Improper battery rotation was costing DSC Logistics big money. An automated lift truck battery management system put a stop to that—and paid for itself in a few weeks.
Contributing Editor Toby Gooley is a writer and editor specializing in supply chain, logistics, and material handling, and a lecturer at MIT's Center for Transportation & Logistics. She previously was Senior Editor at DC VELOCITY and Editor of DCV's sister publication, CSCMP's Supply Chain Quarterly. Prior to joining AGiLE Business Media in 2007, she spent 20 years at Logistics Management magazine as Managing Editor and Senior Editor covering international trade and transportation. Prior to that she was an export traffic manager for 10 years. She holds a B.A. in Asian Studies from Cornell University.
Old habits die hard ... especially when it comes to swapping out lead-acid lift truck batteries. Observe forklift operators in a battery room, and you're likely to see them do one of two things: walk up and down the aisles looking at batteries before choosing the one that looks newest, or nip inside and grab the battery that's closest to the entrance. It's hard to blame them for going either of those routes. Most people will assume that the newest piece of equipment will be the best performer. And operators don't want to spend more time "out of the saddle" than they have to, especially if their pay is based on productivity.
Understandable as those habits may be, they almost guarantee that operators will fail to choose a battery that has been properly charged and fully cooled. That's a problem, because routinely selecting and using the "wrong" batteries will cause their performance and longevity to degrade. That, in turn, translates into more frequent changes during a shift as well as the need to keep a larger number of batteries on hand.
Until three years ago, that was the situation at the University Park, Ill., distribution center (DC) operated by the third-party logistics (3PL) company DSC Logistics. When managers noticed a pattern of unusually frequent changes and shorter-than-expected battery life, they found that incorrect battery selection was to blame. After their original solution produced disappointing results, they turned to an automated battery management system that not only eliminated those problems but also paid for itself in a matter of weeks.
FREQUENT CHANGES RAISE RED FLAGS
The 575,000-square-foot DC operates three shifts five days a week, handling mostly dry and some refrigerated food at the pallet, layer, and individual case level. University Park has a fleet of 45 forklifts, including 22 standup counterbalanced trucks, 11 standup deep-reach trucks, one order picker, and four pallet jacks, all manufactured by Crown Equipment Corp. (The balance are short-term rental trucks.) The fleet is powered by a pool of 85 batteries, all of them purchased from EnerSys, including a single model for all of the standup counterbalanced and deep-reach trucks. That degree of standardization pays off by simplifying vehicle maintenance and operator/technician training; it also helps to keep purchase prices reasonable, says Jim Chamberlain, DSC's senior director of industrial engineering and continual improvement.
While reviewing reports in DSC's labor management system (LMS) some years ago, Chamberlain and his colleagues noticed that lift truck operators frequently made more than one battery change per shift. Short battery run times were compromising productivity, but that wasn't the only problem. There also appeared to be a correlation between the frequent changes and the batteries' shorter-than-expected lifespans.
Observation revealed that improper battery selection was to blame, so the operations and industrial engineering teams came up with a "first in, first out" process to help drivers choose batteries that had been charged and fully cooled. In the battery changing area, there would be one empty storage slot; drivers were told to always put their used battery in that slot and take the fresh one immediately to the right.
"In theory, if everyone [follows the procedure], drivers will never get back to the battery they just put in until they have come all the way around [the storage slots]," Chamberlain explains. But even with that simple visual system, compliance was spotty, he says.
This method produced limited improvement, so DSC asked its battery supplier for ideas. EnerSys suggested an automated battery management system that could address all of its customer's concerns.
SURPRISE TEST RESULTS
The automated battery management system installed by EnerSys, called EZ Select, ensures that all batteries are evenly rotated. "The system monitors the chargers, and when a charge is complete, that battery goes into a queue organized by cool-down time," explains Paul Roeser, national accounts manager for EnerSys.
At DSC's University Park facility, when an operator enters the battery changing area, he or she uses an automatic battery-change cart to insert the depleted battery into an empty slot before hooking the battery up to a charger. Next, the operator looks at EZ Select's light-emitting diode (LED) display panel, which is mounted on a pole at one end of the battery-charging area. The display panel indicates the number of the charger position where the next available properly charged (and longest-cooled) battery is located, Roeser explains. The operator uses the cart to extract the fresh battery, rolls it back to the lift truck, and installs it in the vehicle.
If an operator attempts to take a battery other than the one indicated on the screen, an alarm immediately sounds. The battery management system also applies a date and time stamp to the error, a feature that identifies which operators are making the mistakes. That allows DSC to coach employees who need more training, an approach that quickly paid off. "Now, the employees get it: If we all follow this, then we'll all get good batteries," Chamberlain says. "It's actually fostered more of a team mentality."
Before EnerSys and DSC turned on all the system's capabilities, they ran it "blind" for a week, recording activity but without providing any instructions to operators. The purpose was to get an accurate baseline of operators' current behaviors. The results, in Chamberlain's description, were "startling." It turned out that operators were choosing the right battery only 3 percent of the time. The system documented that they were choosing whichever battery was closest, most convenient, or newest. The blind test, moreover, showed why run times and life spans were so short: The average cool-down time for the batteries the operators selected was just two hours, Chamberlain says.
LESS COST, MORE EFFICIENCY
The automated battery management system, together with operator training, has helped DSC Logistics all but eliminate battery-selection errors. When the system was first installed in 2012, the accuracy of battery selection soared to over 96 percent from 3 percent, and the average cool-down time for each battery rose to 10 hours from two. As a result, Chamberlain says, "We are getting proper run times now ... We've pretty much gone from two to around one change per shift."
Those changes have also improved average battery life spans. "We conservatively estimate that we put an additional six months on a battery's life with this system," but it can be considerably more, depending on the circumstances, says Roeser of EnerSys.
Automated selection has also reduced the time spent changing batteries at the University Park DC by 430 hours annually. There are two reasons for that, Roeser says: Operators no longer walk around looking at batteries before deciding which one to take, and the number of battery changes per shift has been greatly reduced.
Because all of the batteries are properly charged and cooled, more of them are available for use at any one time. That has allowed the three-shift operation to cut down on the number of batteries it maintains per truck from 2.5 to just over two.
An EnerSys analyst monitors the data the EZ Select system uploads daily. The vendor uses that information to identify potential problems with batteries or chargers. Based on trend data, the company can recommend an action plan to drive out costs, Roeser says.
Chamberlain notes that this type of analysis allowed the system, which required an initial investment of less than $24,000, to essentially pay for itself in just one month. To accommodate additional business, DSC had been planning to add another lift truck to its fleet. "With the information from the battery management system, we realized that we already had a healthy ratio of batteries to trucks, and that we could add a truck without buying any additional batteries, chargers, or stands," he recalls. According to EnerSys, DSC achieved savings of $25,000 in the first year after installation and is projecting annual savings in future years of about $31,000.
That was enough to convince Chamberlain and his colleagues to spread the word about the benefits of automated battery selection. "We have this system now in 11 of our logistics centers," he says. "Our goal is to continue rolling them out because they have had such a positive impact on our business."
The system's impact extends well beyond time and cost reduction, in Chamberlain's view. "Our customers are always challenging us to improve what we do for them and how our business is run," he says. Automated battery management has helped DSC meet that expectation. "What it has done is take something that for us was subjective and inconsistent, and turned it into something controlled and standardized," he says. "There really isn't a downside."
Motion Industries Inc., a Birmingham, Alabama, distributor of maintenance, repair and operation (MRO) replacement parts and industrial technology solutions, has agreed to acquire International Conveyor and Rubber (ICR) for its seventh acquisition of the year, the firms said today.
ICR is a Blairsville, Pennsylvania-based company with 150 employees that offers sales, installation, repair, and maintenance of conveyor belts, as well as engineering and design services for custom solutions.
From its seven locations, ICR serves customers in the sectors of mining and aggregates, power generation, oil and gas, construction, steel, building materials manufacturing, package handling and distribution, wood/pulp/paper, cement and asphalt, recycling and marine terminals. In a statement, Kory Krinock, one of ICR’s owner-operators, said the deal would enhance the company’s services and customer value proposition while also contributing to Motion’s growth.
“ICR is highly complementary to Motion, adding seven strategic locations that expand our reach,” James Howe, president of Motion Industries, said in a release. “ICR introduces new customers and end markets, allowing us to broaden our offerings. We are thrilled to welcome the highly talented ICR employees to the Motion team, including Kory and the other owner-operators, who will continue to play an integral role in the business.”
Terms of the agreement were not disclosed. But the deal marks the latest expansion by Motion Industries, which has been on an acquisition roll during 2024, buying up: hydraulic provider Stoney Creek Hydraulics, industrial products distributor LSI Supply Inc., electrical and automation firm Allied Circuits, automotive supplier Motor Parts & Equipment Corporation (MPEC), and both Perfetto Manufacturing and SER Hydraulics.
The move delivers on its August announcement of a fleet renewal plan that will allow the company to proceed on its path to decarbonization, according to a statement from Anda Cristescu, Head of Chartering & Newbuilding at Maersk.
The first vessels will be delivered in 2028, and the last delivery will take place in 2030, enabling a total capacity to haul 300,000 twenty foot equivalent units (TEU) using lower emissions fuel. The new vessels will be built in sizes from 9,000 to 17,000 TEU each, allowing them to fill various roles and functions within the company’s future network.
In the meantime, the company will also proceed with its plan to charter a range of methanol and liquified gas dual-fuel vessels totaling 500,000 TEU capacity, replacing existing capacity. Maersk has now finalized these charter contracts across several tonnage providers, the company said.
The shipyards now contracted to build the vessels are: Yangzijiang Shipbuilding and New Times Shipbuilding—both in China—and Hanwha Ocean in South Korea.
Asia Pacific origin markets are continuing to contribute an outsize share of worldwide air cargo growth this year, generating more than half (56%) of the global +12% year-on-year (YoY) increase in tonnages in the first 10 months of 2024, according to an analysis by WorldACD Market Data.
The region’s strong contribution this year means Asia Pacific’s share of worldwide outbound tonnages overall has risen two percentage points to 41% from 39% last year, well ahead of Europe on 24%, Central & South America on 14%, Middle East & South Asia (MESA) with 9% of global volumes, North America’s 8%, and Africa’s 4%.
Not only does the Asia Pacific region have the largest market share, but it also has the fastest growth, Netherlands-based WorldACD said. After origin Asia Pacific with its 56% share of global tonnage growth this year, Europe came in as the second origin region accounting for a much lower 17% of global tonnage growth. That was followed closely by the MESA region, which contributed 14% of outbound tonnage growth this year despite its small size, bolstered by traffic shifting to air this year due to continuing disruptions to the region’s ocean freight markets caused by violence in the vital Red Sea corridor to the Suez Canal.
The types of freight that are driving Asia Pacific dominance in air freight exports begin with “general cargo” contributing almost two thirds (64%) of this year’s growth, boosted by large volumes of e-commerce traffic flying consolidated as general cargo. After that, “special cargo” generated 36%, with 80% of that portion consisting of the vulnerables/high-tech product category.
Among the top 5 individual airport or city origin growth markets, the world’s busiest air cargo gateway Hong Kong also remained the biggest single generator of YoY outbound growth in October, as it has for much of this year. Hong Kong’s +15% YoY tonnage increase generated around twice the growth in absolute chargeable weight of second-placed Miami, even though the latter had recorded +31% YoY growth compared with its tonnages in October last year. Dubai was the third-biggest outbound growth market, thanks to its +45% YoY increase in October, closely followed by Shanghai and Tokyo.
And on the inverse side of the that trendline, the top 5 YoY decreases in inbound tonnages were recorded in Teheran, Beirut, Beijing, Dhaka, and Zaragoza. Notably, Teheran’s and Beirut’s inbound tonnages almost completely wiped out as most commercial flights to and from Iran and Lebanon were suspended last month amid Middle East violence; tonnages at both airports were down by -96%, YoY, in October. Other location that saw steep declines included Dhaka, Beirut and Zaragoza – affected by political unrest, conflict, and flooding, respectively –followed by China’s Qingdao and Mexico’s Guadalajara.
Specifically, 48% of respondents identified rising tariffs and trade barriers as their top concern, followed by supply chain disruptions at 45% and geopolitical instability at 41%. Moreover, tariffs and trade barriers ranked as the priority issue regardless of company size, as respondents at companies with less than 250 employees, 251-500, 501-1,000, 1,001-50,000 and 50,000+ employees all cited it as the most significant issue they are currently facing.
“Evolving tariffs and trade policies are one of a number of complex issues requiring organizations to build more resilience into their supply chains through compliance, technology and strategic planning,” Jackson Wood, Director, Industry Strategy at Descartes, said in a release. “With the potential for the incoming U.S. administration to impose new and additional tariffs on a wide variety of goods and countries of origin, U.S. importers may need to significantly re-engineer their sourcing strategies to mitigate potentially higher costs.”
Cowan is a dedicated contract carrier that also provides brokerage, drayage, and warehousing services. The company operates approximately 1,800 trucks and 7,500 trailers across more than 40 locations throughout the Eastern and Mid-Atlantic regions, serving the retail and consumer goods, food and beverage products, industrials, and building materials sectors.
After the deal, Schneider will operate over 8,400 tractors in its dedicated arm – approximately 70% of its total Truckload fleet – cementing its place as one of the largest dedicated providers in the transportation industry, Green Bay, Wisconsin-based Schneider said.
The latest move follows earlier acquisitions by Schneider of the dedicated contract carriers Midwest Logistics Systems and M&M Transport Services LLC in 2023.