Flow-through DC designs and sophisticated management software help set the stage for this retailer's success in reaching small, out-of-the-way markets.
David Maloney has been a journalist for more than 35 years and is currently the group editorial director for DC Velocity and Supply Chain Quarterly magazines. In this role, he is responsible for the editorial content of both brands of Agile Business Media. Dave joined DC Velocity in April of 2004. Prior to that, he was a senior editor for Modern Materials Handling magazine. Dave also has extensive experience as a broadcast journalist. Before writing for supply chain publications, he was a journalist, television producer and director in Pittsburgh. Dave combines a background of reporting on logistics with his video production experience to bring new opportunities to DC Velocity readers, including web videos highlighting top distribution and logistics facilities, webcasts and other cross-media projects. He continues to live and work in the Pittsburgh area.
The first rule of retailing has always been, Go where your customers are. For most department store chains, that's meant densely populated urban areas, which goes a long way toward explaining the distinctive atmosphere of, say, midtown Manhattan or the Chicago Loop.
But Stage Stores isn't your average department store chain. This retailer has set its sights on a different, niche market: America's heartland. When choosing locations for its small department stores, Stage Stores deliberately targets areas with less than 50,000 people that are at least 30 minutes from the nearest shopping mall.
Stage Stores operates 656 stores under the Palais Royal, Bealls, Peebles, and Stage nameplates. While the bulk of their sales come from brand name apparel, the stores also offer footwear, jewelry, cosmetics, and gift items. The common denominator of all of its brands is that they fill a niche between the large discount retailers like Wal-Mart and the traditional department stores.
The decision to target customers in out-of-the way places has presented both opportunities and challenges. The distance from urban centers helps insulate the stores from direct competition with the big-league department stores. But it also presents some mighty distribution obstacles. Given the perishable nature of fashion, an apparel retailer's success depends on its ability to whisk hot-selling items out to stores—whether they're in New York City or Chickasha, Okla.— before the trend cools. That's challenge enough for big chains whose stores are located mainly along major transportation arteries. It's all the more difficult for a player like Stage Stores, which serves 600-plus retail locations spread all across rural America—often in hard-to-reach places—from only two distribution centers.
"It is a different animal that requires a different approach to the supply chain," says Gough Grubbs, senior vice president of distribution and logistics. Grubbs came to Stage Stores from Foley's, the large Houston-based department store chain that is now part of Federated Stores. "At Foley's, we had 53 stores in five states. With Stage Stores, we have 656 stores across 34 states. Each Foley's store would receive a 53-foot trailer every day. Here, each store gets about 40 cartons, some of the smaller stores only six."
Grubbs adds that the size of the Foley's stores meant that most products were handled as pallet loads and case quantities. Except for items that required value-added services, cartons were never opened. At Stage Stores, every carton gets touched, either to cross dock or to break them down for split-case orders. "That puts pressure on us to touch [each case] quickly," he says. Despite all the touches, merchandise moves through at a rapid clip, he notes. "We average only a two-day turnaround in our DCs."
A shot across the dock
In order to keep products moving swiftly through its supply chain, Stage Stores has designed its two DCs—one in Jacksonville, Texas; the other in South Hill, Va.—to cross-dock as many items as possible. "We have flowthrough facilities and we do not back stock much," says Grubbs. "We currently receive 8 million cartons a year and ship out about 5 million cartons and large totes to the stores."
The secret to maintaining that speed lies in the preparation. Stage Stores has instituted a vendor compliance program under which it requires suppliers to perform a number of value-added services before the merchandise arrives at the DCs.
As a result, the company's vendors, most of which are domestic, now handle nearly all of the ticketing and hanging of goods, eliminating the need to perform those tasks at Stage Stores' DCs.
To help manage its workflow, the retailer also requires its vendors to notify it of upcoming deliveries. Today, 96 percent of suppliers send advance ship notices (ASNs) to alert the DCs that shipments are on their way. The ASNs provide details on which SKUs are due to arrive at a particular time, which allows products to be pre-allocated to stores before they ever hit the DCs' receiving docks.
"We have had a great collaboration with our merchants," Grubbs says. "We have worked together to package the products so that we have maximum efficiency to cross-dock quickly through the DC without overstocking the inventories in our stores."
Just passing through
The Texas DC is the larger of the two facilities. It boasts a footprint of 330,000 square feet plus an additional 107,000 square feet of mezzanine space, which adds up to a total of 437,000 square feet of operating space. It ships between 17,000 and 22,000 cartons and totes daily to stores.
To manage the volume, the facility relies on an array of sophisticated sortation devices, including a tilt tray sorter, a hanging garment sorter, a bomb bay sorter, and a sliding shoe sorter. (The sliding shoe sorter was supplied by FKI Logistex; the others by SDI Industries.) Which sorter is used for processing depends upon a particular product's handling characteristics.
Inbound trucks must arrive to coincide with their scheduled delivery appointments. As goods come through receiving, DC workers open three cartons from each vendor for inspection. Following inspection, they place all cartons onto slip-sheets and scan the vendor-supplied bar code on each carton to notify the warehouse management system (WMS) of the carton's arrival. The WMS reviews how the merchandise in the box was pre-allocated to orders and tells the worker where it should go next for processing. Some merchandise that had not been assigned to stores previously is allocated on the spot if there are stores in need of that SKU.
An operator on a pallet truck takes each slip-sheet to the appropriate destination, which is typically a manual induct station for one of the facility's sorters. In some cases, the goods move to a storage location. About 48 percent of the products move immediately to the sliding shoe sorter for cross-docking to shipping, where they are inducted by hand onto the sorter.
All sorts of sorts
Products that are not cross-docked are trucked to one of the facility's other sorters, where the items are unpacked from their cartons and manually inducted.
Goods arriving on hangers are handled on the DC's mezzanine level. These are grouped by SKU, color, and size before they're fed through the hanging garment sorter. When an item is needed for a store order, the sorter will release the garment along a glide path. A series of hooks open and close to direct it to one of the 600 diverts on the system where the hanging products are gathered on rails for individual stores. Each of the 476 stores that Jacksonville currently supports is assigned a permanent position in the system. (The facility is designed to handle up to 600 stores.)
A worker removes the garments from the rails and packs them into returnable totes, scanning the last piece of each order to confirm completion. The totes (which are supplied by Buckhorn) measure 27 by 17 by 16 inches, so they each hold a substantial amount of merchandise. The totes also provide consistent stacking, which makes handling easier and helps in cubing out truckloads.
The DC uses the bomb bay sorter for goods that are not on hangers, such as dress shirts, jeans, socks, and undergarments. Items drop through the conveying surface to accumulation chutes below. Together, the bomb bay sorter, tilt tray sorter, and the hanging garment sorter will enable the Texas DC to process over 84 million garments this year.
The tilt tray sorter handles boxed merchandise, such as shoes, cosmetics, and non-fragile gift items. The sorters each have a dedicated drop location for every store as well as their own pack stations. Items that will not pass through the bomb bay or tilt tray sorters, such as bulky or fragile goods and jewelry, are diverted to a manual processing area. Workers using ring bar-code scanners pick these items.
Once all items have been gathered into the totes, they are conveyed to the sliding shoe sorter for shipping. This sorter diverts products to 14 lanes where the totes and cartons are loaded onto 53-foot trailers. Stage Stores adheres to a daily fulfillment schedule, says Grubbs. "We believe in prompt replenishment and in maintaining the freshness of our merchandise."
Celerity, a third-party transportation service provider, handles all store deliveries. It picks up the 53-foot trailers at the Stage Stores DCs and takes the loads to its hubs for resorting and transfer to smaller trucks for store deliveries. The trucks may also contain shipments for other Celerity customers, including Wal-Mart pharmacies, which are often located in the same areas as the Stage stores. Consolidating those loads allows for more cost-effective delivery. Stage Stores chose Celerity for its handling capabilities and fast turnarounds. Celerity reaches 80 percent of the stores served by the Texas DC the next day. Celerity also picks up empty totes at the stores and returns them to the distribution centers.
Stage Stores' other DC is located in South Hill, Va. This 162,000-square-foot facility currently serves 170 stores, but has the capacity to handle 240 stores. South Hill is outfitted with similar equipment to the Texas DC, minus the bomb bay sorter. The absence of a bomb bay sorter means the tilt tray system must do double duty, sorting almost all non-hanger products. Some of the SKUs that would be handled with the bomb bay sorter in Texas are placed into reusable corrugated trays in Virginia, which allows them to slide more easily upon discharge from the tilt trays.
Software for soft goods
Software plays a key role in Stage Stores' distribution success. The company relies on Shippers Commonwealth, a Web-based application service provider (ASP) for optimizing its inbound logistics. The software examines inbound loads and determines what types of transport are needed from its vendors. That allows Stage Stores to better manage flow into the facility and cut transportation costs.
Shippers Commonwealth also links with the Retek warehouse management systems (Retek is now a part of Oracle) that direct operations in the two DCs. This helps the facilities to prepare to receive goods, allocate orders, and determine labor needs.
Labor itself is managed through the use of Spalding Software's ProRep solution. The software helps to assign labor and log productivity, providing essential data for the company's incentive programs. The DCs have a quality program, which is audited four times each month. Every month of achievement moves workers up a rung on the incentives scale. Workers who achieve 12 months of errorfree performance can earn pay raises of up to $1 an hour.
The incentive program is based on both individual and team performance.
The company credits the incentive program, combined with the vendor compliance program and a major effort to recalibrate its material handling equipment, with boosting order accuracy rates to a whole new level. Before these programs started, accuracy was only at 88.0 percent. Today it is 99.7 percent.
The planning Stages
In the meantime, Stage Stores' business has been expanding at double-digit rates. Last year, the company opened a hundred new stores, which represents about 20-percent growth. Much of that growth was the result of its acquisition of B.C. Moore & Sons stores, an East Coast chain. (These stores were absorbed into the Peebles brand.) While that kind of growth is welcome to stockholders, it has created challenges for the distribution system. Servicing the new stores initially fell to the Jacksonville, Texas, DC. Each store required two to three trailer loads to stock, which put a strain on the facility's limited dock space. Grubbs and his team came up with an innovative method to handle the volume without having to stage a lot of product near the stores. They took an old trailer and cut five doors into one of its sides. They then parked the trailer at the last dock of the building, with the newly cut openings facing away from (and perpendicular to) the building's other docks. That makes it easy for trucks to back up to the five temporary doors, just as if they were pulling up to one of the standard docks. Cartons were diverted into the appropriate store trailer for storage until the new store was ready to open, avoiding palletizing and other double handling.
Stage Stores intends to open about 45 stores this year and then another 70 stores per year through 2012. Its expansion plans aren't limited to stores, however; the retailer also intends to build another DC. The company is currently drafting plans for a third distribution center to be built somewhere in the Midwest. Expected to open in July of next year, the new facility will serve stores in the growing Midwest and Northeast markets.
Although the company has had experience with DC renovations— it automated the Virginia DC's manual operations when it acquired the facility in 2005—this will be the first time it has built and equipped a facility from scratch. But it has already come up with a plan: The sortation systems, software, and other systems and equipment in its existing DCs will serve as the handling blueprint for the new facility and will be duplicated there. By going with what it knows, the company hopes to avoid startup bumps and bruises, Grubbs explains. "We know what the equipment can do and what to anticipate."
Most of the apparel sold in North America is manufactured in Asia, meaning the finished goods travel long distances to reach end markets, with all the associated greenhouse gas emissions. On top of that, apparel manufacturing itself requires a significant amount of energy, water, and raw materials like cotton. Overall, the production of apparel is responsible for about 2% of the world’s total greenhouse gas emissions, according to a report titled
Taking Stock of Progress Against the Roadmap to Net Zeroby the Apparel Impact Institute. Founded in 2017, the Apparel Impact Institute is an organization dedicated to identifying, funding, and then scaling solutions aimed at reducing the carbon emissions and other environmental impacts of the apparel and textile industries.
The author of this annual study is researcher and consultant Michael Sadowski. He wrote the first report in 2021 as well as the latest edition, which was released earlier this year. Sadowski, who is also executive director of the environmental nonprofit
The Circulate Initiative, recently joined DC Velocity Group Editorial Director David Maloney on an episode of the “Logistics Matters” podcast to discuss the key findings of the research, what companies are doing to reduce emissions, and the progress they’ve made since the first report was issued.
A: While companies in the apparel industry can set their own sustainability targets, we realized there was a need to give them a blueprint for actually reducing emissions. And so, we produced the first report back in 2021, where we laid out the emissions from the sector, based on the best estimates [we could make using] data from various sources. It gives companies and the sector a blueprint for what we collectively need to do to drive toward the ambitious reduction [target] of staying within a 1.5 degrees Celsius pathway. That was the first report, and then we committed to refresh the analysis on an annual basis. The second report was published last year, and the third report came out in May of this year.
Q: What were some of the key findings of your research?
A: We found that about half of the emissions in the sector come from Tier Two, which is essentially textile production. That includes the knitting, weaving, dyeing, and finishing of fabric, which together account for over half of the total emissions. That was a really important finding, and it allows us to focus our attention on the interventions that can drive those emissions down.
Raw material production accounts for another quarter of emissions. That includes cotton farming, extracting gas and oil from the ground to make synthetics, and things like that. So we now have a really keen understanding of the source of our industry’s emissions.
Q: Your report mentions that the apparel industry is responsible for about 2% of global emissions. Is that an accurate statistic?
A: That’s our best estimate of the total emissions [generated by] the apparel sector. Some other reports on the industry have apparel at up to 8% of global emissions. And there is a commonly misquoted number in the media that it’s 10%. From my perspective, I think the best estimate is somewhere under 2%.
We know that globally, humankind needs to reduce emissions by roughly half by 2030 and reach net zero by 2050 to hit international goals. [Reaching that target will require the involvement of] every facet of the global economy and every aspect of the apparel sector—transportation, material production, manufacturing, cotton farming. Through our work and that of others, I think the apparel sector understands what has to happen. We have highlighted examples of how companies are taking action to reduce emissions in the roadmap reports.
Q: What are some of those actions the industry can take to reduce emissions?
A: I think one of the positive developments since we wrote the first report is that we’re seeing companies really focus on the most impactful areas. We see companies diving deep on thermal energy, for example. With respect to Tier Two, we [focus] a lot of attention on things like ocean freight versus air. There’s a rule of thumb I’ve heard that indicates air freight is about 10 times the cost [of ocean] and also produces 10 times more greenhouse gas emissions.
There is money available to invest in sustainability efforts. It’s really exciting to see the funding that’s coming through for AI [artificial intelligence] and to see that individual companies, such as H&M and Lululemon, are investing in real solutions in their supply chains. I think a lot of concrete actions are being taken.
And yet we know that reducing emissions by half on an absolute basis by 2030 is a monumental undertaking. So I don’t want to be overly optimistic, because I think we have a lot of work to do. But I do think we’ve got some amazing progress happening.
Q: You mentioned several companies that are starting to address their emissions. Is that a result of their being more aware of the emissions they generate? Have you seen progress made since the first report came out in 2021?
A: Yes. When we published the first roadmap back in 2021, our statistics showed that only about 12 companies had met the criteria [for setting] science-based targets. In 2024, the number of apparel, textile, and footwear companies that have set targets or have commitments to set targets is close to 500. It’s an enormous increase. I think they see the urgency more than other sectors do.
We have companies that have been working at sustainability for quite a long time. I think the apparel sector has developed a keen understanding of the impacts of climate change. You can see the impacts of flooding, drought, heat, and other things happening in places like Bangladesh and Pakistan and India. If you’re a brand or a manufacturer and you have operations and supply chains in these places, I think you understand what the future will look like if we don’t significantly reduce emissions.
Q: There are different categories of emission levels, depending on the role within the supply chain. Scope 1 are “direct” emissions under the reporting company’s control. For apparel, this might be the production of raw materials or the manufacturing of the finished product. Scope 2 covers “indirect” emissions from purchased energy, such as electricity used in these processes. Scope 3 emissions are harder to track, as they include emissions from supply chain partners both upstream and downstream.
Now companies are finding there are legislative efforts around the world that could soon require them to track and report on all these emissions, including emissions produced by their partners’ supply chains. Does this mean that companies now need to be more aware of not only what greenhouse gas emissions they produce, but also what their partners produce?
A: That’s right. Just to put this into context, if you’re a brand like an Adidas or a Gap, you still have to consider the Scope 3 emissions. In particular, there are the so-called “purchased goods and services,” which refers to all of the embedded emissions in your products, from farming cotton to knitting yarn to making fabric. Those “purchased goods and services” generally account for well above 80% of the total emissions associated with a product. It’s by far the most significant portion of your emissions.
Leading companies have begun measuring and taking action on Scope 3 emissions because of regulatory developments in Europe and, to some extent now, in California. I do think this is just a further tailwind for the work that the industry is doing.
I also think it will definitely ratchet up the quality requirements of Scope 3 data, which is not yet where we’d all like it to be. Companies are working to improve that data, but I think the regulatory push will make the quality side increasingly important.
Q: Overall, do you think the work being done by the Apparel Impact Institute will help reduce greenhouse gas emissions within the industry?
A: When we started this back in 2020, we were at a place where companies were setting targets and knew their intended destination, but what they needed was a blueprint for how to get there. And so, the roadmap [provided] this blueprint and identified six key things that the sector needed to do—from using more sustainable materials to deploying renewable electricity in the supply chain.
Decarbonizing any sector, whether it’s transportation, chemicals, or automotive, requires investment. The Apparel Impact Institute is bringing collective investment, which is so critical. I’m really optimistic about what they’re doing. They have taken a data-driven, evidence-based approach, so they know where the emissions are and they know what the needed interventions are. And they’ve got the industry behind them in doing that.
The global air cargo market’s hot summer of double-digit demand growth continued in August with average spot rates showing their largest year-on-year jump with a 24% increase, according to the latest weekly analysis by Xeneta.
Xeneta cited two reasons to explain the increase. First, Global average air cargo spot rates reached $2.68 per kg in August due to continuing supply and demand imbalance. That came as August's global cargo supply grew at its slowest ratio in 2024 to-date at 2% year-on-year, while global cargo demand continued its double-digit growth, rising +11%.
The second reason for higher rates was an ocean-to-air shift in freight volumes due to Red Sea disruptions and e-commerce demand.
Those factors could soon be amplified as e-commerce shows continued strong growth approaching the hotly anticipated winter peak season. E-commerce and low-value goods exports from China in the first seven months of 2024 increased 30% year-on-year, including shipments to Europe and the US rising 38% and 30% growth respectively, Xeneta said.
“Typically, air cargo market performance in August tends to follow the July trend. But another month of double-digit demand growth and the strongest rate growths of the year means there was definitely no summer slack season in 2024,” Niall van de Wouw, Xeneta’s chief airfreight officer, said in a release.
“Rates we saw bottoming out in late July started picking up again in mid-August. This is too short a period to call a season. This has been a busy summer, and now we’re at the threshold of Q4, it will be interesting to see what will happen and if all the anticipation of a red-hot peak season materializes,” van de Wouw said.
“Unrelenting labor shortages and wage inflation, accompanied by increasing consumer demand, are driving rapid market adoption of autonomous technologies in manufacturing, warehousing, and logistics,” Seegrid CEO and President Joe Pajer said in a release. “This is particularly true in the area of palletized material flows; areas that are addressed by Seegrid’s autonomous tow tractors and lift trucks. This segment of the market is just now ‘coming into its own,’ and Seegrid is a clear leader.”
According to Pajer, Seegrid’s strength in the sector is due to several new technologies it has released in the past six months. They include: Sliding Scale Autonomy, which provides both flexibility and predictability in autonomous navigation and manipulation; Enhanced Pallet and Payload Detection, which enables reliable recognition and manipulation of a broad range of payloads; and the planned launch of its CR1 autonomous lift truck model later this year.
Seegrid’s CR1 unit offers a 15-foot lift height, 4,000-pound load capacity, and a top speed of 5 mph. In comparison, its existing autonomous lift truck model, the RS1, supports six-foot lift height, 3,500 pound capacity, and the same top speed.
The “series D” investment round was funded by existing lead investors Giant Eagle Incorporated and G2 Venture Partners, as well as smaller investments from other existing shareholders.
The report cites data showing that there are approximately 1.7 million workers missing from the post-pandemic workforce and that 38% of small firms are unable to fill open positions. At the same time, the “skills gap” in the workforce is accelerating as automation and AI create significant shifts in how work is performed.
That information comes from the “2024 Labor Day Report” released by Littler’s Workplace Policy Institute (WPI), the firm’s government relations and public policy arm.
“We continue to see a labor shortage and an urgent need to upskill the current workforce to adapt to the new world of work,” said Michael Lotito, Littler shareholder and co-chair of WPI. “As corporate executives and business leaders look to the future, they are focused on realizing the many benefits of AI to streamline operations and guide strategic decision-making, while cultivating a talent pipeline that can support this growth.”
But while the need is clear, solutions may be complicated by public policy changes such as the upcoming U.S. general election and the proliferation of employment-related legislation at the state and local levels amid Congressional gridlock.
“We are heading into a contentious election that has already proven to be unpredictable and is poised to create even more uncertainty for employers, no matter the outcome,” Shannon Meade, WPI’s executive director, said in a release. “At the same time, the growing patchwork of state and local requirements across the U.S. is exacerbating compliance challenges for companies. That, coupled with looming changes following several Supreme Court decisions that have the potential to upend rulemaking, gives C-suite executives much to contend with in planning their workforce-related strategies.”
Stax Engineering, the venture-backed startup that provides smokestack emissions reduction services for maritime ships, will service all vessels from Toyota Motor North America Inc. visiting the Toyota Berth at the Port of Long Beach, according to a new five-year deal announced today.
Beginning in 2025 to coincide with new California Air Resources Board (CARB) standards, STAX will become the first and only emissions control provider to service roll-on/roll-off (ro-ros) vessels in the state of California, the company said.
Stax has rapidly grown since its launch in the first quarter of this year, supported in part by a $40 million funding round from investors, announced in July. It now holds exclusive service agreements at California ports including Los Angeles, Long Beach, Hueneme, Benicia, Richmond, and Oakland. The firm has also partnered with individual companies like NYK Line, Hyundai GLOVIS, Equilon Enterprises LLC d/b/a Shell Oil Products US (Shell), and now Toyota.
Stax says it offers an alternative to shore power with land- and barge-based, mobile emissions capture and control technology for shipping terminal and fleet operators without the need for retrofits.
In the case of this latest deal, the Toyota Long Beach Vehicle Distribution Center imports about 200,000 vehicles each year on ro-ro vessels. Stax will keep those ships green with its flexible exhaust capture system, which attaches to all vessel classes without modification to remove 99% of emitted particulate matter (PM) and 95% of emitted oxides of nitrogen (NOx). Over the lifetime of this new agreement with Toyota, Stax estimated the service will account for approximately 3,700 hours and more than 47 tons of emissions controlled.
“We set out to provide an emissions capture and control solution that was reliable, easily accessible, and cost-effective. As we begin to service Toyota, we’re confident that we can meet the needs of the full breadth of the maritime industry, furthering our impact on the local air quality, public health, and environment,” Mike Walker, CEO of Stax, said in a release. “Continuing to establish strong partnerships will help build momentum for and trust in our technology as we expand beyond the state of California.”