John Johnson joined the DC Velocity team in March 2004. A veteran business journalist, John has over a dozen years of experience covering the supply chain field, including time as chief editor of Warehousing Management. In addition, he has covered the venture capital community and previously was a sports reporter covering professional and collegiate sports in the Boston area. John served as senior editor and chief editor of DC Velocity until April 2008.
The heady growth reports out of China just keep coming. One week, it's the steel industry reporting that the sector is expanding even more rapidly than analysts had predicted just months earlier. The next week, analysts are hailing the emergence of a Chinese middle class a middle class of more than 250 million with both disposable income and an appetite for American-made products. And all the while, Chinese factories continue to pump out low-cost consumer goods: clothing, shoes, toys, consumer electronics and even cars for export. Although some economists predict that China will find itself dealing with deflation within the next six months, the economy is not expected to cool much from its current 9-percent growth rate.
With all those goods to be moved between the two nations, it should come as no surprise that air freight between the United States and China is burgeoning. In fact, air freight from China to the United States is expected to grow at an average of 9.6 percent a year over the next 20 years (while
traffic to Europe is predicted to grow almost as quickly at 9.3 percent over the same period). "The output from the two major airports [Shanghai and Beijing] into the United States and Europe is tremendous," says Charles Kaufman, vice president and head of air freight, Asia-Pacific, for DHL's Danzas Air & Ocean division. "Airlines are increasing their flights out of China rapidly."
Kaufman isn't alone in his assessment. "China is growing tremendously and I think many of the people that play in this market have seen similar phenomenal growth, especially out of Shanghai," says Rick Whitaker, vice president of international services at BAX Global, a freight forwarder with a significant presence in Asia. "The good news is that there [are] significant [numbers] of new carriers coming into the market."
That's due partly to the fact that the General Administration of Civil Aviation of China recently granted foreign carriers "freedom rights," which means they can pick up cargo on the Chinese mainland en route to other destinations. Previously, an aircraft picking up freight in Shanghai, for example, was required to fly directly to its end destination without making stops in between. Whitaker says the move is expected to further develop the aircargo market between China and the United States, which had been stifled by a shortage of flight rights.
The China syndrome
While the airfreight carriers jockey for a share of the growing U.S.-China trade, the air express carriers are embroiled in a battle of their own. UPS, FedEx Express, DHL Express and even the U.S. Postal Service are making big investments in hopes of capturing market share in the China region.
"We see nothing but growth coming from China and going into China, too," says John Wheeler, a representative of UPS International."The biggest issue right now is that there is a lack of capacity in and out of China and everybody is feeling the pinch."
To help ease the crunch, UPS announced in August that it will add eight new Boeing 747-400 freighters to its fleet, starting in June 2007. The aircraft will be delivered to UPS through 2008, helping UPS increase capacity on its most important international "trunk" routes connecting Asia, Europe and North America.
UPS also has placed an order for an A380 freighter that will be able to fly non-stop from China to the UPS Worldport air hub in Louisville, Ky. UPS expects to take delivery of the plane in 2009. Its primary benefit would be faster transit time from Asia to the U.S. East Coast, while allowing UPS to handle more cargo and larger individual items. Today, all shipments headed to the United States must stop in Anchorage first.
Earlier this year, UPS won permission from the U.S. Department of Transportation to expand air operations in China and was granted three more air routes in China. In the last year, the company has expanded to 18 weekly jet flights to and from China. And in a major public relations coup, UPS has also been chosen as the official Logistics and Express Delivery Sponsor of the Beijing 2008 Olympic Games.
But UPS isn't the only express carrier on the move. After an exhaustive series of feasibility studies that included projections for manufacturing and trading trends both within Asia and internationally for the next 30 years, FedEx announced this summer that it is building a new Asia Pacific hub at the Guangzhou Baiyun International Airport in Southern China. The facility, which represents a $150 million capital investment, will allow FedEx to double its capacity in China by sorting up to 24,000 packages per hour. It will employ 1,200 people when it opens in December 2008.
Although the new hub will undoubtedly rev up FedEx's operations, it's the Chinese economy that really stands to benefit. A joint study by China's Development Research Commission and the U.S.-based Campbell-Hill Aviation Group estimated the direct output impact of a FedEx hub on China's economy at $11 billion in 2010, increasing to $63 billion by 2020, with the majority of the gains resulting from industrial expansion.
Not to be outdone, DHL is investing $273 million in a five-year China expansion plan that calls for the company to develop and launch China Domestic, a door-to-door express delivery service in China; establish Express Logistics Centers (ELCs) in Shanghai, Guangzhou and Beijing; and establish 16 spare-parts centers across China. As part of its financial commitment, DHL will spend $12 million to double DHL Danzas Air & Ocean's presence from 20 cities to 37 by 2007, and will invest $3 million in two DHL Danzas Air & Ocean Logistics Centers in the Shanghai/Pudong region.
DHL cautions, however, that concentrating solely on China would be short-sighted. There are other "Asian tigers" out there with the potential to emerge as economic powerhouses. "We are investing a lot in China but we should not underestimate other countries," says DHL's Kaufman."The growth in China is still the strongest that we see, but there is still very excellent growth in Singapore, Japan and Malaysia, and what's coming up is India."
airfreight industry comes roaring back
Conventional wisdom holds that what goes up must come down. But in the topsy-turvy world of air freight, it seems the converse is true: what goes down must eventually come up. After slumping for several years, the U.S. international airfreight industry took off, posting a banner year in 2004. Air shipments measured by value to and from the United States showed double-digit gains over 2003 figures, according to The Colography Group Inc. The value of U.S. air export shipments rose 12.3 percent to $235.7 billion, while the value of U.S. air imports increased 12.7 percent to $346.5 billion. U.S. air export revenue surged 12.0 percent to $8.4 billion.
At the same time, air carriers managed to make some inroads into the international transport market in terms of tonnage. Measured as a percentage of total U.S. export tonnage, goods shipped by air rose 4.4 percent over 2003 figures last year. And although they lagged behind exports, air imports still showed strength: U.S. air import tonnage as a percentage of all-mode import tonnage rose 2.8 percent. Bidirectionally, the tonnage growth in air outpaced the tonnage growth for goods moving by ocean vessel.
"Our data confirm that 2004 was a stellar year for U.S. international air freight, certainly the best year since 2000," says Ted Scherck, president of the Colography Group. Scherck credits a number of external factors for the airfreight boom. "Air freight benefited from a robust replenishment of inventories due to improving demand and a shift in modal usage from vessel as shippers and consignees sought to avoid delays caused by ongoing congestion at U.S. West Coast ports," he says. "Air exports were further aided by the effect of the U.S. dollar's decline."
According to the Colography Group study, the Australia and Oceania regions were the fastest-growing markets for U.S. air exports, with a 34.1-percent gain in tonnage. However, Asia was the fastest-growing source of U.S. imports, with tonnage rising 16.5 percent. Those import gains were paced by China, whose U.S.-bound air imports (measured in tonnage) soared 31.1 percent.
The supply chain risk management firm Overhaul has landed $55 million in backing, saying the financing will fuel its advancements in artificial intelligence and support its strategic acquisition roadmap.
The equity funding round comes from the private equity firm Springcoast Partners, with follow-on participation from existing investors Edison Partners and Americo. As part of the investment, Springcoast’s Chris Dederick and Holger Staude will join Overhaul’s board of directors.
According to Austin, Texas-based Overhaul, the money comes as macroeconomic and global trade dynamics are driving consequential transformations in supply chains. That makes cargo visibility and proactive risk management essential tools as shippers manage new routes and suppliers.
“The supply chain technology space will see significant consolidation over the next 12 to 24 months,” Barry Conlon, CEO of Overhaul, said in a release. “Overhaul is well-positioned to establish itself as the ultimate integrated solution, delivering a comprehensive suite of tools for supply chain risk management, efficiency, and visibility under a single trusted platform.”
Artificial intelligence (AI) and data science were hot business topics in 2024 and will remain on the front burner in 2025, according to recent research published in AI in Action, a series of technology-focused columns in the MIT Sloan Management Review.
In Five Trends in AI and Data Science for 2025, researchers Tom Davenport and Randy Bean outline ways in which AI and our data-driven culture will continue to shape the business landscape in the coming year. The information comes from a range of recent AI-focused research projects, including the 2025 AI & Data Leadership Executive Benchmark Survey, an annual survey of data, analytics, and AI executives conducted by Bean’s educational firm, Data & AI Leadership Exchange.
The five trends range from the promise of agentic AI to the struggle over which C-suite role should oversee data and AI responsibilities. At a glance, they reveal that:
Leaders will grapple with both the promise and hype around agentic AI. Agentic AI—which handles tasks independently—is on the rise, in the form of generative AI bots that can perform some content-creation tasks. But the authors say it will be a while before such tools can handle major tasks—like make a travel reservation or conduct a banking transaction.
The time has come to measure results from generative AI experiments. The authors say very few companies are carefully measuring productivity gains from AI projects—particularly when it comes to figuring out what their knowledge-based workers are doing with the freed-up time those projects provide. Doing so is vital to profiting from AI investments.
The reality about data-driven culture sets in. The authors found that 92% of survey respondents feel that cultural and change management challenges are the primary barriers to becoming data- and AI-driven—indicating that the shift to AI is about much more than just the technology.
Unstructured data is important again. The ability to apply Generative AI tools to manage unstructured data—such as text, images, and video—is putting a renewed focus on getting all that data into shape, which takes a whole lot of human effort. As the authors explain “organizations need to pick the best examples of each document type, tag or graph the content, and get it loaded into the system.” And many companies simply aren’t there yet.
Who should run data and AI? Expect continued struggle. Should these roles be concentrated on the business or tech side of the organization? Opinions differ, and as the roles themselves continue to evolve, the authors say companies should expect to continue to wrestle with responsibilities and reporting structures.
Shippers today are praising an 11th-hour contract agreement that has averted the threat of a strike by dockworkers at East and Gulf coast ports that could have frozen container imports and exports as soon as January 16.
The agreement came late last night between the International Longshoremen’s Association (ILA) representing some 45,000 workers and the United States Maritime Alliance (USMX) that includes the operators of port facilities up and down the coast.
Details of the new agreement on those issues have not yet been made public, but in the meantime, retailers and manufacturers are heaving sighs of relief that trade flows will continue.
“Providing certainty with a new contract and avoiding further disruptions is paramount to ensure retail goods arrive in a timely manner for consumers. The agreement will also pave the way for much-needed modernization efforts, which are essential for future growth at these ports and the overall resiliency of our nation’s supply chain,” Gold said.
The next step in the process is for both sides to ratify the tentative agreement, so negotiators have agreed to keep those details private in the meantime, according to identical statements released by the ILA and the USMX. In their joint statement, the groups called the six-year deal a “win-win,” saying: “This agreement protects current ILA jobs and establishes a framework for implementing technologies that will create more jobs while modernizing East and Gulf coasts ports – making them safer and more efficient, and creating the capacity they need to keep our supply chains strong. This is a win-win agreement that creates ILA jobs, supports American consumers and businesses, and keeps the American economy the key hub of the global marketplace.”
The breakthrough hints at broader supply chain trends, which will focus on the tension between operational efficiency and workforce job protection, not just at ports but across other sectors as well, according to a statement from Judah Levine, head of research at Freightos, a freight booking and payment platform. Port automation was the major sticking point leading up to this agreement, as the USMX pushed for technologies to make ports more efficient, while the ILA opposed automation or semi-automation that could threaten jobs.
"This is a six-year détente in the tech-versus-labor tug-of-war at U.S. ports," Levine said. “Automation remains a lightning rod—and likely one we’ll see in other industries—but this deal suggests a cautious path forward."
Editor's note: This story was revised on January 9 to include additional input from the ILA, USMX, and Freightos.
Logistics industry growth slowed in December due to a seasonal wind-down of inventory and following one of the busiest holiday shopping seasons on record, according to the latest Logistics Managers’ Index (LMI) report, released this week.
The monthly LMI was 57.3 in December, down more than a percentage point from November’s reading of 58.4. Despite the slowdown, economic activity across the industry continued to expand, as an LMI reading above 50 indicates growth and a reading below 50 indicates contraction.
The LMI researchers said the monthly conditions were largely due to seasonal drawdowns in inventory levels—and the associated costs of holding them—at the retail level. The LMI’s Inventory Levels index registered 50, falling from 56.1 in November. That reduction also affected warehousing capacity, which slowed but remained in expansion mode: The LMI’s warehousing capacity index fell 7 points to a reading of 61.6.
December’s results reflect a continued trend toward more typical industry growth patterns following recent years of volatility—and they point to a successful peak holiday season as well.
“Retailers were clearly correct in their bet to stock [up] on goods ahead of the holiday season,” the LMI researchers wrote in their monthly report. “Holiday sales from November until Christmas Eve were up 3.8% year-over-year according to Mastercard. This was largely driven by a 6.7% increase in e-commerce sales, although in-person spending was up 2.9% as well.”
And those results came during a compressed peak shopping cycle.
“The increase in spending came despite the shorter holiday season due to the late Thanksgiving,” the researchers also wrote, citing National Retail Federation (NRF) estimates that U.S. shoppers spent just short of a trillion dollars in November and December, making it the busiest holiday season of all time.
The LMI is a monthly survey of logistics managers from across the country. It tracks industry growth overall and across eight areas: inventory levels and costs; warehousing capacity, utilization, and prices; and transportation capacity, utilization, and prices. The report is released monthly by researchers from Arizona State University, Colorado State University, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rutgers University, and the University of Nevada, Reno, in conjunction with the Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals (CSCMP).
As U.S. small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) face an uncertain business landscape in 2025, a substantial majority (67%) expect positive growth in the new year compared to 2024, according to a survey from DHL.
However, the survey also showed that businesses could face a rocky road to reach that goal, as they navigate a complex environment of regulatory/policy shifts and global market volatility. Both those issues were cited as top challenges by 36% of respondents, followed by staffing/talent retention (11%) and digital threats and cyber attacks (2%).
Against that backdrop, SMEs said that the biggest opportunity for growth in 2025 lies in expanding into new markets (40%), followed by economic improvements (31%) and implementing new technologies (14%).
As the U.S. prepares for a broad shift in political leadership in Washington after a contentious election, the SMEs in DHL’s survey were likely split evenly on their opinion about the impact of regulatory and policy changes. A plurality of 40% were on the fence (uncertain, still evaluating), followed by 24% who believe regulatory changes could negatively impact growth, 20% who see these changes as having a positive impact, and 16% predicting no impact on growth at all.
That uncertainty also triggered a split when respondents were asked how they planned to adjust their strategy in 2025 in response to changes in the policy or regulatory landscape. The largest portion (38%) of SMEs said they remained uncertain or still evaluating, followed by 30% who will make minor adjustments, 19% will maintain their current approach, and 13% who were willing to significantly adjust their approach.