Skip to content
Search AI Powered

Latest Stories

strategic insight

Rinse, return, and redeploy

With the right strategy and IT tools to support it, retailers and manufacturers can mitigate the economic hit of product returns.

Rinse, return, and redeploy

It may be hard to fathom, but merchandise returns were once orderly processes. A consumer returned a product to the store where it was purchased. The merchant had straightforward guidelines for accepting returns, and the merchandise had to be returned in good, if not pristine, condition. By the way, there was no "e" before "commerce."

Today's returns are anything but straight-line events, due to the digital tsunami that has created what could be called a reverse omnichannel effect. Returns can come from anywhere, at any time, and be received at multiple locations. The convenience of shopping from mobile devices means the length of the returns pipeline is greater than ever before. Retailers with online footprints (which is everyone) and e-tailers tolerate, if not encourage, orders of multiple items in the hopes a buyer will order four and perhaps return two instead of three; that practice effectively stuffs the returns channels. Because merchants are loath to set stringent returns policies for fear of being skewered on social media, scruffy stuff that in the past would be ineligible for refunds or credits is instead accepted. The rise of a phenomenon known as "fast fashion," where new designs replace old at the blink of an eye, means that there are now 12 design seasons a year instead of the traditional four, and has dramatically increased returns turnover.


In the high-tech and electronics segments, tougher environmental regulations make it harder for companies to toss out a product with little residual value. For instance, a liquid crystal display (LCD) module can account for up to 75 percent of the greenhouse gas and carbon emissions of an entire device, according to Li Tong Group, a Hong Kong-based reverse logistics specialist that manages the reverse supply chains for dozens of original equipment manufacturers (OEMs).

SQUEEZE THOSE LEMONS!

These obstacles have not stopped revenue-hungry companies from trying to make lemonade out of lemons, however. The practice of repositioning returned merchandise for a new forward move has gained momentum as manufacturers, retailers, and their reverse logistics practitioners look to monetize returned goods that might otherwise be drastically marked down or simply thrown away. While the redeployment process wouldn't be considered a profit center, it could play a key role in mitigating sizable losses bound to incur from using the traditional disposal methods.

As a result, a tactic that had been executed sporadically and opportunistically has become strategic in nature, said David Vehec, business development specialist-retail at Pittsburgh-based Genco Supply Chain Solutions, a privately held reverse logistics specialist acquired earlier this year by FedEx Corp. "The use of redeployment strategies has grown exponentially in the last two years," said Vehec, without providing data to quantify the growth.

The more sophisticated organizations, perhaps unsurprisingly, have led the charge up to now. Yet virtually all companies can benefit from the availability of digital tools that experts said would provide the needed visibility to identify and ultimately reposition the goods that could fetch the most money in the secondary market. For example, order management systems commonplace across the supply chain contain "distributed order management" (DOM) modules that determine when a return—"eaches," "onesies," or "twosies" that, in aggregate, account for most of the e-commerce avalanche—should stay within a retailer's network for resale, or if the resale's value is so low as to not justify the costs of shipping, according to Victoria Brown, senior research analyst at consultancy IDC Retail Insights. "The DOM does the thinking for you," Brown said. However, many retailers have yet to leverage the module, she said.

HIGH-TECH CHALLENGES

In the high-tech world, the dynamics for returns redeployment are somewhat different. Today's high-value product can become low-value three to six months out, as more powerful technologies quickly push out the old standbys. Linda Li, Li Tong's chief strategy officer, said the company uses sophisticated algorithms to determine what aging inventory could fetch in the appropriate aftermarket and whether the return is best suited for refurbishing to close to its original form, or if its components should be harvested for incorporation into another product before it is shipped back out. Parts harvesting and remanufacturing account for about 70 percent of Li Tong's business, while refurbishment and repairs of damaged products account for the balance, according to the company. A component that Li Tong harvests from, say, a laptop, could end up being used in an air traffic control system, she said. The company handles the manufacturing and fulfillment from 21 global warehouses and factories, doing everything save for the transportation.

Li Tong primarily focuses on the information and physical security of redeployed returns, said Li. Data from the returned device must be purged "at the first point of contact" to ensure that personal information doesn't remain if the product is returned to the aftermarket in near-original condition, she said. Physical security is also critical, especially when it comes to shipping components like lithium-ion batteries, which are embedded in millions of computers, mobile devices, and even cars; concern about bulk shipments of batteries overheating in the cargo hold of a passenger aircraft has led the Federal Aviation Administration to push for a global ban on shipments moving in the planes' bellies. Loose batteries must be properly packaged and are subject to stringent controls, and Li Tong ensures that employees are properly trained in handling procedures before the goods leave its hands, Li said.

The volume and complexity of returns will only intensify as e-commerce becomes a more dominant force in all supply chains. Companies that make stuff that could be returned may have to think further outside the box than they ever have before. This could lead to the enlistment of customers in the effort. For example, there's talk of companies' providing discount vouchers to consumers if they return products to central receiving points rather than through other channels.

Then there's high-end clothier Lilly Pulitzer, whose stores annually store returns of merchandise that is damaged, returned after the season, or not carried at that location in the first place, and ship them en masse to the company's headquarters and main distribution center in King of Prussia, Pa. There, every June, the goods go on sale at a huge mall adjacent to the DC at fire-sale prices. Shoppers come from as far away as Canada to buy quality merchandise and, at the same time, help Lilly clear out its inventory. That, it seems, would be a popular way to reposition returns.

The Latest

More Stories

forklift carrying goods through a warehouse

RJW Logistics gains private equity backing

RJW Logistics Group, a logistics solutions provider (LSP) for consumer packaged goods (CPG) brands, has received a “strategic investment” from Boston-based private equity firm Berkshire partners, and now plans to drive future innovations and expand its geographic reach, the Woodridge, Illinois-based company said Tuesday.

Terms of the deal were not disclosed, but the company said that CEO Kevin Williamson and other members of RJW management will continue to be “significant investors” in the company, while private equity firm Mason Wells, which invested in RJW in 2019, will maintain a minority investment position.

Keep ReadingShow less

Featured

iceberg drawing to illustrate supply chain threats

GEP: six factors could change calm to storm in 2025

The current year is ending on a calm note for the logistics sector, but 2025 is on pace to be an era of rapid transformation, due to six driving forces that will shape procurement and supply chains in coming months, according to a forecast from New Jersey-based supply chain software provider GEP.

"After several years of mitigating inflation, disruption, supply shocks, conflicts, and uncertainty, we are currently in a relative period of calm," John Paitek, vice president, GEP, said in a release. "But it is very much the calm before the coming storm. This report provides procurement and supply chain leaders with a prescriptive guide to weathering the gale force headwinds of protectionism, tariffs, trade wars, regulatory pressures, uncertainty, and the AI revolution that we will face in 2025."

Keep ReadingShow less
supply chain workers counting boxes in warehouse

US Bank tracks top three supply chain impacts for 2025

Freight transportation sector analysts with US Bank say they expect change on the horizon in that market for 2025, due to possible tariffs imposed by a new White House administration, the return of East and Gulf coast port strikes, and expanding freight fraud.

“All three of these merit scrutiny, and that is our promise as we roll into the new year,” the company said in a statement today.

Keep ReadingShow less
chart of business concerns from descartes

Descartes: businesses say top concern is tariff hikes

Business leaders at companies of every size say that rising tariffs and trade barriers are the most significant global trade challenge facing logistics and supply chain leaders today, according to a survey from supply chain software provider Descartes.

Specifically, 48% of respondents identified rising tariffs and trade barriers as their top concern, followed by supply chain disruptions at 45% and geopolitical instability at 41%. Moreover, tariffs and trade barriers ranked as the priority issue regardless of company size, as respondents at companies with less than 250 employees, 251-500, 501-1,000, 1,001-50,000 and 50,000+ employees all cited it as the most significant issue they are currently facing.

Keep ReadingShow less
chart of shipping business conditions

Shippers Conditions index reached high-point in September

A measure of business conditions for shippers improved in September due to lower fuel costs, looser trucking capacity, and lower freight rates, but the freight transportation forecasting firm FTR still expects readings to be weaker and closer to neutral through its two-year forecast period.

Bloomington, Indiana-based FTR is maintaining its stance that trucking conditions will improve, even though its Shippers Conditions Index (SCI) improved in September to 4.6 from a 2.9 reading in August, reaching its strongest level of the year.

Keep ReadingShow less