Contributing Editor Toby Gooley is a writer and editor specializing in supply chain, logistics, and material handling, and a lecturer at MIT's Center for Transportation & Logistics. She previously was Senior Editor at DC VELOCITY and Editor of DCV's sister publication, CSCMP's Supply Chain Quarterly. Prior to joining AGiLE Business Media in 2007, she spent 20 years at Logistics Management magazine as Managing Editor and Senior Editor covering international trade and transportation. Prior to that she was an export traffic manager for 10 years. She holds a B.A. in Asian Studies from Cornell University.
IF YOU ASK THEM, most forklift operators, fleet managers, and warehouse workers will say that safety is their number-one priority. They’ll probably also say that they continually think about safety while they’re at work. More often than not, though, such assertions are closer to aspiration than reality.
Yet it is possible to develop an environment where every employee and contractor actually does consider safety to be his or her responsibility and does think about it throughout the workday. That describes a “safety culture,” which Don Buckman, Hyster Co.’s environmental health and safety manager, defines as “a set of beliefs, attitudes, and actions consistently adopted by everyone in the organization to make the right decisions that value safety.”
The word “everyone” is key: A successful safety culture requires each individual to value and prioritize safety, regardless of his or her position on the organization chart. “We want every person who comes to work, including not just forklift drivers but also office staff, to have a ‘zero injury mindset,’” says Ed Johannesen, director of manufacturing for UniCarriers Americas (UCA).
It’s neither quick nor easy to ensure that everyone is safety-focused and compliant at all times. Rather, it’s a long-term initiative that requires sustained attention. “Safety culture is something that must be cultivated over time,” says Brian Duffy, director of corporate environmental and manufacturing safety for Crown Equipment Corp. “It’s not something that can be created or forced.”
Though it requires time and effort, there are plenty of reasons why developing a safety culture is worthwhile. In addition to fewer injuries, they include higher productivity, lower costs, reduced product and equipment damage, and better compliance with regulations. Here’s one more: A safety culture encourages co-workers to look out for each other’s well-being. “If we truly are treating each other like family, then we care enough to make sure others don’t put themselves in dangerous positions,” says Toyota Material Handling Brand Ambassador Tom Lego.
The consequences of failing to develop and maintain a safety culture can be dire. In a May 2019 blog post, Thelma Marshall of TotalTrax, a provider of forklift telematics systems, cites the example of a forklift operator who backed over a pedestrian; after numerous surgeries, the accident victim’s leg was amputated, and the resulting lawsuit was settled for $9 million. Such mishaps occur when “workers get complacent with repetitive work and ignore safety measures,” Marshall wrote. Indeed, during the trial, the operator admitted to being careless about basic safety protocols.
As the above example suggests, developing a safety culture among forklift operators and other warehouse and DC personnel requires employees to change both their mindset and their behavior. The baseline for accomplishing that: clear, consistent communication and collaboration across the facility.
10 WAYS TO GET YOUR SAFETY PROGRAM STARTED
The U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration’s (OSHA) “Safe and Sound” initiative helps companies of all sizes improve safety in the workplace. OSHA suggests completing the following steps to provide a foundation for a more comprehensive health and safety program. Many of these steps involve soliciting and incorporating recommendations from workers; for example, during inspections, managers should ask workers to identify any activity, piece of equipment, or material that concerns them. The steps include:
Clear, effective communication by and for everyone—not just forklift operators but pedestrians too—is vital. Even nonverbal communication can lead to big improvements when everyone adopts them. Hyster Co., for example, asks pedestrians to “wait for the wave.” Whether employees or visitors, pedestrians do not proceed until the forklift operator waves to them. This conveys the message that “I see you, I value your safety, and I will wait and wave you on,” Buckman explains.
More broadly, safety communications should be shared through multiple channels—horizontal, vertical, and peer-to-peer. UCA, for example, always starts major meetings with a safety-related topic; this reinforces the idea that safety is the first priority, Johannesen says. Because informal discussions can also be effective, UCA makes sure line supervisors and managers are “fluent in safety” and know how to communicate guidance to their direct reports and others in a facility. Regardless of who is delivering the safety messages, Johannesen adds, they must be aligned and consistent across the organization.
Training, of course, is a fundamental element of safety communication. Facilities with a forklift safety culture typically go above and beyond the minimum safety training requirements set by the U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). And because a safety culture by definition encompasses everyone in a facility, their programs generally include pedestrians too. Anyone who enters a facility should receive a safety orientation and periodic refresher training on how to be safe in an environment where forklifts are operating, Lego says.
An essential element of any operator-training program is hands-on safety demonstrations and instruction, says Joe Tomkiewicz, director, consumer trades and durable goods for Yale Materials Handling Corp. He also recommends assigning an experienced mentor to work with new employees during training sessions. “This practice helps ensure that important legacy knowledge is passed on to new hires, enabling them to meet demanding performance standards while respecting safety protocols,” he says.
A different approach may be more effective for experienced employees who have been doing things their own way for years. They might be resistant to new expectations associated with a safety-focused culture. For them, Johannesen says, “this is really about implementing and managing change, just like in any other business or industry.”
Strong safety programs also use a variety of methods to deliver training and guide operators to follow best practices. Advancements such as virtual reality-based instruction, which allows operators to practice safe operating techniques using a simulator on a stationary lift truck, and e-learning are effective when used in addition to traditional safety lectures and in-person instruction, says Dave Norton, vice president, customer solutions and support, for The Raymond Corp. Outside the classroom, technologies like warehouse and labor management systems and forklift telematics enhance safety by allowing organizations to connect and communicate directly with an operation’s fleet management, assets, and workforce, he notes. Forklift telematics, for example, use sensors and wireless transmission to direct, track, and measure some of the lift truck’s and the operator’s activities and performance. This capability makes it possible to identify operators who require additional training. On the flip side, reports, alerts, and remote controls can help to reinforce desired behaviors.
COME TOGETHER
The safest facilities are those where employees take to heart their responsibility for each other’s safety. For mutual responsibility to become a way of life, people must take a collaborative approach to fixing problems. When a mistake, an accident, or a near-miss occurs, it’s important that a working group of employees from different levels, not just managers, come together to understand what happened and take corrective measures right away, Lego says. A safety culture will give similar weight to developing a long-term action plan to prevent similar problems from occurring in the future. Information about the incident as well as the short- and long-term solutions should be shared across the organization so people can learn from each other and work with accurate information, not hearsay, he adds.
Among the most important ways co-workers can help each other be safe is to speak up when they see a hazard or unsafe behavior. But most people are reluctant to approach a co-worker—especially someone they may not know well—with what may be perceived as a criticism.
Behavior-based safety programs leverage human psychology to overcome that obstacle and encourage collaboration. These voluntary programs empower employees to speak to each other about risky behavior and provide positive reinforcement when they see safe behavior. A key success factor for this type of program is that employees both understand and are accountable for the consequences of their behavior.
Crown has had an employee-run behavior-based program, called SafeSteps, in place for about 10 years. When they speak with co-workers, the volunteer observers (many of Crown’s warehouse and factory employees currently participate) use positive language to express concerns about people’s safety, Duffy says. This includes discussing the consequences of unsafe actions and their potential impact on co-workers. Peers also recognize and thank each other for what they did right. Observers note on scorecards whether or not their peers performed specified tasks safely and whether the observer gave verbal feedback. Importantly, participants are coached on how to give feedback so that recipients will be receptive to it.
Companies that have adopted these programs say that over time, they lead to safer workplaces and fewer injuries. Behavior-based safety programs offer other benefits as well. Duffy, for one, cites stronger, more positive relationships among peers, while Johannesen, whose company adopted a behavior-based safety program about two years ago, has seen a positive impact on injury rates, product quality, and, in some cases, operating costs. Employees are more engaged too: “In some departments, everyone is thinking and talking about safety now,” he says.
SIGNS OF SUCCESS
No matter how committed to achieving a safety culture a facility may be, there are bound to be some roadblocks along the way. Oftentimes, says Toyota’s Lego, the root cause is an imbalance among the three pillars of industrial performance—safety, quality, and productivity. He uses the analogy of juggling. All three “balls” have to keep moving at the same pace; they are so interrelated that if there’s too much emphasis on one, then one or both of the others will suffer in some way. If the facility puts too much emphasis on hitting productivity targets, for instance, “that sets a poor precedent, because you’re communicating to your people that numbers are more important than their safety,” he says. Importantly, he adds, nothing should ever allow the safety “ball” to be dropped.
If the entire organization—from top management to the shop floor to the back office—is not aligned, then efforts to develop a safety culture will be undermined. When that’s the case, says Johannesen of UniCarriers, it’s important to help the resisters overcome their objections. “If you can see that some people don’t quite buy into [a safety initiative], have early adopters and safety champions work with them in advance or on the side,” he suggests. “If you can get some quick wins and generate some buzz, that can also help to bring those people on board.”
How do you know when you’ve successfully implemented a safety culture among forklift operators, pedestrians, and others in your warehouse or DC? From a quantitative standpoint, effective preventive measures will result in more streamlined processes, fewer work disruptions, and greater productivity, says Raymond’s Norton, adding that continuous monitoring of data generated by telematics and labor management systems will reflect improvements and shed light on new opportunities for optimization.
Duffy of Crown Equipment points to “leading indicators” that suggest whether a safety culture has not only been achieved but is also likely to continue. In a 2019 National Forklift Safety Day presentation, he characterized the development of a safety culture as a “journey.” In the early stages, employees believe safety and plant or DC managers are responsible for safety, and the focus is on compliance and injury investigations. Later, when all employees consider themselves to be responsible for safety and push each other to improve, that’s an indicator that safety has become part of the company’s culture and that it will continue over the long term. Ultimately, Duffy says, “the core of the program is worker engagement and ownership, not just ‘participation.’ You have to get to a higher level than that.”
The supply chain risk management firm Overhaul has landed $55 million in backing, saying the financing will fuel its advancements in artificial intelligence and support its strategic acquisition roadmap.
The equity funding round comes from the private equity firm Springcoast Partners, with follow-on participation from existing investors Edison Partners and Americo. As part of the investment, Springcoast’s Chris Dederick and Holger Staude will join Overhaul’s board of directors.
According to Austin, Texas-based Overhaul, the money comes as macroeconomic and global trade dynamics are driving consequential transformations in supply chains. That makes cargo visibility and proactive risk management essential tools as shippers manage new routes and suppliers.
“The supply chain technology space will see significant consolidation over the next 12 to 24 months,” Barry Conlon, CEO of Overhaul, said in a release. “Overhaul is well-positioned to establish itself as the ultimate integrated solution, delivering a comprehensive suite of tools for supply chain risk management, efficiency, and visibility under a single trusted platform.”
Artificial intelligence (AI) and data science were hot business topics in 2024 and will remain on the front burner in 2025, according to recent research published in AI in Action, a series of technology-focused columns in the MIT Sloan Management Review.
In Five Trends in AI and Data Science for 2025, researchers Tom Davenport and Randy Bean outline ways in which AI and our data-driven culture will continue to shape the business landscape in the coming year. The information comes from a range of recent AI-focused research projects, including the 2025 AI & Data Leadership Executive Benchmark Survey, an annual survey of data, analytics, and AI executives conducted by Bean’s educational firm, Data & AI Leadership Exchange.
The five trends range from the promise of agentic AI to the struggle over which C-suite role should oversee data and AI responsibilities. At a glance, they reveal that:
Leaders will grapple with both the promise and hype around agentic AI. Agentic AI—which handles tasks independently—is on the rise, in the form of generative AI bots that can perform some content-creation tasks. But the authors say it will be a while before such tools can handle major tasks—like make a travel reservation or conduct a banking transaction.
The time has come to measure results from generative AI experiments. The authors say very few companies are carefully measuring productivity gains from AI projects—particularly when it comes to figuring out what their knowledge-based workers are doing with the freed-up time those projects provide. Doing so is vital to profiting from AI investments.
The reality about data-driven culture sets in. The authors found that 92% of survey respondents feel that cultural and change management challenges are the primary barriers to becoming data- and AI-driven—indicating that the shift to AI is about much more than just the technology.
Unstructured data is important again. The ability to apply Generative AI tools to manage unstructured data—such as text, images, and video—is putting a renewed focus on getting all that data into shape, which takes a whole lot of human effort. As the authors explain “organizations need to pick the best examples of each document type, tag or graph the content, and get it loaded into the system.” And many companies simply aren’t there yet.
Who should run data and AI? Expect continued struggle. Should these roles be concentrated on the business or tech side of the organization? Opinions differ, and as the roles themselves continue to evolve, the authors say companies should expect to continue to wrestle with responsibilities and reporting structures.
Shippers today are praising an 11th-hour contract agreement that has averted the threat of a strike by dockworkers at East and Gulf coast ports that could have frozen container imports and exports as soon as January 16.
The agreement came late last night between the International Longshoremen’s Association (ILA) representing some 45,000 workers and the United States Maritime Alliance (USMX) that includes the operators of port facilities up and down the coast.
Details of the new agreement on those issues have not yet been made public, but in the meantime, retailers and manufacturers are heaving sighs of relief that trade flows will continue.
“Providing certainty with a new contract and avoiding further disruptions is paramount to ensure retail goods arrive in a timely manner for consumers. The agreement will also pave the way for much-needed modernization efforts, which are essential for future growth at these ports and the overall resiliency of our nation’s supply chain,” Gold said.
The next step in the process is for both sides to ratify the tentative agreement, so negotiators have agreed to keep those details private in the meantime, according to identical statements released by the ILA and the USMX. In their joint statement, the groups called the six-year deal a “win-win,” saying: “This agreement protects current ILA jobs and establishes a framework for implementing technologies that will create more jobs while modernizing East and Gulf coasts ports – making them safer and more efficient, and creating the capacity they need to keep our supply chains strong. This is a win-win agreement that creates ILA jobs, supports American consumers and businesses, and keeps the American economy the key hub of the global marketplace.”
The breakthrough hints at broader supply chain trends, which will focus on the tension between operational efficiency and workforce job protection, not just at ports but across other sectors as well, according to a statement from Judah Levine, head of research at Freightos, a freight booking and payment platform. Port automation was the major sticking point leading up to this agreement, as the USMX pushed for technologies to make ports more efficient, while the ILA opposed automation or semi-automation that could threaten jobs.
"This is a six-year détente in the tech-versus-labor tug-of-war at U.S. ports," Levine said. “Automation remains a lightning rod—and likely one we’ll see in other industries—but this deal suggests a cautious path forward."
Editor's note: This story was revised on January 9 to include additional input from the ILA, USMX, and Freightos.
Logistics industry growth slowed in December due to a seasonal wind-down of inventory and following one of the busiest holiday shopping seasons on record, according to the latest Logistics Managers’ Index (LMI) report, released this week.
The monthly LMI was 57.3 in December, down more than a percentage point from November’s reading of 58.4. Despite the slowdown, economic activity across the industry continued to expand, as an LMI reading above 50 indicates growth and a reading below 50 indicates contraction.
The LMI researchers said the monthly conditions were largely due to seasonal drawdowns in inventory levels—and the associated costs of holding them—at the retail level. The LMI’s Inventory Levels index registered 50, falling from 56.1 in November. That reduction also affected warehousing capacity, which slowed but remained in expansion mode: The LMI’s warehousing capacity index fell 7 points to a reading of 61.6.
December’s results reflect a continued trend toward more typical industry growth patterns following recent years of volatility—and they point to a successful peak holiday season as well.
“Retailers were clearly correct in their bet to stock [up] on goods ahead of the holiday season,” the LMI researchers wrote in their monthly report. “Holiday sales from November until Christmas Eve were up 3.8% year-over-year according to Mastercard. This was largely driven by a 6.7% increase in e-commerce sales, although in-person spending was up 2.9% as well.”
And those results came during a compressed peak shopping cycle.
“The increase in spending came despite the shorter holiday season due to the late Thanksgiving,” the researchers also wrote, citing National Retail Federation (NRF) estimates that U.S. shoppers spent just short of a trillion dollars in November and December, making it the busiest holiday season of all time.
The LMI is a monthly survey of logistics managers from across the country. It tracks industry growth overall and across eight areas: inventory levels and costs; warehousing capacity, utilization, and prices; and transportation capacity, utilization, and prices. The report is released monthly by researchers from Arizona State University, Colorado State University, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rutgers University, and the University of Nevada, Reno, in conjunction with the Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals (CSCMP).
As U.S. small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) face an uncertain business landscape in 2025, a substantial majority (67%) expect positive growth in the new year compared to 2024, according to a survey from DHL.
However, the survey also showed that businesses could face a rocky road to reach that goal, as they navigate a complex environment of regulatory/policy shifts and global market volatility. Both those issues were cited as top challenges by 36% of respondents, followed by staffing/talent retention (11%) and digital threats and cyber attacks (2%).
Against that backdrop, SMEs said that the biggest opportunity for growth in 2025 lies in expanding into new markets (40%), followed by economic improvements (31%) and implementing new technologies (14%).
As the U.S. prepares for a broad shift in political leadership in Washington after a contentious election, the SMEs in DHL’s survey were likely split evenly on their opinion about the impact of regulatory and policy changes. A plurality of 40% were on the fence (uncertain, still evaluating), followed by 24% who believe regulatory changes could negatively impact growth, 20% who see these changes as having a positive impact, and 16% predicting no impact on growth at all.
That uncertainty also triggered a split when respondents were asked how they planned to adjust their strategy in 2025 in response to changes in the policy or regulatory landscape. The largest portion (38%) of SMEs said they remained uncertain or still evaluating, followed by 30% who will make minor adjustments, 19% will maintain their current approach, and 13% who were willing to significantly adjust their approach.