. This report provides procurement and supply chain leaders with a prescriptive guide to weathering the gale force headwinds of protectionism, tariffs, trade wars, regulatory pressures, uncertainty, and the AI revolution that we will face in 2025."
A report from the company released today offers predictions and strategies for the upcoming year, organized into six major predictions in GEP’s “Outlook 2025: Procurement & Supply Chain” report.
Advanced AI agents will play a key role in demand forecasting, risk monitoring, and supply chain optimization, shifting procurement's mandate from tactical to strategic. Companies should invest in the technology now to to streamline processes and enhance decision-making.
Expanded value metrics will drive decisions, as success will be measured by resilience, sustainability, and compliance… not just cost efficiency. Companies should communicate value beyond cost savings to stakeholders, and develop new KPIs.
Increasing regulatory demands will necessitate heightened supply chain transparency and accountability. So companies should strengthen supplier audits, adopt ESG tracking tools, and integrate compliance into strategic procurement decisions.
Widening tariffs and trade restrictions will force companies to reassess total cost of ownership (TCO) metrics to include geopolitical and environmental risks, as nearshoring and friendshoring attempt to balance resilience with cost.
Rising energy costs and regulatory demands will accelerate the shift to sustainable operations, pushing companies to invest in renewable energy and redesign supply chains to align with ESG commitments.
New tariffs could drive prices higher, just as inflation has come under control and interest rates are returning to near-zero levels. That means companies must continue to secure cost savings as their primary responsibility.
Freight transportation sector analysts with US Bank say they expect change on the horizon in that market for 2025, due to possible tariffs imposed by a new White House administration, the return of East and Gulf coast port strikes, and expanding freight fraud.
“All three of these merit scrutiny, and that is our promise as we roll into the new year,” the company said in a statement today.
First, US Bank said a new administration will occupy the White House and will control the House and Senate for the first time since 2016. With an announced mandate on tariffs, taxes and trade from his electoral victory, President-Elect Trump’s anticipated actions are almost certain to impact the supply chain, the bank said.
Second, a strike by longshoreman at East Coast and Gulf ports was suspended in October, but the can was only kicked until mid-January. Shipper alarm bells are already ringing, and with peak season in full swing, the West coast ports are roaring, having absorbed containers bound for the East. However, that status may not be sustainable in the event of a prolonged strike in January, US Bank said.
And third, analyst are tracking the proliferation of freight fraud, and its reverberations across the supply chain. No longer the realm of petty criminals, freight fraudsters have become increasingly sophisticated, and the financial toll of their activities in the loss of goods, and data, is expected to be in the billions, the bank estimates.
The move delivers on its August announcement of a fleet renewal plan that will allow the company to proceed on its path to decarbonization, according to a statement from Anda Cristescu, Head of Chartering & Newbuilding at Maersk.
The first vessels will be delivered in 2028, and the last delivery will take place in 2030, enabling a total capacity to haul 300,000 twenty foot equivalent units (TEU) using lower emissions fuel. The new vessels will be built in sizes from 9,000 to 17,000 TEU each, allowing them to fill various roles and functions within the company’s future network.
In the meantime, the company will also proceed with its plan to charter a range of methanol and liquified gas dual-fuel vessels totaling 500,000 TEU capacity, replacing existing capacity. Maersk has now finalized these charter contracts across several tonnage providers, the company said.
The shipyards now contracted to build the vessels are: Yangzijiang Shipbuilding and New Times Shipbuilding—both in China—and Hanwha Ocean in South Korea.
Specifically, 48% of respondents identified rising tariffs and trade barriers as their top concern, followed by supply chain disruptions at 45% and geopolitical instability at 41%. Moreover, tariffs and trade barriers ranked as the priority issue regardless of company size, as respondents at companies with less than 250 employees, 251-500, 501-1,000, 1,001-50,000 and 50,000+ employees all cited it as the most significant issue they are currently facing.
“Evolving tariffs and trade policies are one of a number of complex issues requiring organizations to build more resilience into their supply chains through compliance, technology and strategic planning,” Jackson Wood, Director, Industry Strategy at Descartes, said in a release. “With the potential for the incoming U.S. administration to impose new and additional tariffs on a wide variety of goods and countries of origin, U.S. importers may need to significantly re-engineer their sourcing strategies to mitigate potentially higher costs.”