vested interests
In the outsourcing world, a genuinely new concept comes along only once every 10 years or so. I have a feeling Vested Outsourcing is one of them.
Peter Drucker, considered by many to be the father of modern management, once said that outsourcing is not so much about cost cutting as it is about improving the quality of work that others can do better than you can.
Kate Vitasek and her team at the consultancy Supply Chain Visions and the University of Tennessee have a slightly different take on the subject: They say outsourcing is not so much about cost cutting as it is about both parties' interests being perfectly aligned. And it is on this foundation that they have built a new philosophy of outsourcing: Vested Outsourcing, or VO. Vested Outsourcing represents a totally new, collaborative method of outsourcing based on pay for performance.
In the outsourcing world, a genuinely new concept comes along only once in 10 years or so. But I have a feeling this is one of them.
To understand how VO promises to change the game, it helps to know a little about the history of outsourcing. Outsourcing has been with us since the 14th century, when the merchants of Europe and Asia stored their goods in warehouses at the port of Venice for later shipment to the New World. The concept was quick to catch on, and soon companies all over the world were contracting out warehousing and transportation. But for the most part, these early arrangements were strictly "one off" transactions. It wasn't until the 1960s that we saw our first real breakthrough with multiyear warehouse contracts.
During the 1970s, an era that saw U.S. manufacturers putting heavy emphasis on cost reduction and productivity, longer-term relationships became more common, particularly in the warehousing arena. Outsourcing got a big boost in 1980, when a relaxation in regulation made it possible for carriers and others to enter into truly innovative long-term relationships with customers.
The most common criticism of the typical outsourcing contract was that it offered no incentives for productivity improvement or superior performance, and the late 1990s saw an expanded use of gain-sharing agreements. Unfortunately, however, many of these arrangements lacked a crucial element: While they rewarded providers for enhanced performance, they neglected to include penalties for poor service or substandard productivity.
Vested Outsourcing changes all that. VO meets gain sharing head on. While somewhat similar to gain sharing, VO stipulates that the outsourcer pays strictly for performance—i.e., the successful fulfillment of those activities the two parties have agreed are necessary. A party to a VO contract does not pay for transactions. It pays for results, or in the language of VO, "desired outcomes." The agreement clearly spells out both the financial rewards for exceeding the agreed-upon "desired outcomes" and the penalties for falling short.
At first blush, VO may sound complicated, but actually it's beautiful in its simplicity. And it promises to bring collaboration to a new level, although it will require a significant change in mindset for those logistics service providers that still cling to the transaction-based business model. It requires not only a meeting of the minds or alignment of interests, but also a clear understanding of what is expected. Most important, the provider must be willing to accept the risk-reward aspect.
Perhaps the most important lesson to be learned from the 2000s is that the complacent, reactive logistics service provider is becoming obsolete. Both providers and users must be proactive, flexible, and clearly focused. I believe the sophisticated providers will understand this, as will the more enlightened outsourcers. Particularly in this economy, VO represents a wonderful opportunity for both parties to profit from a true results-oriented collaboration.
For more information, visit www.vestedoutsourcing.com. You'll find it's time well spent.
Clifford F. Lynch is the author of Logistics Outsourcing – A Management Guide and co-author of The Role of Transportation in the Supply Chain. He can be reached at www.cflynch.com.
More articles by Clifford F. Lynch
For more DC Velocity, become a fan on Facebook and follow us on Twitter.
Resources Mentioned In This Article
Related Articles
- Basic Training: Turnaround hopes hinge on "supply chain relevance" – Reviving an ailing community is not about building a skilled workforce. It's about offering a relevant value-adding slot in a viable supply chain. (February 8, 2010)
- For competitive edge, try "flipping" your thinking – Forget the tried and true, says Peter Sheahan. Sometimes, success lies in turning everything you know about business on its head. (February 8, 2010)
- Contract changes could stop 3PL "savings leakage" – When the savings from their outsourcing arrangements taper off, shippers often blame the provider. They'd do better to look at their contracts. (January 25, 2010)
- IWLA chief unfazed by recession's challenges – A slumping economy didn't stop Joel Anderson from boosting the group's membership, finances in 2009. Now, he's looking to build on that success. (January 22, 2010)
- Leading economist sees solid growth in first half; tailing off in second half – Inventory rebuilding and government stimulus programs will buoy economy in the near term, economist tells SMC³ winter meeting in Atlanta. (January 21, 2010)
Feedback: What did you think of this article? We'd like to hear from you. DC VELOCITY is committed to accuracy and clarity in the delivery of important and useful logistics and supply chain news and information. If you find anything in DC VELOCITY you feel is inaccurate or warrants further explanation, please ?Subject=Feedback - : vested interests">contact Editorial Director Peter Bradley. All comments are eligible for publication in the letters section of DC VELOCITY magazine. Please include you name and the name of the company or organization your work for.


