Wal-Mart and Target undoubtedly use similar metrics to assess supply chain performance. But that's not to imply their metrics programs are interchangeable.
Editor's Note: No two successful performance management programs are the same, but all successful performance management programs share common principles. To shed some light on what separates a good company from a great company with regard to performance management, DC VELOCITY will publish a column on one of the 12 Commandments of Successful Performance Management each month. This month we will drill into the 10th commandment: Be flexible.
The 10th Commandment Be flexible: When it comes to metrics, there's no Holy Grail
Though their managements would vigorously disagree, Wal-Mart and Target have a lot in common. They have similar retail formats. They sell similar products. And they undoubtedly use similar metrics to assess supply chain performance—metrics like fill rate, on-time deliveries, distribution costs as a percentage of revenue, stockout rates and inventory turns.
But that's not to imply their metrics programs are interchangeable. They're anything but. The two chains may use many of the same metrics, but they almost certainly set very different performance goals for themselves. Although they're both discount retailers, Wal-Mart and Target pursue widely differing strategies, and it's safe to assume that they set unique performance targets based on their strategic priorities.
The 12 Commandments of
Performance Management
1Focus: Know your goals 2Balance: Use a balanced approach 3Involve: Get employees engaged 4Apply: Be metrics "users," not just "collectors" or "posters" 5Beware: Know the point of your metrics 6Anticipate: Use metrics as your headlights 7Integrate: Layer your metrics like an onion 8Listen: Pay attention to what your customer is saying 9Benchmark: 10Be flexible: There's no such thing as the holy grail of metrics 11Lead: Practice what you preach 12Be Patient: Crawl before you walk (or run!)
For example, Wal-Mart has carved out a niche as the low-cost leader and is renowned for its legendary supply chain efficiencies. As such, it has undoubtedly set extremely aggressive goals when it comes to distribution costs as a percentage of revenue. If Wal-Mart's competitors are spending 4 to 6 percent of revenues on logistics, you can be sure that Wal-Mart aims to spend only 2 to 3 percent.
Target, on the other hand, has spent the last several years building a reputation as the store you can count on to have the hottest, trendiest new items on its shelves at all times. It's safe to assume, then, that Target has set aggressive goals for performance against the stockout rate metric. While Wal-Mart concentrates on rock-bottom costs, Target believes its ability to avoid stockouts will help set it apart from the other mass merchandisers.
All of which goes to show that when it comes to metrics, there's no Holy Grail. Even within a single industry, companies pursue different strategies, and their metrics programs should reflect those differences. That's important to keep in mind when it comes to both choosing which metrics to use and setting performance goals. Though software makes it possible to measure everything that moves these days, you're better off winnowing your metrics down to the vital few. Generate a vision of where you want to be three, five and 10 years from now, then select the key performance indicators (KPIs) that best monitor your progress against specific objectives.
Translating the company's goals into a clear metrics portfolio requires work, of course. But metrics that supply direct feedback on the company's performance against KPIs will help it achieve focus. Take, for example, the case of GE, which has mandated that each of its divisions be #1 or #2 in its market. The metric it has chosen (in this case, market share) supplies very clear feedback on performance. If a division measures up, all's well. If it doesn't, GE can react (usually by taking steps to exit that market) with confidence.
The next time you read the results of a metrics survey or sign up for benchmarking, bear in mind that it's important to be flexible. Just because "90 percent of respondents" are using a certain measure or are achieving a given level of performance doesn't mean it's right for your company. Stop and ask yourself "How does this relate to my company and my strategy?" before you set a program in motion that's right for the Wal-Marts of the world but wrong for your Target-style operation.
Economic activity in the logistics industry expanded in November, continuing a steady growth pattern that began earlier this year and signaling a return to seasonality after several years of fluctuating conditions, according to the latest Logistics Managers’ Index report (LMI), released today.
The November LMI registered 58.4, down slightly from October’s reading of 58.9, which was the highest level in two years. The LMI is a monthly gauge of business conditions across warehousing and logistics markets; a reading above 50 indicates growth and a reading below 50 indicates contraction.
“The overall index has been very consistent in the past three months, with readings of 58.6, 58.9, and 58.4,” LMI analyst Zac Rogers, associate professor of supply chain management at Colorado State University, wrote in the November LMI report. “This plateau is slightly higher than a similar plateau of consistency earlier in the year when May to August saw four readings between 55.3 and 56.4. Seasonally speaking, it is consistent that this later year run of readings would be the highest all year.”
Separately, Rogers said the end-of-year growth reflects the return to a healthy holiday peak, which started when inventory levels expanded in late summer and early fall as retailers began stocking up to meet consumer demand. Pandemic-driven shifts in consumer buying behavior, inflation, and economic uncertainty contributed to volatile peak season conditions over the past four years, with the LMI swinging from record-high growth in late 2020 and 2021 to slower growth in 2022 and contraction in 2023.
“The LMI contracted at this time a year ago, so basically [there was] no peak season,” Rogers said, citing inflation as a drag on demand. “To have a normal November … [really] for the first time in five years, justifies what we’ve seen all these companies doing—building up inventory in a sustainable, seasonal way.
“Based on what we’re seeing, a lot of supply chains called it right and were ready for healthy holiday season, so far.”
The LMI has remained in the mid to high 50s range since January—with the exception of April, when the index dipped to 52.9—signaling strong and consistent demand for warehousing and transportation services.
The LMI is a monthly survey of logistics managers from across the country. It tracks industry growth overall and across eight areas: inventory levels and costs; warehousing capacity, utilization, and prices; and transportation capacity, utilization, and prices. The report is released monthly by researchers from Arizona State University, Colorado State University, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rutgers University, and the University of Nevada, Reno, in conjunction with the Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals (CSCMP).
"After several years of mitigating inflation, disruption, supply shocks, conflicts, and uncertainty, we are currently in a relative period of calm," John Paitek, vice president, GEP, said in a release. "But it is very much the calm before the coming storm. This report provides procurement and supply chain leaders with a prescriptive guide to weathering the gale force headwinds of protectionism, tariffs, trade wars, regulatory pressures, uncertainty, and the AI revolution that we will face in 2025."
A report from the company released today offers predictions and strategies for the upcoming year, organized into six major predictions in GEP’s “Outlook 2025: Procurement & Supply Chain” report.
Advanced AI agents will play a key role in demand forecasting, risk monitoring, and supply chain optimization, shifting procurement's mandate from tactical to strategic. Companies should invest in the technology now to to streamline processes and enhance decision-making.
Expanded value metrics will drive decisions, as success will be measured by resilience, sustainability, and compliance… not just cost efficiency. Companies should communicate value beyond cost savings to stakeholders, and develop new KPIs.
Increasing regulatory demands will necessitate heightened supply chain transparency and accountability. So companies should strengthen supplier audits, adopt ESG tracking tools, and integrate compliance into strategic procurement decisions.
Widening tariffs and trade restrictions will force companies to reassess total cost of ownership (TCO) metrics to include geopolitical and environmental risks, as nearshoring and friendshoring attempt to balance resilience with cost.
Rising energy costs and regulatory demands will accelerate the shift to sustainable operations, pushing companies to invest in renewable energy and redesign supply chains to align with ESG commitments.
New tariffs could drive prices higher, just as inflation has come under control and interest rates are returning to near-zero levels. That means companies must continue to secure cost savings as their primary responsibility.
Freight transportation sector analysts with US Bank say they expect change on the horizon in that market for 2025, due to possible tariffs imposed by a new White House administration, the return of East and Gulf coast port strikes, and expanding freight fraud.
“All three of these merit scrutiny, and that is our promise as we roll into the new year,” the company said in a statement today.
First, US Bank said a new administration will occupy the White House and will control the House and Senate for the first time since 2016. With an announced mandate on tariffs, taxes and trade from his electoral victory, President-Elect Trump’s anticipated actions are almost certain to impact the supply chain, the bank said.
Second, a strike by longshoreman at East Coast and Gulf ports was suspended in October, but the can was only kicked until mid-January. Shipper alarm bells are already ringing, and with peak season in full swing, the West coast ports are roaring, having absorbed containers bound for the East. However, that status may not be sustainable in the event of a prolonged strike in January, US Bank said.
And third, analyst are tracking the proliferation of freight fraud, and its reverberations across the supply chain. No longer the realm of petty criminals, freight fraudsters have become increasingly sophisticated, and the financial toll of their activities in the loss of goods, and data, is expected to be in the billions, the bank estimates.
Specifically, 48% of respondents identified rising tariffs and trade barriers as their top concern, followed by supply chain disruptions at 45% and geopolitical instability at 41%. Moreover, tariffs and trade barriers ranked as the priority issue regardless of company size, as respondents at companies with less than 250 employees, 251-500, 501-1,000, 1,001-50,000 and 50,000+ employees all cited it as the most significant issue they are currently facing.
“Evolving tariffs and trade policies are one of a number of complex issues requiring organizations to build more resilience into their supply chains through compliance, technology and strategic planning,” Jackson Wood, Director, Industry Strategy at Descartes, said in a release. “With the potential for the incoming U.S. administration to impose new and additional tariffs on a wide variety of goods and countries of origin, U.S. importers may need to significantly re-engineer their sourcing strategies to mitigate potentially higher costs.”
A measure of business conditions for shippers improved in September due to lower fuel costs, looser trucking capacity, and lower freight rates, but the freight transportation forecasting firm FTR still expects readings to be weaker and closer to neutral through its two-year forecast period.
Bloomington, Indiana-based FTR is maintaining its stance that trucking conditions will improve, even though its Shippers Conditions Index (SCI) improved in September to 4.6 from a 2.9 reading in August, reaching its strongest level of the year.
“The fact that September’s index is the strongest since last December is not a sign that shippers’ market conditions are steadily improving,” Avery Vise, FTR’s vice president of trucking, said in a release.
“September and May were modest outliers this year in a market that is at least becoming more balanced. We expect that trend to continue and for SCI readings to be mostly negative to neutral in 2025 and 2026. However, markets in transition tend to be volatile, so further outliers are likely and possibly in both directions. The supply chain implications of tariffs are a wild card for 2025 especially,” he said.
The SCI tracks the changes representing four major conditions in the U.S. full-load freight market: freight demand, freight rates, fleet capacity, and fuel price. Combined into a single index, a positive score represents good, optimistic conditions, while a negative score represents bad, pessimistic conditions.