To build a successful performance management program, you have to start from the ground up, basing the program on a sound framework and taking care not to rush the process.
Editor's Note: No two successful performance management programs are the same, but all successful performance management programs share common principles. To shed some light on what separates a good company from a great company with regard to performance management, DC VELOCITY has published a series of columns on the 12 Commandments of Successful Performance Management. This month we wind up the series with the 12th commandment: Be Patient.
The 12th Commandment Be patient: You build a house one nail at a time
A good carpenter will tell you that a house is no stronger than its foundation and frame—and that building a strong foundation and frame takes skill and patience. The same can be said of a successful performance management program. You have to start the building process from the ground up, basing the program on a sound framework and taking care not to rush the process.
But what should that framework look like? The accompanying diagram, which shows the framework for what we call the "House of Performance Management," may help you visualize the underpinnings of a successful performance management program. As the illustration shows, the foundation is a set of metrics that are aligned with the company's strategic goals and objectives. [For more on alignment, see Commandments #1 (Focus: Know your goals), #7 (Integrate: Make sure everybody's working toward the same goals), and #8 (Listen: Find out what your customer wants—not what you think it wants).] The companies that report the greatest success with performance management programs are the ones that track their progress toward what senior management identifies as strategic targets. (Of course, strategies can and do change, so make it a point to review your metrics programs at the start of each business cycle and revise them if necessary.)
Once a company has settled on a strategy and laid the foundation for a performance measurement program, it can focus on the program's major components—the three major pillars, if you will:
Process metrics. To ensure that the company measures strategic outcomes, its metrics must be process oriented, not function oriented. That's because strategic vision focuses on outcomes of the total process irrespective of individual functional contributions to the process. [See Commandment #5 (Beware: Know the point of your metrics and be careful not to get sidetracked).]
Balanced metrics that include both financial and non-financial measurements. Study after study has shown that companies that use a balanced set of financial and non-financial strategic measures outperform their less-disciplined rivals in both performance and management. [See Commandment #2 (Balance: Use a balanced approach to selecting your measures).]
A metrics-oriented culture. You can't motivate employees to improve performance simply by putting well-defined performance measures in place. You must integrate measurement into the corporate culture itself. That means taking the measurements out of the realm of the abstract and translating them into something that's meaningful to the people on the shop floor. It also means measuring performance against goals. And it means using what you learn to drive improvement. [See Commandments #3 (Involve: Engage your employees) and #4 (Apply: Put the metrics data you're collecting to good use).]
The 12 Commandments of
Performance Management
1Focus: Know your goals 2Balance: Use a balanced approach 3Involve: Get employees engaged 4Apply: Be metrics "users," not just "collectors" or "posters" 5Beware: Know the point of your metrics 6Anticipate: Use metrics as your headlights 7Integrate: Layer your metrics like an onion 8Listen: Pay attention to what your customer is saying 9Benchmark: 10Be flexible: There's no such thing as the holy grail of metrics 11Lead: Practice what you preach 12Be Patient: Crawl before you walk (or run!)
Adding the nice-to-haves
Anyone who has built a house knows that part of the process is choosing from a wide array of options that make the house more livable and increase its value, but also drive up the cost. In the performance management house, there are also options and nice-to-have elements that can enhance the value to the company once the culture is established and the program is well under way.
Successfully integrating these enhancements into the protocol without undermining the entire program requires a certain amount of experience and sophistication; thus, it's often best to wait until you've achieved some success before attempting to build on your program. But when the time is right, carefully considered additions can pay off handsomely.
One option, for example, is to establish a program that links employee incentives to the key metrics. Such incentives will, of course, vary depending upon the employee's level and influence on the organization's processes. A good incentive program will motivate the employee to achieve the desired result and will use the appropriate type and level of compensation as a reward.
As for other "nice-to-have" features, once your company has established a solid internal metrics program, it may want to consider extending the measurement program to include trading partners. [See Commandment #11 (Lead: Practice what you preach).] Your customers don't distinguish between your company's performance and your suppliers' performance, which means your company's success depends heavily on the effective management of your extended supply network. True, these processes are outside of your direct control, which makes implementation difficult, but the potential rewards make the effort worthwhile.
Finally, technology and automation can do much to enhance a well-designed and -executed performance improvement program. The key is remembering that the program should dictate the type of technology used, not the other way around. Rare is the company that builds a successful metrics program by purchasing technology first. But that shouldn't be taken as a vote against technology. Once they have a successful program in place, companies can gain tremendous efficiency through automation.
Built to last
Choosing which metrics to use is just the beginning of the journey to world-class performance. The next phase is to implement a performance management program that converts those metrics from an abstract concept to an active management tool for boosting performance. Like any tool, metrics must be properly applied. Anybody can go to the hardware store and pick up the tools. It takes a master craftsman (or woman)—someone with vision, technical skills and patience—to take those tools and build a house that will last.
The supply chain risk management firm Overhaul has landed $55 million in backing, saying the financing will fuel its advancements in artificial intelligence and support its strategic acquisition roadmap.
The equity funding round comes from the private equity firm Springcoast Partners, with follow-on participation from existing investors Edison Partners and Americo. As part of the investment, Springcoast’s Chris Dederick and Holger Staude will join Overhaul’s board of directors.
According to Austin, Texas-based Overhaul, the money comes as macroeconomic and global trade dynamics are driving consequential transformations in supply chains. That makes cargo visibility and proactive risk management essential tools as shippers manage new routes and suppliers.
“The supply chain technology space will see significant consolidation over the next 12 to 24 months,” Barry Conlon, CEO of Overhaul, said in a release. “Overhaul is well-positioned to establish itself as the ultimate integrated solution, delivering a comprehensive suite of tools for supply chain risk management, efficiency, and visibility under a single trusted platform.”
Artificial intelligence (AI) and data science were hot business topics in 2024 and will remain on the front burner in 2025, according to recent research published in AI in Action, a series of technology-focused columns in the MIT Sloan Management Review.
In Five Trends in AI and Data Science for 2025, researchers Tom Davenport and Randy Bean outline ways in which AI and our data-driven culture will continue to shape the business landscape in the coming year. The information comes from a range of recent AI-focused research projects, including the 2025 AI & Data Leadership Executive Benchmark Survey, an annual survey of data, analytics, and AI executives conducted by Bean’s educational firm, Data & AI Leadership Exchange.
The five trends range from the promise of agentic AI to the struggle over which C-suite role should oversee data and AI responsibilities. At a glance, they reveal that:
Leaders will grapple with both the promise and hype around agentic AI. Agentic AI—which handles tasks independently—is on the rise, in the form of generative AI bots that can perform some content-creation tasks. But the authors say it will be a while before such tools can handle major tasks—like make a travel reservation or conduct a banking transaction.
The time has come to measure results from generative AI experiments. The authors say very few companies are carefully measuring productivity gains from AI projects—particularly when it comes to figuring out what their knowledge-based workers are doing with the freed-up time those projects provide. Doing so is vital to profiting from AI investments.
The reality about data-driven culture sets in. The authors found that 92% of survey respondents feel that cultural and change management challenges are the primary barriers to becoming data- and AI-driven—indicating that the shift to AI is about much more than just the technology.
Unstructured data is important again. The ability to apply Generative AI tools to manage unstructured data—such as text, images, and video—is putting a renewed focus on getting all that data into shape, which takes a whole lot of human effort. As the authors explain “organizations need to pick the best examples of each document type, tag or graph the content, and get it loaded into the system.” And many companies simply aren’t there yet.
Who should run data and AI? Expect continued struggle. Should these roles be concentrated on the business or tech side of the organization? Opinions differ, and as the roles themselves continue to evolve, the authors say companies should expect to continue to wrestle with responsibilities and reporting structures.
Shippers today are praising an 11th-hour contract agreement that has averted the threat of a strike by dockworkers at East and Gulf coast ports that could have frozen container imports and exports as soon as January 16.
The agreement came late last night between the International Longshoremen’s Association (ILA) representing some 45,000 workers and the United States Maritime Alliance (USMX) that includes the operators of port facilities up and down the coast.
Details of the new agreement on those issues have not yet been made public, but in the meantime, retailers and manufacturers are heaving sighs of relief that trade flows will continue.
“Providing certainty with a new contract and avoiding further disruptions is paramount to ensure retail goods arrive in a timely manner for consumers. The agreement will also pave the way for much-needed modernization efforts, which are essential for future growth at these ports and the overall resiliency of our nation’s supply chain,” Gold said.
The next step in the process is for both sides to ratify the tentative agreement, so negotiators have agreed to keep those details private in the meantime, according to identical statements released by the ILA and the USMX. In their joint statement, the groups called the six-year deal a “win-win,” saying: “This agreement protects current ILA jobs and establishes a framework for implementing technologies that will create more jobs while modernizing East and Gulf coasts ports – making them safer and more efficient, and creating the capacity they need to keep our supply chains strong. This is a win-win agreement that creates ILA jobs, supports American consumers and businesses, and keeps the American economy the key hub of the global marketplace.”
The breakthrough hints at broader supply chain trends, which will focus on the tension between operational efficiency and workforce job protection, not just at ports but across other sectors as well, according to a statement from Judah Levine, head of research at Freightos, a freight booking and payment platform. Port automation was the major sticking point leading up to this agreement, as the USMX pushed for technologies to make ports more efficient, while the ILA opposed automation or semi-automation that could threaten jobs.
"This is a six-year détente in the tech-versus-labor tug-of-war at U.S. ports," Levine said. “Automation remains a lightning rod—and likely one we’ll see in other industries—but this deal suggests a cautious path forward."
Editor's note: This story was revised on January 9 to include additional input from the ILA, USMX, and Freightos.
Logistics industry growth slowed in December due to a seasonal wind-down of inventory and following one of the busiest holiday shopping seasons on record, according to the latest Logistics Managers’ Index (LMI) report, released this week.
The monthly LMI was 57.3 in December, down more than a percentage point from November’s reading of 58.4. Despite the slowdown, economic activity across the industry continued to expand, as an LMI reading above 50 indicates growth and a reading below 50 indicates contraction.
The LMI researchers said the monthly conditions were largely due to seasonal drawdowns in inventory levels—and the associated costs of holding them—at the retail level. The LMI’s Inventory Levels index registered 50, falling from 56.1 in November. That reduction also affected warehousing capacity, which slowed but remained in expansion mode: The LMI’s warehousing capacity index fell 7 points to a reading of 61.6.
December’s results reflect a continued trend toward more typical industry growth patterns following recent years of volatility—and they point to a successful peak holiday season as well.
“Retailers were clearly correct in their bet to stock [up] on goods ahead of the holiday season,” the LMI researchers wrote in their monthly report. “Holiday sales from November until Christmas Eve were up 3.8% year-over-year according to Mastercard. This was largely driven by a 6.7% increase in e-commerce sales, although in-person spending was up 2.9% as well.”
And those results came during a compressed peak shopping cycle.
“The increase in spending came despite the shorter holiday season due to the late Thanksgiving,” the researchers also wrote, citing National Retail Federation (NRF) estimates that U.S. shoppers spent just short of a trillion dollars in November and December, making it the busiest holiday season of all time.
The LMI is a monthly survey of logistics managers from across the country. It tracks industry growth overall and across eight areas: inventory levels and costs; warehousing capacity, utilization, and prices; and transportation capacity, utilization, and prices. The report is released monthly by researchers from Arizona State University, Colorado State University, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rutgers University, and the University of Nevada, Reno, in conjunction with the Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals (CSCMP).
As U.S. small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) face an uncertain business landscape in 2025, a substantial majority (67%) expect positive growth in the new year compared to 2024, according to a survey from DHL.
However, the survey also showed that businesses could face a rocky road to reach that goal, as they navigate a complex environment of regulatory/policy shifts and global market volatility. Both those issues were cited as top challenges by 36% of respondents, followed by staffing/talent retention (11%) and digital threats and cyber attacks (2%).
Against that backdrop, SMEs said that the biggest opportunity for growth in 2025 lies in expanding into new markets (40%), followed by economic improvements (31%) and implementing new technologies (14%).
As the U.S. prepares for a broad shift in political leadership in Washington after a contentious election, the SMEs in DHL’s survey were likely split evenly on their opinion about the impact of regulatory and policy changes. A plurality of 40% were on the fence (uncertain, still evaluating), followed by 24% who believe regulatory changes could negatively impact growth, 20% who see these changes as having a positive impact, and 16% predicting no impact on growth at all.
That uncertainty also triggered a split when respondents were asked how they planned to adjust their strategy in 2025 in response to changes in the policy or regulatory landscape. The largest portion (38%) of SMEs said they remained uncertain or still evaluating, followed by 30% who will make minor adjustments, 19% will maintain their current approach, and 13% who were willing to significantly adjust their approach.