Contributing Editor Toby Gooley is a writer and editor specializing in supply chain, logistics, and material handling, and a lecturer at MIT's Center for Transportation & Logistics. She previously was Senior Editor at DC VELOCITY and Editor of DCV's sister publication, CSCMP's Supply Chain Quarterly. Prior to joining AGiLE Business Media in 2007, she spent 20 years at Logistics Management magazine as Managing Editor and Senior Editor covering international trade and transportation. Prior to that she was an export traffic manager for 10 years. She holds a B.A. in Asian Studies from Cornell University.
Mexico has an image problem. And for years, its negatives—both real and perceived—led U.S. companies to shy away from the country. Its history of unpredictable regulatory changes, inconsistent customs policies, inefficient distribution, and rampant theft and drug smuggling left shippers, carriers, and third-party logistics companies (3PLs) feeling discouraged and frustrated.
In the end, cheap labor and the cost advantages of both the North American Free Trade Agreement and the maquiladora program often tipped the balance in Mexico's favor. Still, the country's drawbacks caused many to pull up stakes and move to China.
Now, some of that lost business is returning. A devalued Mexican peso coupled with Asia's rising labor costs and long transit times are making Mexico attractive again. Shippers also like the notable improvements in logistics services, technologies, and facilities. Furthermore, Mexico's government has made a public commitment to modernize infrastructure, improve security, and liberalize its customs regime.
Some of the old problems persist, but if you're making decisions about Mexico based on old assumptions, it's time to take a fresh look at this dynamic market. Here's an overview of some recent developments.
Transportation and infrastructure
Some of the biggest differences in freight transportation can be seen out on the roads, where well-maintained toll highways managed by private companies have cut transit times for over-the-road shipments. The trucks that travel Mexico's highways have changed, too. In years gone by, most trucks were old, worn-out, cab-overs—many of them taken out of service in the United States and resold in Mexico. Some of the mom-and-pops that shuttle trailers and containers across the border still operate aging equipment. But for truckload and less-than-truckload carriers, shiny new Class 8 tractors are now the norm. "The transportation equipment you see in Mexico today is pretty much state of the art," says Gene Sevilla-Sacasa, vice president and managing director of Ryder Latin America. "If you look at the average fleet today versus 10 years ago, it's much bigger and much younger."
Vehicle tracking systems are ubiquitous now. Indeed, they're a condition of doing business with large shippers, says Con-way Truckload's vice president of operations, Saul Gonzalez. All but two or three of Con-way's 80 Mexican partners use Qualcomm's satellite tracking system. The U.S. carrier's system interfaces with those of its partners, providing real-time notification of events and pinpointing the location of the 2,000-plus trailers it typically has in Mexico or along the border each day.
Trucking isn't the only mode that's modernizing. The government's policy of granting operating concessions to private operators, which typically pay most of the development costs, benefits rail, port, and intermodal services, says Carlos Bouffier, an independent consultant who works with the consulting firm TranSystems. The government often provides assistance to private infrastructure projects in order to create jobs and boost local economies, he says. Recently, for instance, national and local governments helped to build roadways, utilities, and industrial parks for vehicle-assembly plants and associated parts manufacturers, Bouffier notes.
There's more work to be done. Some intermodal yards, such as the one at Monterrey, are badly congested, and funding problems have delayed construction of container terminals at Punta Colonet, says Ben Fuqua, a vice president with TranSystems. There is some good news on the intermodal front, though. The Port of Lázaro Cárdenas on Mexico's West Coast boasts a new container terminal and expanded shipping services. The Kansas City Southern de Mexico's rail service from that port has opened up the market for importing raw materials and other products for final assembly inland, and provides rapid access for the finished goods to U.S. markets, Fuqua adds.
Facilities and technology
Not too long ago, you could safely assume that warehouses and distribution centers in Mexico would be inefficient, mistakeprone, manual operations. That's no longer the case for facilities that serve large Mexican and multinational companies.
"There's been tremendous improvement in warehousing," says Ryder's Sevilla-Sacasa. "If you go back 10 years, it was difficult to find a very good warehouse. Now, I would say we operate five million square feet of warehouse space in Mexico, and all of it is AAA, state-of-the-art facilities with very, very good security." It's still not easy to build those warehouses, though. According to the World Bank publication Doing Business in Mexico 2009, the biggest obstacle to building a warehouse is getting utility connections, such as water, telephone lines, sewers, and electricity.
Many operations rely on the same warehouse management systems and transportation management systems that are popular north of the border, and workers use similar types of equipment and software to store, pick, pack, and ship products. In fact, vendors of material handling and dock equipment say that Mexico is one of their fastest-growing markets.
Mexican companies are under the same cost and service pressures as their counterparts up north, and that's boosting investments in supply chain technology, says Francisco Giral, CEO of NetLogistik, a systems integrator that represents RedPrairie, Vocollect, and UPS Logistics Technologies in Mexico and Argentina. "We still have a five- to 10-year gap [in technology compared to the United States]," he says, "but that's diminishing."
In the past, companies typically relied on homegrown applications, but sales of best-of-breed solutions have climbed in the last five years. One reason is that most vendors now release their software in different international markets simultaneously, making new products available to Mexican buyers more quickly than before. Additionally, buyers can more easily share data and collaborate with suppliers and customers outside of Mexico if they use the same or compatible software.
Collaborating with trading partners via an Internet pOréal, especially in areas like transportation and supplier management, is catching on quickly. Giral says he also is seeing growing interest in service-oriented architecture (SOA) and supply chain performance measurement. Until a few years ago, the country lacked data centers that were capable of reliably hosting solutions. Now, there are several such centers in Mexico, most of them associated with big telecom companies.
Customs and security
Customs policies and cargo security, which are intimately connected, are high on the list of concerns for anyone doing business with Mexico. They're also priorities for President Felipe Calderón Hinojosa, who has ordered some changes in customs practices and reinstated a federal security program to reduce thefts from trucks traveling Mexico's highways.
The Mexican Customs Administration (popularly known as Aduana) is working hard to change its image. That campaign has succeeded, in Gonzalez's opinion. "They are very professional now and very easy to work with," he says. "I personally have not heard about any negative things with Mexican customs in years."
Two years ago, customs officials issued a five-year plan that called for redesigned and simplified procedures; greater use of automation, including an integrated IT system that encompasses all stakeholders; and better management of change and of human resources, among other measures. The agency is well on its way toward achieving those goals. Several years ago, it did away with the infamous "red light, green light" procedure for selecting shipments for inspection and has since implemented an electronic submission system for documents and payments.
Aduana is collaborating with international bankers JP Morgan on a pilot program that will give tax-friendly treatment to imports of raw materials for some manufacturers, reports Alvaro Quintana, formerly a high-level official in Mexican Customs and now head of logistics business for JP Morgan's global trade services group in Mexico. Under the pilot, three manufacturing companies and their customs brokers are clearing shipments through customs using a simplified document that contains minimal information. They do not need to classify the goods, and there are no physical inspections by either the customs authorities or the brokers. After they're cleared, the shipments go to special bonded warehouses called Recinto Fiscalizado Estratégicas (RFEs), where they can remain for up to two years tax- and duty-free.
The program is similar but more liberal than one that's already available to the auto industry. Quintana expects that if Aduana approves RFEs for wider use, the cost of importing into Mexico—estimated by the World Bank at $2,700 per container—will drop sharply, because it will speed customs clearance, eliminate two rounds of inspections, and reduce brokers' fees by hundreds of dollars per shipment.
Cargo security remains the biggest worry for shippers, carriers, and 3PLs, despite their best efforts. Truckers stick to major highways and travel in convoys; warehouses are installing high-tech surveillance and identity technology; and carriers in all modes are spending millions of dollars on guards and inspections.
But those measures have had limited success. A cargo security manager working on the border (who requested anonymity for safety reasons) reports that drug smugglers are targeting companies that participate in the Customs-Trade Partnership Against Terrorism (C-TPAT) because U.S. Customs is unlikely to open their trailers for inspection—and are threatening employees with death if they refuse to cooperate. In late January, the newspaper Reforma created a stir in Mexico when it reported that drug cartels control the major rail lines serving the United States. The newspaper said it had proof that railroad personnel at all levels and at nearly every station are colluding with the traffickers. The Mexican Railroad Association denied those charges, asserting that rail is the safest method of freight transportation in Mexico.
To combat cargo theft, many companies are turning to technology. Vehicle-tracking and container-monitoring systems are widespread, and some high-tech warehouses have sophisticated access controls, including fingerprint matching.
There are a number of cargo security and tracking systems on the market and in development. Aduana is planning to test one from Powers International, a company headed by Dr. Jim Giermanski, a professor of international business at Belmont Abbey College in North Carolina and an expert on trade with Mexico. Like other tracking systems, Powers' technology transmits alerts when a trailer or container door has been opened. It also "notices" if an intruder cuts a hole elsewhere in the equipment, and it can detect changes in light, temperature, and vibration.
Here's what makes this system interesting to Mexican Customs: It also tracks the chain of custody, controlling access and recording the container's contents at both origin and destination. At the point of origin, an authorized person enters data about the trailer's contents into a computer and uses an electronic "key" (similar to a swipe card) to arm and secure the lock. "The person who locks it has to be a vetted person who has a unique code number, so we know his identity," Giermanski explains. The system sends the handler's ID and detailed shipment data via satellite to a data center, which communicates the information to the shipper's logistics software and to customs authorities. En route, the container "reports" variations from its planned route and any other changes to a network of data centers. At the destination, an authorized person with a unique identifier opens the container with an electronic key and verifies that the contents match the original shipment.
Upbeat but realistic
The outlook for transportation, logistics, and trade in Mexico is positive and encouraging. Certainly problems persist, but Mexico will likely continue to make progress in its drive to reach logistics parity with the United States and Canada.
The growing cadre of Mexican logistics and supply chain professionals will see to that. The number of courses in the discipline at Mexican universities is growing, as is membership in professional organizations. The Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals, for example, now has two roundtables in Mexico, and APICS—The Association for Operations Management has nine chapters in the country. The rapid expansion of events like the annual Expologística trade show, which typically draws more than 300 exhibitors of material handling equipment and supply chain technology and services, testifies to the demand for logistics tools and information.
Like many people who do business in the country, Sevilla-Sacasa offers an upbeat view of Mexico's future that is at the same time, tempered with a dose of realism. "I think that Mexico has a lot of challenges, yet a lot of very positive things are happening," he says. "We all have to deal with difficult issues like drugs and crime— we can't be blind to them. But the fact of the matter is that goods continue to move and to reach the Mexican marketplace. Mexico is becoming a very competitive place ... and we are pretty confident the changes we are making will mean continuing improvement."
When it comes to logistics technology, the pace of innovation has never been faster. In recent years, the market has been inundated by waves of cool new tech tools, all promising to help users enhance their operations and cope with today’s myriad supply chain challenges.
But that ever-expanding array of offerings can make it difficult to separate the wheat from the chaff—technology that’s the real deal versus technology that’s just “vaporware,” meaning products that don’t live up to their hype and may even still be in the conceptual stage.
One way to cut through the confusion is to check out the entries for the “3 V’s of Supply Chain Innovation Awards,” an annual competition held by the Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals (CSCMP). This competition, which is hosted by DC Velocity’s sister publication, Supply Chain Xchange, and supply chain visionary and 3 V’s framework creator Art Mesher, recognizes companies that have parlayed the 3 V’s—“embracing variability, harnessing visibility, and competing with velocity”—into business success and advanced the practice of supply chain management. Awards are presented in two categories: the “Business Innovation Award,” which recognizes more established businesses, and the “Best Overall Innovative Startup/Early Stage Award,” which recognizes newer companies.
The judging for this year’s competition—the second annual contest—took place at CSCMP’s EDGE Supply Chain Conference & Exhibition in September, where the three finalists for each award presented their innovations via a fast-paced “elevator pitch.” (To watch a video of the presentations, visit the Supply Chain Xchange website.)
What follows is a brief look at the six companies that made the competition’s final round and the latest updates on their achievements:
Arkestro: This San Francisco-based firm offers a predictive procurement orchestration solution that uses machine learning (ML) and behavioral science to revolutionize sourcing, eliminating the need for outdated manual tools like pivot tables and for labor-intensive negotiations. Instead, procurement teams can process quotes and secure optimal supplier agreements at a speed and accuracy that would be impossible to achieve manually, the firm says.
The company recently joined the Amazon Web Services (AWS) Partner Network (APN), which it says will help it reach its goal of elevating procurement from a cost center to a strategic growth engine.
AutoScheduler.AI: This Austin, Texas-based company offers a predictive warehouse optimization platform that integrates with a user’s existing warehouse management system (WMS) and “accelerates” its ability to resolve problems like dock schedule conflicts, inefficient workforce allocation, poor on-time/in-full (OTIF) performance, and excessive intra-campus moves.
“We’re here to make the warehouse sexy,” the firm says on its website. “With our deep background in building machine learning solutions, everything delivered by the AutoScheduler team is designed to provide value by learning your challenges, environment, and best practices.” Privately funded up until this summer, the company recently secured venture capital funding that it will use to accelerate its growth and enhance its technologies.
Davinci Micro Fulfillment: Located in Bound Brook, New Jersey, Davinci operates a “microfulfillment as a service” platform that helps users expedite inventory turnover while reducing operating expenses by leveraging what it calls the “4 Ps of global distribution”—product, placement, price, and promotion. The firm operates a network of microfulfillment centers across the U.S., offering services that include front-end merchandising and network optimization.
Within the past year, the company raised seed funding to help enhance its technology capabilities.
Flying Ship: Headquartered in Leesburg, Virginia, Flying Ship has designed an unmanned, low-flying “ground-effect maritime craft” that moves freight over the ocean in coastal regions. Although the Flying Ship looks like a small aircraft or large drone, it is classified as a maritime vessel because it does not leave the air cushion over the waves, similar to a hovercraft.
The first-generation models are 30 feet long, electrically powered, and semi-autonomous. They can dock at existing marinas, beaches, and boat ramps to deliver goods, providing service that the company describes as faster than boats and cheaper than air. The firm says the next-generation models will be fully autonomous.
Flying Ship, which was honored with the Best Overall Startup Award in this year’s 3 V’s competition, is currently preparing to fly demo missions with the Air Force Research Laboratory (AFRL).
Perfect Planner: Based in Alpharetta, Georgia, Perfect Planner operates a cloud-based platform that’s designed to streamline the material planning and replenishment process. The technology collects, organizes, and analyzes data from a business’s material requirements planning (MRP) system to create daily “to-do lists” for material planners/buyers, with the “to-dos” ranked in order of criticality. The solution also uses advanced analytics to “understand” and address inventory shortages and surpluses.
Perfect Planner was honored with the Business Innovation Award in this year’s 3 V’s competition.
ProvisionAi: Located in Franklin, Tennessee, ProvisionAi has developed load optimization software that helps consumer packaged goods (CPG) companies move their freight with fewer trucks, thereby cutting their transportation costs. The firm says its flagship offering is an automatic order optimization (AutoO2) system that bolts onto a company’s existing enterprise resource planning (ERP) or WMS platform and guides larger orders through execution, ensuring that what is planned is actually loaded on the truck. The firm’s CEO and founder, Tom Moore, was recognized as a 2024 Rainmaker by this magazine.
Global forklift sales have slumped in 2024, falling short of initial forecasts as a result of the struggling economy in Europe and the slow release of project funding in the U.S., a report from market analyst firm Interact Analysis says.
In response, the London-based firm has reduced its shipment forecast for the year to rise just 0.3%, although it still predicts consistent growth of around 4-5% out to 2034.
The “bleak” figures come as the European economy has stagnated during the second half of 2024, with two of the leading industry sectors for forklifts - automotive and logistics – struggling. In addition, order backlogs from the pandemic have now been absorbed, so order volumes for the global forklift market will be slightly lower than shipment volumes over the next few years, Interact Analysis said.
On a more positive note, 3 million forklifts are forecast to be shipped per year by 2031 as enterprises are forced to reduce their dependence on manual labor. Interact Analysis has observed that major forklift OEMs are continuing with their long-term expansion plans, while other manufacturers that are affected by demand fluctuations are much more cautious with spending on automation projects.
At the same time, the forklift market is seeing a fundamental shift in power sources, with demand for Li-ion battery-powered forklifts showing a growth rate of over 10% while internal combustion engine (ICE) demand shrank by 1% and lead-acid battery-powered forklift fell 7%.
And according to Interact Analysis, those trends will continue, with the report predicting that ICE annual market demand will shrink over 20% from 670,000 units in 2024 to a projected 500,000 units by 2034. And by 2034, Interact Analysis predicts 81% of fully electric forklifts will be powered by li-ion batteries.
The reasons driving that shift include a move in Europe to cleaner alternatives to comply with environmental policies, and a swing in the primary customer base for forklifts from manufacturing to logistics and warehousing, due to the rise of e-commerce. Electric forklift demand is also growing in emerging markets, but for different reasons—labor costs are creating a growing need for automation in factories, especially in China, India, and Eastern Europe. And since lithium-ion battery production is primarily based in Asia, the average cost of equipping forklifts with li-ion batteries is much lower than the rest of the world.
Companies in every sector are converting assets from fossil fuel to electric power in their push to reach net-zero energy targets and to reduce costs along the way, but to truly accelerate those efforts, they also need to improve electric energy efficiency, according to a study from technology consulting firm ABI Research.
In fact, boosting that efficiency could contribute fully 25% of the emissions reductions needed to reach net zero. And the pursuit of that goal will drive aggregated global investments in energy efficiency technologies to grow from $106 Billion in 2024 to $153 Billion in 2030, ABI said today in a report titled “The Role of Energy Efficiency in Reaching Net Zero Targets for Enterprises and Industries.”
ABI’s report divided the range of energy-efficiency-enhancing technologies and equipment into three industrial categories:
Commercial Buildings – Network Lighting Control (NLC) and occupancy sensing for automated lighting and heating; Artificial Intelligence (AI)-based energy management; heat-pumps and energy-efficient HVAC equipment; insulation technologies
Manufacturing Plants – Energy digital twins, factory automation, manufacturing process design and optimization software (PLM, MES, simulation); Electric Arc Furnaces (EAFs); energy efficient electric motors (compressors, fans, pumps)
“Both the International Energy Agency (IEA) and the United Nations Climate Change Conference (COP) continue to insist on the importance of energy efficiency,” Dominique Bonte, VP of End Markets and Verticals at ABI Research, said in a release. “At COP 29 in Dubai, it was agreed to commit to collectively double the global average annual rate of energy efficiency improvements from around 2% to over 4% every year until 2030, following recommendations from the IEA. This complements the EU’s Energy Efficiency First (EE1) Framework and the U.S. 2022 Inflation Reduction Act in which US$86 billion was earmarked for energy efficiency actions.”
Many AI deployments are getting stuck in the planning stages due to a lack of AI skills, governance issues, and insufficient resources, leading 61% of global businesses to scale back their AI investments, according to a study from the analytics and AI provider Qlik.
Philadelphia-based Qlik found a disconnect in the market where 88% of senior decision makers say they feel AI is absolutely essential or very important to achieving success. Despite that support, multiple factors are slowing down or totally blocking those AI projects: a lack of skills to develop AI [23%] or to roll out AI once it’s developed [22%], data governance challenges [23%], budget constraints [21%], and a lack of trusted data for AI to work with [21%].
The numbers come from a survey of 4,200 C-Suite executives and AI decision makers, revealing what is hindering AI progress globally and how to overcome these barriers.
Respondents also said that many stakeholders lack trust in AI technology generally, which holds those projects back. Over a third [37%] of AI decision makers say their senior managers lack trust in AI, 42% feel less senior employees don’t trust the technology., and a fifth [21%] believe their customers don’t trust AI either.
“Business leaders know the value of AI, but they face a multitude of barriers that prevent them from moving from proof of concept to value creating deployment of the technology,” James Fisher, Chief Strategy Officer at Qlik, said in a release. “The first step to creating an AI strategy is to identify a clear use case, with defined goals and measures of success, and use this to identify the skills, resources and data needed to support it at scale. In doing so you start to build trust and win management buy-in to help you succeed.”
Many chief supply chain officers (CSCOs) are focused on reorganizing their supply chains in today’s business climate—but as they do so, they should be careful to avoid common pitfalls that can derail their efforts.
That’s according to recent research from Gartner that identifies critical organizational design mistakes that will prevent supply chain leaders from delivering on business goals.
“Supply chain reorganization is high up on CSCOs’ agendas, yet many are unclear about how organization design outcomes link to business goals,” according to Alan O'Keeffe, senior director analyst in Gartner’s Supply Chain practice.
The research revealed that the most successful projects radically redesign supply chain structure based on distinct organizational needs “while prioritizing balance, strength, and speed as key business objectives.”
“Our findings reveal that the leaders who achieved success took a more radical approach to redesigning their supply chain organizations, resulting in the ability to deliver on new and transformational operating models,” O’Keefe said in a statement announcing the findings.
The research was based on a series of interviews with supply chain leaders as well as data gathered from Gartner clients. It revealed that successful organizations assigned responsibilities to reporting lines in radically diverse ways, and that they focused on the unique characteristics of their business to design supply chain organizations that were tailored to meet their needs.
“The commonality between successful organizations is that their leaders intentionally prioritized the organizational goals of balance, strength and speed into their design process,” said O’Keeffe. “In doing so, they sidestepped the most common pitfalls in supply chain reorganization design.”
The three most common errors, according to Gartner, are:
Mistake 1: The “either/or” approach
Unbalanced organizational structures result in delays, gaps in performance, and confusion about responsibility. This often stems from a binary choice between centralized and decentralized models. Such an approach limits design possibilities and can lead to organizational power struggles, with teams feeling overwhelmed and misaligned.
Successful CSCOs recognize balance as a critical outcome. They employ both integration (combining activities under one team structure) and differentiation (empowering multiple units to conduct activities in unique ways). This granular approach ensures that decisions, expertise, and resources are allocated optimally to serve diverse customer needs while maintaining internally coherent operating models.
Mistake 2: Debilitating headcount reduction
Reducing headcount as a primary goal of reorganization can undermine long-term organizational capability. This approach often leads to a focus on short-term cost savings at the expense of losing critical talent and expertise, which are essential for driving future success.
Instead, CSCOs should focus on understanding what capabilities will make the organization strong in the short, medium, and long term. They should also prioritize the development and leveraging of people capabilities, social networks, and autonomy. This approach not only enhances organizational effectiveness but also ensures that the organization is ready to meet future challenges.
Mistake 3: The copy/paste approach
Copying organizational designs from other companies without considering enterprise-specific variations can slow decision-making and hinder organizational effectiveness. Each organization has unique characteristics that must be factored into its design.
CSCOs who successfully redesign their organizations make speed an explicit outcome by assigning and clarifying authority and expertise to remove elements that slow decision-making speed. This involves:
Designing structures that enable rapid response to customer needs;
Streamlining internal decision-making processes;
And differentiating between operational execution and transformation efforts.
The research for the report was based in part on qualitative interviews conducted between February and June 2024 with supply chain leaders from organizations that had undergone organizational redesign, according to Gartner. Insights were drawn from those who had successfully completed a radical reorganization, defined as a shift that enabled organizations to deliver on new activities and operating models that better met the needs of the business. The researchers also drew on more than 1,200 inquiries with clients conducted between July 2022 and June 2024 for the report.