Move over, RFID. A feisty Israeli company wants to make an information-rich little symbol called the Visidot America's identification technology of choice.
Tired of waiting in line for top-dollar tickets to the information extravaganza promised by RFID technology? Depressed by the thought of that off-off-Broadway low-budget show where men in brown coats laboriously scan bar codes one by one? Beep. Pause. Beep. It's hardly toe-tapping stuff.
Well, the stage is set for a smart, sassy alternative in automatic data collection entertainment, with a medium- priced ticket: two-dimensional bar codes or color dots that can be read hundreds at a time.
Hans Mueller, vice president of pool management and technology at Ifco Systems GmbH, is helping ImageID Ltd., an Israeli company, take a technology originally developed to identify individual images in online photo albums and put it on the logistics stage. If Ifco's experience is anything to go by, the idea may hit it big.
The technology is called Visidot, and in some ways it's not really new. It uses two-dimensional visual coding—either a colored dot or a Data Matrix 2- D bar code—to store up to 3,000 characters of information.
When it comes to capacity, two-dimensional symbols have an enormous edge over the traditional linear bar-code symbologies (like Code 39 and UPC). While traditional symbologies can only encode 10 to 20 characters of information, 2-D symbologies can encode several thousand characters of machine-readable data. (Data Matrix is one of the three most popular two-dimensional bar codes, the others being PDF417 and MaxiCode.) In effect, a portable database can travel with the product. The beauty of the technology is that, although the scanners are almost as expensive as RFID readers, the cost of the labels is negligible. As proponents of the technology point out, you're already printing a label on your boxes.Adding another printed symbol next to the product code isn't going to add much to the cost.
In living color
"Due to the precedent being set by Wal-Mart and the DOD, many companies are jumping on the RFID train even though it may not be the best solution for their needs," says Rami Kopelman, vice president, sales and marketing of ImageID, the Tel Aviv-based company that developed Visidot. "Visidot offers an accurate and less expensive option that is more appropriate for certain environments than RFID."
What sorts of environments would these be? Well, for starters, Visidot is potentially useful when RFID is too expensive and simple bar coding too rudimentary. But Kopelman predicts that what will really win over the audience is Visidot's ability to read a lot of tags or labels at once.
Independent research shows that, while RFID is in theory able to do that, the read-accuracy rate with multiple tags closely packed together still leaves a lot to be desired—some estimates put accuracy rates as low as 70 percent. (By contrast, Ifco reports read accuracy rates for Visidot codes of 99.7 percent.) Furthermore, RFID is notoriously skittish around metal containers—something to do with metal interfering with the radio signal—which is a considerable drawback in a world where items ranging from soda to motor oil come packaged in metal or metallic materials.
"You have the legacy of linear bar codes where you read them one by one. Then there's the Holy Grail of RFID, that one day you'll be able to set up a reader and any pallet that moves through will give you information.We're in between. We're giving everything that RFID technology promises but won't be able to deliver for perhaps 10 years," Kopelman says. "We can give it today."
So how does it work? The Visidot system uses an information-capturing device with a wide field of vision, "so we can decode multiple dots within a second—hundreds or even thousands," says Kopelman. For many applications, the color-dot version has the advantage over its 2-D Data Matrix code counterpart because the dot doesn't need to be as large as its monochrome co-star, and it can still be read even when the scanner is at a 60-degree angle to the plane of the dot's label. The color dot's downside is that decoding its symbology requires a proprietary technology that's not standardized like the European Article Number (EAN) codes associated with the 2-D Data Matrix symbology. That means you need a supply chain that involves a limited number of participants who all agree to use the proprietary system.
Click and track
At this point, the company most familiar with the Visidot's strengths and weaknesses is Ifco Systems, which has been beta-testing the system for the last three years. Ifco is not only the largest recycler of wooden pallets in the United States, but it also runs a wide-ranging operation in Europe, where it makes returnable plastic container (RPC) systems and distributes them to customers —mostly food producers—who fill them and ship them to their own customers. Ifco then arranges for the containers to be picked up. Although Ifco is not responsible for physically moving the containers, it is responsible for tracking them and providing information about the whereabouts of the containers (and their contents). It collects tracking information from partners in the supply chain and makes it available to customers, as a side benefit to its own need to know where its assets are. Well, at least that's the theory. Until recently, Ifco, which owns 60 million containers in Europe alone, had little idea where every container or pallet was, who was responsible for it, or when it was likely to be returned.
"Before Visidot, they were renting out different types of crates, and they had only a vague idea of how many were where—how many in the depot, how many in the customers' hands, how many returned.Now they have a private ID for each crate and can know how many are in the depots, how many are lost and who lost them, so they can bill the customer," says Kopelman.
All that's a lot of information to keep track of, so Visidot also comes with a Web-based data management system. "We provided them not only with a data-capturing system, but [also with] a very complex Web-based track and trace data system," Kopelman adds. "You can access it from anywhere in the world and see the status of each and every crate, or depot, or any kind of cross section you want."
Selective service
So after three years of testing, what's Ifco's assessment of the Visidot? Mueller cautions that the technology, which requires a line of sight, isn't for everyone, but he reports that it works well for certain segments of his business. "If you don't have visible contact with your goods, you can't use this technology. But if you're using it like multiple-read bar codes, where you can read multiple items with one shot, then it makes sense,"Mueller says. "At the moment, we can read a 500-item pallet with one photo."
Mueller also warns that the technology isn't for every application. Ifco uses the technology only selectively at present —specifically in its Paris facility,where the company provides containers for meat products shipped throughout France, and in four facilities in Germany. Mueller says that, even then, the company uses the Visidot in combination with the standard bar code and normal letters, so that there is always a way of identifying the packages by eye as well. "If a color code isn't readable because it's covered or scratched, we can type in the GRAI (Global Returnable Asset Identifier) code and find out which asset it is, or we can use the standard bar code," says Mueller.
The need for backup bar codes notwithstanding, Mueller considers the extra information Visidot provides to be a boon. "Without this information we can just guess what turn rate we have. Now we have a detailed view of our pool and can see how long an individual crate takes to come round. We also know what product is in the crate at the moment."
And the bottom line is that, for Mueller, simply being able to automate the process of counting containers in the warehouse is a big plus. "Knowing how many assets you have in the warehouse without doing a manual count, this is a huge advantage," he says.
Another advantage is that the Visidot reader is an advanced imaging device—it effectively takes a photo of the codes. That gives users the option of storing those images in an "image bank." Installed on a dedicated server, the images can then be used as visual proof of such things as a container's condition upon shipment or arrival. Another use would be to pinpoint the actual physical location within a shipment of an individual item for removal or substitution further along the supply chain.
This could be an enormous boon in the case of a food disaster.Mueller is glad to say he's never had to recall a shipment of food, but what if a particular brand of sausage were found to contain meat infected with BSE (mad cow disease)? Recalling individual packages of sausages from a larger mixed shipment was impossible before. Even finding individual RPCs or clusters of them would have been next to hopeless. Now, in theory, a product recall would be fast and would target only the suspect goods, not everything shipped in the same container or pallet.
2D or not 2D?
So far, it has to be said, the line for this new product hasn't stretched round the block. Visidot has a mere five customers in the United States, but Kopelman says the technology has only been available here for six months or so. Certainly, folks are looking around for alternatives to pricey RFID and limited bar coding. "I think RFID is being overhyped. I don't think there's a real good ROI for the kind of applications that Wal-Mart is using. I don't think of automatic data collection as just bar codes. Now, you're capturing data in real time and using that data," says Steve Banker, service director for supply chain management with ARC Advisory Group in Dedham, Mass. But he's not convinced 2D codes are for everyone either, citing other alternative or supplementary technologies such as voice recognition and global positioning systems.
Still, for Kopelman, the show must go on, so he's working hard on pitching the idea.
He asks you to imagine a warehouse that is shipping out pallets with mixed product in mixed boxes, assembled by order pickers. "When it's being shipped with our technology, we can install a scanner on the loading dock, which does a quick scan, decoding all the bar codes on goods ready for loading. It can compare those codes to the pick list, and it gives a green light if it's OK or a red light if not," Kopelman says. If there's a problem, the dispatcher will see on the screen a cross over the dots of the boxes that shouldn't be there, and can remove them quickly, or will be alerted on screen to the boxes that should be there and aren't. "That can save warehouses a lot of time and money," Kopelman points out. "It saves having someone stand there doing a manual scan of bar codes one by one, or relying on people to load the right stuff onto the pallets. That leads to lots of errors and goods you'll never see again, or complaints from the customer."
Impressive, to be sure, but is the technology worth the price of admission? It may well be. According to Kopelman, customers usually see a return on their investment in just a couple of months.
Economic activity in the logistics industry expanded in November, continuing a steady growth pattern that began earlier this year and signaling a return to seasonality after several years of fluctuating conditions, according to the latest Logistics Managers’ Index report (LMI), released today.
The November LMI registered 58.4, down slightly from October’s reading of 58.9, which was the highest level in two years. The LMI is a monthly gauge of business conditions across warehousing and logistics markets; a reading above 50 indicates growth and a reading below 50 indicates contraction.
“The overall index has been very consistent in the past three months, with readings of 58.6, 58.9, and 58.4,” LMI analyst Zac Rogers, associate professor of supply chain management at Colorado State University, wrote in the November LMI report. “This plateau is slightly higher than a similar plateau of consistency earlier in the year when May to August saw four readings between 55.3 and 56.4. Seasonally speaking, it is consistent that this later year run of readings would be the highest all year.”
Separately, Rogers said the end-of-year growth reflects the return to a healthy holiday peak, which started when inventory levels expanded in late summer and early fall as retailers began stocking up to meet consumer demand. Pandemic-driven shifts in consumer buying behavior, inflation, and economic uncertainty contributed to volatile peak season conditions over the past four years, with the LMI swinging from record-high growth in late 2020 and 2021 to slower growth in 2022 and contraction in 2023.
“The LMI contracted at this time a year ago, so basically [there was] no peak season,” Rogers said, citing inflation as a drag on demand. “To have a normal November … [really] for the first time in five years, justifies what we’ve seen all these companies doing—building up inventory in a sustainable, seasonal way.
“Based on what we’re seeing, a lot of supply chains called it right and were ready for healthy holiday season, so far.”
The LMI has remained in the mid to high 50s range since January—with the exception of April, when the index dipped to 52.9—signaling strong and consistent demand for warehousing and transportation services.
The LMI is a monthly survey of logistics managers from across the country. It tracks industry growth overall and across eight areas: inventory levels and costs; warehousing capacity, utilization, and prices; and transportation capacity, utilization, and prices. The report is released monthly by researchers from Arizona State University, Colorado State University, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rutgers University, and the University of Nevada, Reno, in conjunction with the Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals (CSCMP).
"After several years of mitigating inflation, disruption, supply shocks, conflicts, and uncertainty, we are currently in a relative period of calm," John Paitek, vice president, GEP, said in a release. "But it is very much the calm before the coming storm. This report provides procurement and supply chain leaders with a prescriptive guide to weathering the gale force headwinds of protectionism, tariffs, trade wars, regulatory pressures, uncertainty, and the AI revolution that we will face in 2025."
A report from the company released today offers predictions and strategies for the upcoming year, organized into six major predictions in GEP’s “Outlook 2025: Procurement & Supply Chain” report.
Advanced AI agents will play a key role in demand forecasting, risk monitoring, and supply chain optimization, shifting procurement's mandate from tactical to strategic. Companies should invest in the technology now to to streamline processes and enhance decision-making.
Expanded value metrics will drive decisions, as success will be measured by resilience, sustainability, and compliance… not just cost efficiency. Companies should communicate value beyond cost savings to stakeholders, and develop new KPIs.
Increasing regulatory demands will necessitate heightened supply chain transparency and accountability. So companies should strengthen supplier audits, adopt ESG tracking tools, and integrate compliance into strategic procurement decisions.
Widening tariffs and trade restrictions will force companies to reassess total cost of ownership (TCO) metrics to include geopolitical and environmental risks, as nearshoring and friendshoring attempt to balance resilience with cost.
Rising energy costs and regulatory demands will accelerate the shift to sustainable operations, pushing companies to invest in renewable energy and redesign supply chains to align with ESG commitments.
New tariffs could drive prices higher, just as inflation has come under control and interest rates are returning to near-zero levels. That means companies must continue to secure cost savings as their primary responsibility.
Freight transportation sector analysts with US Bank say they expect change on the horizon in that market for 2025, due to possible tariffs imposed by a new White House administration, the return of East and Gulf coast port strikes, and expanding freight fraud.
“All three of these merit scrutiny, and that is our promise as we roll into the new year,” the company said in a statement today.
First, US Bank said a new administration will occupy the White House and will control the House and Senate for the first time since 2016. With an announced mandate on tariffs, taxes and trade from his electoral victory, President-Elect Trump’s anticipated actions are almost certain to impact the supply chain, the bank said.
Second, a strike by longshoreman at East Coast and Gulf ports was suspended in October, but the can was only kicked until mid-January. Shipper alarm bells are already ringing, and with peak season in full swing, the West coast ports are roaring, having absorbed containers bound for the East. However, that status may not be sustainable in the event of a prolonged strike in January, US Bank said.
And third, analyst are tracking the proliferation of freight fraud, and its reverberations across the supply chain. No longer the realm of petty criminals, freight fraudsters have become increasingly sophisticated, and the financial toll of their activities in the loss of goods, and data, is expected to be in the billions, the bank estimates.
Specifically, 48% of respondents identified rising tariffs and trade barriers as their top concern, followed by supply chain disruptions at 45% and geopolitical instability at 41%. Moreover, tariffs and trade barriers ranked as the priority issue regardless of company size, as respondents at companies with less than 250 employees, 251-500, 501-1,000, 1,001-50,000 and 50,000+ employees all cited it as the most significant issue they are currently facing.
“Evolving tariffs and trade policies are one of a number of complex issues requiring organizations to build more resilience into their supply chains through compliance, technology and strategic planning,” Jackson Wood, Director, Industry Strategy at Descartes, said in a release. “With the potential for the incoming U.S. administration to impose new and additional tariffs on a wide variety of goods and countries of origin, U.S. importers may need to significantly re-engineer their sourcing strategies to mitigate potentially higher costs.”
A measure of business conditions for shippers improved in September due to lower fuel costs, looser trucking capacity, and lower freight rates, but the freight transportation forecasting firm FTR still expects readings to be weaker and closer to neutral through its two-year forecast period.
Bloomington, Indiana-based FTR is maintaining its stance that trucking conditions will improve, even though its Shippers Conditions Index (SCI) improved in September to 4.6 from a 2.9 reading in August, reaching its strongest level of the year.
“The fact that September’s index is the strongest since last December is not a sign that shippers’ market conditions are steadily improving,” Avery Vise, FTR’s vice president of trucking, said in a release.
“September and May were modest outliers this year in a market that is at least becoming more balanced. We expect that trend to continue and for SCI readings to be mostly negative to neutral in 2025 and 2026. However, markets in transition tend to be volatile, so further outliers are likely and possibly in both directions. The supply chain implications of tariffs are a wild card for 2025 especially,” he said.
The SCI tracks the changes representing four major conditions in the U.S. full-load freight market: freight demand, freight rates, fleet capacity, and fuel price. Combined into a single index, a positive score represents good, optimistic conditions, while a negative score represents bad, pessimistic conditions.