Though Latin America is still playing catch-up when it comes to supply chain technology, it will progress quickly over the next few years if vendors can avoid some potential roadblocks.
Contributing Editor Toby Gooley is a writer and editor specializing in supply chain, logistics, and material handling, and a lecturer at MIT's Center for Transportation & Logistics. She previously was Senior Editor at DC VELOCITY and Editor of DCV's sister publication, CSCMP's Supply Chain Quarterly. Prior to joining AGiLE Business Media in 2007, she spent 20 years at Logistics Management magazine as Managing Editor and Senior Editor covering international trade and transportation. Prior to that she was an export traffic manager for 10 years. She holds a B.A. in Asian Studies from Cornell University.
Ask someone in Latin America about the state of supply chain technology, and he or she will probably tell you that the region is a decade behind the United States.
Why the 10-year lag? It's not because of Latin America's vine-filled jungles, mile-wide rivers, or forbidding mountain ranges—although these topographical features have made it tough to build reliable infrastructure. Rather, it's a result of decades of instability in this diverse region, which stretches more than 7,000 miles from the United States-Mexico border to the islands of Tierra del Fuego at South America's southern tip. Given the region's long history of economic volatility, governments and the private sector have had little incentive to invest in costly new technologies.
But that situation is quickly changing. As Latin America's economies stabilize, the region is becoming a competitive exporter. Consumer demand is rising, and that has drawn retailers and manufacturers from North America, Europe, and Asia to its fast-growing cities and industrial centers. Multinationals like Wal-Mart, Coca-Cola, and Sony have forced competition on these markets. They've also brought along some high expectations: They want the same data quality and supply chain visibility they enjoy in more developed parts of the world. All of these factors make for an upbeat forecast for supply chain technology south of the border, though vendors will still find there are hurdles to clear.
Different priorities
In at least one respect, the supply chain technology market in Latin America is similar to that in North America: Warehouse management systems (WMS) and transportation management systems (TMS) are the most frequently used types of software, says Francisco Giral, CEO of NetLogistik, a Mexico City-based consulting firm and systems integrator that represents several U.S. technology providers, including RedPrairie and Vocollect. Other types of software, automated material handling systems, and voice-directed solutions are less common, but sales are nonetheless growing, Giral says.
Despite that similarity, the factors driving demand for supply chain technologies in Latin America are quite different than in the United States, says John Price, president of InfoAmericas, a Miami-based business intelligence firm with offices in Mexico and Brazil. In the U.S. market, he says, the most important drivers are the costs of labor, space, real estate, and financing inventory, in that order. In Latin America, labor, space, and real estate costs generally are not major considerations. Instead, the top priorities are minimizing both security risks and financing costs.
InfoAmericas classifies Latin American countries in four tiers relative to their usage of supply chain technologies:
Tier 1: Mexico's export economy, dominated by large exporters, multinationals, and their suppliers. Assembly operations that moved to northern Mexico in search of cheaper labor adopted sophisticated logistics practices and technologies to compensate for higher transportation costs and greater distances from suppliers and customers.
Tier 2: Mexico's domestic economy, Brazil, Puerto Rico, and Panama. Multinational retailers and third-party logistics service companies (3PLs) are leaders in implementing supply chain technologies here.
Tier 3: Chile, Argentina, Colombia, Uruguay, Costa Rica, and Venezuela, which Price calls "the next frontier" for logistics. These countries need world-class logistics capabilities to help them compete internationally.
Tier 4: The rest of Latin America, where multinationals have a minimal presence and technology investments focus on cargo security.
Top priority: security
Who are the technology leaders in the region? Price says companies that handle high-value, high-volume products like pharmaceuticals and electronics—where security and integrity of product handling are top priorities—"spend pretty lavishly on logistics technology."
In Mexico, adds Giral, retailers and grocery chains are leading the way—in part because of competitive pressures from multinationals like Wal-Mart. When it comes to material handling systems, however, the pharmaceutical industry, with its specialized handling requirements, is in the vanguard. Still, it's a small universe: Probably fewer than twodozen companies in Mexico have such sophisticated systems as pick-to-light and automated storage and retrieval, he says.
Large exporters also have incentives to invest in technology. For instance, Chile's produce and seafood exporters, which compete in North America, Europe, and Asia, want software that will help them understand their lead times, optimize inventories, and reduce costs, says Michael Schetman, director of international business development for the Americas for technology provider Savi Networks.
When you look at businesses in general, however, the number-one reason for investing in technology remains security—and in Latin America, "security" means preventing cargo theft and drug smuggling, not terrorism. "Cargo insurance costs are astronomical, as are the claims for theft and other losses, so [companies] have to make every effort to mitigate those costs," says Price. "If a technology can do that, customers will buy it."
The traditional approach has been to hire guards to ride shotgun with trucks and containers, notes Neil Smith, acting CEO of Savi Networks. But companies in fast-growing economies like Colombia and Brazil have been receptive to the use of RFID, global positioning system (GPS) devices, and cell-phone-based systems to track and monitor assets.
In Colombia, Savi has teamed up with the technology firm Emprevi Ltda. This locally owned company has more than 20 years of experience managing logistics risks for clients like Johnson & Johnson, Pfizer, and Gillette. The two partners operate an RFID-based system that tracks the location and security status of shipments between Colombian factories and seaports. A network of readers captures data that has been transmitted from electronic container seals and routes the information to transportation security software, Schetman explains. In addition to reporting location and security status, the software also sends alerts about security breaches and other exceptions to users' e-mail accounts, cell phones, or personal digital assistants (PDAs).
But wait a minute—RFID and cell phones in the jungle? It's true. Although many rural areas have no access to telecom networks, basic services are now available in most population centers. In regions where utilities and telecom infrastructure are unreliable, satellite-based solutions are popular. Savi and Emprevi are a little more creative: They're successfully using solar-powered RFID readers in some parts of Colombia.
Buy globally, implement locally
Sales channels for software and automated systems in Latin America differ considerably from those in the U.S. market. In a culture where personal relationships still matter, few technology firms sell directly to end users, says Price. Instead, they may partner with logistics service providers, which offer software to clients as a value-add. That system has made third-party logistics companies and freight forwarders "incredibly important" in introducing technology to the mostly family-owned companies in this region, he says.
The Latin American market is not yet lucrative enough for companies to develop technology specifically for that region, so products designed for the United States and Europe dominate the marketplace, says Schetman. In some countries, foreign software has a virtual lock on the market because users can get more mature, proven products for roughly the same price they'd pay for homegrown solutions. One exception is Colombia, where political unrest and security worries have kept most foreign logistics companies and technology vendors away. According to Price, Colombian companies have developed about half a dozen competitive logistics applications.
Foreign products may dominate sales, but when it comes time for implementation, Latin American buyers prefer to work with local firms. Many of the locals started out as developers, Price says, but their inability to invest in second- and third-generation technology, together with the lack of legal protections for intellectual property, pushed most of them to become service companies allied with foreign vendors.
Buyers' preference for local partners is based as much on cost as it is on shared language and culture, says Giral. Similarly, demand for product customization has more to do with corporate customs than with cultural differences. But language can still influence buying decisions. Brazilian companies, for instance, prefer to buy from and work with Portuguese-speakers, and communication problems can arise even in Spanish. For instance, when Mexico-based NetLogistik develops a "dictionary" of templates in a service-oriented architecture application for RedPrairie in Argentina, it must change about 30 percent of the terms to reflect differences in vocabulary.
Filling the knowledge gap
Despite a bright outlook for supply chain technologies in Latin America, one problem threatens to strangle future growth: a severe shortage of technical experts.
"Latin Americans are extremely well educated, but they are untrained," says Price. That is, higher education is very traditional and classical; the university system does not turn out enough scientists, engineers, and technicians, and there is nothing like the technical colleges that fill that role in Europe.What's missing from the labor pool, he says, is the competent, mid-level technician. As a result, companies find that they have to spend a lot more on technical training than they expected.
For Giral's company, the solution to that problem has been to hire young engineers from Mexico's top universities and teach them what they need to know. Similarly, Savi takes a "train the trainer" approach, with the goal of creating a pool of experts who can manage operations and customization in Colombia, says Schetman.
Interestingly, technology itself may help to mitigate the effects of Latin America's knowledge gap, Schetman notes. Hosted on-demand solutions that are now beginning to take hold in the region require comparatively little in the way of implementation time and expense; more important, perhaps, is that they can be upgraded and supported over the Internet by the application service provider.
For now, depending on outsiders to develop and support supply chain technologies may indeed be the most sensible course for a region that is still finding its economic way. Latin America's "watch and wait" approach to technology adoption has served it well in the past, says Giral, who points to Mexico's communication infrastructure as an example. Because conservative Mexican buyers waited for U.S. companies to work out all the bugs, he says, the country was able to leapfrog over intermediate telecom systems and go directly to fiber-optic communications—and do so at a speed unmatched in most of the United States.
success south of the border
Latin American companies may be conservative when it comes to buying technology, but an expanding array of logistics and transportation trade shows offers testament to the region's appetite for supply chain solutions. U.S., European, and Asian vendors of supply chain software and automated material handling systems represent a hefty percentage of exhibitors at events like Expo Logisti-K Argentina, Salon de la Logística Latinoamericana in Chile, Intermodal Brasil, Colombia's Sala Logística de las Américas, Congreso de Logística in Costa Rica, and Mexico's Expologística (the granddaddy of logistics events in the region), to name a few.
They wouldn't exhibit if they didn't see sales opportunities—and a number of these vendors have already struck gold in this market. Here are just a few success stories from the last few months:
INTTRA, a provider of e-commerce solutions to ocean carriers and their customers, experienced more than 200-percent sales growth in Mexico, Peru, and Venezuela in the 12-month period ending in June 2007.
Infor expects to rack up 20-percent sales growth in Argentina for 2007. The company now has some 800 active clients in that country.
FKI Logistex has added several sales executives in Mexico to handle increased demand for automated material handling systems.
JDA Software announced that Colombian grocery chain Almacenes Éxito increased inventory turnover by 10 percent, reduced overstocks by 60 percent, and cut out-of-stocks by 12 percent with JDA's E3 allocation and replenishment solutions.
Epicor Software formed strategic alliances with Technology Coast Partners (TCP) in Chile and Ability Data in Colombia, to offer integrated enterprise resource planning (ERP), customer relationship management (CRM), supply chain management (SCM), and professional services automation (PSA) software.
Editor's note: A useful source of information about the technology capabilities of third-party logistics service companies is Who's Who in Latin American Logistics and Supply Chain Management, published by Armstrong & Associates Inc. in partnership with InfoAmericas. Profiles of 88 global and local companies include details of their services, facilities, information technology capabilities, major customers, and more. For information, go to www.3PLogistics.com.
The consulting firm Accenture has acquired Staufen AG, a German management consulting firm, saying the move will expand Accenture’s capabilities to drive operational excellence and competitiveness in manufacturing and supply chains.
Specifically, adding Staufen will help Accenture serve clients in discrete manufacturing industries including automotive, aerospace and defense, industrial goods, and medical equipment.
According to Accenture it made the deal because manufacturers are under pressure to mitigate supply chain disruptions, geopolitical tensions, and fluctuating tariffs while staying abreast of rapid technological advances. To meet those needs, Staufen brings expertise in helping clients optimize their entire value chains, drive value with digital manufacturing initiatives, and improve overall businesses performance.
Staufen’s service portfolio includes solutions for Industry 4.0, supply chain management, and organizational change as well as data-driven tools, continuous improvement techniques, and lean management principles. Its approach enhances clients’ product design, shopfloor processes, time to market, and sustainability efforts, reducing costs, eliminating inefficiencies, and optimizing production capacity, the company said.
“Manufacturers must continuously improve their entire value chains to stay competitive,” Matthias Hégelé, Accenture’s supply chain and operations lead for Germany, Austria, and Switzerland, said in a release.
“The acquisition of Staufen aligns with our strategy to reinvent supply chains and manufacturing for clients. We will combine Staufen’s proven expertise in operational excellence and value chain transformation with our capabilities in digital technologies, such as AI, generative AI, digital twins and supply chain and manufacturing software platforms, to help clients transform their core value chains, improving efficiency and productivity, supporting sustainable practices, and building resilient, autonomous systems,” Hégelé said.
Part of the reason for that situation is that companies can’t adjust to tariffs overnight by finding new suppliers. “Supply chains are complex. Retailers continue to engage in diversification efforts. Unfortunately, it takes significant time to move supply chains, even if you can find available capacity,” NRF Vice President for Supply Chain and Customs Policy Jonathan Gold said in a release.
“While we support the need to address the fentanyl crisis at our borders, new tariffs on China and other countries will mean higher prices for American families,” Gold said. “Retailers have engaged in mitigation strategies to minimize the potential impact of tariffs, including frontloading of some products, but that can lead to increased challenges because of added warehousing and related costs. We hope to resolve our outstanding border security issues as quickly as possible because there will be a significant impact on the economy if increased tariffs are maintained and expanded.”
Hackett Associates Founder Ben Hackett said tariffs on Canada and Mexico would initially have minimal impact at ports because most imports from either country move by truck, rail or pipeline. In the long term, tariffs on goods that receive final manufacturing in Canada or Mexico but originate elsewhere could prompt an increase in direct maritime imports to the U.S. In the meantime, port cargo “could be badly hit” if tariffs on overseas Asian and European nations increase prices and prompt consumers to buy less, he said.
“At this stage, the situation is fluid, and it’s too early to know if the tariffs will be implemented, removed or further delayed,” Hackett said. “As such, our view of North American imports has not changed significantly for the next six months.”
U.S. ports covered by Global Port Tracker handled 2.14 million twenty-foot equivalent units (TEUs) in December, although the Port of New York and New Jersey and the Port of Miami have yet to report final data. That was down 0.9% from November but up 14.4% year over year, and would be the busiest December on record. For the year, December brought 2024 to a total of 25.5 million TEU, up 14.8% from 2023 and the highest level since 2021’s record of 25.8 million TEU during the pandemic.
Global Port Tracker provides historical data and forecasts for the U.S. ports of Los Angeles/Long Beach, Oakland, Seattle and Tacoma on the West Coast; New York/New Jersey, Port of Virginia, Charleston, Savannah, Port Everglades, Miami and Jacksonville on the East Coast, and Houston on the Gulf Coast.
Having reported on the supply chain world for some 25 years, I've seen technologies come and go. Many were once touted as the best thing since sliced bread but either failed to live up to the hype or else had to simmer a few years before they caught on.
Remember the hoopla surrounding dot-com retail? In the late 1990s, we were told that stores as we knew them would eventually go away, to be totally replaced by online shopping. The ease and convenience of e-commerce made that a reasonable expectation. But in March 2000, the bubble burst, and a host of online retailers closed their virtual doors forever. Of course, online shopping is still very much with us, and its share of total retail sales is growing by the year. Maybe we'll get to that retail seventh heaven someday, but it's taking much longer than originally predicted.
Then there's RFID (radio-frequency identification). These small electronic tags were going to replace barcodes largely because of the vast amount of data they can hold and their capacity to update information.
In 2003, Walmart famously demanded that its top 100 suppliers affix RFID tags to all pallets and cases shipped to its DCs. We figured that if Walmart had gone all in on RFID, the rest of the industry would automatically follow. Well, not so fast. It's true that after years of stutter-step progress, Walmart today is more heavily invested in RFID than ever. But in the rest of the world, the humble barcode is still king.
A more recently hyped technology is blockchain. It was actually conceived back in 1982 but remained just a concept until 2008, when a person (or persons) using the name "Satoshi Nakamoto" created an actual blockchain to serve as the public distributed ledger for cryptocurrency transactions. Blockchain was expected to revolutionize the way supply chain partners do business. But it, too, has been a bit slow to take off, and it's still unclear how the blockchain story will play out.
That brings us to the latest potentially game-changing technology: artificial intelligence (AI). In some ways, AI is really just data analytics on steroids. Supply chains have relied on data analytics for decades—the difference now is the promise of greater accuracy and better simulations. Will it ultimately change everything we do in supply chain management? Maybe. But it may take a while. A November report from workplace tools developer Slack showed that AI adoption rates among U.S. workers had slowed in the last quarter, while a recent analysis of open supply chain jobs by software integration specialist Cleo found that only 2% of open jobs required AI skills.
So is AI just another fad or a truly transformative technology? It appears we'll need a few good use cases before we can make that call.
Economic activity in the logistics industry expanded in January, growing at its fastest clip in more than two years, according to the latest Logistics Managers’ Index (LMI) report, released this week.
The LMI jumped nearly five points from December to a reading of 62, reflecting continued steady growth in the U.S. economy along with faster-than-expected inventory growth across the sector as retailers, wholesalers, and manufacturers attempted to manage the uncertainty of tariffs and a changing regulatory environment. The January reading represented the fastest rate of expansion since June 2022, the LMI researchers said.
An LMI reading above 50 indicates growth across warehousing and transportation markets, and a reading below 50 indicates contraction. The LMI has remained in the mid- to high 50s range for most of the past year, indicating moderate, consistent growth in logistics markets.
Inventory levels rose 8.5 points from December, driven by downstream retailers stocking up ahead of the Trump administration’s potential tariffs on imports from Mexico, Canada, and China. Those increases led to higher costs throughout the industry: inventory costs, warehousing prices, and transportation prices all expanded to readings above 70, indicating strong growth. This occurred alongside slowing growth in warehousing and transportation capacity, suggesting that prices are up due to demand rather than other factors, such as inflation, according to the LMI researchers.
The LMI is a monthly survey of logistics managers from across the country. It tracks industry growth overall and across eight areas: inventory levels and costs; warehousing capacity, utilization, and prices; and transportation capacity, utilization, and prices. The report is released monthly by researchers from Arizona State University, Colorado State University, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rutgers University, and the University of Nevada, Reno, in conjunction with the Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals (CSCMP).
As commodities go, furniture presents its share of manufacturing and distribution challenges. For one thing, it's bulky. Second, its main components—wood and cloth—are easily damaged in transit. Third, much of it is manufactured overseas, making for some very long supply chains with all the associated risks. And finally, completed pieces can sit on the showroom floor for weeks or months, tying up inventory dollars and valuable retail space.
In other words, the furniture market is ripe for disruption. And John "Jay" Rogers wants to be the catalyst. In 2022, he cofounded a company that takes a whole new approach to furniture manufacturing—one that leverages the power of 3D printing and robotics. Rogers serves as CEO of that company, Haddy, which essentially aims to transform how furniture—and all elements of the "built environment"—are designed, manufactured, distributed, and, ultimately, recycled.
Rogers graduated from Princeton University and went to work for a medical device startup in China before moving to a hedge fund company, where he became a Chartered Financial Analyst (CFA). After that, he joined the U.S. Marine Corps, serving eight years in the infantry. Following two combat tours, he earned an MBA from the Harvard Business School and became a consultant for McKinsey & Co.
During this time, he founded Local Motors, a next-generation vehicle manufacturer that launched the world's first 3D-printed car, the Strati, in 2014. In 2021, he brought the technology to the furniture industry to launch Haddy. The father of four boys, Rogers is also a director of the RBR Foundation, a philanthropic organization focused on education and health care.
Rogers spoke recently with DC Velocity Group Editorial Director David Maloney on an episode of the "Logistics Matters" podcast.
Q: Could you tell us about Haddy and how this unique company came to be?
A: Absolutely. We have believed in the future of distributed digital manufacturing for a long time. The world has gone from being heavily globalized to one where lengthy supply chains are a liability—thanks to factors like the growing risk of terrorist attacks and the threat of tariffs. At the same time, there are more capabilities to produce things locally. Haddy is an outgrowth of those general trends.
Adoption of the technologies used in 3D printing has been decidedly uneven, although we do hear about applications like tissue bioprinting and food printing as well as the printing of trays for dental aligners. At Haddy, we saw an opportunity to take advantage of large-scale structural printing to approach the furniture and furnishings industry. The technology and software that make this possible are already here.
Q: Furniture is a very mature market. Why did you see this as a market that was ripe for disruption?
A:The furniture market has actually been disrupted many times in the last 200 years. The manufacturing of furniture for U.S. consumption originally took place in England. It then moved to Boston and from there to New Amsterdam, the Midwest, and North Carolina. Eventually, it went to Taiwan, then China, and now Vietnam, Indonesia, and Thailand. And each of those moves brought some type of disruption.
Other disruptions have been based on design. You can look at things like the advent of glue-laminated wood with Herman Miller, MillerKnoll, and the Eames [furniture design and manufacturing] movement. And you can look at changes in the way manufacturing is powered—the move from manual operations to machine-driven operations powered by steam and electricity. So the furniture industry has been continuously disrupted, sometimes by labor markets and sometimes by machines and methods.
What's happening now is that we're seeing changes in the way that labor is applied in furniture manufacturing. Furniture has traditionally been put together by human hands. But today, we have an opportunity to reassign those hands to processes that take place around the edges of furniture production. The hands are now directing robotics through programming and design; they're not actually making the furniture.
And so, we see this mature market as being one that's been continuously disrupted during the last 200 years. And this disruption now has a lot to do with changing the way that labor interacts with the making of furniture.
Q: How do your 3D printers actually create the furniture?
A:All 3D printing is not the same. The 3D printers we use are so-called "hybrid" systems. When we say hybrid, what we mean is that they're not just printers—they are holders, printers, polishers, and cutters, and they also do milling and things like that. We measure things and then print things, which is the additive portion. Then we can do subtractive and polishing work—re-measuring, moving, and printing parts again. And so, these hybrid systems are the actual makers of the furniture.
Q: What types of products are you making?
A: We've started with hardline or case goods, as they're sometimes known, for both residential and commercial use—cabinets, wall bookshelves, freestanding bookshelves, tables, rigid chairs, planters, and the like. Basically, we've been concentrating on products that don't have upholstery.
It's not that upholstery isn't necessary in furniture, as it is used in many pieces. But right now, we have found that digital furniture manufacturing becomes analog again when you have to factor in the sewing process. And so, to move quickly and fully leverage the advantages of digital manufacturing, we're sticking to the hardline groups, except for a couple of pieces that we have debuted that have 3D-printed cushions, which are super cool.
Q: Of course, 3D printers create objects in layers. What types of materials are you running through your 3D printers to create this furniture?
A: We use recycled materials, primarily polymer composites—a bio-compostable polymer or a synthetic polymer. We look for either recycled or bio-compostable [materials], which we then reinforce with fibers and fillers, and that's what makes them composites. To create the bio-compostables, we marry them with bio-fibers, such as hemp or bamboo. For synthetic materials, we marry them with things like glass or carbon fibers.
Q: Does producing goods via 3D printing allow you to customize products easily?
A: Absolutely. The real problem in the furniture and furnishings industries is that when you tool up to make something with a jig, a fixture, or a mold, you tend to be less creative because you now feel you have to make and sell a lot of that item to justify the investment.
One of the great promises of 3D printing is that it doesn't have a mold and doesn't require tooling. It exists in the digital realm before it becomes physical, and so customization is part and parcel of the process.
I would also add that people aren't necessarily looking for one-off furniture. Just because we can customize doesn't mean we're telling customers that once we've delivered a product, we break the digital mold, so to speak. We still feel that people like styles and trends created by designers, but the customization really allows enterprise clients—like businesses, retailers, and architects—to think more freely.
Customization is most useful in allowing people to "iterate" quickly. Our designers can do something digitally first without having to build a tool, which frees them to be more creative. Plus, because our material is fully recyclable, if we print something for the first time and find it doesn't work, we can just recycle it. So there's really no penalty for a failed first printing—in fact, those failures bring their own rewards in the form of lessons we can apply in future digital and physical iterations.
Q: You currently produce your furniture in an automated microfactory in Florida, with plans to set up several more. Could you talk a little about what your microfactory looks like and how you distribute the finished goods?
A: Our microfactory is a 30,000-square-foot box that mainly contains the robots that make our furniture along with shipping docks. But we don't intend for our microfactories to be storage warehouses and trans-shipment facilities like the kind you'd typically see in the furniture industry—all of the trappings of a global supply chain. Instead, a microfactory is meant to be a site where you print the product, put it on a dock, and then ship it out. So a microfactory is essentially an enabler of regional manufacturing and distribution.
Q: Do you manufacture your products on a print-to-order basis as opposed to a print-to-stock model?
A: No. We may someday get to the point where we receive an order digitally, print it, and then send it out on a truck the next day. But right now, we aren't set up to do a mini-delivery to one customer out of a microfactory.
We are an enterprise company that partners with architects, designers, builders, and retailers, who then distribute our furnishings to their customers. We are not trying to go direct-to-consumer at this stage. It's not the way a microfactory is set up to distribute goods.
Q: You've mentioned your company's use of recycled materials. Could you talk a little bit about other ways you're looking to reduce waste and help support a circular economy?
A: Yes. Sustainability and a circular economy are really something that you have to plan for. In our case, our plans call for moving toward a distributed digital manufacturing model, where we establish microfactories in various regions around the world to serve customers within a 10-hour driving radius of the factory. That is a pretty large area, so we could cover the United States with just four or five microfactories.
That also means that we can credibly build our recycling network as part of our microfactory setup. As I mentioned, we use recycled polymer stock in our production, so we're keeping that material out of a landfill. And then we tell our enterprise customers that while the furniture they're buying is extremely durable, when they're ready to run a special and offer customers a credit for turning in their used furniture, we'll buy back the material. Buying back that material actually reduces our costs because it's already been composited and created and recaptured. So our microfactory network is well designed for circularity in concert with our enterprise customers.