Gary Frantz is a contributing editor for DC Velocity and its sister publication CSCMP's Supply Chain Quarterly, and a veteran communications executive with more than 30 years of experience in the transportation and logistics industries. He's served as communications director and strategic media relations counselor for companies including XPO Logistics, Con-way, Menlo Logistics, GT Nexus, Circle International Group, and Consolidated Freightways. Gary is currently principal of GNF Communications LLC, a consultancy providing freelance writing, editorial and media strategy services. He's a proud graduate of the Journalism program at California State University–Chico.
Randy Sinker thought he had seen just about everything over his more than 30 years in the airfreight and logistics business. That was until 2020. “Unprecedented doesn’t even begin to describe it,” says Sinker, who is president of Winnsboro, Texas-based freight forwarder and third-party service provider Team Worldwide. If anything, the year reinforced for Sinker, and others in the airfreight forwarding industry, that the “f” in forwarding really stands for “flexible.”
“We found we had to have lots of patience and be very creative” in the face of unprecedented challenges, he says, referring to the market gyrations caused by the pandemic, shelter-in-place orders, and the need to ensure safe workspaces and provide adequate personal protective equipment (PPE) for employees. Then there was the drastic reduction in commercial passenger flights (and the resulting loss of critical belly space for cargo), the surge in PPE shipments, skyrocketing rates, and the shift of cargo profiles from supporting B2B (business-to-business) needs to meeting e-commerce–driven B2C (business-to-consumer) demands.
He defined the year as a progression through three phases. In the first phase, February and March, the market still had capacity. “I recall taking a flight to JFK on March 9, and the plane was two-thirds empty,” he notes.
Then the middle phase, from mid-March through the summer and fall, saw commercial passenger lift disappear. “You’d book [cargo on] a flight, and it would be canceled,” Sinker remembers. Airlines began furloughing employees and shuttering some secondary- and tertiary-market offices. Station hours were reduced. Some experienced, long-time employees took early retirement, and with them, valuable forwarder relationships. It was a daily challenge to get reliable information as short-staffed airlines struggled to keep up.
That period coincided with surging demand for shipping personal protective equipment, mostly from Asia. Finding capacity became a huge challenge, and rates shot up “to levels we have never seen—four to five times normal, if not greater,” Sinker says.
Entering the new year, the market has somewhat stabilized into a third phase. While freight volumes are still high, the holiday crush has passed and e-commerce–related freight has come off its 2020 peak. Both all-cargo and passenger airlines have adapted, regrouped, redeployed, and adapted again—as have their freight-forwarding partners.
A STEEP LEARING CURVE
In many cases, those adaptations have involved the way airlines deploy their aircraft. “It’s been an interesting year; we’ve all learned a huge amount,” says Roger Samways, vice president of cargo, commercial for Dallas, Texas-based American Airlines Cargo. By way of background, he notes that some 50% of the world’s air cargo moves in the bellies of passenger aircraft. His company typically generates some $800 million to $1 billion in cargo revenue annually.
At American Airlines, “early on we saw a need to repurpose some of our passenger aircraft to carry cargo. That is what we’ve been doing since early March,” Samways recalls. The first such flight was Dallas to Frankfurt, Germany. Over time, that grew to some 250 flights per week, mostly between Asia, Europe, and the U.S. By late December, American was on the cusp of operating its 5,000th cargo-only flight using passenger aircraft, he said. Samways expects to operate the same number of weekly flights through the first quarter, which could change depending on how much—and how quickly—passenger traffic returns.
While American was flying passenger aircraft for all-cargo duty, the freight was being loaded only into the belly of the aircraft. Other airlines, such as Air Canada, went the extra step and removed seats from the premium and economy areas of passenger cabins so the plane could carry more cargo in addition to freight in the plane’s belly. Last year, Delta Airlines removed seats from a Boeing 777 and converted the aircraft to all-cargo use, prior to retiring its 777 fleet last October.
American decided against that strategy, says Samways, because it foresaw several challenges.
For one thing, cargo that goes in the belly of the aircraft normally is consolidated in unit load devices (ULDs), containers designed specifically to fit in a passenger plane’s lower-deck cargo area. Freight intended for the passenger cabin—whether the cabin has seats or not—would have to be boxed or in cartons that could be walked onto the aircraft. Flight attendants and, in some cases, ground crews also would have to fly with the cargo in the passenger cabin.
Another challenge was limited “slot times” at airports, particularly in Asia. Operators literally had 90 minutes on the ground. “We could not commit to loading in the passenger cabin in that short time frame,” Samways recalls. Lastly was the cost of pulling out seats—and then reinstalling them for when passenger traffic returned.
“The [past] year has not been easy,” Samways says, adding that he expects a shortage of cargo capacity to persist into 2021, with demand outstripping supply in many markets and, thereby, keeping yields near record levels. Yet 2020 “has been an incredible learning experience,” he notes. The key lesson: “We have to be nimble and adaptable.”
FINDING NEW SOLUTIONS
John Hill, president and chief commercial officer of Glen Mills, Pennsylvania-based Pilot Freight Services, recalls being stunned by the whipsawing of the market. “We went from having a brutal March to being in peak season in May,” and then operating at that pace the rest of the year. Rates for aircargo space “went crazy, peaking at about $20 a kilo from Asia to the U.S.,” he recalls.
While the pandemic upended the market in many ways, it also spotlighted companies that were creative in helping customers overcome unique challenges. Early on, “we had one of the largest health-care equipment companies come to us” for help with a pandemic-related problem, Hill notes. Normally, their field technicians would assemble, test, and certify the company’s patient-monitoring equipment on site within a hospital. Pilot traditionally supported this effort by consolidating and shipping components and parts to technicians on site.
Yet with hospital ICUs swamped with Covid patients, the company was concerned about putting its technicians at risk in an environment where the virus was so prevalent.
Hill and his team got together and came up with a solution. Instead of shipping piecemeal to hospitals, Pilot took its main New Jersey station, cordoned off an area of the facility as a “cleanroom,” and set up workstations for the technicians so they could assemble and test the patient-monitoring equipment there. As technicians finished assembling and testing the machines, Pilot then blanket-wrapped the units and expedited their delivery by dedicated truck to hospitals in Manhattan.
“We had them up and running in 24 hours to accommodate the hospital and its patients,” Hill reports. The result was a solution that significantly limited the time technicians had to spend inside the hospital—and, by extension, their risk of exposure to the virus.
TAKING ON THE VACCINE CHALLENGE
While similar stories abound, the one that captured the public’s eye last year was the logistics sector’s role in the vaccination effort. While FedEx and UPS have received, deservedly so, the lion’s share of attention for marshaling their integrated networks to provide linehaul airlift and local delivery of vaccine shipments from manufacturing plants, the freight-forwarding and all-cargo community also stepped up, providing transportation of raw materials, equipment, and other supplies for vaccine manufacture as well as medical equipment to facilitate vaccine administration.
Miami, Florida-based all-cargo carrier Amerijet International Airlines supported two areas. It moved ingredients, reagents, and other substances used in vaccine manufacturing from San Juan, Puerto Rico, into the U.S. Amerijet, which has sophisticated cold chain capabilities at its Miami station, also shipped some 250 million syringes and needles from Asia to the U.S., reports Tim Strauss, the company’s chief executive officer.
Amerijet provides scheduled and charter services with a fleet of eight wide-body Boeing 767 aircraft. The company primarily services Latin and Central America, the Caribbean, and Europe and operates dedicated charters to other worldwide points as well.
The scope and scale of vaccine distribution is a huge challenge for the airfreight industry, Strauss notes, but it’s one that he believes the industry’s collective resources, experience, and expertise are up to.
Part of that challenge lies in the amount of product that has to get to market to support global vaccination efforts. Strauss estimates that “roughly speaking, you can put about 1 million doses on a Boeing 777 freighter.” While that might sound like a lot, thousands of such flights would be needed for the current campaign. “To do half the population of the world, that would take roughly 3,500 777 loads, or 7,000 for both doses,” he explains. “That’s like 20 years of flying compressed into a very short period of time.”
For the foreseeable future, Strauss does not expect long-haul international passenger flights—the primary source of cargo capacity—to increase significantly because “passengers are not there” to support it. “Almost all the profit for passenger airlines comes from the front cabin. The back cabin is break even,” he explains. “That’s the group that has learned to work [remotely] by Zoom (video meetings). Where executives before might have traveled internationally five to six times a year, now they go [online to attend Microsoft] Teams meetings and maybe travel once a year.”
He recalls that when the SARS (severe acute respiratory syndrome) virus hit, it took nearly seven years for the industry to recover to previous levels of flights and cargo capacity. He thinks the recovery from Covid-19 will be faster than with SARS, yet he does not foresee a meaningful recovery of commercial lift from international passenger flights until 2022 or 2023.
STEPPING UP TO THE PLATE
In the meantime, airfreight players continue to keep supply lines open despite significant operating constraints. “What I’ve been most impressed with is the [airfreight forwarding] industry’s ability to step up to the plate … especially in the face of one of the biggest challenges we’ve ever had,” with the grounding of some 50% of passenger flights, notes Brandon Fried, executive director of the Washington, D.C.-based Airforwarders Association, which represents 275 member companies, including airlines, forwarders, and all-cargo carriers.
“It has been a team effort … this big symphony of stakeholders working together” to make possible the rapid and efficient movement of millions of shipments of essential health-care, medical, and pharmaceutical supplies; protective equipment; and other critical consumer goods, he notes.
As for what lies ahead, more than anything else, progress administering the vaccine—and how quickly that restores consumer confidence—will drive the pace of recovery, Fried believes. “We are never going to see [a return to] the traditional normal of the past,” he says, because “people will be wondering if the next pandemic is around the corner and whether we’re ready for it.”
He expects mask wearing and social distancing to continue for some time to come, and pandemic-driven alterations to many workplace and business practices to become permanent. “We might not go into the office as much—maybe only two, three times a week.”
Fried also cites the pandemic-induced shift in consumer buying behavior. “People [have come to] like buying things online, getting boxes delivered directly to their doorsteps,” he notes, all of which has fundamentally changed shopping habits, supply chain flows, and distribution demands in ways that will likely endure after the pandemic subsides.
Yet some old habits die hard, he says. Fried predicts that as the pandemic begins to ease, consumer confidence returns, and the economy responds, “then we’ll see more people willing to get on airplanes and fly.”
Most of the apparel sold in North America is manufactured in Asia, meaning the finished goods travel long distances to reach end markets, with all the associated greenhouse gas emissions. On top of that, apparel manufacturing itself requires a significant amount of energy, water, and raw materials like cotton. Overall, the production of apparel is responsible for about 2% of the world’s total greenhouse gas emissions, according to a report titled
Taking Stock of Progress Against the Roadmap to Net Zeroby the Apparel Impact Institute. Founded in 2017, the Apparel Impact Institute is an organization dedicated to identifying, funding, and then scaling solutions aimed at reducing the carbon emissions and other environmental impacts of the apparel and textile industries.
The author of this annual study is researcher and consultant Michael Sadowski. He wrote the first report in 2021 as well as the latest edition, which was released earlier this year. Sadowski, who is also executive director of the environmental nonprofit
The Circulate Initiative, recently joined DC Velocity Group Editorial Director David Maloney on an episode of the “Logistics Matters” podcast to discuss the key findings of the research, what companies are doing to reduce emissions, and the progress they’ve made since the first report was issued.
A: While companies in the apparel industry can set their own sustainability targets, we realized there was a need to give them a blueprint for actually reducing emissions. And so, we produced the first report back in 2021, where we laid out the emissions from the sector, based on the best estimates [we could make using] data from various sources. It gives companies and the sector a blueprint for what we collectively need to do to drive toward the ambitious reduction [target] of staying within a 1.5 degrees Celsius pathway. That was the first report, and then we committed to refresh the analysis on an annual basis. The second report was published last year, and the third report came out in May of this year.
Q: What were some of the key findings of your research?
A: We found that about half of the emissions in the sector come from Tier Two, which is essentially textile production. That includes the knitting, weaving, dyeing, and finishing of fabric, which together account for over half of the total emissions. That was a really important finding, and it allows us to focus our attention on the interventions that can drive those emissions down.
Raw material production accounts for another quarter of emissions. That includes cotton farming, extracting gas and oil from the ground to make synthetics, and things like that. So we now have a really keen understanding of the source of our industry’s emissions.
Q: Your report mentions that the apparel industry is responsible for about 2% of global emissions. Is that an accurate statistic?
A: That’s our best estimate of the total emissions [generated by] the apparel sector. Some other reports on the industry have apparel at up to 8% of global emissions. And there is a commonly misquoted number in the media that it’s 10%. From my perspective, I think the best estimate is somewhere under 2%.
We know that globally, humankind needs to reduce emissions by roughly half by 2030 and reach net zero by 2050 to hit international goals. [Reaching that target will require the involvement of] every facet of the global economy and every aspect of the apparel sector—transportation, material production, manufacturing, cotton farming. Through our work and that of others, I think the apparel sector understands what has to happen. We have highlighted examples of how companies are taking action to reduce emissions in the roadmap reports.
Q: What are some of those actions the industry can take to reduce emissions?
A: I think one of the positive developments since we wrote the first report is that we’re seeing companies really focus on the most impactful areas. We see companies diving deep on thermal energy, for example. With respect to Tier Two, we [focus] a lot of attention on things like ocean freight versus air. There’s a rule of thumb I’ve heard that indicates air freight is about 10 times the cost [of ocean] and also produces 10 times more greenhouse gas emissions.
There is money available to invest in sustainability efforts. It’s really exciting to see the funding that’s coming through for AI [artificial intelligence] and to see that individual companies, such as H&M and Lululemon, are investing in real solutions in their supply chains. I think a lot of concrete actions are being taken.
And yet we know that reducing emissions by half on an absolute basis by 2030 is a monumental undertaking. So I don’t want to be overly optimistic, because I think we have a lot of work to do. But I do think we’ve got some amazing progress happening.
Q: You mentioned several companies that are starting to address their emissions. Is that a result of their being more aware of the emissions they generate? Have you seen progress made since the first report came out in 2021?
A: Yes. When we published the first roadmap back in 2021, our statistics showed that only about 12 companies had met the criteria [for setting] science-based targets. In 2024, the number of apparel, textile, and footwear companies that have set targets or have commitments to set targets is close to 500. It’s an enormous increase. I think they see the urgency more than other sectors do.
We have companies that have been working at sustainability for quite a long time. I think the apparel sector has developed a keen understanding of the impacts of climate change. You can see the impacts of flooding, drought, heat, and other things happening in places like Bangladesh and Pakistan and India. If you’re a brand or a manufacturer and you have operations and supply chains in these places, I think you understand what the future will look like if we don’t significantly reduce emissions.
Q: There are different categories of emission levels, depending on the role within the supply chain. Scope 1 are “direct” emissions under the reporting company’s control. For apparel, this might be the production of raw materials or the manufacturing of the finished product. Scope 2 covers “indirect” emissions from purchased energy, such as electricity used in these processes. Scope 3 emissions are harder to track, as they include emissions from supply chain partners both upstream and downstream.
Now companies are finding there are legislative efforts around the world that could soon require them to track and report on all these emissions, including emissions produced by their partners’ supply chains. Does this mean that companies now need to be more aware of not only what greenhouse gas emissions they produce, but also what their partners produce?
A: That’s right. Just to put this into context, if you’re a brand like an Adidas or a Gap, you still have to consider the Scope 3 emissions. In particular, there are the so-called “purchased goods and services,” which refers to all of the embedded emissions in your products, from farming cotton to knitting yarn to making fabric. Those “purchased goods and services” generally account for well above 80% of the total emissions associated with a product. It’s by far the most significant portion of your emissions.
Leading companies have begun measuring and taking action on Scope 3 emissions because of regulatory developments in Europe and, to some extent now, in California. I do think this is just a further tailwind for the work that the industry is doing.
I also think it will definitely ratchet up the quality requirements of Scope 3 data, which is not yet where we’d all like it to be. Companies are working to improve that data, but I think the regulatory push will make the quality side increasingly important.
Q: Overall, do you think the work being done by the Apparel Impact Institute will help reduce greenhouse gas emissions within the industry?
A: When we started this back in 2020, we were at a place where companies were setting targets and knew their intended destination, but what they needed was a blueprint for how to get there. And so, the roadmap [provided] this blueprint and identified six key things that the sector needed to do—from using more sustainable materials to deploying renewable electricity in the supply chain.
Decarbonizing any sector, whether it’s transportation, chemicals, or automotive, requires investment. The Apparel Impact Institute is bringing collective investment, which is so critical. I’m really optimistic about what they’re doing. They have taken a data-driven, evidence-based approach, so they know where the emissions are and they know what the needed interventions are. And they’ve got the industry behind them in doing that.
The global air cargo market’s hot summer of double-digit demand growth continued in August with average spot rates showing their largest year-on-year jump with a 24% increase, according to the latest weekly analysis by Xeneta.
Xeneta cited two reasons to explain the increase. First, Global average air cargo spot rates reached $2.68 per kg in August due to continuing supply and demand imbalance. That came as August's global cargo supply grew at its slowest ratio in 2024 to-date at 2% year-on-year, while global cargo demand continued its double-digit growth, rising +11%.
The second reason for higher rates was an ocean-to-air shift in freight volumes due to Red Sea disruptions and e-commerce demand.
Those factors could soon be amplified as e-commerce shows continued strong growth approaching the hotly anticipated winter peak season. E-commerce and low-value goods exports from China in the first seven months of 2024 increased 30% year-on-year, including shipments to Europe and the US rising 38% and 30% growth respectively, Xeneta said.
“Typically, air cargo market performance in August tends to follow the July trend. But another month of double-digit demand growth and the strongest rate growths of the year means there was definitely no summer slack season in 2024,” Niall van de Wouw, Xeneta’s chief airfreight officer, said in a release.
“Rates we saw bottoming out in late July started picking up again in mid-August. This is too short a period to call a season. This has been a busy summer, and now we’re at the threshold of Q4, it will be interesting to see what will happen and if all the anticipation of a red-hot peak season materializes,” van de Wouw said.
“Unrelenting labor shortages and wage inflation, accompanied by increasing consumer demand, are driving rapid market adoption of autonomous technologies in manufacturing, warehousing, and logistics,” Seegrid CEO and President Joe Pajer said in a release. “This is particularly true in the area of palletized material flows; areas that are addressed by Seegrid’s autonomous tow tractors and lift trucks. This segment of the market is just now ‘coming into its own,’ and Seegrid is a clear leader.”
According to Pajer, Seegrid’s strength in the sector is due to several new technologies it has released in the past six months. They include: Sliding Scale Autonomy, which provides both flexibility and predictability in autonomous navigation and manipulation; Enhanced Pallet and Payload Detection, which enables reliable recognition and manipulation of a broad range of payloads; and the planned launch of its CR1 autonomous lift truck model later this year.
Seegrid’s CR1 unit offers a 15-foot lift height, 4,000-pound load capacity, and a top speed of 5 mph. In comparison, its existing autonomous lift truck model, the RS1, supports six-foot lift height, 3,500 pound capacity, and the same top speed.
The “series D” investment round was funded by existing lead investors Giant Eagle Incorporated and G2 Venture Partners, as well as smaller investments from other existing shareholders.
The report cites data showing that there are approximately 1.7 million workers missing from the post-pandemic workforce and that 38% of small firms are unable to fill open positions. At the same time, the “skills gap” in the workforce is accelerating as automation and AI create significant shifts in how work is performed.
That information comes from the “2024 Labor Day Report” released by Littler’s Workplace Policy Institute (WPI), the firm’s government relations and public policy arm.
“We continue to see a labor shortage and an urgent need to upskill the current workforce to adapt to the new world of work,” said Michael Lotito, Littler shareholder and co-chair of WPI. “As corporate executives and business leaders look to the future, they are focused on realizing the many benefits of AI to streamline operations and guide strategic decision-making, while cultivating a talent pipeline that can support this growth.”
But while the need is clear, solutions may be complicated by public policy changes such as the upcoming U.S. general election and the proliferation of employment-related legislation at the state and local levels amid Congressional gridlock.
“We are heading into a contentious election that has already proven to be unpredictable and is poised to create even more uncertainty for employers, no matter the outcome,” Shannon Meade, WPI’s executive director, said in a release. “At the same time, the growing patchwork of state and local requirements across the U.S. is exacerbating compliance challenges for companies. That, coupled with looming changes following several Supreme Court decisions that have the potential to upend rulemaking, gives C-suite executives much to contend with in planning their workforce-related strategies.”
Stax Engineering, the venture-backed startup that provides smokestack emissions reduction services for maritime ships, will service all vessels from Toyota Motor North America Inc. visiting the Toyota Berth at the Port of Long Beach, according to a new five-year deal announced today.
Beginning in 2025 to coincide with new California Air Resources Board (CARB) standards, STAX will become the first and only emissions control provider to service roll-on/roll-off (ro-ros) vessels in the state of California, the company said.
Stax has rapidly grown since its launch in the first quarter of this year, supported in part by a $40 million funding round from investors, announced in July. It now holds exclusive service agreements at California ports including Los Angeles, Long Beach, Hueneme, Benicia, Richmond, and Oakland. The firm has also partnered with individual companies like NYK Line, Hyundai GLOVIS, Equilon Enterprises LLC d/b/a Shell Oil Products US (Shell), and now Toyota.
Stax says it offers an alternative to shore power with land- and barge-based, mobile emissions capture and control technology for shipping terminal and fleet operators without the need for retrofits.
In the case of this latest deal, the Toyota Long Beach Vehicle Distribution Center imports about 200,000 vehicles each year on ro-ro vessels. Stax will keep those ships green with its flexible exhaust capture system, which attaches to all vessel classes without modification to remove 99% of emitted particulate matter (PM) and 95% of emitted oxides of nitrogen (NOx). Over the lifetime of this new agreement with Toyota, Stax estimated the service will account for approximately 3,700 hours and more than 47 tons of emissions controlled.
“We set out to provide an emissions capture and control solution that was reliable, easily accessible, and cost-effective. As we begin to service Toyota, we’re confident that we can meet the needs of the full breadth of the maritime industry, furthering our impact on the local air quality, public health, and environment,” Mike Walker, CEO of Stax, said in a release. “Continuing to establish strong partnerships will help build momentum for and trust in our technology as we expand beyond the state of California.”