Editor's Note: No two successful performance management programs are the same, but all successful performance management programs share common principles. To shed some light on what separates a good company from a great company with regard to performance management, DC VELOCITY will publish a column on one of the 12 Commandments of Successful Performance Management each month. This month we drill into the fourth commandment: Beware.
The Fifth Commandment Beware: Know the point of your metrics and be careful not to get sidetracked
The scenario is all too familiar: Tired of fielding complaints from customers about poor service, senior management decides to crack down on the DC staff. It gathers the supervisors, planners and expeditors together to announce that it expects everyone to pull together to improve delivery reliability. As an incentive, it's establishing a bonus program; workers will be rewarded based on their performance against a standard metric, say, the DC's fill rate.
The
12 Commandments of
Performance Management
1Focus:
Know
your goals 2Balance:
Use a balanced approach 3Involve:
Get employees engaged 4Apply:
Be metrics "users", not just "collectors" or "posters" 5Beware: Know the point of your metrics 6 Anticipate: Use metrics
as your headlights 7 Integrate: Layer your
metrics like an onion 8 Listen: Pay attention
to what your customer is saying 9 Benchmark! 10 Be flexible: There's
no such thing as the holy grail of metrics 11 Lead: Practice what
you preach 12 Be Patient: Crawl
before you walk (or run!)
In the following days, managers draft "expedite" lists and workers spend hours chasing orders that are due to ship in hopes of achieving world-class performance. What they don't realize, however, is that the company will never achieve world-class performance by focusing on an isolated metric—be it fill rate, inventory turns or order cycle time.Worldclass performance is a result of world-class process—devising a system for perfectly executing not a task like getting a box to the dock, but a comprehensive multi-step process, like order fulfillment.
Focusing exclusively on one small task is like painstakingly caulking a window frame while the ceiling collapses around you. Nonetheless, companies fall into this trap all the time.What follows are a few true-life examples (with identifying details changed) of how companies have gotten sidetracked from their main mission by a metric (in this case, fill rate):
Company A receives an order for a printer cartridge on Monday but holds off sending the order to the DC because that particular cartridge is out of stock. When the cartridges are finally restocked on Thursday, the order is forwarded to the DC for fulfillment on Friday. By now, the impatient customer has had to wait five extra days for the cartridge. Nonetheless, Company A, which measures fill rates by how quickly the order is filled once it hits the DC (not from the time the order was received), proudly reports a 100-percent fill rate.
Company B receives an order for a truck engine on Monday. Though its normal cycle time is two days from order to shipment, the company quotes the customer a five-day cycle time because it's experiencing unusually high demand.When it ships the engine out on Friday, Company B reports that it has achieved a 100-percent fill rate because it shipped the product when it said it would (but not when the customer needed it).
Company C, a videogame manufacturer whose plant runs 24 hours a day, ships games to DCs nationwide. The cutoff for trucks leaving the plant is usually 9 p.m. During the peak demand period, production falls behind and an order misses the truck. However, the plant continues assembling the order and finally sends the carton to the shipping department at 10 p.m. Shipping clerks fill out the manifests and send the carton to the dock—where it sits until the next evening. Though the carton languishes on the dock for nearly 24 hours, Company C's computer system shows the order as "shipped" and reports a 100-percent fill rate.
Company D boasted of stellar fill rates (98.5 percent) for books shipped from its DC to retailers.Nonetheless, customers were constantly on the phone complaining about lousy service. An investigation revealed that though the books left the DC on time, they rarely arrived at the customer's receiving dock during the scheduled delivery window. When they failed to show up, the retailer was forced to reschedule the delivery, which meant delays of up to three days.
Company E's delivery performance had slumped, with fill rates dipping into the low 70th percentile. Management stepped in to offer bonuses if workers could raise that to 99 percent. In short order, they were hitting the target regularly. What no one noticed was that a spike in expedited shipments had cost the company over $1 million.
Are your orders perfect?
It's safe to say that claims that a company regularly achieves a 100-percent fill rate or ships products "on time" is no guarantee that the customer will receive the goods on time. Nor does it mean the customer will get the products it ordered in the quantity ordered or that the box will arrive undamaged and with a correct invoice. It simply tells you that the company has found a way to hit one particular target consistently.
To measure what's truly important to the customer, you must turn to the Perfect Order. Though slight variations exist, the Perfect Order is usually defined as an order that's delivered on time, complete, damage free and accompanied by the correct invoice.
And it's not even that complicated to calculate: You simply multiply scores for the various component measures. For example, if a company reports that it has a 95.0-percent performance record for on time deliveries, fill rates, correct invoices and damage free shipments, the resulting Perfect Order index would be 81.4 percent (95% x 95% x 95% x 95%). Had each of the scores been 90 percent, the Perfect Order index would drop significantly—to 65.6 percent.
The lesson is simple. Manage your business with process metrics, and evaluate your business using results metrics. Used properly, process metrics drive the desired results.
“The past year has been unprecedented, with extreme weather events, heightened geopolitical tension and cybercrime destabilizing supply chains throughout the world. Navigating this year’s looming risks to build a secure supply network has never been more critical,” Corey Rhodes, CEO of Everstream Analytics, said in the firm’s “2025 Annual Risk Report.”
“While some risks are unavoidable, early notice and swift action through a combination of planning, deep monitoring, and mitigation can save inventory and lives in 2025,” Rhodes said.
In its report, Everstream ranked the five categories by a “risk score metric” to help global supply chain leaders prioritize planning and mitigation efforts for coping with them. They include:
Drowning in Climate Change – 90% Risk Score. Driven by shifting climate patterns and record-high temperatures, extreme weather events are a dominant risk to the supply chain due to concerns such as flooding and elevated ocean temperatures.
Geopolitical Instability with Increased Tariff Risk – 80% Risk Score. These threats could disrupt trade networks and impact economies worldwide, including logistics, transportation, and manufacturing industries. The following major geopolitical events are likely to impact global trade: Red Sea disruptions, Russia-Ukraine conflict, Taiwan trade risks, Middle East tensions, South China Sea disputes, and proposed tariff increases.
More Backdoors for Cybercrime – 75% Risk Score. Supply chain leaders face escalating cybersecurity risks in 2025, driven by the growing reliance on AI and cloud computing within supply chains, the proliferation of IoT-connected devices, vulnerabilities in sub-tier supply chains, and a disproportionate impact on third-party logistics providers (3PLs) and the electronics industry.
Rare Metals and Minerals on Lockdown – 65% Risk Score. Between rising regulations, new tariffs, and long-term or exclusive contracts, rare minerals and metals will be harder than ever, and more expensive, to obtain.
Crackdown on Forced Labor – 60% Risk Score. A growing crackdown on forced labor across industries will increase pressure on companies who are facing scrutiny to manage and eliminate suppliers violating human rights. Anticipated risks in 2025 include a push for alternative suppliers, a cascade of legislation to address lax forced labor issues, challenges for agri-food products such as palm oil and vanilla.
That number is low compared to widespread unemployment in the transportation sector which reached its highest level during the COVID-19 pandemic at 15.7% in both May 2020 and July 2020. But it is slightly above the most recent pre-pandemic rate for the sector, which was 2.8% in December 2019, the BTS said.
For broader context, the nation’s overall unemployment rate for all sectors rose slightly in December, increasing 0.3 percentage points from December 2023 to 3.8%.
On a seasonally adjusted basis, employment in the transportation and warehousing sector rose to 6,630,200 people in December 2024 — up 0.1% from the previous month and up 1.7% from December 2023. Employment in transportation and warehousing grew 15.1% in December 2024 from the pre-pandemic December 2019 level of 5,760,300 people.
The largest portion of those workers was in warehousing and storage, followed by truck transportation, according to a breakout of the total figures into separate modes (seasonally adjusted):
Warehousing and storage rose to 1,770,300 in December 2024 — up 0.1% from the previous month and up 0.2% from December 2023.
Truck transportation fell to 1,545,900 in December 2024 — down 0.1% from the previous month and down 0.4% from December 2023.
Air transportation rose to 578,000 in December 2024 — up 0.4% from the previous month and up 1.4% from December 2023.
Transit and ground passenger transportation rose to 456,000 in December 2024 — up 0.3% from the previous month and up 5.7% from December 2023.
Rail transportation remained virtually unchanged in December 2024 at 150,300 from the previous month but down 1.8% from December 2023.
Water transportation rose to 74,300 in December 2024 — up 0.1% from the previous month and up 4.8% from December 2023.
Pipeline transportation rose to 55,000 in December 2024 — up 0.5% from the previous month and up 6.2% from December 2023.
Parcel carrier and logistics provider UPS Inc. has acquired the German company Frigo-Trans and its sister company BPL, which provide complex healthcare logistics solutions across Europe, the Atlanta-based firm said this week.
According to UPS, the move extends its UPS Healthcare division’s ability to offer end-to-end capabilities for its customers, who increasingly need temperature-controlled and time-critical logistics solutions globally.
UPS Healthcare has 17 million square feet of cGMP and GDP-compliant healthcare distribution space globally, supporting services such as inventory management, cold chain packaging and shipping, storage and fulfillment of medical devices, and lab and clinical trial logistics.
More specifically, UPS Healthcare said that the acquisitions align with its broader mission to provide end-to-end logistics for temperature-sensitive healthcare products, including biologics, specialty pharmaceuticals, and personalized medicine. With 80% of pharmaceutical products in Europe requiring temperature-controlled transportation, investments like these ensure UPS Healthcare remains at the forefront of innovation in the $82 billion complex healthcare logistics market, the company said.
Additionally, Frigo-Trans' presence in Germany—the world's fourth-largest healthcare manufacturing market—strengthens UPS's foothold and enhances its support for critical intra-Germany operations. Frigo-Trans’ network includes temperature-controlled warehousing ranging from cryopreservation (-196°C) to ambient (+15° to +25°C) as well as Pan-European cold chain transportation. And BPL provides logistics solutions including time-critical freight forwarding capabilities.
Terms of the deal were not disclosed. But it fits into UPS' long term strategy to double its healthcare revenue from $10 billion in 2023 to $20 billion by 2026. To get there, it has also made previous acquisitions of companies like Bomi and MNX. And UPS recently expanded its temperature-controlled fleet in France, Italy, the Netherlands, and Hungary.
"Healthcare customers increasingly demand precision, reliability, and adaptability—qualities that are critical for the future of biologics and personalized medicine. The Frigo-Trans and BPL acquisitions allow us to offer unmatched service across Europe, making logistics a competitive advantage for our pharma partners," says John Bolla, President, UPS Healthcare.
The supply chain risk management firm Overhaul has landed $55 million in backing, saying the financing will fuel its advancements in artificial intelligence and support its strategic acquisition roadmap.
The equity funding round comes from the private equity firm Springcoast Partners, with follow-on participation from existing investors Edison Partners and Americo. As part of the investment, Springcoast’s Chris Dederick and Holger Staude will join Overhaul’s board of directors.
According to Austin, Texas-based Overhaul, the money comes as macroeconomic and global trade dynamics are driving consequential transformations in supply chains. That makes cargo visibility and proactive risk management essential tools as shippers manage new routes and suppliers.
“The supply chain technology space will see significant consolidation over the next 12 to 24 months,” Barry Conlon, CEO of Overhaul, said in a release. “Overhaul is well-positioned to establish itself as the ultimate integrated solution, delivering a comprehensive suite of tools for supply chain risk management, efficiency, and visibility under a single trusted platform.”
Shippers today are praising an 11th-hour contract agreement that has averted the threat of a strike by dockworkers at East and Gulf coast ports that could have frozen container imports and exports as soon as January 16.
The agreement came late last night between the International Longshoremen’s Association (ILA) representing some 45,000 workers and the United States Maritime Alliance (USMX) that includes the operators of port facilities up and down the coast.
Details of the new agreement on those issues have not yet been made public, but in the meantime, retailers and manufacturers are heaving sighs of relief that trade flows will continue.
“Providing certainty with a new contract and avoiding further disruptions is paramount to ensure retail goods arrive in a timely manner for consumers. The agreement will also pave the way for much-needed modernization efforts, which are essential for future growth at these ports and the overall resiliency of our nation’s supply chain,” Gold said.
The next step in the process is for both sides to ratify the tentative agreement, so negotiators have agreed to keep those details private in the meantime, according to identical statements released by the ILA and the USMX. In their joint statement, the groups called the six-year deal a “win-win,” saying: “This agreement protects current ILA jobs and establishes a framework for implementing technologies that will create more jobs while modernizing East and Gulf coasts ports – making them safer and more efficient, and creating the capacity they need to keep our supply chains strong. This is a win-win agreement that creates ILA jobs, supports American consumers and businesses, and keeps the American economy the key hub of the global marketplace.”
The breakthrough hints at broader supply chain trends, which will focus on the tension between operational efficiency and workforce job protection, not just at ports but across other sectors as well, according to a statement from Judah Levine, head of research at Freightos, a freight booking and payment platform. Port automation was the major sticking point leading up to this agreement, as the USMX pushed for technologies to make ports more efficient, while the ILA opposed automation or semi-automation that could threaten jobs.
"This is a six-year détente in the tech-versus-labor tug-of-war at U.S. ports," Levine said. “Automation remains a lightning rod—and likely one we’ll see in other industries—but this deal suggests a cautious path forward."
Editor's note: This story was revised on January 9 to include additional input from the ILA, USMX, and Freightos.