Skip to content
Search AI Powered

Latest Stories

fastlane

Shaky platforms

The good news: Both the Republican and Democratic party platforms address the subject of infrastructure. The bad news: Neither seems to grasp the importance of a seamless, well-functioning national transportation system.

By the time this column appears in print, the country will have chosen its next president. Leading up to this, we've heard a tremendous amount of rhetoric from each major candidate about the Mideast, the economy, oil, jobs, and other issues that are critical to the country's future. But we've heard little, if anything, about their plans to address the nation's deteriorating transportation infrastructure.

It is difficult to imagine that anyone in this country wouldn't be concerned about the issue. Our river dams and locks are old and crumbling; our highways in many cases are inadequate or in a state of disrepair; and the railroads need more infrastructure to meet the demands of the next several years. This country has no truly high-speed rail system. The system that controls our aircraft in flight is 50 years old, but we are more concerned about seats coming loose on airplanes.


Fixing the problems won't be cheap. The Congressional Budget Office has estimated that we need to spend an additional $20 billion annually just to maintain the current, inadequate system. That sounds like a staggering sum until you consider the alternative. The American Society of Civil Engineers has estimated that failing to invest in the country's bridges and roads will cost us $3.1 trillion in lost GDP growth by 2020.

The effects are already being felt in our industry. For evidence of that, you need look no further than the recently released **ital{2013 Third-Party Logistics Study} conducted by C. John Langley. When asked to identify the most common sources of supply chain disruption, the third-party logistics service providers who participated in the study put infrastructure at the top of the list. Yet the government seems to view infrastructure improvement as simply a vehicle to provide jobs.

In an effort to get some clarity on the subject, the National Industrial Transportation League sent excellent letters to President Obama and Mitt Romney asking them to outline their plans for shoring up the nation's transportation infrastructure, but to my knowledge, no response has been forthcoming. I thought I might get a clue by reading the Republican and Democratic platforms and see what each had to say about infrastructure. (I am not taking a political position—just calling it as I see it.)

First of all, both platforms address the subject, although the Democrats had less to say about it than the Republicans. They both support infrastructure improvement; and interestingly enough, both take credit for the recent highway funding bill. Considering the content of the bill as it was finally enacted, however, I'm not sure I would be taking credit for it.

Neither party seems to have a firm plan for funding the improvements. The Republicans accused the Democrats of spending stimulus funds on cosmetic, "shovel ready" projects rather than on real structural improvements. The Democratic platform suggests that a portion of the money we have spent on wars will be diverted to infrastructure, and reforms will be initiated that will "better leverage government dollars." The Republicans stated we will have to make some difficult choices in spending. They got that right anyway.

What no one seems to grasp is the importance of a seamless, well-functioning national transportation infrastructure. Abraham Lincoln understood it when he encouraged the building of the first transcontinental railroad. Dwight Eisenhower got it when he envisioned the interstate highway system. But given Congress's apparent inability to make sense out of this issue, whoever our new president is, I'm a little pessimistic about this problem being resolved any time soon. I simply don't think either party has a good handle on the issue. But hey, as the Cheshire Cat told Alice (in Wonderland), if you don't know where you want to go, it doesn't matter which road you take.

The Latest

More Stories

Image of earth made of sculpted paper, surrounded by trees and green

Creating a sustainability roadmap for the apparel industry: interview with Michael Sadowski

Michael Sadowski
Michael Sadowski

Most of the apparel sold in North America is manufactured in Asia, meaning the finished goods travel long distances to reach end markets, with all the associated greenhouse gas emissions. On top of that, apparel manufacturing itself requires a significant amount of energy, water, and raw materials like cotton. Overall, the production of apparel is responsible for about 2% of the world’s total greenhouse gas emissions, according to a report titled

Taking Stock of Progress Against the Roadmap to Net Zeroby the Apparel Impact Institute. Founded in 2017, the Apparel Impact Institute is an organization dedicated to identifying, funding, and then scaling solutions aimed at reducing the carbon emissions and other environmental impacts of the apparel and textile industries.

Keep ReadingShow less

Featured

xeneta air-freight.jpeg

Air cargo carriers enjoy 24% rise in average spot rates

The global air cargo market’s hot summer of double-digit demand growth continued in August with average spot rates showing their largest year-on-year jump with a 24% increase, according to the latest weekly analysis by Xeneta.

Xeneta cited two reasons to explain the increase. First, Global average air cargo spot rates reached $2.68 per kg in August due to continuing supply and demand imbalance. That came as August's global cargo supply grew at its slowest ratio in 2024 to-date at 2% year-on-year, while global cargo demand continued its double-digit growth, rising +11%.

Keep ReadingShow less
littler Screenshot 2024-09-04 at 2.59.02 PM.png

Congressional gridlock and election outcomes complicate search for labor

Worker shortages remain a persistent challenge for U.S. employers, even as labor force participation for prime-age workers continues to increase, according to an industry report from labor law firm Littler Mendelson P.C.

The report cites data showing that there are approximately 1.7 million workers missing from the post-pandemic workforce and that 38% of small firms are unable to fill open positions. At the same time, the “skills gap” in the workforce is accelerating as automation and AI create significant shifts in how work is performed.

Keep ReadingShow less
stax PR_13August2024-NEW.jpg

Toyota picks vendor to control smokestack emissions from its ro-ro ships

Stax Engineering, the venture-backed startup that provides smokestack emissions reduction services for maritime ships, will service all vessels from Toyota Motor North America Inc. visiting the Toyota Berth at the Port of Long Beach, according to a new five-year deal announced today.

Beginning in 2025 to coincide with new California Air Resources Board (CARB) standards, STAX will become the first and only emissions control provider to service roll-on/roll-off (ro-ros) vessels in the state of California, the company said.

Keep ReadingShow less
trucker premium_photo-1670650045209-54756fb80f7f.jpeg

ATA survey: Truckload drivers earn median salary of $76,420

Truckload drivers in the U.S. earned a median annual amount of $76,420 in 2023, posting an increase of 10% over the last survey, done two years ago, according to an industry survey from the fleet owners’ trade group American Trucking Associations (ATA).

That result showed that driver wages across the industry continue to increase post-pandemic, despite a challenging freight market for motor carriers. The data comes from ATA’s “Driver Compensation Study,” which asked 120 fleets, more than 150,000 employee drivers, and 14,000 independent contractors about their wage and benefit information.

Keep ReadingShow less