Keeping track of all the moving parts: interview with D.G. Macpherson
With a catalog of over 1 million products, W.W. Grainger aims to clean up in the facility maintenance market. It's D.G. Macpherson's job to keep the orders flowing smoothly.
Mitch Mac Donald has more than 30 years of experience in both the newspaper and magazine businesses. He has covered the logistics and supply chain fields since 1988. Twice named one of the Top 10 Business Journalists in the U.S., he has served in a multitude of editorial and publishing roles. The leading force behind the launch of Supply Chain Management Review, he was that brand's founding publisher and editorial director from 1997 to 2000. Additionally, he has served as news editor, chief editor, publisher and editorial director of Logistics Management, as well as publisher of Modern Materials Handling. Mitch is also the president and CEO of Agile Business Media, LLC, the parent company of DC VELOCITY and CSCMP's Supply Chain Quarterly.
A supply chain that moves over 1,000,000 items around the globe each year and supports worldwide sales of $7 billion annually demands organization, innovation, and a leader with the right background, skill set, and management style. For W.W. Grainger Inc., that person is D.G. Macpherson.
Macpherson, who joined Grainger in February 2008, heads up the company's global supply chain operations as senior vice president of the division. He is responsible for operations, including the performance of Grainger's distribution centers as well as its product offerings and availability. He also provides global planning, coordination, and specialized expertise to the supply chain organizations in all of Grainger's business units.
Macpherson came to Grainger from the Boston Consulting Group (BCG), where he was partner and managing director for six years. In that capacity, he served as a strategic consultant at Grainger and led BCG's relationship with Grainger. His guidance helped Grainger shape and execute many supply chain initiatives that have been foundational to the distributor's growth, including product availability improvements and product line expansion. Earlier in his career, he was an operations manager for Rain Bird Sprinkler Manufacturing Co. and a test engineer with the U.S. Air Force.
Macpherson holds a bachelor's degree from Stanford University and an M.B.A. from Northwestern University's Kellogg Graduate School of Management. He spoke recently with DC Velocity Group Editorial Director Mitch Mac Donald about his career path and his team's commitment to supply chain excellence.
Q: Tell us about Grainger and its mission. A: Grainger is an industrial distribution business that has been around since the 1920s, and we have a Canadian operation that's even older than that. Grainger today is focused on making sure we provide customers with a very broad range of products to help them keep their facilities and operations up and running. Our reputation is based on providing terrific, very high-level service to our customers.
Q: What do you see as your mission as senior vice president of global supply chain operations? A: We are a very large U.S. business that last year generated roughly $7 billion in sales. We've been around for a long time and we have international businesses, our Canadian business being by far the biggest of these. I am responsible for the global supply chain, which really supports all of those. My role is making sure that we have, to simplify things a bit, the right products in the right place at the right time for all of our businesses throughout the world. I spend a lot of time thinking about product management, inventory management, transportation, operations, global sourcing, and our relationships with suppliers.
The best way to describe the nature of our operations is that we have literally thousands of suppliers that we work with and that are very important to our efforts to make sure we provide great service to our customers. They provide us with hundreds of thousands of products, which we distribute to our customers through multiple channels. In the United States, in Canada, in most of our businesses, customers can walk into a local branch to get their product or they can use one of our catalogs or our website.
In the United States, for example, we have about 3,000 suppliers. We have 10 distribution centers, which are fairly large buildings. We carry over 400 brands of products in our DCs. We have over 300,000 transactions a day, so we have a lot of transactions in those buildings. Our objective every time we have a transaction is to get the order perfect. Our business is really based on our team members' understanding that objective.
Q: Given your extensive product line and the varied sales channels, you probably use a pretty broad mix of shipping modes, everything from parcel express to truckload, right? A: Yes, we do. One thing that's interesting about our business is that we do many transactions, but they're typically $250 to $300 at a time, so customers are not ordering huge amounts in most cases. We are generally really working on their immediate needs, and those are typically small orders. For that reason, small parcels account for the biggest share of our shipping transactions, but we do use pretty much every mode of transportation.
Q: You've seen substantial growth with global initiatives. Could you touch a little bit on Grainger's global strategy? A: We have expanded pretty rapidly. International is about 20 percent of our total mix. We have a very clear strategy to leverage our supply chain scale to expand in the Latin America region and in Asia. We have strong business in Mexico. We have strong business in Japan. We have fledgling businesses in China and India. From a supply chain perspective, I'd say we aim to follow the same principles we follow in our U.S. business, which is making sure you provide absolutely flawless service to customers, making sure your key members are wired to ensure absolutely flawless execution.
I think some things are different, though. For example, depending on the competitive side of the market you're in, the product range requirements may vary dramatically. Oftentimes, the product range in smaller countries is much narrower than in, say, Canada or the United States, so we have to think differently. Still, we want to make sure we have a better product offering, in many cases a broader product offering, than any of our competitors. What that equates to can be much narrower margins, so it can be a very different ballgame.
Q: Which of your skills do you believe serve you best as you go about the daily business of managing Grainger's global supply chain? A: There are a couple of things that I think are important. One is making sure that we stay very focused on what delivers value for the customer. The other, I think, is just being comfortable working with multiple levels of our organization, multiple functions, and working and cross collaborating with the commercial side of the business. It is important to be able to go from discussions with sales and marketing and then translate the key points for my team, every level of my team, effectively. I think those are the things that are important—making sure you have a strategic focus that is based on customer value and then working with all levels of the organization to communicate that to all team members successfully.
Q: Put on a futurist's hat for a moment. What do you see as the next big thing in logistics and supply chain management? A: Connectivity to our suppliers and collaboration with our suppliers that allows us to improve that part of our performance. Our suppliers do a great job of providing us with products of very high quality, but I think we can probably do things on the collaboration side with suppliers. For us, it is specific probably because we have got so many. We've got thousands of suppliers and some of them are very small businesses, some are very big businesses. The challenges of achieving transparency, visibility, and collaboration in ways that improve performance—I think that is really the area where we could probably improve the most.
Q: What advice would you give to a young person interested in a career in supply chain management? A: There are two bits of advice I would give them. The first is make sure that you get out and understand customers, that you actually visit customers and develop a visceral understanding of what your customers need. I think you really need to get out there and touch and feel what the customer does.
The other thing is to think carefully about where they go. In some organizations, supply chain and operations are absolutely core to strategy and kind of one and the same. In others, they are not. I think you will get kind of a different level of interaction with core strategy and what the business does depending on where you go. Both can be great, but you need to think about it because it can have an influence on the overall business.
Most of the apparel sold in North America is manufactured in Asia, meaning the finished goods travel long distances to reach end markets, with all the associated greenhouse gas emissions. On top of that, apparel manufacturing itself requires a significant amount of energy, water, and raw materials like cotton. Overall, the production of apparel is responsible for about 2% of the world’s total greenhouse gas emissions, according to a report titled
Taking Stock of Progress Against the Roadmap to Net Zeroby the Apparel Impact Institute. Founded in 2017, the Apparel Impact Institute is an organization dedicated to identifying, funding, and then scaling solutions aimed at reducing the carbon emissions and other environmental impacts of the apparel and textile industries.
The author of this annual study is researcher and consultant Michael Sadowski. He wrote the first report in 2021 as well as the latest edition, which was released earlier this year. Sadowski, who is also executive director of the environmental nonprofit
The Circulate Initiative, recently joined DC Velocity Group Editorial Director David Maloney on an episode of the “Logistics Matters” podcast to discuss the key findings of the research, what companies are doing to reduce emissions, and the progress they’ve made since the first report was issued.
A: While companies in the apparel industry can set their own sustainability targets, we realized there was a need to give them a blueprint for actually reducing emissions. And so, we produced the first report back in 2021, where we laid out the emissions from the sector, based on the best estimates [we could make using] data from various sources. It gives companies and the sector a blueprint for what we collectively need to do to drive toward the ambitious reduction [target] of staying within a 1.5 degrees Celsius pathway. That was the first report, and then we committed to refresh the analysis on an annual basis. The second report was published last year, and the third report came out in May of this year.
Q: What were some of the key findings of your research?
A: We found that about half of the emissions in the sector come from Tier Two, which is essentially textile production. That includes the knitting, weaving, dyeing, and finishing of fabric, which together account for over half of the total emissions. That was a really important finding, and it allows us to focus our attention on the interventions that can drive those emissions down.
Raw material production accounts for another quarter of emissions. That includes cotton farming, extracting gas and oil from the ground to make synthetics, and things like that. So we now have a really keen understanding of the source of our industry’s emissions.
Q: Your report mentions that the apparel industry is responsible for about 2% of global emissions. Is that an accurate statistic?
A: That’s our best estimate of the total emissions [generated by] the apparel sector. Some other reports on the industry have apparel at up to 8% of global emissions. And there is a commonly misquoted number in the media that it’s 10%. From my perspective, I think the best estimate is somewhere under 2%.
We know that globally, humankind needs to reduce emissions by roughly half by 2030 and reach net zero by 2050 to hit international goals. [Reaching that target will require the involvement of] every facet of the global economy and every aspect of the apparel sector—transportation, material production, manufacturing, cotton farming. Through our work and that of others, I think the apparel sector understands what has to happen. We have highlighted examples of how companies are taking action to reduce emissions in the roadmap reports.
Q: What are some of those actions the industry can take to reduce emissions?
A: I think one of the positive developments since we wrote the first report is that we’re seeing companies really focus on the most impactful areas. We see companies diving deep on thermal energy, for example. With respect to Tier Two, we [focus] a lot of attention on things like ocean freight versus air. There’s a rule of thumb I’ve heard that indicates air freight is about 10 times the cost [of ocean] and also produces 10 times more greenhouse gas emissions.
There is money available to invest in sustainability efforts. It’s really exciting to see the funding that’s coming through for AI [artificial intelligence] and to see that individual companies, such as H&M and Lululemon, are investing in real solutions in their supply chains. I think a lot of concrete actions are being taken.
And yet we know that reducing emissions by half on an absolute basis by 2030 is a monumental undertaking. So I don’t want to be overly optimistic, because I think we have a lot of work to do. But I do think we’ve got some amazing progress happening.
Q: You mentioned several companies that are starting to address their emissions. Is that a result of their being more aware of the emissions they generate? Have you seen progress made since the first report came out in 2021?
A: Yes. When we published the first roadmap back in 2021, our statistics showed that only about 12 companies had met the criteria [for setting] science-based targets. In 2024, the number of apparel, textile, and footwear companies that have set targets or have commitments to set targets is close to 500. It’s an enormous increase. I think they see the urgency more than other sectors do.
We have companies that have been working at sustainability for quite a long time. I think the apparel sector has developed a keen understanding of the impacts of climate change. You can see the impacts of flooding, drought, heat, and other things happening in places like Bangladesh and Pakistan and India. If you’re a brand or a manufacturer and you have operations and supply chains in these places, I think you understand what the future will look like if we don’t significantly reduce emissions.
Q: There are different categories of emission levels, depending on the role within the supply chain. Scope 1 are “direct” emissions under the reporting company’s control. For apparel, this might be the production of raw materials or the manufacturing of the finished product. Scope 2 covers “indirect” emissions from purchased energy, such as electricity used in these processes. Scope 3 emissions are harder to track, as they include emissions from supply chain partners both upstream and downstream.
Now companies are finding there are legislative efforts around the world that could soon require them to track and report on all these emissions, including emissions produced by their partners’ supply chains. Does this mean that companies now need to be more aware of not only what greenhouse gas emissions they produce, but also what their partners produce?
A: That’s right. Just to put this into context, if you’re a brand like an Adidas or a Gap, you still have to consider the Scope 3 emissions. In particular, there are the so-called “purchased goods and services,” which refers to all of the embedded emissions in your products, from farming cotton to knitting yarn to making fabric. Those “purchased goods and services” generally account for well above 80% of the total emissions associated with a product. It’s by far the most significant portion of your emissions.
Leading companies have begun measuring and taking action on Scope 3 emissions because of regulatory developments in Europe and, to some extent now, in California. I do think this is just a further tailwind for the work that the industry is doing.
I also think it will definitely ratchet up the quality requirements of Scope 3 data, which is not yet where we’d all like it to be. Companies are working to improve that data, but I think the regulatory push will make the quality side increasingly important.
Q: Overall, do you think the work being done by the Apparel Impact Institute will help reduce greenhouse gas emissions within the industry?
A: When we started this back in 2020, we were at a place where companies were setting targets and knew their intended destination, but what they needed was a blueprint for how to get there. And so, the roadmap [provided] this blueprint and identified six key things that the sector needed to do—from using more sustainable materials to deploying renewable electricity in the supply chain.
Decarbonizing any sector, whether it’s transportation, chemicals, or automotive, requires investment. The Apparel Impact Institute is bringing collective investment, which is so critical. I’m really optimistic about what they’re doing. They have taken a data-driven, evidence-based approach, so they know where the emissions are and they know what the needed interventions are. And they’ve got the industry behind them in doing that.
The global air cargo market’s hot summer of double-digit demand growth continued in August with average spot rates showing their largest year-on-year jump with a 24% increase, according to the latest weekly analysis by Xeneta.
Xeneta cited two reasons to explain the increase. First, Global average air cargo spot rates reached $2.68 per kg in August due to continuing supply and demand imbalance. That came as August's global cargo supply grew at its slowest ratio in 2024 to-date at 2% year-on-year, while global cargo demand continued its double-digit growth, rising +11%.
The second reason for higher rates was an ocean-to-air shift in freight volumes due to Red Sea disruptions and e-commerce demand.
Those factors could soon be amplified as e-commerce shows continued strong growth approaching the hotly anticipated winter peak season. E-commerce and low-value goods exports from China in the first seven months of 2024 increased 30% year-on-year, including shipments to Europe and the US rising 38% and 30% growth respectively, Xeneta said.
“Typically, air cargo market performance in August tends to follow the July trend. But another month of double-digit demand growth and the strongest rate growths of the year means there was definitely no summer slack season in 2024,” Niall van de Wouw, Xeneta’s chief airfreight officer, said in a release.
“Rates we saw bottoming out in late July started picking up again in mid-August. This is too short a period to call a season. This has been a busy summer, and now we’re at the threshold of Q4, it will be interesting to see what will happen and if all the anticipation of a red-hot peak season materializes,” van de Wouw said.
The report cites data showing that there are approximately 1.7 million workers missing from the post-pandemic workforce and that 38% of small firms are unable to fill open positions. At the same time, the “skills gap” in the workforce is accelerating as automation and AI create significant shifts in how work is performed.
That information comes from the “2024 Labor Day Report” released by Littler’s Workplace Policy Institute (WPI), the firm’s government relations and public policy arm.
“We continue to see a labor shortage and an urgent need to upskill the current workforce to adapt to the new world of work,” said Michael Lotito, Littler shareholder and co-chair of WPI. “As corporate executives and business leaders look to the future, they are focused on realizing the many benefits of AI to streamline operations and guide strategic decision-making, while cultivating a talent pipeline that can support this growth.”
But while the need is clear, solutions may be complicated by public policy changes such as the upcoming U.S. general election and the proliferation of employment-related legislation at the state and local levels amid Congressional gridlock.
“We are heading into a contentious election that has already proven to be unpredictable and is poised to create even more uncertainty for employers, no matter the outcome,” Shannon Meade, WPI’s executive director, said in a release. “At the same time, the growing patchwork of state and local requirements across the U.S. is exacerbating compliance challenges for companies. That, coupled with looming changes following several Supreme Court decisions that have the potential to upend rulemaking, gives C-suite executives much to contend with in planning their workforce-related strategies.”
Stax Engineering, the venture-backed startup that provides smokestack emissions reduction services for maritime ships, will service all vessels from Toyota Motor North America Inc. visiting the Toyota Berth at the Port of Long Beach, according to a new five-year deal announced today.
Beginning in 2025 to coincide with new California Air Resources Board (CARB) standards, STAX will become the first and only emissions control provider to service roll-on/roll-off (ro-ros) vessels in the state of California, the company said.
Stax has rapidly grown since its launch in the first quarter of this year, supported in part by a $40 million funding round from investors, announced in July. It now holds exclusive service agreements at California ports including Los Angeles, Long Beach, Hueneme, Benicia, Richmond, and Oakland. The firm has also partnered with individual companies like NYK Line, Hyundai GLOVIS, Equilon Enterprises LLC d/b/a Shell Oil Products US (Shell), and now Toyota.
Stax says it offers an alternative to shore power with land- and barge-based, mobile emissions capture and control technology for shipping terminal and fleet operators without the need for retrofits.
In the case of this latest deal, the Toyota Long Beach Vehicle Distribution Center imports about 200,000 vehicles each year on ro-ro vessels. Stax will keep those ships green with its flexible exhaust capture system, which attaches to all vessel classes without modification to remove 99% of emitted particulate matter (PM) and 95% of emitted oxides of nitrogen (NOx). Over the lifetime of this new agreement with Toyota, Stax estimated the service will account for approximately 3,700 hours and more than 47 tons of emissions controlled.
“We set out to provide an emissions capture and control solution that was reliable, easily accessible, and cost-effective. As we begin to service Toyota, we’re confident that we can meet the needs of the full breadth of the maritime industry, furthering our impact on the local air quality, public health, and environment,” Mike Walker, CEO of Stax, said in a release. “Continuing to establish strong partnerships will help build momentum for and trust in our technology as we expand beyond the state of California.”
That result showed that driver wages across the industry continue to increase post-pandemic, despite a challenging freight market for motor carriers. The data comes from ATA’s “Driver Compensation Study,” which asked 120 fleets, more than 150,000 employee drivers, and 14,000 independent contractors about their wage and benefit information.
Drilling into specific categories, linehaul less-than-truckload (LTL) drivers earned a median annual amount of $94,525 in 2023, while local LTL drivers earned a median of $80,680. The median annual compensation for drivers at private carriers has risen 12% since 2021, reaching $95,114 in 2023. And leased-on independent contractors for truckload carriers were paid an annual median amount of $186,016 in 2023.
The results also showed how the demographics of the industry are changing, as carriers offered smaller referral and fewer sign-on bonuses for new drivers in 2023 compared to 2021 but more frequently offered tenure bonuses to their current drivers and with a greater median value.
"While our last study, conducted in 2021, illustrated how drivers benefitted from the strongest freight environment in a generation, this latest report shows professional drivers' earnings are still rising—even in a weaker freight economy," ATA Chief Economist Bob Costello said in a release. "By offering greater tenure bonuses to their current driver force, many fleets appear to be shifting their workforce priorities from recruitment to retention."