Skip to content
Search AI Powered

Latest Stories

newsworthy

As ACE deadline looms, doubts about readiness, calls for partial delay grow

Few are fully prepared for the mandated Feb. 28 switch to Customs' Automated Commercial Environment system, raising concerns about potential supply chain disruptions.

On Feb. 28, U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) plans to shut down the Automated Commercial System (ACS)—the mechanism long used by importers and customs brokers to submit, process, and share information about U.S. imports—and require traders to file import entries and associated summaries in the Automated Commercial Environment (ACE), the long-awaited information-management system that's expected to greatly improve the complex transactions required for import and export compliance.

Also on that date, a handful of other federal agencies, including the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), are supposed to begin using ACE's "Single Window" program, which eventually will eliminate the need for traders to submit separate filings to multiple government agencies.


But as the deadline approaches, concerns are growing over whether the trade community—and CBP itself—can make the switch without it causing supply chain disruptions. Though some early adopters were proactive about piloting and implementing ACE, many others are not ready to convert. As a result, stakeholders are becoming more vocal about postponing some aspects of ACE implementation.

In a Jan. 8 open letter to importers, the National Customs Brokers and Forwarders Association of America (NCBFAA) placed much of the blame on CBP, asserting that some functions will not be available until the transition date, and that the agency continues to make software refinements and issue system updates "on an almost daily basis." The group has asked CBP to halt all software changes so that developers of the software required for electronic filing can finalize their products, and so that joint testing by government agencies, customs brokers, importers, and the vendors can be completed. That process requires a minimum of 60 days, the group said.

The ACE implementation deadline originally was set for Nov. 1, 2015. Last August, CBP postponed it to Feb. 28, 2016, after customs brokers and software providers said the original deadline and the slow release of technical specifications did not give them enough time to conduct the necessary programming, integration, testing, and revisions. Even with that delay, just 17 percent of import entries in January were processed through ACE, according to information provided by customs broker Livingston International.

There are a number of reasons why entry filers are at different stages of readiness, Vincent Iacopella, president, U.S. West Division of Janel Group Inc., a provider of integrated international logistics services, said in an interview. Iacopella, who is also the current trade cochair for COAC, a committee that advises CBP on commercial operations, emphasized that his comments were made on behalf of Janel and not COAC.

Iacopella said importers and customs brokers that handle a variety of products and associated regulatory requirements will have to manage more software and process changes than those that are limited to a single industry. In addition, software vendors that importers and customs brokers depend on are, for a number of reasons, "not all in the same place" when it comes to locking down the various functions within ACE, he said.

Other government agencies involved in international trade are at different stages of programming, testing, and implementing the Single Window aspect of ACE. That's a big concern for importers that are highly dependent on a particular government agency, Iacopella said, citing the example of the FDA's control over imports of medical devices. The decisions filers have made about their implementation strategy also are affecting their readiness, he added.

Iacopella said the most effective way to address the situation would be to move forward with what works today, and then phase in additional capabilities as they are finalized. "A wholesale delay off the Feb. 28 deadline, in my opinion, would not be helpful," Iacopella said. "We should stick to the deadline with 'carveouts' for functionality that a broad section of filers will have challenges implementing in ACE, or that cause commercial hardship to filers or the supply chain." It will be critical, he added, that CBP develop contingency plans for preventing or mitigating ACE-related delays in import processing.

The Latest

More Stories

image of digital city

Accenture acquires German management consulting firm Staufen AG

The consulting firm Accenture has acquired Staufen AG, a German management consulting firm, saying the move will expand Accenture’s capabilities to drive operational excellence and competitiveness in manufacturing and supply chains.

Specifically, adding Staufen will help Accenture serve clients in discrete manufacturing industries including automotive, aerospace and defense, industrial goods, and medical equipment.

Keep ReadingShow less

Featured

chart of US imports

NRF: Container imports remain high after Trump tariff threats

Days after tariff threats by the Trump Administration against Canada and Mexico were paused for a month, imports at the nation’s major container ports are expected to remain high, as retailers continue to bring in cargo ahead of the new deadline and to cope with elevated tariffs on China that did occur, according to the Global Port Tracker report released today by the National Retail Federation and Hackett Associates.

Part of the reason for that situation is that companies can’t adjust to tariffs overnight by finding new suppliers. “Supply chains are complex. Retailers continue to engage in diversification efforts. Unfortunately, it takes significant time to move supply chains, even if you can find available capacity,” NRF Vice President for Supply Chain and Customs Policy Jonathan Gold said in a release.

Keep ReadingShow less

AI: Is it the real deal?

Having reported on the supply chain world for some 25 years, I've seen technologies come and go. Many were once touted as the best thing since sliced bread but either failed to live up to the hype or else had to simmer a few years before they caught on.

Remember the hoopla surrounding dot-com retail? In the late 1990s, we were told that stores as we knew them would eventually go away, to be totally replaced by online shopping. The ease and convenience of e-commerce made that a reasonable expectation. But in March 2000, the bubble burst, and a host of online retailers closed their virtual doors forever. Of course, online shopping is still very much with us, and its share of total retail sales is growing by the year. Maybe we'll get to that retail seventh heaven someday, but it's taking much longer than originally predicted.

Keep ReadingShow less
Logistics economy picked up speed in January

Logistics Managers' Index

Logistics economy picked up speed in January

Economic activity in the logistics industry expanded in January, growing at its fastest clip in more than two years, according to the latest Logistics Managers’ Index (LMI) report, released this week.

The LMI jumped nearly five points from December to a reading of 62, reflecting continued steady growth in the U.S. economy along with faster-than-expected inventory growth across the sector as retailers, wholesalers, and manufacturers attempted to manage the uncertainty of tariffs and a changing regulatory environment. The January reading represented the fastest rate of expansion since June 2022, the LMI researchers said.

Keep ReadingShow less
Disrupting the furniture supply chain: An interview with Jay Rogers

Disrupting the furniture supply chain: An interview with Jay Rogers

As commodities go, furniture presents its share of manufacturing and distribution challenges. For one thing, it's bulky. Second, its main components—wood and cloth—are easily damaged in transit. Third, much of it is manufactured overseas, making for some very long supply chains with all the associated risks. And finally, completed pieces can sit on the showroom floor for weeks or months, tying up inventory dollars and valuable retail space.

In other words, the furniture market is ripe for disruption. And John "Jay" Rogers wants to be the catalyst. In 2022, he cofounded a company that takes a whole new approach to furniture manufacturing—one that leverages the power of 3D printing and robotics. Rogers serves as CEO of that company, Haddy, which essentially aims to transform how furniture—and all elements of the "built environment"—are designed, manufactured, distributed, and, ultimately, recycled.

Keep ReadingShow less