Skip to content
Search AI Powered

Latest Stories

newsworthy

DHS to enforce security rules for chemical storage and distribution

If you're involved in the storage, transportation, or distribution of chemicals, the Department of Homeland Security says it's time to comply with security regulations.

When it comes to cargo security, air and ocean transportation probably are where you've focused your efforts. But if you have any involvement with the storage, transportation, and distribution of chemicals, warns the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS), then you need to add those activities to your list of security concerns—right now.

CFATS, the Chemical Facility Anti-Terrorism Standards (6 CFR Part 27), establishes risk-based performance standards for chemical facility security. The final rule was published in late 2007, and DHS plans to ramp up enforcement in 2010.


CFATS applies to any facility that manufactures, uses, stores, or distributes certain chemicals at or above specified quantities. The rule requires all facilities that handle chemicals to complete an online "Top Screen" questionnaire about the facility itself and the chemicals that are manufactured, processed, used, stored, or distributed there. After the completed form has been submitted, an automated response will advise the user whether or not the chemicals are regulated. Chemicals that fall under the regulations are those that DHS has determined present significant risk from theft, diversion, sabotage, or other security issues, says DHS manager Laurie Boulden. (The list of "chemicals of interest" can be found in the regulation's Appendix A.)

Facilities that are regulated must conduct a Security Vulnerability Assessment, which investigates further how and where the chemicals are stored as well as the facility's vulnerability to certain risk scenarios, Boulden explains. Once DHS has reviewed the assessment, a facility may be required to prepare a Site Security Plan demonstrating that a facility is able to meet certain risk-based performance standards. "DHS is expressly forbidden from requiring any particular measure, so it is up to each individual facility to decide, based on its own processes, operations, business models, and plans, how it wants to meet the standards," Boulden says. "Each site is basically writing its own regulation by which it wants to be held accountable." DHS may also conduct a site visit.

Penalties for noncompliance are stiff indeed: up to $25,000 per day and/or orders to cease operations. The regulation is rather complicated, and DHS has made extremely detailed information available online. But the agency is not leaving companies entirely to their own devices: Those that are subject to the regulation may arrange for an informational presentation, an on-site "compliance assistance" visit, and compliance training, among other support services.

The Latest

More Stories

power outage map after hurricane

Southeast region still hindered by hurricane power outages

States across the Southeast woke up today to find that the immediate weather impacts from Hurricane Helene are done, but the impacts to people, businesses, and the supply chain continue to be a major headache, according to Everstream Analytics.

The primary problem is the collection of massive power outages caused by the storm’s punishing winds and rainfall, now affecting some 2 million customers across the Southeast region of the U.S.

Keep ReadingShow less

Featured

Survey: In-store shopping sentiment up 21%

Survey: In-store shopping sentiment up 21%

E-commerce activity remains robust, but a growing number of consumers are reintegrating physical stores into their shopping journeys in 2024, emphasizing the need for retailers to focus on omnichannel business strategies. That’s according to an e-commerce study from Ryder System, Inc., released this week.

Ryder surveyed more than 1,300 consumers for its 2024 E-Commerce Consumer Study and found that 61% of consumers shop in-store “because they enjoy the experience,” a 21% increase compared to results from Ryder’s 2023 survey on the same subject. The current survey also found that 35% shop in-store because they don’t want to wait for online orders in the mail (up 4% from last year), and 15% say they shop in-store to avoid package theft (up 8% from last year).

Keep ReadingShow less
containers stacked in a yard

Reinke moves from TIA to IANA in top office

Transportation industry veteran Anne Reinke will become president & CEO of trade group the Intermodal Association of North America (IANA) at the end of the year, stepping into the position from her previous post leading third party logistics (3PL) trade group the Transportation Intermediaries Association (TIA), both organizations said today.

Reinke will take her new job upon the retirement of Joni Casey at the end of the year. Casey had announced in July that she would step down after 27 years at the helm of IANA.

Keep ReadingShow less
Driverless parcel delivery debuts in Switzerland
Loxo/Planzer

Driverless parcel delivery debuts in Switzerland

Two European companies are among the most recent firms to put autonomous last-mile delivery to the test with a project in Bern, Switzerland, that debuted this month.

Swiss transportation and logistics company Planzer has teamed up with fellow Swiss firm Loxo, which develops autonomous driving software solutions, for a two-year pilot project in which a Loxo-equipped, Planzer parcel delivery van will handle last-mile logistics in Bern’s city center.

Keep ReadingShow less
Dock strike: Shippers seek ways to minimize the damage

Dock strike: Shippers seek ways to minimize the damage

As the hours tick down toward a “seemingly imminent” strike by East Coast and Gulf Coast dockworkers, experts are warning that the impacts of that move would mushroom well-beyond the actual strike locations, causing prevalent shipping delays, container ship congestion, port congestion on West coast ports, and stranded freight.

However, a strike now seems “nearly unavoidable,” as no bargaining sessions are scheduled prior to the September 30 contract expiration between the International Longshoremen’s Association (ILA) and the U.S. Maritime Alliance (USMX) in their negotiations over wages and automation, according to the transportation law firm Scopelitis, Garvin, Light, Hanson & Feary.

Keep ReadingShow less