Mark Solomon joined DC VELOCITY as senior editor in August 2008, and was promoted to his current position on January 1, 2015. He has spent more than 30 years in the transportation, logistics and supply chain management fields as a journalist and public relations professional. From 1989 to 1994, he worked in Washington as a reporter for the Journal of Commerce, covering the aviation and trucking industries, the Department of Transportation, Congress and the U.S. Supreme Court. Prior to that, he worked for Traffic World for seven years in a similar role. From 1994 to 2008, Mr. Solomon ran Media-Based Solutions, a public relations firm based in Atlanta. He graduated in 1978 with a B.A. in journalism from The American University in Washington, D.C.
In an episode of the TV series "Mad Men," a chronicle of the 1960s New York advertising world through the eyes of a fictitious agency, the daughter of one of the partners pleads with him to invest in a wondrous idea called "refrigerated transportation." Imagine a world, she tells him in early 1968, where fresh and frozen foods can be transported door to door by trucks over thousands of miles without spoiling.
If ever in this business there were a case of art imitating life, this is it. With the advent of superior refrigeration systems and more powerful and efficient diesel engines, long-haul refrigerated, or reefer, trucking took off in the early 1970s. It created new choices for consumers, new markets for shippers, and a new industry—and virtual monopoly—for carriers. It has been that way for nearly a half century.
But the last few years have shown that railroads are more than willing to jump into the truckers' traditional sandbox. The rails, knowing truck shippers are concerned about volatile fuel costs, increased regulatory pressure, and capacity availability, among other things, have aggressively pushed into domestic intermodal services; this has resulted in the conversion of millions of trailers from the highways to the tracks. In the past year or so, rails have shortened their intermodal lengths of haul, encroaching even further into what has been truckers' sovereign territory.
Now, rails are eyeing a bigger slice of transport's cold chain, a business they've been involved in for years, albeit in a modest way. By using rail intermodal for most of the total move, operators are looking to underprice end-to-end truck transport by 10 to 15 percent on produce shipments moving from farm to market. How well the rails and their partners execute could, over time, reshape a market still controlled by truck; by some estimates, only 2 percent of U.S. long-haul produce traffic moves via intermodal.
Sometime in May, a service will launch that its backers said will put a new spin on the reefer transport tale. Dubbed "TransCold Express," the service calls for BNSF Railway to operate dedicated weekly trains linking specially designed "food parks" in Wilmington, Ill., about 60 miles southwest of Chicago, with Selma, Calif., a town 20 miles south of Fresno that's known as the world's "raisin capital." Heading west, a BNSF train will pull refrigerated and frozen food products such as meats and cheeses in 50 72-foot specialized boxcars, each one capable of holding the equivalent of four trailerloads of palletized cargo. Coming east, another BNSF train of identical size will carry produce shipments from California's Central Valley to the Midwest. Each train will initially operate on Wednesday and take four days to traverse the 2,220 miles between hubs.
A DIFFERENT DRUMMER
A key distinction between this and traditional intermodal services is that it will operate as a rail-truck hybrid instead of incorporating a wider-reaching dray, according to Randy McKay, CEO of McKay TransCold, an Edina, Minn.-based company largely responsible for developing the project. In a typical intermodal move, truck draymen move goods to and from the rail ramps. However, dray equipment covers only about 200 miles before drivers must return to origin, McKay said. With the new service, drivers can drop off loads at destination, pick up another load, and head off without returning to base, he said. McKay said the service will increase supply chain coverage and flexibility beyond what is available through today's intermodal offerings.
"By loading four truckloads of cargo onto one boxcar and then cross-docking those goods to standard reefer trailers, we can run those trucks as if they are regular refrigerated trucks," McKay said in an e-mail to DC Velocity. "They don't need to deadhead back to our yard."
From the Selma railhead, for example, trucks will carry goods as far south as San Diego and as far north as the Bay Area, McKay said. There are no plans to extend service into the Pacific Northwest, McKay said.
Eastbound, goods can be trucked up to 500 miles to points in the Midwest and into the East and South, he said.
About half of the fleet will consist of dedicated contract carriage, with the remainder coming from the spot market, McKay said. He declined to identify the name of the fleet contractor. Private fleets operated by beneficial cargo owners may also be involved, meaning a retailer's trucks can meet the freight at the intermodal hub instead of having McKay's trucks deliver the loads to the retailer's door.
The Wilmington distribution hub, known as RidgePort, is being developed by Ridge Property Trust, a Chicago-based private real estate investment trust (REIT). Van-G Logistics, located in Fowler, Calif., 11 miles from Fresno, will run the Selma facility. McKay said the goal is to offer a full-service operation at both facilities.
LONG LEADTIME
McKay said in mid-January that several anchor customers were "ready to sign contracts," but that the company wanted to wait until the launch date grew nearer before it committed.
There are risks that will remain once the service starts. Volume density is critical to the success of any bidirectional operation. Yet there has always been a pronounced directional imbalance favoring goods from the West Coast. McKay executives acknowledge they will have to make a strong sales push on the westbound leg to narrow the gap.
Though a multitude of produce comes out of California's verdant Central Valley, the pipeline generally runs dry for about two months out of the year. McKay executives said they hope to pick up the slack by booking other types of temperature-sensitive goods.
C. Thomas Barnes, president of Con-way Multimodal, a mode-agnostic unit of trucking and logistics giant Con-way Inc., said the nascent service will get a boost by using BNSF's Los Angeles-Chicago lane. Barnes said the trains on the corridor run "like clockwork" with rapid velocity and short dwell times, both important attributes in hauling perishables. Truckers involved in the operation should also gain efficiencies through better equipment utilization, a result of driving longer distances than the typical dray, he said.
Barnes said the key would be the speed at which cargo is transloaded at destination from the boxcars to the trailers. Transloading can be time-consuming and labor-intensive, adding to the cost and risk of product spoilage, he said.
The McKay service is not the only rail initiative slated to start this year that focuses on the produce market. Also this spring, a company called Tiger Cool Express LLC, founded by intermodal veterans Ted Prince, Tom Finkbiner, and Tom Shurstad, is expected to get rolling. Like McKay TransCold, the Tiger Cool folks spent several years trying to get growers, retailers, railroads, and financiers seriously interested in a service that, up until now, has been off the beaten path.
Little wonder. Trucks come with higher costs relative to rail. However, trucks promise faster, direct transit times and fewer hand-offs, must-haves for perishables shippers and their customers. As such, no one expects the produce business to radically flip to intermodal or boxcar any time soon.
McKay said his goal is not necessarily to take share from truckers but to offer an interesting alternative to stakeholders in the reefer supply chain. Those stakeholders, he said, include truckers.
The service is designed to "give trucking companies, shippers, and others options with added service offerings," he said.
The supply chain risk management firm Overhaul has landed $55 million in backing, saying the financing will fuel its advancements in artificial intelligence and support its strategic acquisition roadmap.
The equity funding round comes from the private equity firm Springcoast Partners, with follow-on participation from existing investors Edison Partners and Americo. As part of the investment, Springcoast’s Chris Dederick and Holger Staude will join Overhaul’s board of directors.
According to Austin, Texas-based Overhaul, the money comes as macroeconomic and global trade dynamics are driving consequential transformations in supply chains. That makes cargo visibility and proactive risk management essential tools as shippers manage new routes and suppliers.
“The supply chain technology space will see significant consolidation over the next 12 to 24 months,” Barry Conlon, CEO of Overhaul, said in a release. “Overhaul is well-positioned to establish itself as the ultimate integrated solution, delivering a comprehensive suite of tools for supply chain risk management, efficiency, and visibility under a single trusted platform.”
Artificial intelligence (AI) and data science were hot business topics in 2024 and will remain on the front burner in 2025, according to recent research published in AI in Action, a series of technology-focused columns in the MIT Sloan Management Review.
In Five Trends in AI and Data Science for 2025, researchers Tom Davenport and Randy Bean outline ways in which AI and our data-driven culture will continue to shape the business landscape in the coming year. The information comes from a range of recent AI-focused research projects, including the 2025 AI & Data Leadership Executive Benchmark Survey, an annual survey of data, analytics, and AI executives conducted by Bean’s educational firm, Data & AI Leadership Exchange.
The five trends range from the promise of agentic AI to the struggle over which C-suite role should oversee data and AI responsibilities. At a glance, they reveal that:
Leaders will grapple with both the promise and hype around agentic AI. Agentic AI—which handles tasks independently—is on the rise, in the form of generative AI bots that can perform some content-creation tasks. But the authors say it will be a while before such tools can handle major tasks—like make a travel reservation or conduct a banking transaction.
The time has come to measure results from generative AI experiments. The authors say very few companies are carefully measuring productivity gains from AI projects—particularly when it comes to figuring out what their knowledge-based workers are doing with the freed-up time those projects provide. Doing so is vital to profiting from AI investments.
The reality about data-driven culture sets in. The authors found that 92% of survey respondents feel that cultural and change management challenges are the primary barriers to becoming data- and AI-driven—indicating that the shift to AI is about much more than just the technology.
Unstructured data is important again. The ability to apply Generative AI tools to manage unstructured data—such as text, images, and video—is putting a renewed focus on getting all that data into shape, which takes a whole lot of human effort. As the authors explain “organizations need to pick the best examples of each document type, tag or graph the content, and get it loaded into the system.” And many companies simply aren’t there yet.
Who should run data and AI? Expect continued struggle. Should these roles be concentrated on the business or tech side of the organization? Opinions differ, and as the roles themselves continue to evolve, the authors say companies should expect to continue to wrestle with responsibilities and reporting structures.
Shippers today are praising an 11th-hour contract agreement that has averted the threat of a strike by dockworkers at East and Gulf coast ports that could have frozen container imports and exports as soon as January 16.
The agreement came late last night between the International Longshoremen’s Association (ILA) representing some 45,000 workers and the United States Maritime Alliance (USMX) that includes the operators of port facilities up and down the coast.
Details of the new agreement on those issues have not yet been made public, but in the meantime, retailers and manufacturers are heaving sighs of relief that trade flows will continue.
“Providing certainty with a new contract and avoiding further disruptions is paramount to ensure retail goods arrive in a timely manner for consumers. The agreement will also pave the way for much-needed modernization efforts, which are essential for future growth at these ports and the overall resiliency of our nation’s supply chain,” Gold said.
The next step in the process is for both sides to ratify the tentative agreement, so negotiators have agreed to keep those details private in the meantime, according to identical statements released by the ILA and the USMX. In their joint statement, the groups called the six-year deal a “win-win,” saying: “This agreement protects current ILA jobs and establishes a framework for implementing technologies that will create more jobs while modernizing East and Gulf coasts ports – making them safer and more efficient, and creating the capacity they need to keep our supply chains strong. This is a win-win agreement that creates ILA jobs, supports American consumers and businesses, and keeps the American economy the key hub of the global marketplace.”
The breakthrough hints at broader supply chain trends, which will focus on the tension between operational efficiency and workforce job protection, not just at ports but across other sectors as well, according to a statement from Judah Levine, head of research at Freightos, a freight booking and payment platform. Port automation was the major sticking point leading up to this agreement, as the USMX pushed for technologies to make ports more efficient, while the ILA opposed automation or semi-automation that could threaten jobs.
"This is a six-year détente in the tech-versus-labor tug-of-war at U.S. ports," Levine said. “Automation remains a lightning rod—and likely one we’ll see in other industries—but this deal suggests a cautious path forward."
Editor's note: This story was revised on January 9 to include additional input from the ILA, USMX, and Freightos.
Logistics industry growth slowed in December due to a seasonal wind-down of inventory and following one of the busiest holiday shopping seasons on record, according to the latest Logistics Managers’ Index (LMI) report, released this week.
The monthly LMI was 57.3 in December, down more than a percentage point from November’s reading of 58.4. Despite the slowdown, economic activity across the industry continued to expand, as an LMI reading above 50 indicates growth and a reading below 50 indicates contraction.
The LMI researchers said the monthly conditions were largely due to seasonal drawdowns in inventory levels—and the associated costs of holding them—at the retail level. The LMI’s Inventory Levels index registered 50, falling from 56.1 in November. That reduction also affected warehousing capacity, which slowed but remained in expansion mode: The LMI’s warehousing capacity index fell 7 points to a reading of 61.6.
December’s results reflect a continued trend toward more typical industry growth patterns following recent years of volatility—and they point to a successful peak holiday season as well.
“Retailers were clearly correct in their bet to stock [up] on goods ahead of the holiday season,” the LMI researchers wrote in their monthly report. “Holiday sales from November until Christmas Eve were up 3.8% year-over-year according to Mastercard. This was largely driven by a 6.7% increase in e-commerce sales, although in-person spending was up 2.9% as well.”
And those results came during a compressed peak shopping cycle.
“The increase in spending came despite the shorter holiday season due to the late Thanksgiving,” the researchers also wrote, citing National Retail Federation (NRF) estimates that U.S. shoppers spent just short of a trillion dollars in November and December, making it the busiest holiday season of all time.
The LMI is a monthly survey of logistics managers from across the country. It tracks industry growth overall and across eight areas: inventory levels and costs; warehousing capacity, utilization, and prices; and transportation capacity, utilization, and prices. The report is released monthly by researchers from Arizona State University, Colorado State University, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rutgers University, and the University of Nevada, Reno, in conjunction with the Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals (CSCMP).
As U.S. small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) face an uncertain business landscape in 2025, a substantial majority (67%) expect positive growth in the new year compared to 2024, according to a survey from DHL.
However, the survey also showed that businesses could face a rocky road to reach that goal, as they navigate a complex environment of regulatory/policy shifts and global market volatility. Both those issues were cited as top challenges by 36% of respondents, followed by staffing/talent retention (11%) and digital threats and cyber attacks (2%).
Against that backdrop, SMEs said that the biggest opportunity for growth in 2025 lies in expanding into new markets (40%), followed by economic improvements (31%) and implementing new technologies (14%).
As the U.S. prepares for a broad shift in political leadership in Washington after a contentious election, the SMEs in DHL’s survey were likely split evenly on their opinion about the impact of regulatory and policy changes. A plurality of 40% were on the fence (uncertain, still evaluating), followed by 24% who believe regulatory changes could negatively impact growth, 20% who see these changes as having a positive impact, and 16% predicting no impact on growth at all.
That uncertainty also triggered a split when respondents were asked how they planned to adjust their strategy in 2025 in response to changes in the policy or regulatory landscape. The largest portion (38%) of SMEs said they remained uncertain or still evaluating, followed by 30% who will make minor adjustments, 19% will maintain their current approach, and 13% who were willing to significantly adjust their approach.