Mark Solomon joined DC VELOCITY as senior editor in August 2008, and was promoted to his current position on January 1, 2015. He has spent more than 30 years in the transportation, logistics and supply chain management fields as a journalist and public relations professional. From 1989 to 1994, he worked in Washington as a reporter for the Journal of Commerce, covering the aviation and trucking industries, the Department of Transportation, Congress and the U.S. Supreme Court. Prior to that, he worked for Traffic World for seven years in a similar role. From 1994 to 2008, Mr. Solomon ran Media-Based Solutions, a public relations firm based in Atlanta. He graduated in 1978 with a B.A. in journalism from The American University in Washington, D.C.
UPS Inc.'s proposed $6.8 billion buy-out of Dutch express delivery firm TNT Express may be experiencing more than just a passing squall.
On Friday, Atlanta-based UPS said it received a "statement of objections" from the European Commission (EC), the executive body of the European Union, to the proposed purchase of TNT Express, based in Hoofddorf.
In a statement released Friday, UPS said the document—the contents of which have been kept confidential—"addresses the competitive effects of the intended merger on Europe's international express market."
UPS called the document a routine part of the 27-member EC's regulatory review process and said that both companies are expected to respond to regulators' concerns within the next couple of weeks.
Peggy Gardner, a UPS spokeswoman, said the EC statement "helps to further focus the areas of discussion moving forward" and that it doesn't "prejudge the outcome."
Still the statement of objections has forced UPS to extend the deadline to complete the transaction for the second time since both companies formally agreed to the deal on March 19. The initial deadline was Aug. 31, which was then pushed back to Nov. 9 due to competitive concerns raised in Europe. On Friday, UPS said the deadline has now been extended to early 2013. Initially, UPS had not anticipated any regulatory static over the deal.
UPS said it remains committed to the acquisition. The issue is likely to be raised tomorrow during UPS' scheduled analyst call to discuss its third-quarter results. Given the hush-hush climate surrounding the deal, however, it is likely executives will provide no new information.
The main sticking point could be a disagreement over the size of the European parcel market. That wouldn't be surprising, since analysts have proffered conflicting market share estimates since the transaction was announced in February. One estimate that appears to stick was made by New York-based investment firm Wolfe Trahan & Co., which pegged TNT Express as the market leader with 18 percent, followed by DHL Express with 16 percent, UPS with 14 percent, and FedEx Corp. with 4 percent.
The EC's review process comes as the Euro-zone grapples with a major financial crisis mostly afflicting its southern region. Given the current turbulence, David G. Ross, transport analyst at Stifel, Nicolaus & Co., surmised that the EC might be loath to approve any transaction that eliminates a competitor from the market. Ross added, however, that the body rarely vetoes deals like this one.
He did speculate that as a condition of approving the deal, the EC might require a divestiture of assets in countries where the two firms have significant market concentration. He would not comment on which countries would be ripe for divestiture.
UPS said in its statement that parcel competition in Europe is already brisk because it involves "multiple players who offer similar services." UPS said the combined entity would actually enhance the continent's competitive landscape by creating a "more efficient logistics market."
TNT Express' strength is its intra-European business, though it also serves the intra-China, Southeast Asian, and Brazilian markets. Its U.S. operations are confined to connecting the country to international markets. And even there, the company's footprint is almost nonexistent.
Ross, for one, is not keen on the deal, saying that beyond the cost of the purchase, the subsequent integration would be expensive and more difficult to execute than UPS assumes. UPS already has a significant and profitable presence in Europe, and the company would be better off growing its Asian and Brazilian operations in-house instead of buying TNT Express' "second-rate operations" in those markets, he said.
Keep away from FedEx?
Many of those following the deal have speculated that UPS' move on TNT Express was partly motivated by a desire to keep it out of FedEx's hands and block its rival from establishing a major foothold in Europe via a major acquisition.
FedEx, for its part, has expressed no interest in a counter-offer, saying it could grow nicely in Europe through organic expansion and smaller, more targeted acquisitions known in the trade as "tuck-ins."
The other major player in the market, DHL, has been silent on its intentions so far. Experts say it is doubtful DHL will make a bid for TNT Express for fear of raising the ire of European antitrust regulators. However, DHL and its owner, German postal and logistics giant Deutsche Post, wield significant influence in Brussels. Both could use their combined heft to either get the deal blocked or force conditions on UPS that could dilute the impact of controlling more than 30 percent of the intra-European parcel market.
DHL could have other, more personal motivations to block a UPS-TNT Express deal. In 2003, UPS opposed DHL's proposed acquisition of Airborne Express, then the third-largest U.S. parcel carrier. The transaction was eventually approved. According to those close to the transaction, UPS' opposition still rankles, even though in retrospect DHL would have been better off walking away as the acquisition set the stage for six years of multi-billion dollar losses that eventually led DHL to abandon the domestic U.S. market.
If the current deal is blocked, it would be hard to fathom TNT Express' staying independent for long as its competitiveness has faltered in recent years. When the company was split off from the Dutch postal system in May 2011, rumors swirled that it was put on a standalone basis to prep it for sale. By mid-2011, TNT Express' stock had plunged to multi-year lows as it sustained large losses due to the contraction in Europe and operating costs that spiraled out of control.
In addition, Marie-Christine Lombard, who was CEO at the time the deal was announced, suddenly resigned at the end of September to pursue interests outside the industry. The timing of her decision was not warmly received by the company's supervisory board. "It is regrettable that Marie-Christine has decided to leave TNT Express now," said Antony Burgmans, its chairman, at the time her resignation was announced.
These events seem to have affected the company's internal culture as well. A parcel industry executive who spoke on condition of anonymity said inertia has set in as TNT Express waits to be sold. In the meantime, the company risks becoming—if it already hasn't--the fourth player in a three-chair European parcel game.
"I think TNT had been on cruise control for a long time just waiting to be sold to somebody, and therefore has lost vision and mission and internal leadership," the executive said. "The senior guys just want their [compensation] packages so they can get on with life."
Autonomous forklift maker Cyngn is deploying its DriveMod Tugger model at COATS Company, the largest full-line wheel service equipment manufacturer in North America, the companies said today.
By delivering the self-driving tuggers to COATS’ 150,000+ square foot manufacturing facility in La Vergne, Tennessee, Cyngn said it would enable COATS to enhance efficiency by automating the delivery of wheel service components from its production lines.
“Cyngn’s self-driving tugger was the perfect solution to support our strategy of advancing automation and incorporating scalable technology seamlessly into our operations,” Steve Bergmeyer, Continuous Improvement and Quality Manager at COATS, said in a release. “With its high load capacity, we can concentrate on increasing our ability to manage heavier components and bulk orders, driving greater efficiency, reducing costs, and accelerating delivery timelines.”
Terms of the deal were not disclosed, but it follows another deployment of DriveMod Tuggers with electric automaker Rivian earlier this year.
Manufacturing and logistics workers are raising a red flag over workplace quality issues according to industry research released this week.
A comparative study of more than 4,000 workers from the United States, the United Kingdom, and Australia found that manufacturing and logistics workers say they have seen colleagues reduce the quality of their work and not follow processes in the workplace over the past year, with rates exceeding the overall average by 11% and 8%, respectively.
The study—the Resilience Nation report—was commissioned by UK-based regulatory and compliance software company Ideagen, and it polled workers in industries such as energy, aviation, healthcare, and financial services. The results “explore the major threats and macroeconomic factors affecting people today, providing perspectives on resilience across global landscapes,” according to the authors.
According to the study, 41% of manufacturing and logistics workers said they’d witnessed their peers hiding mistakes, and 45% said they’ve observed coworkers cutting corners due to apathy—9% above the average. The results also showed that workers are seeing colleagues take safety risks: More than a third of respondents said they’ve seen people putting themselves in physical danger at work.
The authors said growing pressure inside and outside of the workplace are to blame for the lack of diligence and resiliency on the job. Internally, workers say they are under pressure to deliver more despite reduced capacity. Among the external pressures, respondents cited the rising cost of living as the biggest problem (39%), closely followed by inflation rates, supply chain challenges, and energy prices.
“People are being asked to deliver more at work when their resilience is being challenged by economic and political headwinds,” Ideagen’s CEO Ben Dorks said in a statement announcing the findings. “Ultimately, this is having a determinantal impact on business productivity, workplace health and safety, and the quality of work produced, as well as further reducing the resilience of the nation at large.”
Respondents said they believe technology will eventually alleviate some of the stress occurring in manufacturing and logistics, however.
“People are optimistic that emerging tech and AI will ultimately lighten the load, but they’re not yet feeling the benefits,” Dorks added. “It’s a gap that now, more than ever, business leaders must look to close and support their workforce to ensure their staff remain safe and compliance needs are met across the business.”
The “2024 Year in Review” report lists the various transportation delays, freight volume restrictions, and infrastructure repair costs of a long string of events. Those disruptions include labor strikes at Canadian ports and postal sites, the U.S. East and Gulf coast port strike; hurricanes Helene, Francine, and Milton; the Francis Scott key Bridge collapse in Baltimore Harbor; the CrowdStrike cyber attack; and Red Sea missile attacks on passing cargo ships.
“While 2024 was characterized by frequent and overlapping disruptions that exposed many supply chain vulnerabilities, it was also a year of resilience,” the Project44 report said. “From labor strikes and natural disasters to geopolitical tensions, each event served as a critical learning opportunity, underscoring the necessity for robust contingency planning, effective labor relations, and durable infrastructure. As supply chains continue to evolve, the lessons learned this past year highlight the increased importance of proactive measures and collaborative efforts. These strategies are essential to fostering stability and adaptability in a world where unpredictability is becoming the norm.”
In addition to tallying the supply chain impact of those events, the report also made four broad predictions for trends in 2025 that may affect logistics operations. In Project44’s analysis, they include:
More technology and automation will be introduced into supply chains, particularly ports. This will help make operations more efficient but also increase the risk of cybersecurity attacks and service interruptions due to glitches and bugs. This could also add tensions among the labor pool and unions, who do not want jobs to be replaced with automation.
The new administration in the United States introduces a lot of uncertainty, with talks of major tariffs for numerous countries as well as talks of US freight getting preferential treatment through the Panama Canal. If these things do come to fruition, expect to see shifts in global trade patterns and sourcing.
Natural disasters will continue to become more frequent and more severe, as exhibited by the wildfires in Los Angeles and the winter storms throughout the southern states in the U.S. As a result, expect companies to invest more heavily in sustainability to mitigate climate change.
The peace treaty announced on Wednesday between Isael and Hamas in the Middle East could support increased freight volumes returning to the Suez Canal as political crisis in the area are resolved.
The French transportation visibility provider Shippeo today said it has raised $30 million in financial backing, saying the money will support its accelerated expansion across North America and APAC, while driving enhancements to its “Real-Time Transportation Visibility Platform” product.
The funding round was led by Woven Capital, Toyota’s growth fund, with participation from existing investors: Battery Ventures, Partech, NGP Capital, Bpifrance Digital Venture, LFX Venture Partners, Shift4Good and Yamaha Motor Ventures. With this round, Shippeo’s total funding exceeds $140 million.
Shippeo says it offers real-time shipment tracking across all transport modes, helping companies create sustainable, resilient supply chains. Its platform enables users to reduce logistics-related carbon emissions by making informed trade-offs between modes and carriers based on carbon footprint data.
"Global supply chains are facing unprecedented complexity, and real-time transport visibility is essential for building resilience” Prashant Bothra, Principal at Woven Capital, who is joining the Shippeo board, said in a release. “Shippeo’s platform empowers businesses to proactively address disruptions by transforming fragmented operations into streamlined, data-driven processes across all transport modes, offering precise tracking and predictive ETAs at scale—capabilities that would be resource-intensive to develop in-house. We are excited to support Shippeo’s journey to accelerate digitization while enhancing cost efficiency, planning accuracy, and customer experience across the supply chain.”
Donald Trump has been clear that he plans to hit the ground running after his inauguration on January 20, launching ambitious plans that could have significant repercussions for global supply chains.
As Mark Baxa, CSCMP president and CEO, says in the executive forward to the white paper, the incoming Trump Administration and a majority Republican congress are “poised to reshape trade policies, regulatory frameworks, and the very fabric of how we approach global commerce.”
The paper is written by import/export expert Thomas Cook, managing director for Blue Tiger International, a U.S.-based supply chain management consulting company that focuses on international trade. Cook is the former CEO of American River International in New York and Apex Global Logistics Supply Chain Operation in Los Angeles and has written 19 books on global trade.
In the paper, Cook, of course, takes a close look at tariff implications and new trade deals, emphasizing that Trump will seek revisions that will favor U.S. businesses and encourage manufacturing to return to the U.S. The paper, however, also looks beyond global trade to addresses topics such as Trump’s tougher stance on immigration and the possibility of mass deportations, greater support of Israel in the Middle East, proposals for increased energy production and mining, and intent to end the war in the Ukraine.
In general, Cook believes that many of the administration’s new policies will be beneficial to the overall economy. He does warn, however, that some policies will be disruptive and add risk and cost to global supply chains.
In light of those risks and possible disruptions, Cook’s paper offers 14 recommendations. Some of which include:
Create a team responsible for studying the changes Trump will introduce when he takes office;
Attend trade shows and make connections with vendors, suppliers, and service providers who can help you navigate those changes;
Consider becoming C-TPAT (Customs-Trade Partnership Against Terrorism) certified to help mitigate potential import/export issues;
Adopt a risk management mindset and shift from focusing on lowest cost to best value for your spend;
Increase collaboration with internal and external partners;
Expect warehousing costs to rise in the short term as companies look to bring in foreign-made goods ahead of tariffs;
Expect greater scrutiny from U.S. Customs and Border Patrol of origin statements for imports in recognition of attempts by some Chinese manufacturers to evade U.S. import policies;
Reduce dependency on China for sourcing; and
Consider manufacturing and/or sourcing in the United States.
Cook advises readers to expect a loosening up of regulations and a reduction in government under Trump. He warns that while some world leaders will look to work with Trump, others will take more of a defiant stance. As a result, companies should expect to see retaliatory tariffs and duties on exports.
Cook concludes by offering advice to the incoming administration, including being sensitive to the effect retaliatory tariffs can have on American exports, working on federal debt reduction, and considering promoting free trade zones. He also proposes an ambitious water works program through the Army Corps of Engineers.