the top of the food chain: interview with William B. Day
It's already North America's largest foodservice distributor. Now Sysco wants to make its supply chain the best food chain on the planet. And it's William B. Day's job to see that it happens.
Mitch Mac Donald has more than 30 years of experience in both the newspaper and magazine businesses. He has covered the logistics and supply chain fields since 1988. Twice named one of the Top 10 Business Journalists in the U.S., he has served in a multitude of editorial and publishing roles. The leading force behind the launch of Supply Chain Management Review, he was that brand's founding publisher and editorial director from 1997 to 2000. Additionally, he has served as news editor, chief editor, publisher and editorial director of Logistics Management, as well as publisher of Modern Materials Handling. Mitch is also the president and CEO of Agile Business Media, LLC, the parent company of DC VELOCITY and CSCMP's Supply Chain Quarterly.
The usual complaint among supply chain executives is that the supply chain is all but invisible to the CEO. But you won't hear that from William B. Day. Day is a senior supply chain executive at food-distributor Sysco, which supplies fresh and frozen food, china and silverware, and kitchen equipment to nearly 400,000 restaurant and institutional food-service customers. Sysco's CEO, Richard J. Schnieders, has made it clear that he sees the supply chain as the industry's new competitive battleground. In a November 2005 address to shareholders, Schnieders announced his intent to make Sysco the global leader in "multi-temperature food product supply chains." And he left no doubt as to his expectations: "We will be able to move a case—or multiple cases—of food and related products from points anywhere in the world more effectively than any other company."
It's now up to Day to deliver on that very public promise. But at least the groundwork is in place. Since 2001, he has been immersed in a wide-ranging supply chain overhaul that will leave virtually no aspect of the operation untouched. Among other goals, the project seeks to improve the company's forecasting, use technology to cut operating and delivery costs, and open as many as nine new distribution centers (or as Sysco calls them, "redistribution" centers) throughout the United States. And according to Day, it's beginning to see results.
A 24-year Sysco veteran, Day began his career as a staff accountant at the company's Memphis, Tenn., office. Since that time, he has transferred to corporate headquarters in Houston, where he progressed through a variety of technology and finance positions, becoming vice president of supply chain management in 2003. In February, the company announced his promotion to senior vice president, supply chain, effective next month.
Day met recently with DC VELOCITY Group Editorial Director Mitch Mac Donald to discuss how he moved from staff accountant to senior vice president, the study that prompted Sysco's supply chain overhaul, and what he sees lacking in supply chain management in most industries in the United States.
Q: Would you tell us a little about Sysco?
A: We are the nation's largest foodservice distributor. For fiscal 2007, sales are projected to be around $34 billion. We have about 53,000 employees nationwide, supplying our customers with 300,000 different products.We have somewhere around 10,000 salespeople out on the street calling on restaurants, hospitals, schools, nursing homes, and so forth. Our customers are any institutional user of food products.
We also have the largest private truck fleet in the United States, with over 9,000 delivery vehicles on the road.
Q: Do you strictly serve the U.S. market or does your scope extend beyond that?
A: We are primarily North American, but we do have a division called International Food Group that exports food to about 70 different countries. It doesn't account for a large percentage of our sales right now, but we are certainly planning to grow that part of our business.
Q: As Sysco's senior vice president of supply chain, what are your responsibilities?
A: I'm responsible for what we call supply chain management and redistribution. That encompasses a network of redistribution centers that we're building across the country that makes our supply chain a lot more efficient and cost-effective than our previous system. I am also responsible for the national inbound transportation of all the products flowing into the redistribution centers and into our operating companies. I am responsible for demand planning and inventory management, which is primarily management of the redistribution centers. I also have responsibility for the inventory systems that are used by our other business divisions. I have a very substantial analysis team that is responsible for supply chain planning and optimization as well as supplier compliance and a few other little things. The big pieces are the redistribution centers, inbound transportation management, demand planning and inventory management, and planning and optimization.
Q: What are "redistribution centers"? I've never heard that term before.
A: A redistribution center is basically an aggregation point for product that doesn't go directly from the manufacturer to our operating companies. Our analysis and supply chain planning team spends a great deal of time looking at the transportation costs, inventory costs, handling costs, transaction costs—essentially all supply chain costs—for our various products. If they determine it would be less expensive to move a product through the redistribution center than to go directly to our operating company, that's how we flow the product.
We're in the process of building several redistribution centers across the country. Our first is in Front Royal, Va. It services our 14 operating companies in the Northeast.
Q: How long have you been with Sysco?
A: I've been with Sysco for 24 years, though not always in a supply chain capacity. I started out in the financial area and came up through the ranks. I was a financial officer with the company at one time, but I also have a strong systems background here. I was the director of applications development for the company and actually led the development of the systems that the company runs on today.
About six years ago, we initiated a study to weigh the merits of shifting from a system in which each individual location managed its own supply chain (we have 172 locations around the country) to a model in which we would centralize certain aspects of the operation where it made sense to do so.What we've done as a result of that analysis is to centralize execution of carrier management functions, especially as it relates to the flow of inbound inventory. We've also implemented a new demand planning and inventory management system that will help with the transition to our new processes using the redistribution centers. The new system is allowing us to dramatically reduce our safety stock and cycle times at our operating companies.
Q: The holy grail of inventory management, right?
A: Yes, that's right.We have had really fantastic results in that regard.
Q: I would guess that your IT background made your shift to this side of the business a fairly natural transition?
A: Yes, it actually was a pretty easy transition for me. Of course, there were a lot of nuances about the logistics field, especially as it relates to managing relationships with the railroads and motor carriers.
Q: What are some of the biggest challenges you face when it comes to optimizing Sysco's logistics operations?
A: The biggest challenge for me is continuing to lead the transformation that we're going through right now. It's a big cultural change for the company. So far it has required the integration of five new best-of-breed supply chain systems into our existing ERP [enterprise resource planning] system.
Q: What prompted Sysco to overhaul its supply chain?
A: Sometimes a company looks at its position in the market and realizes that it needs to transform its business processes if it wants to stay competitive in the long run. That's what we saw when we did our analysis. It is a big adjustment for the company, but it is needed. Changes like these affect almost every area of a company—no one goes untouched.
Q: When did Sysco begin the transformation process?
A: We began in 2001.We've now got our first redistribution center up and running in Virginia. A second redistribution center is under construction in Alachua, Fla., and will begin shipping in April 2008. The site for a third redistribution center has been secured; we plan to begin construction next month. It should be operational by October 2008. Then we have three or four other sites that we are working on.
Q: It's not uncommon for corporations to encounter some pretty serious resistance when they ask employees to change the way they do their jobs. Are you taking any steps to help them understand why it's so important to embrace these changes?
A: That is a very big and very important part of the transformation. Certainly, education must be a big part of the process when you're asking people to begin looking at costs differently than they've looked at them in the past. You're asking them to make decisions differently. You're changing the standards against which success is measured. All of that change is always difficult to introduce and manage in a company.
Q: You mentioned earlier that Sysco has the largest private truck fleet in the United States.What do you use the fleet for?
A: We use dedicated private carriage for outbound deliveries of goods from the redistribution centers to the operating companies. Those operating companies then distribute the supplies directly to customers in their regions.
Q: What will be the next big breakthrough in supply chain management?
A: Full integration of the entire business process.We talk about it all the time, but when I look at supply chain management across most industries in the United States, I see a lot of room for improvement. One of the biggest problems I see is the disconnect that exists between sales and supply chain planning, and then even among various supply chain activities.
We have to get to the point where we have full integration across all those business processes and where we have an optimized planning layer that really enables us to understand our capacity needs, our constraints, and what we need to do to optimize the supply chain.
Q: What will it take to get there?
A: I think a big part of the answer will be technology that helps with demand planning and inventory management and sharing of information with your suppliers so that production can be planned and shipments can be predicted. The effort to integrate business processes will always be ongoing, but I do think there are tools that can move things forward quickly. There are enough people in the software development world who understand the need, that I think the tools are going to get even better over time.
Q: Speaking of tools, if you had to identify the one tool in your personal skill set that's most useful in the dayto-day management of your company's supply chain, what would it be?
A: In the context of this large-scale transformation we've been working on, I would say strategic thinking and decision-making ability. I've been out there on the front lines throughout the process, presenting the business case, organizing the projects, and making really most of the decisions. I think my leadership skills are good, and I have the ability to really help people bridge the gap between strategy and execution—that is, taking the strategy and then figuring out what steps are required in order to realize it.
Q: It brings to mind the old adage that a really good idea is a job half done.
A: Exactly.
Q: A few years down the road when your supply chain overhaul is complete, what do you hope to point to as testimony to the project's success?
A: Well, actually it already exists. In the Northeast, with our first redistribution center online, our inventory levels are lower than they were in 2004. The operating benefits that we expected to achieve and that we built into the business case are being realized. I think that we have our proof of concept. In the end, what we will have will be a network that will be able to significantly increase our capacity to grow because our supply chain is going to be lower cost and more efficient. We are going to have a capacity to move more product at a lower cost than anybody else can.
Artificial intelligence (AI) and data science were hot business topics in 2024 and will remain on the front burner in 2025, according to recent research published in AI in Action, a series of technology-focused columns in the MIT Sloan Management Review.
In Five Trends in AI and Data Science for 2025, researchers Tom Davenport and Randy Bean outline ways in which AI and our data-driven culture will continue to shape the business landscape in the coming year. The information comes from a range of recent AI-focused research projects, including the 2025 AI & Data Leadership Executive Benchmark Survey, an annual survey of data, analytics, and AI executives conducted by Bean’s educational firm, Data & AI Leadership Exchange.
The five trends range from the promise of agentic AI to the struggle over which C-suite role should oversee data and AI responsibilities. At a glance, they reveal that:
Leaders will grapple with both the promise and hype around agentic AI. Agentic AI—which handles tasks independently—is on the rise, in the form of generative AI bots that can perform some content-creation tasks. But the authors say it will be a while before such tools can handle major tasks—like make a travel reservation or conduct a banking transaction.
The time has come to measure results from generative AI experiments. The authors say very few companies are carefully measuring productivity gains from AI projects—particularly when it comes to figuring out what their knowledge-based workers are doing with the freed-up time those projects provide. Doing so is vital to profiting from AI investments.
The reality about data-driven culture sets in. The authors found that 92% of survey respondents feel that cultural and change management challenges are the primary barriers to becoming data- and AI-driven—indicating that the shift to AI is about much more than just the technology.
Unstructured data is important again. The ability to apply Generative AI tools to manage unstructured data—such as text, images, and video—is putting a renewed focus on getting all that data into shape, which takes a whole lot of human effort. As the authors explain “organizations need to pick the best examples of each document type, tag or graph the content, and get it loaded into the system.” And many companies simply aren’t there yet.
Who should run data and AI? Expect continued struggle. Should these roles be concentrated on the business or tech side of the organization? Opinions differ, and as the roles themselves continue to evolve, the authors say companies should expect to continue to wrestle with responsibilities and reporting structures.
Shippers today are praising an 11th-hour contract agreement that has averted the threat of a strike by dockworkers at East and Gulf coast ports that could have frozen container imports and exports as soon as January 16.
The agreement came late last night between the International Longshoremen’s Association (ILA) representing some 45,000 workers and the United States Maritime Alliance (USMX) that includes the operators of port facilities up and down the coast.
Details of the new agreement on those issues have not yet been made public, but in the meantime, retailers and manufacturers are heaving sighs of relief that trade flows will continue.
“Providing certainty with a new contract and avoiding further disruptions is paramount to ensure retail goods arrive in a timely manner for consumers. The agreement will also pave the way for much-needed modernization efforts, which are essential for future growth at these ports and the overall resiliency of our nation’s supply chain,” Gold said.
The next step in the process is for both sides to ratify the tentative agreement, so negotiators have agreed to keep those details private in the meantime, according to identical statements released by the ILA and the USMX. In their joint statement, the groups called the six-year deal a “win-win,” saying: “This agreement protects current ILA jobs and establishes a framework for implementing technologies that will create more jobs while modernizing East and Gulf coasts ports – making them safer and more efficient, and creating the capacity they need to keep our supply chains strong. This is a win-win agreement that creates ILA jobs, supports American consumers and businesses, and keeps the American economy the key hub of the global marketplace.”
The breakthrough hints at broader supply chain trends, which will focus on the tension between operational efficiency and workforce job protection, not just at ports but across other sectors as well, according to a statement from Judah Levine, head of research at Freightos, a freight booking and payment platform. Port automation was the major sticking point leading up to this agreement, as the USMX pushed for technologies to make ports more efficient, while the ILA opposed automation or semi-automation that could threaten jobs.
"This is a six-year détente in the tech-versus-labor tug-of-war at U.S. ports," Levine said. “Automation remains a lightning rod—and likely one we’ll see in other industries—but this deal suggests a cautious path forward."
Editor's note: This story was revised on January 9 to include additional input from the ILA, USMX, and Freightos.
Logistics industry growth slowed in December due to a seasonal wind-down of inventory and following one of the busiest holiday shopping seasons on record, according to the latest Logistics Managers’ Index (LMI) report, released this week.
The monthly LMI was 57.3 in December, down more than a percentage point from November’s reading of 58.4. Despite the slowdown, economic activity across the industry continued to expand, as an LMI reading above 50 indicates growth and a reading below 50 indicates contraction.
The LMI researchers said the monthly conditions were largely due to seasonal drawdowns in inventory levels—and the associated costs of holding them—at the retail level. The LMI’s Inventory Levels index registered 50, falling from 56.1 in November. That reduction also affected warehousing capacity, which slowed but remained in expansion mode: The LMI’s warehousing capacity index fell 7 points to a reading of 61.6.
December’s results reflect a continued trend toward more typical industry growth patterns following recent years of volatility—and they point to a successful peak holiday season as well.
“Retailers were clearly correct in their bet to stock [up] on goods ahead of the holiday season,” the LMI researchers wrote in their monthly report. “Holiday sales from November until Christmas Eve were up 3.8% year-over-year according to Mastercard. This was largely driven by a 6.7% increase in e-commerce sales, although in-person spending was up 2.9% as well.”
And those results came during a compressed peak shopping cycle.
“The increase in spending came despite the shorter holiday season due to the late Thanksgiving,” the researchers also wrote, citing National Retail Federation (NRF) estimates that U.S. shoppers spent just short of a trillion dollars in November and December, making it the busiest holiday season of all time.
The LMI is a monthly survey of logistics managers from across the country. It tracks industry growth overall and across eight areas: inventory levels and costs; warehousing capacity, utilization, and prices; and transportation capacity, utilization, and prices. The report is released monthly by researchers from Arizona State University, Colorado State University, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rutgers University, and the University of Nevada, Reno, in conjunction with the Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals (CSCMP).
The overall national industrial real estate vacancy rate edged higher in the fourth quarter, although it still remains well below pre-pandemic levels, according to an analysis by Cushman & Wakefield.
Vacancy rates shrunk during the pandemic to historically low levels as e-commerce sales—and demand for warehouse space—boomed in response to massive numbers of people working and living from home. That frantic pace is now cooling off but real estate demand remains elevated from a long-term perspective.
“We've witnessed an uptick among firms looking to lease larger buildings to support their omnichannel fulfillment strategies and maintain inventory for their e-commerce, wholesale, and retail stock. This trend is not just about space, but about efficiency and customer satisfaction,” Jason Tolliver, President, Logistics & Industrial Services, said in a release. “Meanwhile, we're also seeing a flurry of activity to support forward-deployed stock models, a strategy that keeps products closer to the market they serve and where customers order them, promising quicker deliveries and happier customers.“
The latest figures show that industrial vacancy is likely nearing its peak for this cooling cycle in the coming quarters, Cushman & Wakefield analysts said.
Compared to the third quarter, the vacancy rate climbed 20 basis points to 6.7%, but that level was still 30 basis points below the 10-year, pre-pandemic average. Likewise, overall net absorption in the fourth quarter—a term for the amount of newly developed property leased by clients—measured 36.8 million square feet, up from the 33.3 million square feet recorded in the third quarter, but down 20% on a year-over-year basis.
In step with those statistics, real estate developers slowed their plans to erect more buildings. New construction deliveries continued to decelerate for the second straight quarter. Just 85.3 million square feet of new industrial product was completed in the fourth quarter, down 8% quarter-over-quarter and 48% versus one year ago.
Likewise, only four geographic markets saw more than 20 million square feet of completions year-to-date, compared to 10 markets in 2023. Meanwhile, as construction starts remained tempered overall, the under-development pipeline has continued to thin out, dropping by 36% annually to its lowest level (290.5 million square feet) since the third quarter of 2018.
Despite the dip in demand last quarter, the market for industrial space remains relatively healthy, Cushman & Wakefield said.
“After a year of hesitancy, logistics is entering a new, sustained growth phase,” Tolliver said. “Corporate capital is being deployed to optimize supply chains, diversify networks, and minimize potential risks. What's particularly encouraging is the proactive approach of retailers, wholesalers, and 3PLs, who are not just reacting to the market, but shaping it. 2025 will be a year characterized by this bias for action.”
Under terms of the deal, Sick and Endress+Hauser will each hold 50% of a joint venture called "Endress+Hauser SICK GmbH+Co. KG," which will strengthen the development and production of analyzer and gas flow meter technologies. According to Sick, its gas flow meters make it possible to switch to low-emission and non-fossil energy sources, for example, and the process analyzers allow reliable monitoring of emissions.
As part of the partnership, the product solutions manufactured together will now be marketed by Endress+Hauser, allowing customers to use a broader product portfolio distributed from a single source via that company’s global sales centers.
Under terms of the contract between the two companies—which was signed in the summer of 2024— around 800 Sick employees located in 42 countries will transfer to Endress+Hauser, including workers in the global sales and service units of Sick’s “Cleaner Industries” division.
“This partnership is a perfect match,” Peter Selders, CEO of the Endress+Hauser Group, said in a release. “It creates new opportunities for growth and development, particularly in the sustainable transformation of the process industry. By joining forces, we offer added value to our customers. Our combined efforts will make us faster and ultimately more successful than if we acted alone. In this case, one and one equals more than two.”
According to Sick, the move means that its current customers will continue to find familiar Sick contacts available at Endress+Hauser for consulting, sales, and service of process automation solutions. The company says this approach allows it to focus on its core business of factory and logistics automation to meet global demand for automation and digitalization.
Sick says its core business has always been in factory and logistics automation, which accounts for more than 80% of sales, and this area remains unaffected by the new joint venture. In Sick’s view, automation is crucial for industrial companies to secure their productivity despite limited resources. And Sick’s sensor solutions are a critical part of industrial automation, which increases productivity through artificial intelligence and the digital networking of production and supply chains.