The nation got its first look at the United States' annual freight and logistics bill last month, and so far, nobody's demanded an audit. That's probably because the results were generally in line with expectations. If nothing else, the report confirmed the perception that with an economic recovery come rising costs. And indeed, the 15th annual State of Logistics Report showed that total logistics costs in the United States had headed upward in 2003, rising by 2.9 percent over the previous year's figures to reach $936 billion.
Just as importantly, the report also demonstrated how effective the nation's logistics managers have proved to be in wresting productivity improvements from their operations. Despite rising costs, these executives managed to hold total logistics expenditures to just 8.5 percent of the nominal gross domestic product (GDP)—making this the third year in a row that logistics costs fell as a percentage of nominal GDP. The latest figure, which is down from 8.7 percent last year, is also the lowest percentage recorded in all the years the report's been published.
But it's unlikely that next year's report, which will examine the numbers from this year, will deliver the same good news, says Rosalyn Wilson, the report's author. "A lot of things will impact this year," she says. "We can't hold our breath and expect interest rates to stay at 1 percent.With everybody adjusting to global business, there are some reports of increased investment in warehousing. I don't see how transportation costs will not make big jumps. I don't think we'll see it [the logistics percentage of GDP] go down again." She expects that longer and more variable lead times resulting from longer international supply chains are causing businesses to adjust how they manage inventories. "I think there will be a blip, and then we will adjust again," she says.
The annual State of Logistics Report, sponsored this year by the Council of Logistics Management, is widely considered the best measure of logistics costs available, though some critics dispute the methodology used. For the first 14 years of its existence, the report was spearheaded by Robert V. Delaney.When Delaney died on April 2, Wilson, the report's co-author, took on the responsibility of completing the report.Wilson is an independent consultant with 25 years' experience in transportation and logistics research. She also works for Reality Based IT Services Ltd., an information technology security firm.
Itemized statement
Reviewing this past year's results, Wilson points out that managers had several factors working in their favor as they fought to hold down costs. Not least among them were low interest rates. Commercial paper rates hovered around 1 percent, according to the report, which had a direct effect on holding down inventory carrying costs.
That's not to say that all conditions were favorable, however. During the year, logistics costs began to nudge upward. Wilson says the largest portion of the cost increase can be traced to rising transportation rates. Trucking costs, in particular, rose relatively quickly, she reports. That had a big impact on the total bill because trucking represents more than 50 percent of total logistics costs. She attributed the higher trucking costs to tight capacity, which gave truckers more leverage to use in recovering some of their own higher costs, particularly for insurance and fuel.
Costs of rail transportation rose slightly during the year. At the same time, domestic air freight revenues were flat and maritime and domestic water traffic fell by $1 billion. High demand for goods from Asia and constraints on ocean liner capacity in the Pacific led to 6- to 10- percent growth in eastbound trans-Pacific shipments and shipping rate hikes of 40 percent on average.
The cost of warehousing also remained flat, Wilson says. But she notes that some reports suggest that warehousing costs began to rise toward the end of last year.
It's a small, small world
But as they plan for the future, logistics professionals will have to look at much more than these largely domestic cost trends, Wilson warns. "The phenomenal growth in world trade and the rebound in the U.S. economy have profound implications for logistics," she writes. "In 2003, for example,we saw the demand for shipping outstrip the capacity in many markets, altering the supply/ demand equilibrium and pushing up prices."
Economic activity in the logistics industry expanded in November, continuing a steady growth pattern that began earlier this year and signaling a return to seasonality after several years of fluctuating conditions, according to the latest Logistics Managers’ Index report (LMI), released today.
The November LMI registered 58.4, down slightly from October’s reading of 58.9, which was the highest level in two years. The LMI is a monthly gauge of business conditions across warehousing and logistics markets; a reading above 50 indicates growth and a reading below 50 indicates contraction.
“The overall index has been very consistent in the past three months, with readings of 58.6, 58.9, and 58.4,” LMI analyst Zac Rogers, associate professor of supply chain management at Colorado State University, wrote in the November LMI report. “This plateau is slightly higher than a similar plateau of consistency earlier in the year when May to August saw four readings between 55.3 and 56.4. Seasonally speaking, it is consistent that this later year run of readings would be the highest all year.”
Separately, Rogers said the end-of-year growth reflects the return to a healthy holiday peak, which started when inventory levels expanded in late summer and early fall as retailers began stocking up to meet consumer demand. Pandemic-driven shifts in consumer buying behavior, inflation, and economic uncertainty contributed to volatile peak season conditions over the past four years, with the LMI swinging from record-high growth in late 2020 and 2021 to slower growth in 2022 and contraction in 2023.
“The LMI contracted at this time a year ago, so basically [there was] no peak season,” Rogers said, citing inflation as a drag on demand. “To have a normal November … [really] for the first time in five years, justifies what we’ve seen all these companies doing—building up inventory in a sustainable, seasonal way.
“Based on what we’re seeing, a lot of supply chains called it right and were ready for healthy holiday season, so far.”
The LMI has remained in the mid to high 50s range since January—with the exception of April, when the index dipped to 52.9—signaling strong and consistent demand for warehousing and transportation services.
The LMI is a monthly survey of logistics managers from across the country. It tracks industry growth overall and across eight areas: inventory levels and costs; warehousing capacity, utilization, and prices; and transportation capacity, utilization, and prices. The report is released monthly by researchers from Arizona State University, Colorado State University, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rutgers University, and the University of Nevada, Reno, in conjunction with the Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals (CSCMP).
"After several years of mitigating inflation, disruption, supply shocks, conflicts, and uncertainty, we are currently in a relative period of calm," John Paitek, vice president, GEP, said in a release. "But it is very much the calm before the coming storm. This report provides procurement and supply chain leaders with a prescriptive guide to weathering the gale force headwinds of protectionism, tariffs, trade wars, regulatory pressures, uncertainty, and the AI revolution that we will face in 2025."
A report from the company released today offers predictions and strategies for the upcoming year, organized into six major predictions in GEP’s “Outlook 2025: Procurement & Supply Chain” report.
Advanced AI agents will play a key role in demand forecasting, risk monitoring, and supply chain optimization, shifting procurement's mandate from tactical to strategic. Companies should invest in the technology now to to streamline processes and enhance decision-making.
Expanded value metrics will drive decisions, as success will be measured by resilience, sustainability, and compliance… not just cost efficiency. Companies should communicate value beyond cost savings to stakeholders, and develop new KPIs.
Increasing regulatory demands will necessitate heightened supply chain transparency and accountability. So companies should strengthen supplier audits, adopt ESG tracking tools, and integrate compliance into strategic procurement decisions.
Widening tariffs and trade restrictions will force companies to reassess total cost of ownership (TCO) metrics to include geopolitical and environmental risks, as nearshoring and friendshoring attempt to balance resilience with cost.
Rising energy costs and regulatory demands will accelerate the shift to sustainable operations, pushing companies to invest in renewable energy and redesign supply chains to align with ESG commitments.
New tariffs could drive prices higher, just as inflation has come under control and interest rates are returning to near-zero levels. That means companies must continue to secure cost savings as their primary responsibility.
Freight transportation sector analysts with US Bank say they expect change on the horizon in that market for 2025, due to possible tariffs imposed by a new White House administration, the return of East and Gulf coast port strikes, and expanding freight fraud.
“All three of these merit scrutiny, and that is our promise as we roll into the new year,” the company said in a statement today.
First, US Bank said a new administration will occupy the White House and will control the House and Senate for the first time since 2016. With an announced mandate on tariffs, taxes and trade from his electoral victory, President-Elect Trump’s anticipated actions are almost certain to impact the supply chain, the bank said.
Second, a strike by longshoreman at East Coast and Gulf ports was suspended in October, but the can was only kicked until mid-January. Shipper alarm bells are already ringing, and with peak season in full swing, the West coast ports are roaring, having absorbed containers bound for the East. However, that status may not be sustainable in the event of a prolonged strike in January, US Bank said.
And third, analyst are tracking the proliferation of freight fraud, and its reverberations across the supply chain. No longer the realm of petty criminals, freight fraudsters have become increasingly sophisticated, and the financial toll of their activities in the loss of goods, and data, is expected to be in the billions, the bank estimates.
Specifically, 48% of respondents identified rising tariffs and trade barriers as their top concern, followed by supply chain disruptions at 45% and geopolitical instability at 41%. Moreover, tariffs and trade barriers ranked as the priority issue regardless of company size, as respondents at companies with less than 250 employees, 251-500, 501-1,000, 1,001-50,000 and 50,000+ employees all cited it as the most significant issue they are currently facing.
“Evolving tariffs and trade policies are one of a number of complex issues requiring organizations to build more resilience into their supply chains through compliance, technology and strategic planning,” Jackson Wood, Director, Industry Strategy at Descartes, said in a release. “With the potential for the incoming U.S. administration to impose new and additional tariffs on a wide variety of goods and countries of origin, U.S. importers may need to significantly re-engineer their sourcing strategies to mitigate potentially higher costs.”
A measure of business conditions for shippers improved in September due to lower fuel costs, looser trucking capacity, and lower freight rates, but the freight transportation forecasting firm FTR still expects readings to be weaker and closer to neutral through its two-year forecast period.
Bloomington, Indiana-based FTR is maintaining its stance that trucking conditions will improve, even though its Shippers Conditions Index (SCI) improved in September to 4.6 from a 2.9 reading in August, reaching its strongest level of the year.
“The fact that September’s index is the strongest since last December is not a sign that shippers’ market conditions are steadily improving,” Avery Vise, FTR’s vice president of trucking, said in a release.
“September and May were modest outliers this year in a market that is at least becoming more balanced. We expect that trend to continue and for SCI readings to be mostly negative to neutral in 2025 and 2026. However, markets in transition tend to be volatile, so further outliers are likely and possibly in both directions. The supply chain implications of tariffs are a wild card for 2025 especially,” he said.
The SCI tracks the changes representing four major conditions in the U.S. full-load freight market: freight demand, freight rates, fleet capacity, and fuel price. Combined into a single index, a positive score represents good, optimistic conditions, while a negative score represents bad, pessimistic conditions.