Deliver customized orders to retail stores worldwide from a single DC on a Pacific island? With its Direct Ship program, Timex does just that and much faster than you might imagine.
Contributing Editor Toby Gooley is a writer and editor specializing in supply chain, logistics, and material handling, and a lecturer at MIT's Center for Transportation & Logistics. She previously was Senior Editor at DC VELOCITY and Editor of DCV's sister publication, CSCMP's Supply Chain Quarterly. Prior to joining AGiLE Business Media in 2007, she spent 20 years at Logistics Management magazine as Managing Editor and Senior Editor covering international trade and transportation. Prior to that she was an export traffic manager for 10 years. She holds a B.A. in Asian Studies from Cornell University.
Watches aren't inherently perishable, but fashion is. Fads come and go with astonishing speed, and he who makes it into the store last loses.
For fashion-dependent companies that manufacture in Asia, time constraints make life doubly difficult: Not only must they contend with the complexities of overseas manufacturing, but they also must figure out how to get their products to consumers halfway around the world before the fad fizzles out.
That was the dilemma facing Timex Corp., the Middlebury, Conn.-based company best known for its inexpensive, reliable wristwatches. Timex, which sources most of its products and components in Asia, needed to speed up deliveries to retail stores around the world. It wasn't easy, but through a combination of creative process engineering, wise use of technology, and improvements in transportation services, Timex has managed to slash average order-to-delivery time from four or five weeks to just seven days.
Born in the U.S.A.
Timex Corp. is hardly a newcomer to the manufacturing game. The storied company got its start in the 1850s as Waterbury Clock Co. A spin-off, Waterbury Watch, sold tens of millions of affordable pocket watches, including the "Yankee" model, at one time the world's best-selling watch.
A U.S. Army contract during World War I sparked the development of the wristwatch. Civilians liked them, too, and began buying them in large numbers in the 1920s. In the 1930s, Waterbury Watch created a children's market when it teamed up with Walt Disney to produce the iconic Mickey Mouse wristwatch. In the 1950s, the company (then called U.S. Time) launched the memorable "torture test" ad campaign for its popular "Timex" wristwatch. (See sidebar.) A few years later, the renamed Timex Corp. began marketing the wristwatch as a fashion accessory. Later innovations, like the Indiglo illuminated watch face, the IronMan sports watch, and the new iControl watchmounted wireless controller for iPods, have kept Timex a household name.
This tradition of first-to-market product design has helped Timex survive competition from Asian manufacturers. According to the company, it is the only U.S.-based watchmaker still in business.
Although Timex has been able to keep its roots firmly planted in the United States—a market that still accounts for 80 percent of annual sales—it no longer makes watches in this country. Competitive pressures have led the company to move most of its sourcing, manufacturing, and assembly to Asia.
A long, costly process
Even as it shifted its manufacturing operations to overseas locations, Timex continued to follow its long-established distribution model for a number of years. Watches were preassembled based on sales projections and then shipped in bulk by ocean to Timex's distribution centers in the United States, Canada, Mexico, Europe, and Asia. At those centers, they were repackaged, labeled, and shipped to customers' warehouses.
Over time, a couple of problems began to develop. One was cost—this approach often led to overstocking of components and unsold watches. The other was speed. The time required to pick orders, pack them for transportation, ship them, warehouse them, repackage and label them for specific customers and countries, and ship them to customers' warehouses—not to mention the time required for the customers themselves to sort, pack, and ship the watches to individual stores—significantly lengthened the order-to-delivery cycle.
For a company with a history of being first to market with innovative products, that simply didn't fly. Competitive pressures added to the sense that it was time for a quicker, cheaper, and more efficient way of filling orders and moving product onto retail shelves.
Timex hired consultants and systems integrators to take a hard look at the whole shebang—manufacturing, storage, picking, assembly, packing, and shipping. The goal: to slash order-to-delivery time while keeping costs under control.
Together, Timex's project team, systems integrator The Numina Group, and the St. Onge supply chain engineering firm came to the conclusion that the far-flung global distribution network wasn't necessary, or even desirable. The company could assemble virtually all of its orders on a justin-time (JIT) basis at a single production and distribution center. By streamlining assembly and order fulfillment and by consolidating production and distribution in one location, Timex could save itself millions of dollars in inventory costs. What's more, it could pick and package individual stock-keeping units (SKUs) for direct-to-store delivery, saving retailers the time and expense of warehousing, repackaging, and reshipping the goods themselves.
Once everyone had signed off on the plan, Timex began working out the details of the Direct Ship program, as the initiative is known. One of the first steps was to decide where to locate the global DC that would house the operations. Eventually, the company chose Cebu in the Philippines. Why Cebu? There were a number of reasons, says Andrew Ledesma, Timex's director of distribution engineering, packaging, and transportation. To begin with, the company has been successfully manufacturing in Cebu for 27 or 28 years, says Ledesma, a Filipino who has been with the company nearly that long himself. Another factor was the availability of transportation. Air transportation service from the area has improved in recent years, with both FedEx and UPS increasing their capacity and service frequency. "We can now ship on one flight the same amount that used to take five flights," Ledesma says. "This allowed transportation to become a tool rather than an obstacle."
Sale-ready in record time
In 2005, Timex opened a $13 million, 46,000-square-foot distribution center that is attached to the Cebu manufacturing facility. The new DC is capable of shipping about 170,000 watches in 16 airline containers each day. It features state-of-the-art material handling equipment and software that is tightly integrated with an i2 supply chain planning system and an Infor Viaware warehouse management system (WMS). A pick-to-light system from Numina directs batch picking of product for induction into an Interroll cross-belt order-fulfillment sorter (OFS). That sorter and conveyors supplied by FKI Logistex and TGW-Ermanco transport and route built-to-order product from manufacturing through picking and shipping operations, where print-and-apply label applicators from Panther Industries prepare shipments for direct-to-store delivery. Tying it all together is Numina's Real-time Distribution Software (RDS), which handles control and execution.
The cycle begins when an order arrives and the required watch heads are assembled in a clean-room environment from parts and components made in the Philippines or imported from Timex-owned factories elsewhere in Asia. Straps and bands are added, the watches are placed in country- and order-specific retail packaging, and the packages are placed in totes.
As the totes leave the manufacturing areas on conveyors, the RDS system receives data on their contents. The conveyor moves the totes through a cutout in the wall and into the DC; a bar-code scanner reads the totes' "license plates" as they arrive. RDS dynamically assigns a forward- or reserve-pick location in the second or third level of the pick module (the first level is for bulk orders) and directs operators using radio-frequency (RF) terminals to slot the product in the assigned locations. The space-saving pick module is located on a mezzanine above the shipping area, a design that allowed Timex to pack a lot of activity into a relatively small space.
Next, the WMS sends orders containing the SKUs, serial numbers, and quantities assigned to each carton to the RDS system. Based on that information, the RDS transmits instructions to the customized pick-to-light system, which directs picking activity in the module.Workers there batchpick items for multiple orders into totes, selecting items from over 3,500 individual storage locations. The software manages the batch picking to make the most efficient use of the 116-destination order-fulfillment sorter, explains Dan Hanrahan, business development manager for The Numina Group. Meanwhile, inventory is automatically replenished from reserve locations as needed.
A conveyor routes the totes to the OFS induction area, where operators unload the watches and scan the bar codes on the bottom of each package. RDS looks up each SKU; based on that information, a retail price label is automatically printed and applied if required by the customer. When orders are complete, station displays at the head of the diversion chutes indicate what size cartons will be needed for each order. After they pack the cartons, operators then attach license plate bar codes to the cartons and use RF terminals to "marry" the cartons to the diverter locations.
The cartons leave the order-fulfillment sorter and travel by conveyor to a combination packing and shipping sorter. At the induction point, they pass through a scan-weigh station for in-line weight verification combined with a digital photo, which provides a visual record of the contents. If all is well, the cartons are sorted to the pack-and-seal lanes. If a shortage or other anomaly is detected, cartons are diverted for inspection.
At the pack-and-seal area, operators insert packing lists and any special export documentation, and then send the cartons through void-fill stations and variable-height tape sealers. After a final trip through the sorter, the cartons move out to the labeling stations, which automatically print and apply customer-specific compliance and shipping labels, Hanrahan explains. One more audit, and the packed cartons head on down the shipping lanes for pickup by UPS, FedEx, and other air carriers.
The cartons fly in "igloos"—large air-freight containers—to the carriers' hubs, where sorting takes place. UPS, for example, breaks down U.S.-bound containers in Alaska and combines Timex's shipments with other shipments going to the same retailer. The combined loads then head to additional destinations in the United States, where they are delivered by truck to individual stores.
Not all orders, by the way, move by parcel carrier, and not all go directly to the stores. Some bulk orders, for example, are stored and shipped in full cases to customers' DCs, says Ledesma. These and other, more complex shipments typically are handled by Timex's freight forwarder, Agility (formerly GeoLogistics).
Regardless of how the orders are shipped, though, Timex's customers can count on their speedy arrival. The timing of every one of the steps involved is governed by two requirements: All orders must be filled within 48 hours from the time they are received (most are now filled the same day), and most shipments must arrive at their destinations within seven days after the order's release. That's a far cry from the four or five weeks customers had to wait under the old system.
Transportation trade-off
You might think that the cost of shipping hundreds of thousands of wristwatches from an island on the far side of the Pacific Ocean would be prohibitive. And in fact, Ledesma says, Timex's transportation costs have increased. There are several reasons for that, he says. One factor, of course, is the DC's location. Another is that the products' time-sensitivity mandates the use of air express; ocean freight is simply not an option.
What's more, direct-to-store delivery by definition means smaller, more frequent orders. Though smaller orders help Timex minimize inventory, they also push up per-piece transportation costs. "You might ship five pieces in a package that weighs about one pound, but because of minimums, the rate is the same as it is for up to five pounds. If you could ship four pounds, then the per-piece cost would be less," Ledesma explains.
The higher transportation costs, however, have been more than offset by the savings afforded by Cebu's assemble-toorder capability and greater efficiency in production, order fulfillment, packaging, labeling, and shipping, Ledesma says. Timex also has gained better visibility of product, from planning to delivery, with much less inventory.
Timex isn't the only winner here. Retailers benefit as well. Timex's ability to ship orders with sale-ready packaging and customized labels to individual stores saves them both time and money while ensuring that merchandise is ready when shoppers want it.
The fact that Timex found a way to take weeks out of the order-to-delivery cycle while improving compliance with its customers' requirements should come as no surprise. After all, when timing becomes a problem, who better to solve it than a watchmaker?
withstanding the tests of Timex
If you're old enough to remember the days of blackand-white television, a certain rhyming phrase probably popped into your head when you first looked at this article.
In 1950, U.S. Time Corp. introduced the inexpensive but extremely reliable Timex wristwatch. Print advertisements featured the watch that "takes a licking and keeps on ticking" being strapped to Mickey Mantle's bat, frozen in an ice cube tray, spun inside a vacuum cleaner, taped to a lobster's claw, and more.
Sales really took off, however, when newsman John Cameron Swayze began showcasing the Timex watch in "torture test" commercials on television. Watches were taped to the propeller of an outboard motor, sent tumbling over the Grand Coulee Dam, and held by a diver jumping into the ocean from the Acapulco cliffs. According to the company, thousands of viewers suggested other tests—including an Air Force sergeant who offered to crash a plane while wearing a Timex.
The unique ad campaign had the desired effect: By the end of the decade, one out of every three watches sold in the United States was a Timex, and the company had changed its name to match that of one of the best-known consumer products in U.S. history.
As the old adage goes, everything old is new again. For evidence of that, you need look no farther than cargo ships, which are looking to a 5,000-year-old technology as an eco-friendly source of propulsion—the sail.
But today’s sails bear little resemblance to the papyrus or animal-skin sails used in ancient times or the billowing cotton or linen sails of 19th-century clipper ships. These are thoroughly modern, high-tech devices designed to reduce ship operators’ reliance on costly marine fuels and help curb greenhouse gas emissions—and they’re sprouting up on freight vessels around the world.
One example is the “rotor sail,” a cylindrical unit that’s mounted inside a flagpole-shaped device. When installed on a cargo ship’s deck, the sail can reduce the vessel’s fuel consumption and carbon dioxide emissions by 6% to 12%, users say. Last month, the Japanese marine freight carrier NS United Kaiun Kaisha Ltd.announced plans to install five rotor sails manufactured by Anemoi Marine Technologies Ltd. on the 1,184-foot-long iron ore carrier ship NSU Tubarao over the next year.
But the story doesn’t end with rotor sails. Companies are experimenting with other types of high-tech sails as well. For instance, the Dutch heavy-lift cargo ship Jumbo Jubileehas been outfitted with two mechanical sails known as wind-assisted ship propulsion (WASP) units in a bid to boost fuel efficiency and cut carbon. And the Dutch maritime gas carrier Anthony Vederhas deployed two “VentoFoil” sails made by Econowind on its ethylene carrier Coral Patula, with plans to add two similar sails to its sister ship Coral Pearl later this year.
When it comes to logistics technology, the pace of innovation has never been faster. In recent years, the market has been inundated by waves of cool new tech tools, all promising to help users enhance their operations and cope with today’s myriad supply chain challenges.
But that ever-expanding array of offerings can make it difficult to separate the wheat from the chaff—technology that’s the real deal versus technology that’s just “vaporware,” meaning products that don’t live up to their hype and may even still be in the conceptual stage.
One way to cut through the confusion is to check out the entries for the “3 V’s of Supply Chain Innovation Awards,” an annual competition held by the Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals (CSCMP). This competition, which is hosted by DC Velocity’s sister publication, Supply Chain Xchange, and supply chain visionary and 3 V’s framework creator Art Mesher, recognizes companies that have parlayed the 3 V’s—“embracing variability, harnessing visibility, and competing with velocity”—into business success and advanced the practice of supply chain management. Awards are presented in two categories: the “Business Innovation Award,” which recognizes more established businesses, and the “Best Overall Innovative Startup/Early Stage Award,” which recognizes newer companies.
The judging for this year’s competition—the second annual contest—took place at CSCMP’s EDGE Supply Chain Conference & Exhibition in September, where the three finalists for each award presented their innovations via a fast-paced “elevator pitch.” (To watch a video of the presentations, visit the Supply Chain Xchange website.)
What follows is a brief look at the six companies that made the competition’s final round and the latest updates on their achievements:
Arkestro: This San Francisco-based firm offers a predictive procurement orchestration solution that uses machine learning (ML) and behavioral science to revolutionize sourcing, eliminating the need for outdated manual tools like pivot tables and for labor-intensive negotiations. Instead, procurement teams can process quotes and secure optimal supplier agreements at a speed and accuracy that would be impossible to achieve manually, the firm says.
The company recently joined the Amazon Web Services (AWS) Partner Network (APN), which it says will help it reach its goal of elevating procurement from a cost center to a strategic growth engine.
AutoScheduler.AI: This Austin, Texas-based company offers a predictive warehouse optimization platform that integrates with a user’s existing warehouse management system (WMS) and “accelerates” its ability to resolve problems like dock schedule conflicts, inefficient workforce allocation, poor on-time/in-full (OTIF) performance, and excessive intra-campus moves.
“We’re here to make the warehouse sexy,” the firm says on its website. “With our deep background in building machine learning solutions, everything delivered by the AutoScheduler team is designed to provide value by learning your challenges, environment, and best practices.” Privately funded up until this summer, the company recently secured venture capital funding that it will use to accelerate its growth and enhance its technologies.
Davinci Micro Fulfillment: Located in Bound Brook, New Jersey, Davinci operates a “microfulfillment as a service” platform that helps users expedite inventory turnover while reducing operating expenses by leveraging what it calls the “4 Ps of global distribution”—product, placement, price, and promotion. The firm operates a network of microfulfillment centers across the U.S., offering services that include front-end merchandising and network optimization.
Within the past year, the company raised seed funding to help enhance its technology capabilities.
Flying Ship: Headquartered in Leesburg, Virginia, Flying Ship has designed an unmanned, low-flying “ground-effect maritime craft” that moves freight over the ocean in coastal regions. Although the Flying Ship looks like a small aircraft or large drone, it is classified as a maritime vessel because it does not leave the air cushion over the waves, similar to a hovercraft.
The first-generation models are 30 feet long, electrically powered, and semi-autonomous. They can dock at existing marinas, beaches, and boat ramps to deliver goods, providing service that the company describes as faster than boats and cheaper than air. The firm says the next-generation models will be fully autonomous.
Flying Ship, which was honored with the Best Overall Startup Award in this year’s 3 V’s competition, is currently preparing to fly demo missions with the Air Force Research Laboratory (AFRL).
Perfect Planner: Based in Alpharetta, Georgia, Perfect Planner operates a cloud-based platform that’s designed to streamline the material planning and replenishment process. The technology collects, organizes, and analyzes data from a business’s material requirements planning (MRP) system to create daily “to-do lists” for material planners/buyers, with the “to-dos” ranked in order of criticality. The solution also uses advanced analytics to “understand” and address inventory shortages and surpluses.
Perfect Planner was honored with the Business Innovation Award in this year’s 3 V’s competition.
ProvisionAi: Located in Franklin, Tennessee, ProvisionAi has developed load optimization software that helps consumer packaged goods (CPG) companies move their freight with fewer trucks, thereby cutting their transportation costs. The firm says its flagship offering is an automatic order optimization (AutoO2) system that bolts onto a company’s existing enterprise resource planning (ERP) or WMS platform and guides larger orders through execution, ensuring that what is planned is actually loaded on the truck. The firm’s CEO and founder, Tom Moore, was recognized as a 2024 Rainmaker by this magazine.
Global forklift sales have slumped in 2024, falling short of initial forecasts as a result of the struggling economy in Europe and the slow release of project funding in the U.S., a report from market analyst firm Interact Analysis says.
In response, the London-based firm has reduced its shipment forecast for the year to rise just 0.3%, although it still predicts consistent growth of around 4-5% out to 2034.
The “bleak” figures come as the European economy has stagnated during the second half of 2024, with two of the leading industry sectors for forklifts - automotive and logistics – struggling. In addition, order backlogs from the pandemic have now been absorbed, so order volumes for the global forklift market will be slightly lower than shipment volumes over the next few years, Interact Analysis said.
On a more positive note, 3 million forklifts are forecast to be shipped per year by 2031 as enterprises are forced to reduce their dependence on manual labor. Interact Analysis has observed that major forklift OEMs are continuing with their long-term expansion plans, while other manufacturers that are affected by demand fluctuations are much more cautious with spending on automation projects.
At the same time, the forklift market is seeing a fundamental shift in power sources, with demand for Li-ion battery-powered forklifts showing a growth rate of over 10% while internal combustion engine (ICE) demand shrank by 1% and lead-acid battery-powered forklift fell 7%.
And according to Interact Analysis, those trends will continue, with the report predicting that ICE annual market demand will shrink over 20% from 670,000 units in 2024 to a projected 500,000 units by 2034. And by 2034, Interact Analysis predicts 81% of fully electric forklifts will be powered by li-ion batteries.
The reasons driving that shift include a move in Europe to cleaner alternatives to comply with environmental policies, and a swing in the primary customer base for forklifts from manufacturing to logistics and warehousing, due to the rise of e-commerce. Electric forklift demand is also growing in emerging markets, but for different reasons—labor costs are creating a growing need for automation in factories, especially in China, India, and Eastern Europe. And since lithium-ion battery production is primarily based in Asia, the average cost of equipping forklifts with li-ion batteries is much lower than the rest of the world.
Companies in every sector are converting assets from fossil fuel to electric power in their push to reach net-zero energy targets and to reduce costs along the way, but to truly accelerate those efforts, they also need to improve electric energy efficiency, according to a study from technology consulting firm ABI Research.
In fact, boosting that efficiency could contribute fully 25% of the emissions reductions needed to reach net zero. And the pursuit of that goal will drive aggregated global investments in energy efficiency technologies to grow from $106 Billion in 2024 to $153 Billion in 2030, ABI said today in a report titled “The Role of Energy Efficiency in Reaching Net Zero Targets for Enterprises and Industries.”
ABI’s report divided the range of energy-efficiency-enhancing technologies and equipment into three industrial categories:
Commercial Buildings – Network Lighting Control (NLC) and occupancy sensing for automated lighting and heating; Artificial Intelligence (AI)-based energy management; heat-pumps and energy-efficient HVAC equipment; insulation technologies
Manufacturing Plants – Energy digital twins, factory automation, manufacturing process design and optimization software (PLM, MES, simulation); Electric Arc Furnaces (EAFs); energy efficient electric motors (compressors, fans, pumps)
“Both the International Energy Agency (IEA) and the United Nations Climate Change Conference (COP) continue to insist on the importance of energy efficiency,” Dominique Bonte, VP of End Markets and Verticals at ABI Research, said in a release. “At COP 29 in Dubai, it was agreed to commit to collectively double the global average annual rate of energy efficiency improvements from around 2% to over 4% every year until 2030, following recommendations from the IEA. This complements the EU’s Energy Efficiency First (EE1) Framework and the U.S. 2022 Inflation Reduction Act in which US$86 billion was earmarked for energy efficiency actions.”
Many AI deployments are getting stuck in the planning stages due to a lack of AI skills, governance issues, and insufficient resources, leading 61% of global businesses to scale back their AI investments, according to a study from the analytics and AI provider Qlik.
Philadelphia-based Qlik found a disconnect in the market where 88% of senior decision makers say they feel AI is absolutely essential or very important to achieving success. Despite that support, multiple factors are slowing down or totally blocking those AI projects: a lack of skills to develop AI [23%] or to roll out AI once it’s developed [22%], data governance challenges [23%], budget constraints [21%], and a lack of trusted data for AI to work with [21%].
The numbers come from a survey of 4,200 C-Suite executives and AI decision makers, revealing what is hindering AI progress globally and how to overcome these barriers.
Respondents also said that many stakeholders lack trust in AI technology generally, which holds those projects back. Over a third [37%] of AI decision makers say their senior managers lack trust in AI, 42% feel less senior employees don’t trust the technology., and a fifth [21%] believe their customers don’t trust AI either.
“Business leaders know the value of AI, but they face a multitude of barriers that prevent them from moving from proof of concept to value creating deployment of the technology,” James Fisher, Chief Strategy Officer at Qlik, said in a release. “The first step to creating an AI strategy is to identify a clear use case, with defined goals and measures of success, and use this to identify the skills, resources and data needed to support it at scale. In doing so you start to build trust and win management buy-in to help you succeed.”