When you think of your best defenses against disaster, the weather guy is probably not the first thing that comes to mind. But maybe he should. Threats to your operations can come from all venues—terrorists, fires, chemical spills—but an awful lot of them seem to involve weather: tornadoes, blizzards and ice storms, hurricanes and floods.
Though any one of these weather events could completely disrupt the supply chain, they're rare enough that they may only rate mention in, say, Section 19-G of the corporate disaster plan. That's a risky way to do business. "You wouldn't think of operating a distribution center without a fire alarm," says Michael R. Smith, CEO and founder of WeatherData of Wichita, Kan., "but it's amazing how many companies try to operate their weathersensitive businesses without some kind of weather alarm system."
In fact, it seems that many companies are trying to run their businesses without much in the way of a disaster preparedness plan at all. According to a recent survey, the 2003 Protecting Value Study conducted by commercial and industrial property insurer FM Global, the Financial Executives Research Foundation and the National Association of Corporate Treasurers, 88 percent of financial executives and 83 percent of risk managers admitted that their companies were not entirely prepared to recover from a major disruption to a top revenue source. That same study singled out property-related hazards, such as fire and natural disasters, as the greatest threat to revenue sources.
There's not a thing you can do to prevent a natural disaster, of course. But there are many matters you can think through in advance when it comes to recovery: Who's responsible when a tornado rips through your loading dock and damages a carrier's trucks? What happens to the urgent shipment that requires pickup in Alabama when your fleet is snowed in somewhere on Michigan's Upper Peninsula? How can you protect your delicate robotic loading equipment from lightning strikes?
You may never have to answer these questions. But then again, you might. For those who aren't taking any chances, we offer five tips on preparing your supply chain for stormy weather:
Back up all your systems – not just your computer systems. Too many people figure that because their IT specialists have devised a recovery strategy for their data center, they've made a good start to their disaster planning, says Mike Morganti, customer training manager for FM Global of Johnston, R.I. The problem is, there's more to the distribution of goods than just the data.
Take the private fleet, for example. "Having your own fleet and drivers gives you a lot of control, but it doesn't preclude something's interrupting the flow," Morganti says. His advice: "Identify strategies to make sure there will be an uninterrupted flow of products from the distribution center to the customer. This could be as simple as making flexible arrangements with outside carriers."
Another option is to pre-position product in certain locations if the weather looks threatening, says Michael J. Fagel, Ph.D. , emergency management director for meat packer Aurora Packing Co. of North Aurora, Ill., and emergency manager for the village of Sugar Grove, Ill. Arrange for some alternative warehousing around the country and get your product closer to the "end game." Then rotate your stock. "For example, a lot of companies placed food and other perishables on trailers and had them pre-positioned throughout the country just prior to Y2K in case there were problems," he recalls. "If you're anticipating, say, a winter storm or other disaster, this is something to consider."
Review your insurance coverage. A seemingly minor point, but one that may save you a lot of money: "If you have other companies' inventory in your center, you must be sure you are properly insured for it, "warns John Kauffman, director of loss control training for the Connecticut-based Hartford Financial Services Group.
Of course, somewhere down the road, most—if not all—inventory becomes cargo. That cargo should be insured as well. "Make sure third-party carriers are adequately insured, "advises Kauffman, "and get copies of proofs of insurance. "Then meet with your insurance agent to discuss what your exposures and responsibilities are with third-party carriers in disaster situations. For example, if the carrier's trucks are on your premises during a disaster and are damaged ,who's responsible for the damage to those trucks? "Create up-front agreements with the carriers so everyone knows who's responsible for what du ring a disaster, such as alternate means of transportation," he urges. Then make sure the carriers have disaster plans in place and be prepared to coordinate your plans with their plans.
Forget the NWS. Many companies rely on reports from the National Weather Service (NWS) for advance notice of weather-related problems. But those NWS reports often fall short, argues Smith of WeatherData, a service that helps clients identify their weather-related risks and create plans to mitigate those risks.
For example, the NWS does not issue any kind of lightning warnings. "However, if you have a highly automated distribution center that relies on robotic loading equipment or computers that run the operations, a power surge can be disastrous," he says. If that's the case, you need a lightning warning system so you have time to shift to your generators and isolate your power sources from commercial power before lightning arrives.
The NWS doesn't do much better with tornadoes. The Weather Service only issues tornado warnings by county, which gives you no real indication whether your facility is directly in the tornado's path. "It is possible, using the improved technology that has been developed over the last decade, to be very specific about whether a given site is within the path of a tornado or not," Smith reports. That's important to know: "If you're in the path, you want to do an orderly shutdown and shelter your people," he says."If you're not in the path, though, there is no reason to take what could be a very expensive hit in terms of productivity by shutting down operations."
Hurricanes present a different kind of problem: Ever since Hurricane Andrew devastated parts of Florida, the NWS has been prone to overwarning, stressing the worstcase scenarios. The problem is that the overwarnings are becoming very costly to businesses. You can't do much about an approaching hurricane, of course, but by working with a business-focused weather consultant,it is possible to anticipate and be proactive in these circumstances, and figure out the potential risk to your sp ecific site.
Take off the blinders. Many times DC managers underestimate how vulnerable they are to significant weather events at distant points in the supply chain."I can't tell you how many times over the years I've heard of people running out of parts or experiencing other supply disruptions when the weather was clear at the distribution center and clear at the customer's or supplier's location, but there was an ice storm, snowstorm or flood in between," says Smith.
If your business depends on your ability to receive raw materials or ship finished products, you'll want to keep an eye on the weather along the entire supply chain. As soon as you hear of a potential disruption along your supply route, you can begin to coordinate with your customers."You can't wait until there are 15 inches of snow on the ground to decide what you're going to do," Smith says. You need to ask customers how they want to plan for the event before it happens. For example: Do they want additional parts or inventory sent early? Do they want a contingency plan put into effect to use air freight?
Hope for the best, but prepare for the worst. One mistake many managers make—particularly when building a new facility—is gauging hazards from statistics drawn from an inadequate time period, according to Smith. In some cases, companies look at averages over as few as three to 10 years, he says, which can be very misleading.
"For example, if you had used data taken from the last three to 10 years on the potential threat for roof loading due to heavy snow in Denver, you wouldn't get much useful information because the last 10 years have been relatively snow-free," says Smith. Yet after a decade of winters that featured a relatively light accumulation,on Wednesday, March 19, almost seven feet of snow fell in the Denver area, making it the worst blizzard in almost a century and the second worst in Denver's history. Fire officials reported that roofs caved in on approximately 100 homes, businesses and other buildings.
Smith recommends that businesses review at least 30 years' worth of records, and preferably 50 to 100 years' worth (which are also available), to get a true idea of just how bad things could get. And, no surprise here, he also points out that using a weather risk management service can provide crucial advance warning ("Though no one expected the Denver roof collapses," he reports, "the information we put out to our clients did mention this possibility").
Could early warning have helped avert a disaster? It's hard to know. But one thing seems clear enough: With advance information, you could at least break out the snow melters and roof rakes. And maybe call up and thank the weather guy.
The supply chain risk management firm Overhaul has landed $55 million in backing, saying the financing will fuel its advancements in artificial intelligence and support its strategic acquisition roadmap.
The equity funding round comes from the private equity firm Springcoast Partners, with follow-on participation from existing investors Edison Partners and Americo. As part of the investment, Springcoast’s Chris Dederick and Holger Staude will join Overhaul’s board of directors.
According to Austin, Texas-based Overhaul, the money comes as macroeconomic and global trade dynamics are driving consequential transformations in supply chains. That makes cargo visibility and proactive risk management essential tools as shippers manage new routes and suppliers.
“The supply chain technology space will see significant consolidation over the next 12 to 24 months,” Barry Conlon, CEO of Overhaul, said in a release. “Overhaul is well-positioned to establish itself as the ultimate integrated solution, delivering a comprehensive suite of tools for supply chain risk management, efficiency, and visibility under a single trusted platform.”
Artificial intelligence (AI) and data science were hot business topics in 2024 and will remain on the front burner in 2025, according to recent research published in AI in Action, a series of technology-focused columns in the MIT Sloan Management Review.
In Five Trends in AI and Data Science for 2025, researchers Tom Davenport and Randy Bean outline ways in which AI and our data-driven culture will continue to shape the business landscape in the coming year. The information comes from a range of recent AI-focused research projects, including the 2025 AI & Data Leadership Executive Benchmark Survey, an annual survey of data, analytics, and AI executives conducted by Bean’s educational firm, Data & AI Leadership Exchange.
The five trends range from the promise of agentic AI to the struggle over which C-suite role should oversee data and AI responsibilities. At a glance, they reveal that:
Leaders will grapple with both the promise and hype around agentic AI. Agentic AI—which handles tasks independently—is on the rise, in the form of generative AI bots that can perform some content-creation tasks. But the authors say it will be a while before such tools can handle major tasks—like make a travel reservation or conduct a banking transaction.
The time has come to measure results from generative AI experiments. The authors say very few companies are carefully measuring productivity gains from AI projects—particularly when it comes to figuring out what their knowledge-based workers are doing with the freed-up time those projects provide. Doing so is vital to profiting from AI investments.
The reality about data-driven culture sets in. The authors found that 92% of survey respondents feel that cultural and change management challenges are the primary barriers to becoming data- and AI-driven—indicating that the shift to AI is about much more than just the technology.
Unstructured data is important again. The ability to apply Generative AI tools to manage unstructured data—such as text, images, and video—is putting a renewed focus on getting all that data into shape, which takes a whole lot of human effort. As the authors explain “organizations need to pick the best examples of each document type, tag or graph the content, and get it loaded into the system.” And many companies simply aren’t there yet.
Who should run data and AI? Expect continued struggle. Should these roles be concentrated on the business or tech side of the organization? Opinions differ, and as the roles themselves continue to evolve, the authors say companies should expect to continue to wrestle with responsibilities and reporting structures.
Shippers today are praising an 11th-hour contract agreement that has averted the threat of a strike by dockworkers at East and Gulf coast ports that could have frozen container imports and exports as soon as January 16.
The agreement came late last night between the International Longshoremen’s Association (ILA) representing some 45,000 workers and the United States Maritime Alliance (USMX) that includes the operators of port facilities up and down the coast.
Details of the new agreement on those issues have not yet been made public, but in the meantime, retailers and manufacturers are heaving sighs of relief that trade flows will continue.
“Providing certainty with a new contract and avoiding further disruptions is paramount to ensure retail goods arrive in a timely manner for consumers. The agreement will also pave the way for much-needed modernization efforts, which are essential for future growth at these ports and the overall resiliency of our nation’s supply chain,” Gold said.
The next step in the process is for both sides to ratify the tentative agreement, so negotiators have agreed to keep those details private in the meantime, according to identical statements released by the ILA and the USMX. In their joint statement, the groups called the six-year deal a “win-win,” saying: “This agreement protects current ILA jobs and establishes a framework for implementing technologies that will create more jobs while modernizing East and Gulf coasts ports – making them safer and more efficient, and creating the capacity they need to keep our supply chains strong. This is a win-win agreement that creates ILA jobs, supports American consumers and businesses, and keeps the American economy the key hub of the global marketplace.”
The breakthrough hints at broader supply chain trends, which will focus on the tension between operational efficiency and workforce job protection, not just at ports but across other sectors as well, according to a statement from Judah Levine, head of research at Freightos, a freight booking and payment platform. Port automation was the major sticking point leading up to this agreement, as the USMX pushed for technologies to make ports more efficient, while the ILA opposed automation or semi-automation that could threaten jobs.
"This is a six-year détente in the tech-versus-labor tug-of-war at U.S. ports," Levine said. “Automation remains a lightning rod—and likely one we’ll see in other industries—but this deal suggests a cautious path forward."
Editor's note: This story was revised on January 9 to include additional input from the ILA, USMX, and Freightos.
Logistics industry growth slowed in December due to a seasonal wind-down of inventory and following one of the busiest holiday shopping seasons on record, according to the latest Logistics Managers’ Index (LMI) report, released this week.
The monthly LMI was 57.3 in December, down more than a percentage point from November’s reading of 58.4. Despite the slowdown, economic activity across the industry continued to expand, as an LMI reading above 50 indicates growth and a reading below 50 indicates contraction.
The LMI researchers said the monthly conditions were largely due to seasonal drawdowns in inventory levels—and the associated costs of holding them—at the retail level. The LMI’s Inventory Levels index registered 50, falling from 56.1 in November. That reduction also affected warehousing capacity, which slowed but remained in expansion mode: The LMI’s warehousing capacity index fell 7 points to a reading of 61.6.
December’s results reflect a continued trend toward more typical industry growth patterns following recent years of volatility—and they point to a successful peak holiday season as well.
“Retailers were clearly correct in their bet to stock [up] on goods ahead of the holiday season,” the LMI researchers wrote in their monthly report. “Holiday sales from November until Christmas Eve were up 3.8% year-over-year according to Mastercard. This was largely driven by a 6.7% increase in e-commerce sales, although in-person spending was up 2.9% as well.”
And those results came during a compressed peak shopping cycle.
“The increase in spending came despite the shorter holiday season due to the late Thanksgiving,” the researchers also wrote, citing National Retail Federation (NRF) estimates that U.S. shoppers spent just short of a trillion dollars in November and December, making it the busiest holiday season of all time.
The LMI is a monthly survey of logistics managers from across the country. It tracks industry growth overall and across eight areas: inventory levels and costs; warehousing capacity, utilization, and prices; and transportation capacity, utilization, and prices. The report is released monthly by researchers from Arizona State University, Colorado State University, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rutgers University, and the University of Nevada, Reno, in conjunction with the Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals (CSCMP).
As U.S. small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) face an uncertain business landscape in 2025, a substantial majority (67%) expect positive growth in the new year compared to 2024, according to a survey from DHL.
However, the survey also showed that businesses could face a rocky road to reach that goal, as they navigate a complex environment of regulatory/policy shifts and global market volatility. Both those issues were cited as top challenges by 36% of respondents, followed by staffing/talent retention (11%) and digital threats and cyber attacks (2%).
Against that backdrop, SMEs said that the biggest opportunity for growth in 2025 lies in expanding into new markets (40%), followed by economic improvements (31%) and implementing new technologies (14%).
As the U.S. prepares for a broad shift in political leadership in Washington after a contentious election, the SMEs in DHL’s survey were likely split evenly on their opinion about the impact of regulatory and policy changes. A plurality of 40% were on the fence (uncertain, still evaluating), followed by 24% who believe regulatory changes could negatively impact growth, 20% who see these changes as having a positive impact, and 16% predicting no impact on growth at all.
That uncertainty also triggered a split when respondents were asked how they planned to adjust their strategy in 2025 in response to changes in the policy or regulatory landscape. The largest portion (38%) of SMEs said they remained uncertain or still evaluating, followed by 30% who will make minor adjustments, 19% will maintain their current approach, and 13% who were willing to significantly adjust their approach.