With a wide array of styles, sizes, and widths, shoes can be surprisingly challenging from a distribution perspective. Clarks solved the problem by rebooting its entire DC operation with high-speed automated equipment—all in a 450,000-square-foot area.
David Maloney has been a journalist for more than 35 years and is currently the group editorial director for DC Velocity and Supply Chain Quarterly magazines. In this role, he is responsible for the editorial content of both brands of Agile Business Media. Dave joined DC Velocity in April of 2004. Prior to that, he was a senior editor for Modern Materials Handling magazine. Dave also has extensive experience as a broadcast journalist. Before writing for supply chain publications, he was a journalist, television producer and director in Pittsburgh. Dave combines a background of reporting on logistics with his video production experience to bring new opportunities to DC Velocity readers, including web videos highlighting top distribution and logistics facilities, webcasts and other cross-media projects. He continues to live and work in the Pittsburgh area.
As the venerable footwear retailer Clarks can attest, shoes are not the easiest products to distribute. For one thing, each style comes in a wide range of sizes, widths, and colors. For another, shoes and boots are often bulky. So it helps to have sophisticated software and handling systems to help navigate the complexities. That's exactly what Clarks Americas now has at its new DC in Hanover, Pa.
British-based Clarks was founded in England in 1825 when brothers Cyrus and James Clark made their first pair of sheepskin slippers. Today, it has grown into a global corporation that includes the Bostonian and Hanover brands.
It was the Hanover Shoe acquisition in the late 1970s that first brought Clarks to the small Pennsylvania town of the same name, where the company already had a factory and distribution center. Shoe production has since moved overseas, but distribution for all of Clarks in the Americas remains in Hanover today, albeit with some modifications. The company has seen steady growth since that acquisition—growth that eventually would lead to capacity limitations that would take more than just polish to address.
"We were outgrowing the walls there," recalls Ed Smith, project manager and facilities engineer. "We knew we could not get by for long. Plus, we needed to invest in new technologies to replace the old technologies we had that were simply worn out."
HANOVER HOLDOVER
Clarks did not want to abandon Hanover for a location closer to interstate highways. It had a long history there, as well as an experienced and dependable work force. Hanover is also a short drive from the Port of Baltimore, through which most of its imports arrive. As it happened, Clarks found sufficient land to build directly across the street from the former DC.
Planning for the new facility began more than a decade ago, but the Great Recession put the project on hold. In many ways, the delay was fortuitous, as a notable portion of the company's business has since shifted to the direct-to-consumer channel. When work on the facility resumed, Clarks changed gears and designed a building that can handle multichannel distribution from a shared inventory pool. Today, this includes distribution to more than 300 Clarks-branded stores, a wholesale channel, and e-commerce orders.
Another benefit of starting over was that it gave the company the opportunity to "reverse engineer" the design process. That is, it allowed the Clarks team to determine what technologies would best support the flow of goods and then design a facility around them. After evaluating a number of material handling solutions, the Clarks managers decided to go with automated systems from Knapp.
FEET FEAT
The facility, which went live in May 2014, serves all of North and South America. It boasts Knapp's OSR Shuttle goods-to-person picking system and a large automated storage and retrieval system (AS/RS) that stores more than half a million cases of shoes. Knapp handled the design and integration, supplied the conveyors and sortation systems, and installed the warehouse management system (WMS) that directs all of the activities. The three-shift operation has the capacity to distribute more than 25 million pairs of shoes annually.
The project was not without its challenges, however. For one thing, the available land was limited, so Clarks decided to build upward instead of outward, making extensive use of automated equipment. For another, because the DC was built close to town, building codes restricted the facility's height. Although a variance was granted to build to a height of 70 feet above ground level, space would still be tight. So to fit in the AS/RS, a four-level facility was constructed with the bottom level underground when viewed from the front entrance.
The new building has a relatively modest footprint of about 450,000 square feet, with some additional footage to expand when needed. The automated systems use the full height of the facility, while picking is performed on mezzanine levels, which have additional mezzanines located above them to accommodate future growth.
"We wanted to make sure we had the capacity to meet our future business needs," says Paul Clark, Clarks' group performance and optimization leader. "We can grow that capacity in places by adding more picking stations and other work areas. So it gives us some flexibility."
The automated systems occupy most of the facility. Approximately two-thirds of the building consists of racking, including racks for automated storage. The DC also contains conventional racks, which are used to hold some packed products and which are serviced by Raymond forklifts.
SHOE ARRIVALS
Today, products flow through the automated facility with choreographed precision. Processing begins at the facility's four receiving docks, where ocean containers filled with goods are unloaded. Most of the merchandise arrives floor-stacked in the containers, which enter the country through the ports of Baltimore, New York, and Philadelphia. Two Caljan telescopic conveyors from Rite-Hite extend into the containers to aid in the unloading process, with each conveyor able to move between two of the four doors.
Incoming cases are first weighed and measured. About 3 percent are then conveyed to a vendor compliance area, where these receipts are further inspected for quality. Some repack may also be done in this area if vendor cartons don't meet the minimum standards for automated processing.
Label applicators next place a bar code "license plate" onto each received carton, including those that have passed through the compliance area. The cartons are then scanned using fixed scanners from industrial sensor manufacturer Sick and conveyed to a large carton-level AS/RS. The system has 14 aisles and 30 levels of racking. TGW storage and retrieval cranes operate in the aisles, which are 600 feet long. The cranes are equipped to carry two cartons at a time to 511,000 locations, where they are stored double deep.
To build goodwill with the Hanover community, Clarks provides tours to local school groups and even allowed students to name the storage and retrieval machines. For instance, one machine is named BOB, short for "bring our boxes." The students also drew pictures of their namesakes that are displayed on the fencing at the ends of the aisles.
RUNNING SHOES
As orders arrive, the warehouse management system directs the AS/RS to retrieve needed items. These are conveyed to the large active OSR Shuttle system for fulfillment.
"The OSR is the bread and butter of our operation," says Smith. "Knapp uses algorithms to put the inventory in the right place, and then we rely on the solution to do the work."
The OSR Shuttle features 10 aisles and multiple levels of storage positions. Robotic shuttles glide on rails on each level to service the positions. The OSR is actually two systems in one, with each functioning separately. OSR1 is used to feed order picking stations, while OSR2 holds packed goods until they are ready for shipping.
The company experiences two peak seasons—December/January and July/August. In an effort to balance work load during these peaks, orders like those for the wholesale channel are filled in advance and placed into OSR2, where they're held for shipment. "This allows us to get ahead from an order fulfillment perspective," says Paul Clark. "We can smooth out the workflow, and it [frees up] capacity for when we need to make a big push."
The OSR system has 235 total shuttles, with about four shuttles operating on most levels within each aisle. Upon arrival from the AS/RS, products are diverted to an aisle, raised vertically by lifts to the assigned level, and then transferred onto the shuttles for horizontal transport to the storage positions. When an order is prepped for assembly, the shuttles retrieve the items for delivery to 10 goods-to-person processing stations. Five stations are located on the ground floor, with the other five on a mezzanine level above. Each of the 10 aisles is dedicated to one of the picking stations to shorten delivery time, but the system is designed to deliver products from any aisle to any station.
Only one order is processed at a time at a station, and only one stock-keeping unit (SKU) of source product is presented. This makes it virtually impossible to pick the wrong product.
The picking process begins with an order carton that's been automatically erected. The cartons come in a variety of sizes, with most holding either six or 12 shoeboxes. There are also cartons designed for one, two, or three pairs, which are useful for e-commerce orders. The order carton is given a bar-code label, which is scanned to marry that carton to the order.
The first SKU needed for the order is then delivered to the station. A display shows how many pairs of that SKU to pick from the source carton, which holds the shoes in individual shoeboxes. The worker selects a shoebox and scans it with a Datalogic scanner to confirm the pick before placing the box into an order carton. If additional pairs of that SKU are needed for the order, the worker will repeat the process as often as necessary.
The source carton is then returned to the OSR, and the system presents the next carton containing items for the order. This continues until either the order carton is full, in which case another order carton is presented, or the order is complete. The average order line consists of 1.3 items.
The order cartons next head to packing. The packing area contains 28 stations, about eight of which are used for value-added services like special labeling, although the design provides for any station to be used for these services if needed. Smaller cartons are packed manually—workers add air-cushion dunnage from FP International, close the cartons, and apply shipping labels before placing them on takeaway conveyors.
Larger cartons, such as the six- and 12-pair cartons, are sent through two automated closing machines. The machines measure the contents of the cartons, cut their tops down to just above the topmost shoebox, apply a lid, and seal it onto the top of the carton. Right-sizing the shipment provides for better cubing of trailers and saves on freight costs. A shipping label is automatically printed and applied using equipment from Weber Packaging Solutions. The weight and volume of each carton are also captured using Mettler Toledo systems.
Cartons that are not yet ready to ship are conveyed either to OSR2 for temporary holding or to the conventional rack areas. Cartons that are ready for loading onto a truck are conveyed to an inline sorter with roller diverts that send cartons to 13 dispatch lanes based on carrier and route.
ROOM TO GROW
As for how the new DC is working out, the Clarks managers say they are pleased with the results. Among other benefits, the dense storage provided by the automated systems has enabled the company to shoehorn more product into what is a relatively small footprint. The new facility also allows for higher throughput with less labor and fewer touches than were required in the old building. On top of that, the setup gives Clarks room to grow along with the ability to flex with changing markets.
"The world is changing around us, so we have to react to that," notes Paul Clark. "We'll continue to work with Knapp to stretch the capabilities of our systems even further."
A version of this article appears in our December 2017 print edition under the title "There's no business like shoe business."
Most of the apparel sold in North America is manufactured in Asia, meaning the finished goods travel long distances to reach end markets, with all the associated greenhouse gas emissions. On top of that, apparel manufacturing itself requires a significant amount of energy, water, and raw materials like cotton. Overall, the production of apparel is responsible for about 2% of the world’s total greenhouse gas emissions, according to a report titled
Taking Stock of Progress Against the Roadmap to Net Zeroby the Apparel Impact Institute. Founded in 2017, the Apparel Impact Institute is an organization dedicated to identifying, funding, and then scaling solutions aimed at reducing the carbon emissions and other environmental impacts of the apparel and textile industries.
The author of this annual study is researcher and consultant Michael Sadowski. He wrote the first report in 2021 as well as the latest edition, which was released earlier this year. Sadowski, who is also executive director of the environmental nonprofit
The Circulate Initiative, recently joined DC Velocity Group Editorial Director David Maloney on an episode of the “Logistics Matters” podcast to discuss the key findings of the research, what companies are doing to reduce emissions, and the progress they’ve made since the first report was issued.
A: While companies in the apparel industry can set their own sustainability targets, we realized there was a need to give them a blueprint for actually reducing emissions. And so, we produced the first report back in 2021, where we laid out the emissions from the sector, based on the best estimates [we could make using] data from various sources. It gives companies and the sector a blueprint for what we collectively need to do to drive toward the ambitious reduction [target] of staying within a 1.5 degrees Celsius pathway. That was the first report, and then we committed to refresh the analysis on an annual basis. The second report was published last year, and the third report came out in May of this year.
Q: What were some of the key findings of your research?
A: We found that about half of the emissions in the sector come from Tier Two, which is essentially textile production. That includes the knitting, weaving, dyeing, and finishing of fabric, which together account for over half of the total emissions. That was a really important finding, and it allows us to focus our attention on the interventions that can drive those emissions down.
Raw material production accounts for another quarter of emissions. That includes cotton farming, extracting gas and oil from the ground to make synthetics, and things like that. So we now have a really keen understanding of the source of our industry’s emissions.
Q: Your report mentions that the apparel industry is responsible for about 2% of global emissions. Is that an accurate statistic?
A: That’s our best estimate of the total emissions [generated by] the apparel sector. Some other reports on the industry have apparel at up to 8% of global emissions. And there is a commonly misquoted number in the media that it’s 10%. From my perspective, I think the best estimate is somewhere under 2%.
We know that globally, humankind needs to reduce emissions by roughly half by 2030 and reach net zero by 2050 to hit international goals. [Reaching that target will require the involvement of] every facet of the global economy and every aspect of the apparel sector—transportation, material production, manufacturing, cotton farming. Through our work and that of others, I think the apparel sector understands what has to happen. We have highlighted examples of how companies are taking action to reduce emissions in the roadmap reports.
Q: What are some of those actions the industry can take to reduce emissions?
A: I think one of the positive developments since we wrote the first report is that we’re seeing companies really focus on the most impactful areas. We see companies diving deep on thermal energy, for example. With respect to Tier Two, we [focus] a lot of attention on things like ocean freight versus air. There’s a rule of thumb I’ve heard that indicates air freight is about 10 times the cost [of ocean] and also produces 10 times more greenhouse gas emissions.
There is money available to invest in sustainability efforts. It’s really exciting to see the funding that’s coming through for AI [artificial intelligence] and to see that individual companies, such as H&M and Lululemon, are investing in real solutions in their supply chains. I think a lot of concrete actions are being taken.
And yet we know that reducing emissions by half on an absolute basis by 2030 is a monumental undertaking. So I don’t want to be overly optimistic, because I think we have a lot of work to do. But I do think we’ve got some amazing progress happening.
Q: You mentioned several companies that are starting to address their emissions. Is that a result of their being more aware of the emissions they generate? Have you seen progress made since the first report came out in 2021?
A: Yes. When we published the first roadmap back in 2021, our statistics showed that only about 12 companies had met the criteria [for setting] science-based targets. In 2024, the number of apparel, textile, and footwear companies that have set targets or have commitments to set targets is close to 500. It’s an enormous increase. I think they see the urgency more than other sectors do.
We have companies that have been working at sustainability for quite a long time. I think the apparel sector has developed a keen understanding of the impacts of climate change. You can see the impacts of flooding, drought, heat, and other things happening in places like Bangladesh and Pakistan and India. If you’re a brand or a manufacturer and you have operations and supply chains in these places, I think you understand what the future will look like if we don’t significantly reduce emissions.
Q: There are different categories of emission levels, depending on the role within the supply chain. Scope 1 are “direct” emissions under the reporting company’s control. For apparel, this might be the production of raw materials or the manufacturing of the finished product. Scope 2 covers “indirect” emissions from purchased energy, such as electricity used in these processes. Scope 3 emissions are harder to track, as they include emissions from supply chain partners both upstream and downstream.
Now companies are finding there are legislative efforts around the world that could soon require them to track and report on all these emissions, including emissions produced by their partners’ supply chains. Does this mean that companies now need to be more aware of not only what greenhouse gas emissions they produce, but also what their partners produce?
A: That’s right. Just to put this into context, if you’re a brand like an Adidas or a Gap, you still have to consider the Scope 3 emissions. In particular, there are the so-called “purchased goods and services,” which refers to all of the embedded emissions in your products, from farming cotton to knitting yarn to making fabric. Those “purchased goods and services” generally account for well above 80% of the total emissions associated with a product. It’s by far the most significant portion of your emissions.
Leading companies have begun measuring and taking action on Scope 3 emissions because of regulatory developments in Europe and, to some extent now, in California. I do think this is just a further tailwind for the work that the industry is doing.
I also think it will definitely ratchet up the quality requirements of Scope 3 data, which is not yet where we’d all like it to be. Companies are working to improve that data, but I think the regulatory push will make the quality side increasingly important.
Q: Overall, do you think the work being done by the Apparel Impact Institute will help reduce greenhouse gas emissions within the industry?
A: When we started this back in 2020, we were at a place where companies were setting targets and knew their intended destination, but what they needed was a blueprint for how to get there. And so, the roadmap [provided] this blueprint and identified six key things that the sector needed to do—from using more sustainable materials to deploying renewable electricity in the supply chain.
Decarbonizing any sector, whether it’s transportation, chemicals, or automotive, requires investment. The Apparel Impact Institute is bringing collective investment, which is so critical. I’m really optimistic about what they’re doing. They have taken a data-driven, evidence-based approach, so they know where the emissions are and they know what the needed interventions are. And they’ve got the industry behind them in doing that.
Chief supply chain officers (CSCOs) must proactively embrace a geopolitically elastic supply chain strategy to support their organizations’ growth objectives, according to a report from analyst group Gartner Inc.
An elastic supply chain capability, which can expand or contract supply in response to geopolitical risks, provides supply chain organizations with greater flexibility and efficacy than operating from a single geopolitical bloc, the report said.
"The natural response to recent geopolitical tensions has been to operate within ‘trust boundaries,’ which are geographical areas deemed comfortable for business operations,” Pierfrancesco Manenti, VP analyst in Gartner’s Supply Chain practice, said in a release.
“However, there is a risk that these strategies are taken too far, as maintaining access to global markets and their growth opportunities cannot be fulfilled by operating within just one geopolitical bloc. Instead, CSCOs should embrace a more flexible approach that reflects the fluid nature of geopolitical risks and positions the supply chain for new opportunities to support growth,” Manenti said.
Accordingly, Gartner recommends that CSCOs consider a strategy that is flexible enough to pursue growth amid current and future geopolitical challenges, rather than attempting to permanently shield their supply chains from these risks.
To reach that goal, Gartner outlined three key categories of action that define an elastic supply chain capability: understand trust boundaries and define operational limits; assess the elastic supply chain opportunity; and use targeted, market-specific scenario planning.
The global air cargo market’s hot summer of double-digit demand growth continued in August with average spot rates showing their largest year-on-year jump with a 24% increase, according to the latest weekly analysis by Xeneta.
Xeneta cited two reasons to explain the increase. First, Global average air cargo spot rates reached $2.68 per kg in August due to continuing supply and demand imbalance. That came as August's global cargo supply grew at its slowest ratio in 2024 to-date at 2% year-on-year, while global cargo demand continued its double-digit growth, rising +11%.
The second reason for higher rates was an ocean-to-air shift in freight volumes due to Red Sea disruptions and e-commerce demand.
Those factors could soon be amplified as e-commerce shows continued strong growth approaching the hotly anticipated winter peak season. E-commerce and low-value goods exports from China in the first seven months of 2024 increased 30% year-on-year, including shipments to Europe and the US rising 38% and 30% growth respectively, Xeneta said.
“Typically, air cargo market performance in August tends to follow the July trend. But another month of double-digit demand growth and the strongest rate growths of the year means there was definitely no summer slack season in 2024,” Niall van de Wouw, Xeneta’s chief airfreight officer, said in a release.
“Rates we saw bottoming out in late July started picking up again in mid-August. This is too short a period to call a season. This has been a busy summer, and now we’re at the threshold of Q4, it will be interesting to see what will happen and if all the anticipation of a red-hot peak season materializes,” van de Wouw said.
The report cites data showing that there are approximately 1.7 million workers missing from the post-pandemic workforce and that 38% of small firms are unable to fill open positions. At the same time, the “skills gap” in the workforce is accelerating as automation and AI create significant shifts in how work is performed.
That information comes from the “2024 Labor Day Report” released by Littler’s Workplace Policy Institute (WPI), the firm’s government relations and public policy arm.
“We continue to see a labor shortage and an urgent need to upskill the current workforce to adapt to the new world of work,” said Michael Lotito, Littler shareholder and co-chair of WPI. “As corporate executives and business leaders look to the future, they are focused on realizing the many benefits of AI to streamline operations and guide strategic decision-making, while cultivating a talent pipeline that can support this growth.”
But while the need is clear, solutions may be complicated by public policy changes such as the upcoming U.S. general election and the proliferation of employment-related legislation at the state and local levels amid Congressional gridlock.
“We are heading into a contentious election that has already proven to be unpredictable and is poised to create even more uncertainty for employers, no matter the outcome,” Shannon Meade, WPI’s executive director, said in a release. “At the same time, the growing patchwork of state and local requirements across the U.S. is exacerbating compliance challenges for companies. That, coupled with looming changes following several Supreme Court decisions that have the potential to upend rulemaking, gives C-suite executives much to contend with in planning their workforce-related strategies.”
Stax Engineering, the venture-backed startup that provides smokestack emissions reduction services for maritime ships, will service all vessels from Toyota Motor North America Inc. visiting the Toyota Berth at the Port of Long Beach, according to a new five-year deal announced today.
Beginning in 2025 to coincide with new California Air Resources Board (CARB) standards, STAX will become the first and only emissions control provider to service roll-on/roll-off (ro-ros) vessels in the state of California, the company said.
Stax has rapidly grown since its launch in the first quarter of this year, supported in part by a $40 million funding round from investors, announced in July. It now holds exclusive service agreements at California ports including Los Angeles, Long Beach, Hueneme, Benicia, Richmond, and Oakland. The firm has also partnered with individual companies like NYK Line, Hyundai GLOVIS, Equilon Enterprises LLC d/b/a Shell Oil Products US (Shell), and now Toyota.
Stax says it offers an alternative to shore power with land- and barge-based, mobile emissions capture and control technology for shipping terminal and fleet operators without the need for retrofits.
In the case of this latest deal, the Toyota Long Beach Vehicle Distribution Center imports about 200,000 vehicles each year on ro-ro vessels. Stax will keep those ships green with its flexible exhaust capture system, which attaches to all vessel classes without modification to remove 99% of emitted particulate matter (PM) and 95% of emitted oxides of nitrogen (NOx). Over the lifetime of this new agreement with Toyota, Stax estimated the service will account for approximately 3,700 hours and more than 47 tons of emissions controlled.
“We set out to provide an emissions capture and control solution that was reliable, easily accessible, and cost-effective. As we begin to service Toyota, we’re confident that we can meet the needs of the full breadth of the maritime industry, furthering our impact on the local air quality, public health, and environment,” Mike Walker, CEO of Stax, said in a release. “Continuing to establish strong partnerships will help build momentum for and trust in our technology as we expand beyond the state of California.”