Mark Solomon joined DC VELOCITY as senior editor in August 2008, and was promoted to his current position on January 1, 2015. He has spent more than 30 years in the transportation, logistics and supply chain management fields as a journalist and public relations professional. From 1989 to 1994, he worked in Washington as a reporter for the Journal of Commerce, covering the aviation and trucking industries, the Department of Transportation, Congress and the U.S. Supreme Court. Prior to that, he worked for Traffic World for seven years in a similar role. From 1994 to 2008, Mr. Solomon ran Media-Based Solutions, a public relations firm based in Atlanta. He graduated in 1978 with a B.A. in journalism from The American University in Washington, D.C.
In one of the most significant days in its history, less-than-truckload (LTL) carrier YRC Worldwide Inc. today named a new CEO and eight-member board of directors, formally announced the retirement of the executive who has run the company since 1999, completed a financial restructuring critical to its ongoing success, and released second-quarter results that it said shows some daylight after three dark years.
YRC confirmed late today that long-time transportation executive James L. Welch was named the company's CEO, effective immediately. Until Thursday, when his resignation was announced effective July 22, Welch was president and CEO of Dallas-based transport company Dynamex Inc. He spent nearly 30 years with YRC and its predecessor companies, the last seven as president and CEO of national LTL carrier Yellow Transportation. Yellow Transportation became YRC National following its integration with Roadway Express, which YRC bought in 2003.
DC Velocityreported in its Thursday online edition that Welch had been chosen as YRC's next CEO.
Welch replaces William D. Zollars, who retired today as the company's CEO as well as its chairman and president. There was no announcement of a new president or chief financial officer. William Trubeck, who had been serving as interim CFO, is expected to step down when a new CFO is named.
In a statement, James Hoffman, who today was named to chair an entirely new eight-member board of directors, said Welch's stature and leadership puts YRC in a "strong position to regain its competitive edge in the transportation marketplace."
"This is an exciting and challenging time for YRC Worldwide, and I am pleased to have been chosen to move the company forward," Welch said in the same statement.
Welch, 55, is an accomplished transportation executive, and is highly regarded within YRC and the Teamsters union, which represents more than 25,000 YRC employees and actively participated in the CEO selection process. The union played a key role in rescuing YRC from the brink of bankruptcy at the end of 2009 and in making significant wage and benefit concessions that have helped keep the company solvent.
Hoffman, 58, is a long-time telecommunications executive who for the past 10 years has worked at Alliant Energy, a Madison, Wis.-based concern, in what YRC described as "various leadership roles." The new board member likely most familiar to the transportation/logistics community is Jim Winestock Jr., 60, who spent 40 years at UPS Inc. and capped his long career there by heading the company's U.S. operations and sitting on the 11-person "management committee" that effectively runs the Atlanta-based giant.
Restructuring wraps up
The Overland Park, Kan.-based carrier said that, as the final phase of the restructuring that began at the end of April, it will issue convertible notes that will generate $100 million of new capital. It also replaced its three-year asset-based securitization program with a new three-year, asset-based loan structure that will provide even more liquidity and financial flexibility. It also swapped part of its loans for the issuance of new securities, including equity, a move that will alleviate the company's debt burden but reduce the value of its equity to the point that current stockholders will hold nearly worthless shares.
The Teamsters hailed the agreement. "The completion of the restructuring is a significant accomplishment in our efforts to preserve good jobs," said Teamster President James P. Hoffa in a statement.
"Because of the restructuring, YRC will now have the cash to focus on operations, and a new CEO and board to implement its operating plan. With these difficult three years behind us, we can look forward to a brighter future," Hoffa said.
The Teamsters will control about one-quarter of YRC's equity following the restructuring.
Q2 results released
At the same time, YRC reported a $2 million consolidated operating loss in the second quarter on consolidated operating revenue of $1.257 billion. The results included a $17 million adjustment for professional fees related to the restructuring, YRC said. Last year's quarter included an $83 million after-tax benefit for what the company termed in a statement a "fair value adjustment to an equity-based award." On a net basis, it reported a loss of $39 million in the quarter, compared with a $10 million net loss in the 2010 quarter.
In the 2010 quarter, YRC reported consolidated operating revenue of $1.25 billion and consolidated operating income of $48 million. The 2010 quarterly results included the combined impact of the $83 million after-tax gain as well as $9 million in professional fees.
YRC National posted adjusted operating income in the second quarter, the first time it has been in the black in three years. YRC National's average daily shipments and tonnage rose 7.1 percent and 6.2 percent, respectively, over year-ago levels. Revenue per shipment climbed 5 percent, and revenue per hundredweight increased 6 percent, the company said.
At YRC's regional unit, daily tonnage rose 8.1 percent, revenue per shipment rose 9.9 percent, daily shipment volume increased 4.7 percent, and revenue per-hundredweight climbed 6.5 percent, the company said. The revenue per-hundredweight results include the effects of fuel surcharges, the company said. Still, YRC said it would have seen gains in hundredweight revenue even without the surcharges.
Sanity returns to LTL pricing
In his final analyst call, Zollars painted an optimistic picture of YRC's current position and its outlook. Activity in July, historically a weak month for freight, is consistent with normal trends, he said. Zollars said YRC is gaining market share, though he couldn't quantify the statement.
Zollars said former customers are returning to the company and will continue to do so, encouraged by the carrier's improving financial situation and the completion of the restructuring.
Zollars said that "sanity" has returned to LTL pricing after many quarters of destructive price wars, as evidenced by the number of carriers—including YRC—that have announced general rate increases of 6.9 percent on non-contractual traffic. Zollars said YRC is experiencing about a 4-percent increase in contract rates when those agreements come up for renewal.
At current pricing conditions, YRC could add 20 percent more capacity across its system without impacting profitability, Zollars said. The company's $120 million capital expenditure (CapEx) budget for 2011 will go to replacing its fleet, which for over-the-road equipment is roughly five years old, and for equipment used in urban areas is about twice that age. YRC has about 16,400 rigs and 54,000 trailers.
Zollars did not disclose YRC's 2012 CapEx plans other than to say the company will "reinvest in the business going forward."
As the old adage goes, everything old is new again. For evidence of that, you need look no farther than cargo ships, which are looking to a 5,000-year-old technology as an eco-friendly source of propulsion—the sail.
But today’s sails bear little resemblance to the papyrus or animal-skin sails used in ancient times or the billowing cotton or linen sails of 19th-century clipper ships. These are thoroughly modern, high-tech devices designed to reduce ship operators’ reliance on costly marine fuels and help curb greenhouse gas emissions—and they’re sprouting up on freight vessels around the world.
One example is the “rotor sail,” a cylindrical unit that’s mounted inside a flagpole-shaped device. When installed on a cargo ship’s deck, the sail can reduce the vessel’s fuel consumption and carbon dioxide emissions by 6% to 12%, users say. Last month, the Japanese marine freight carrier NS United Kaiun Kaisha Ltd.announced plans to install five rotor sails manufactured by Anemoi Marine Technologies Ltd. on the 1,184-foot-long iron ore carrier ship NSU Tubarao over the next year.
But the story doesn’t end with rotor sails. Companies are experimenting with other types of high-tech sails as well. For instance, the Dutch heavy-lift cargo ship Jumbo Jubileehas been outfitted with two mechanical sails known as wind-assisted ship propulsion (WASP) units in a bid to boost fuel efficiency and cut carbon. And the Dutch maritime gas carrier Anthony Vederhas deployed two “VentoFoil” sails made by Econowind on its ethylene carrier Coral Patula, with plans to add two similar sails to its sister ship Coral Pearl later this year.
When it comes to logistics technology, the pace of innovation has never been faster. In recent years, the market has been inundated by waves of cool new tech tools, all promising to help users enhance their operations and cope with today’s myriad supply chain challenges.
But that ever-expanding array of offerings can make it difficult to separate the wheat from the chaff—technology that’s the real deal versus technology that’s just “vaporware,” meaning products that don’t live up to their hype and may even still be in the conceptual stage.
One way to cut through the confusion is to check out the entries for the “3 V’s of Supply Chain Innovation Awards,” an annual competition held by the Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals (CSCMP). This competition, which is hosted by DC Velocity’s sister publication, Supply Chain Xchange, and supply chain visionary and 3 V’s framework creator Art Mesher, recognizes companies that have parlayed the 3 V’s—“embracing variability, harnessing visibility, and competing with velocity”—into business success and advanced the practice of supply chain management. Awards are presented in two categories: the “Business Innovation Award,” which recognizes more established businesses, and the “Best Overall Innovative Startup/Early Stage Award,” which recognizes newer companies.
The judging for this year’s competition—the second annual contest—took place at CSCMP’s EDGE Supply Chain Conference & Exhibition in September, where the three finalists for each award presented their innovations via a fast-paced “elevator pitch.” (To watch a video of the presentations, visit the Supply Chain Xchange website.)
What follows is a brief look at the six companies that made the competition’s final round and the latest updates on their achievements:
Arkestro: This San Francisco-based firm offers a predictive procurement orchestration solution that uses machine learning (ML) and behavioral science to revolutionize sourcing, eliminating the need for outdated manual tools like pivot tables and for labor-intensive negotiations. Instead, procurement teams can process quotes and secure optimal supplier agreements at a speed and accuracy that would be impossible to achieve manually, the firm says.
The company recently joined the Amazon Web Services (AWS) Partner Network (APN), which it says will help it reach its goal of elevating procurement from a cost center to a strategic growth engine.
AutoScheduler.AI: This Austin, Texas-based company offers a predictive warehouse optimization platform that integrates with a user’s existing warehouse management system (WMS) and “accelerates” its ability to resolve problems like dock schedule conflicts, inefficient workforce allocation, poor on-time/in-full (OTIF) performance, and excessive intra-campus moves.
“We’re here to make the warehouse sexy,” the firm says on its website. “With our deep background in building machine learning solutions, everything delivered by the AutoScheduler team is designed to provide value by learning your challenges, environment, and best practices.” Privately funded up until this summer, the company recently secured venture capital funding that it will use to accelerate its growth and enhance its technologies.
Davinci Micro Fulfillment: Located in Bound Brook, New Jersey, Davinci operates a “microfulfillment as a service” platform that helps users expedite inventory turnover while reducing operating expenses by leveraging what it calls the “4 Ps of global distribution”—product, placement, price, and promotion. The firm operates a network of microfulfillment centers across the U.S., offering services that include front-end merchandising and network optimization.
Within the past year, the company raised seed funding to help enhance its technology capabilities.
Flying Ship: Headquartered in Leesburg, Virginia, Flying Ship has designed an unmanned, low-flying “ground-effect maritime craft” that moves freight over the ocean in coastal regions. Although the Flying Ship looks like a small aircraft or large drone, it is classified as a maritime vessel because it does not leave the air cushion over the waves, similar to a hovercraft.
The first-generation models are 30 feet long, electrically powered, and semi-autonomous. They can dock at existing marinas, beaches, and boat ramps to deliver goods, providing service that the company describes as faster than boats and cheaper than air. The firm says the next-generation models will be fully autonomous.
Flying Ship, which was honored with the Best Overall Startup Award in this year’s 3 V’s competition, is currently preparing to fly demo missions with the Air Force Research Laboratory (AFRL).
Perfect Planner: Based in Alpharetta, Georgia, Perfect Planner operates a cloud-based platform that’s designed to streamline the material planning and replenishment process. The technology collects, organizes, and analyzes data from a business’s material requirements planning (MRP) system to create daily “to-do lists” for material planners/buyers, with the “to-dos” ranked in order of criticality. The solution also uses advanced analytics to “understand” and address inventory shortages and surpluses.
Perfect Planner was honored with the Business Innovation Award in this year’s 3 V’s competition.
ProvisionAi: Located in Franklin, Tennessee, ProvisionAi has developed load optimization software that helps consumer packaged goods (CPG) companies move their freight with fewer trucks, thereby cutting their transportation costs. The firm says its flagship offering is an automatic order optimization (AutoO2) system that bolts onto a company’s existing enterprise resource planning (ERP) or WMS platform and guides larger orders through execution, ensuring that what is planned is actually loaded on the truck. The firm’s CEO and founder, Tom Moore, was recognized as a 2024 Rainmaker by this magazine.
Global forklift sales have slumped in 2024, falling short of initial forecasts as a result of the struggling economy in Europe and the slow release of project funding in the U.S., a report from market analyst firm Interact Analysis says.
In response, the London-based firm has reduced its shipment forecast for the year to rise just 0.3%, although it still predicts consistent growth of around 4-5% out to 2034.
The “bleak” figures come as the European economy has stagnated during the second half of 2024, with two of the leading industry sectors for forklifts - automotive and logistics – struggling. In addition, order backlogs from the pandemic have now been absorbed, so order volumes for the global forklift market will be slightly lower than shipment volumes over the next few years, Interact Analysis said.
On a more positive note, 3 million forklifts are forecast to be shipped per year by 2031 as enterprises are forced to reduce their dependence on manual labor. Interact Analysis has observed that major forklift OEMs are continuing with their long-term expansion plans, while other manufacturers that are affected by demand fluctuations are much more cautious with spending on automation projects.
At the same time, the forklift market is seeing a fundamental shift in power sources, with demand for Li-ion battery-powered forklifts showing a growth rate of over 10% while internal combustion engine (ICE) demand shrank by 1% and lead-acid battery-powered forklift fell 7%.
And according to Interact Analysis, those trends will continue, with the report predicting that ICE annual market demand will shrink over 20% from 670,000 units in 2024 to a projected 500,000 units by 2034. And by 2034, Interact Analysis predicts 81% of fully electric forklifts will be powered by li-ion batteries.
The reasons driving that shift include a move in Europe to cleaner alternatives to comply with environmental policies, and a swing in the primary customer base for forklifts from manufacturing to logistics and warehousing, due to the rise of e-commerce. Electric forklift demand is also growing in emerging markets, but for different reasons—labor costs are creating a growing need for automation in factories, especially in China, India, and Eastern Europe. And since lithium-ion battery production is primarily based in Asia, the average cost of equipping forklifts with li-ion batteries is much lower than the rest of the world.
Companies in every sector are converting assets from fossil fuel to electric power in their push to reach net-zero energy targets and to reduce costs along the way, but to truly accelerate those efforts, they also need to improve electric energy efficiency, according to a study from technology consulting firm ABI Research.
In fact, boosting that efficiency could contribute fully 25% of the emissions reductions needed to reach net zero. And the pursuit of that goal will drive aggregated global investments in energy efficiency technologies to grow from $106 Billion in 2024 to $153 Billion in 2030, ABI said today in a report titled “The Role of Energy Efficiency in Reaching Net Zero Targets for Enterprises and Industries.”
ABI’s report divided the range of energy-efficiency-enhancing technologies and equipment into three industrial categories:
Commercial Buildings – Network Lighting Control (NLC) and occupancy sensing for automated lighting and heating; Artificial Intelligence (AI)-based energy management; heat-pumps and energy-efficient HVAC equipment; insulation technologies
Manufacturing Plants – Energy digital twins, factory automation, manufacturing process design and optimization software (PLM, MES, simulation); Electric Arc Furnaces (EAFs); energy efficient electric motors (compressors, fans, pumps)
“Both the International Energy Agency (IEA) and the United Nations Climate Change Conference (COP) continue to insist on the importance of energy efficiency,” Dominique Bonte, VP of End Markets and Verticals at ABI Research, said in a release. “At COP 29 in Dubai, it was agreed to commit to collectively double the global average annual rate of energy efficiency improvements from around 2% to over 4% every year until 2030, following recommendations from the IEA. This complements the EU’s Energy Efficiency First (EE1) Framework and the U.S. 2022 Inflation Reduction Act in which US$86 billion was earmarked for energy efficiency actions.”
Many AI deployments are getting stuck in the planning stages due to a lack of AI skills, governance issues, and insufficient resources, leading 61% of global businesses to scale back their AI investments, according to a study from the analytics and AI provider Qlik.
Philadelphia-based Qlik found a disconnect in the market where 88% of senior decision makers say they feel AI is absolutely essential or very important to achieving success. Despite that support, multiple factors are slowing down or totally blocking those AI projects: a lack of skills to develop AI [23%] or to roll out AI once it’s developed [22%], data governance challenges [23%], budget constraints [21%], and a lack of trusted data for AI to work with [21%].
The numbers come from a survey of 4,200 C-Suite executives and AI decision makers, revealing what is hindering AI progress globally and how to overcome these barriers.
Respondents also said that many stakeholders lack trust in AI technology generally, which holds those projects back. Over a third [37%] of AI decision makers say their senior managers lack trust in AI, 42% feel less senior employees don’t trust the technology., and a fifth [21%] believe their customers don’t trust AI either.
“Business leaders know the value of AI, but they face a multitude of barriers that prevent them from moving from proof of concept to value creating deployment of the technology,” James Fisher, Chief Strategy Officer at Qlik, said in a release. “The first step to creating an AI strategy is to identify a clear use case, with defined goals and measures of success, and use this to identify the skills, resources and data needed to support it at scale. In doing so you start to build trust and win management buy-in to help you succeed.”