We're likely to see more robots in DCs within the decade. But Tom Bonkenburg says the first wave will probably look a lot more like driverless forklifts than R2-D2 or C-3PO.
James Cooke is a principal analyst with Nucleus Research in Boston, covering supply chain planning software. He was previously the editor of CSCMP?s Supply Chain Quarterly and a staff writer for DC Velocity.
The Boston Consulting Group recently predicted that global sales for robots would reach $67 billion by 2025, with the industrial segment being the largest component of that market.
That prediction comes as no surprise to St. Onge Co. consultant Tom Bonkenburg, the leading expert on the use of robotic systems in distribution. A mechanical engineering graduate from the Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Bonkenburg has been fascinated by robots since he was a kid.
That fascination led him to a career in material handling. For the past 15 years, Bonkenburg's consulting efforts have focused on supply chain and warehouse design with a strong interest in custom automation and robotics within the distribution environment. He is currently a partner in the St. Onge Co. and heads up that firm's European office.
Bonkenburg recently discussed trends in robotics with DC Velocity Editor at Large James Cooke.
Q: What's the current state of "robotics" in warehousing?
A: The current state of robotics depends on your definition of the word "robot." For many years, we have seen robotic technology in the distribution environment such as AS/RS (automated storage/retrieval systems), AGVs (automated guided vehicles), shuttle systems, transfer cars, palletizers, Kiva, Symbotic, etc. These types of systems are mature, well understood, and installed in DCs around the world. However, if your definition of "robot" includes such terms as multipurpose, adaptable for different types of jobs, redeployable, or even "humanoid," then robotics is not very common in a typical warehouse environment.
Q: Any idea of the percentage of DCs that are using robotics in their operations? A: This is a very difficult question to answer. Our research shows that 15 percent of warehouses are mechanized, and only 5 percent have true automation. Robotic systems would typically fall somewhere within these operations. The key point to note is that 80 percent of DCs are currently manual, creating a large potential opportunity for the future deployment of robotic systems if they could be made capable and affordable.
Q: What types of robotic systems are being used in warehousing, and for what purpose? A: We often see robotic systems such as pallet AS/RS and end-of-line palletizers used in high-volume finished-goods warehouses that are attached to factories. These systems tend to operate for three shifts and handle a limited range of similar SKUs (stock-keeping units) but high volumes. The "goods to picker" technologies such as shuttles are being deployed in some direct-to-consumer piece picking operations with many small orders and large SKU bases.
Q: How about humanoid robotics? How soon do you think we'll see humanlike robots in warehousing? A: Many of the traditional robotic-arm manufacturers are developing two-arm "humanlike" robots for use in assembly operations. These robots are still bolted down within an automated work cell like typical manufacturing robots. So far, few have been installed, but the interest in these new robots is very high. I believe this technology will first take hold in the manufacturing environment and then possibly move to the distribution side of the supply chain. This transition will likely take several years and will require a few more software, sensor, and cost-point breakthroughs. The good news is that several companies are investing serious money into advancing this technology.
Q: Do you know of any companies that are experimenting with humanoid robots in DCs? A: One of the most impressive humanoid robots, Robonaut, was developed by NASA in cooperation with General Motors. They have experimented in the manufacturing environment but as far as I know not in the distribution environment.
Q: There's a company called Rethink Robotics that makes a humanoid robot called "Baxter." Where does development of that technology stand and is it being used in warehouses? A: I am a big fan of Rethink Robotics and their underlying concepts. They have developed a low-cost, easy-to-use software-focused robot that works alongside human workers without fences or safety gates. Unfortunately, their first system, Baxter, is quite slow and has limited capability when it comes to warehousing and many manufacturing operations. There are rumors in the market that their second-generation robot will come out next year, and I am looking forward to seeing if future generations, such as versions three or four, would be more suited to distribution operations.
Q: Are any companies developing humanoid robots for use in warehousing? A: Rethink Robotics has focused its development energy on manufacturing pick-and-place-type applications rather than on the more complex warehouse environment. This market strategy is similar to the path taken by other companies that are currently working on dual-arm robotics. The warehousing industry needs a robotic manufacturer to take the Rethink approach but focus on the distribution side of the supply chain.
Q: What's the biggest obstacle to putting robots in warehouses—cost or technology? A: The truth is that both cost and technology are currently barriers to bringing robots into the warehouse. A few fundamental breakthroughs are necessary to both improve capability and reduce cost. The good news is that mini robotic breakthroughs are happening every year, and their frequency is increasing rapidly. The future path to commonplace robotics will depend on low-cost sensors and inexpensive but massive computing power. Anyone who used to have a rotary phone and now has an iPhone knows that those two key ingredients improve rapidly! I believe that all supply chain professionals should watch the robotics space because we will all be amazed how fast it will change.
Q: What's the biggest opportunity for using robots in warehousing? A: When looking forward to the next likely breakthroughs in robotic technology, I feel that robotic industrial trucks, similar to but more advanced than those made by Seegrid, will be the true entry point for more widespread use of robotics in the warehouse. A truly functional fully robotic forklift could find immediate application in almost any warehouse. If you look at the recent breakthroughs in self-driving cars by companies such as Google, GM, BMW, Audi, etc., it is not hard to picture this happening in the coming years.
Q: You said that robotic industrial trucks would likely be the entry point for robots. Why is that? Why are we likely to see driverless forklifts in a warehouse before humanoid robots? A: While building a fully driverless forklift will be a great challenge, developing a humanoid robot to work in a warehouse will be even more difficult. Modern forklifts offer a robust, inexpensive, and well-designed physical platform to eventually automate with computers, sensors, and vision systems. There are several large forklift manufacturers with strong sales and support networks that could possibly deploy and maintain a robot forklift fleet.
In the case of a humanoid robot, there is still no strong physical hardware platform to start with and few large companies produce them. Most humanoid robots are currently prototypes or focused on light-duty manufacturing. More robust humanoid robotic systems with large support networks need to be developed before we can even think of applying them to warehouse applications. The modern forklift has a head start over humanoid robots since it is already a hardened piece of warehouse equipment with the relatively easy task of moving standard pallets rather than the more difficult humanoid tasks that require the handling of a wide range of dissimilar items.
Q: Do you expect humanoid robots to replace warehouse workers or to work alongside human workers in warehousing? A: My personal belief is that robots will work alongside human workers. People are very, very good, and we keep making them better. Anyone who has spent more than a day in a distribution center will see that it is a very dynamic environment that requires adaptability, flexibility, quick thinking, creative problem solving, and good decision making. Similar to a WMS [warehouse management system] or a conveyor system, robots will be a tool that the smart warehouse team will use to improve its operation. At the end of the day, a supply chain is only as good as the people who work within it, and therefore, the need for talented and motivated people will never disappear.
However, that trend is counterbalanced by economic uncertainty driven by geopolitics, which is prompting many companies to diversity their supply chains, Dun & Bradstreet said in its “Q4 2024 Global Business Optimism Insights” report, which was based on research conducted during the third quarter.
“While overall global business optimism has increased and inflation has abated, it’s important to recognize that geopolitics contribute to economic uncertainty,” Neeraj Sahai, president of Dun & Bradstreet International, said in a release. “Industry-specific regulatory risks and more stringent data requirements have emerged as the top concerns among a third of respondents. To mitigate these risks, businesses are considering diversifying their supply chains and markets to manage regulatory risk.”
According to the report, nearly four in five businesses are expressing increased optimism in domestic and export orders, capital expenditures, and financial risk due to a combination of easing financial pressures, shifts in monetary policies, robust regulatory frameworks, and higher participation in sustainability initiatives.
U.S. businesses recorded a nearly 9% rise in optimism, aided by falling inflation and expectations of further rate cuts. Similarly, business optimism in the U.K. and Spain showed notable recoveries as their respective central banks initiated monetary easing, rising by 13% and 9%, respectively. Emerging economies, such as Argentina and India, saw jumps in optimism levels due to declining inflation and increased domestic demand respectively.
"Businesses are increasingly confident as borrowing costs decline, boosting optimism for higher sales, stronger exports, and reduced financial risks," Arun Singh, Global Chief Economist at Dun & Bradstreet, said. "This confidence is driving capital investments, with easing supply chain pressures supporting growth in the year's final quarter."
The firms’ “GEP Global Supply Chain Volatility Index” tracks demand conditions, shortages, transportation costs, inventories, and backlogs based on a monthly survey of 27,000 businesses.
The rise in underutilized vendor capacity was driven by a deterioration in global demand. Factory purchasing activity was at its weakest in the year-to-date, with procurement trends in all major continents worsening in September and signaling gloomier prospects for economies heading into Q4, the report said.
According to the report, the slowing economy was seen across the major regions:
North America factory purchasing activity deteriorates more quickly in September, with demand at its weakest year-to-date, signaling a quickly slowing U.S. economy
Factory procurement activity in China fell for a third straight month, and devastation from Typhoon Yagi hit vendors feeding Southeast Asian markets like Vietnam
Europe's industrial recession deepens, leading to an even larger increase in supplier spare capacity
"September is the fourth straight month of declining demand and the third month running that the world's supply chains have spare capacity, as manufacturing becomes an increasing drag on the major economies," Jagadish Turimella, president of GEP, said in a release. "With the potential of a widening war in the Middle East impacting oil, and the possibility of more tariffs and trade barriers in the new year, manufacturers should prioritize agility and resilience in their procurement and supply chains."
The third-party logistics service provider (3PL) Total Distribution Inc. (TDI) is continuing to grow through acquisitions, announcing today that it has bought REO Processing & REO Logistics.
Terms of the deal were not disclosed, but REO Processing & REO Logistics is headquartered in West Virginia with 10 facilities across West Virginia in Parkersburg, Vienna, Huntington, Kenova, and Nitro as well as in Atlanta, GA.
Headquartered in Canton, Ohio, TDI is a wholly owned subsidiary of Peoples Services Inc. (PSI). The combined TDI and PSI businesses operate over 12 million square feet of contract and public warehouse space located in 65 facilities in eight states including Michigan, Ohio, West Virginia, New Jersey, Virginia, North Carolina, South Carolina, and Florida.
As an asset-based 3PL, the PSI network offers a range of specialized material handling and storage services including many value-added activities such as drumming, milling, tolling, packaging, kitting, inventory management, transloading, cross docking, transportation, and brokerage services.
This latest move follows a series of other acquisitions, as TDI bought D+S Distribution, Inc. and Integrated Logistics Services Inc. in May, and Swafford Trucking, Inc., Swafford Warehousing, Inc., and Swafford Transportation, Inc. in February. The company also bought Presidential Express Trucking, Inc. and Presidential Express Warehousing & Distribution, Inc. in 2023.
The freight equipment original equipment manufacturer (OEM) Wabash will use a federal grant to launch a project with the University of Delaware that will save electricity by incorporating lightweight solar panels into refrigerated trailers and truck bodies, the Indiana company said today.
The three-year project, set to begin next year in partnership with the University of Delaware’s Center for Composite Materials, is intended to play a pivotal role in making zero-emission mid-mile transportation a commercially viable option, Wabash said.
Those materials are important because batteries powering heavy trucks can weigh between 5,000 to 10,000 pounds, often limiting the payload capacity and drawing significant energy from the electrical grid when charging, the partners said.
“This project has the potential to revolutionize refrigerated transport by reducing reliance on the electrical grid and minimizing overall emissions,” Michael Bodey, director of technology discovery and innovation at Wabash, said in a release. “While many of today’s zero-emission products focus on tailpipe emissions, they still draw power from energy grids, which often rely on non-renewable sources. Our goal is to offer a truly green solution—a well-to-wheel approach—that accounts for the full life cycle of energy consumption, from production to usage.”
Pharmaceutical groups are breathing a sigh of relief today after federal regulators granted many of them more time to come into compliance with strict track and trace rules required by the Drug Supply Chain Security Act (DSCSA).
The regulation was initially scheduled to be required by 2023, but that has been delayed due to the steep logistics and IT challenges of managing the reams of data that must be generated, stored, and retrieved. The most recent target update was November 27, but industry experts say many businesses would probably have missed that date, too.
Facing that reality, the FDA yesterday again delayed that deadline until next year, setting new deadlines for various trading partners: Manufacturers and Repackagers have until May 27, 2025; Wholesale Distributors have until August 27, 2025; and Dispensers with 26 or more full-time employees have until November 27, 2025.
Pharmaceutical businesses quickly cheered the move. “HDA and our pharmaceutical distributor members applaud the FDA’s decision to grant an exemption for the DSCSA’s enhanced drug distribution security (EDDS) requirements for eligible trading partners,” said Chester “Chip” Davis, Jr., president and CEO of the Healthcare Distribution Alliance (HDA), which is an industry group representing primary pharmaceutical distributors, who connect the nation’s pharmaceutical manufacturers with pharmacies, hospitals, long-term care facilities, and clinics.
“While many in the supply chain have made significant progress throughout the stabilization period, some are still struggling to establish data connections. Given the interdependency of the pharmaceutical supply chain, FDA’s phased-in approach will allow supply chain partners to better align their data exchange processes to ultimately achieve full implementation and also acknowledges the progress made thus far,” Davis said.
“As we continue to make progress toward full DSCSA implementation, HDA and our distributor members will remain engaged with our public- and private-sector partners to share information and education, as we move toward our shared goal: helping patients and providers safely access the medicines they need.”