Even the best-designed distribution systems may harbor traps that rob them of their highest performance potential. Here's how to find—and avoid—those velocity traps.
William T. Walker, CFPIM (Certified Fellow in Production and Inventory Management), CIRM (Certified in Integrated Resource Management), is a director of supply chain management for Siemens Building Technologies. He is also author of the book Supply Chain Architecture: A Blueprint for Networking the Flow of Material, Information, and Cash, CRC Press, ?2005.
For one DC, the trap turned out to be its own order approval process. An order for urgently needed replenishments from Taiwan was delayed a full six days because the only person authorized to sign off on the purchase was out of the country. For another DC, the trap turned out to be the company's accounting department. A $3,300 order never reached the DC because of miscommunication with the people in credit. For yet another, the trap lay in a procedural oversight that snarled an incoming shipment from Malaysia. After a series of delays, the shipment finally arrived at the DC only to be held up again while workers frantically searched for a hidden packing slip.
In all three cases, the DCs were ensnared by what we call "velocity traps"—mishaps that disrupt the smooth flow of material, information and cash that's so essential to a well-performing supply chain. Unfortunately, these are hardly isolated cases. Velocity traps are everywhere. Even a well-designed distribution system has velocity traps that can rob a DC of its highest performance potential.
What makes the DC particularly vulnerable to these traps is its position in the larger supply chain network. In its daily transactions, the DC acts as both buyer and seller, simultaneously buying from its upstream suppliers and selling to its downstream customers.
On the surface, the transactions look simple enough: You fill the order, deliver the merchandise and transfer the cash, completing what's known as the order-to-delivery-to-cash (ODC) cycle. (Or if the DC is ordering replenishments, you place the order, accept the delivery and transfer the cash.) Add up the time it takes to complete each step, and you have a measure of DC velocity. It's just that basic.
But the execution, as every DC manager knows, can get complicated. Potential pitfalls lurk in every one of those transactions. The customer's order never reaches the DC. The DC ships the merchandise only to have it rejected at the customer's dock. Payments are misdirected. Orders are put on indefinite credit hold. There are a million ways to lose velocity. It may not be possible to avoid every trap. But the more you know about problems that can interfere with the flow of material, information and cash, the better you can prepare. What follows is a look at some common velocity traps:
Material whirl
The sooner you deliver a shipment, the sooner you get paid. Seems simple enough, but a lot can happen between the time you receive an order and the time your customer takes delivery of the goods. Here are some common traps to watch for:
Rejected shipments. The DC ships an order out, only to find it's back a few days later. A phone call reveals that the shipment was rejected at the receiving dock because of inaccurate counts or damaged cartons. Get the order right the first time and see that merchandise is packed to withstand the rigors of transportation.
A "no-show" carrier. The shipment's ready to go, but it ends up sitting on the dock for days before someone arrives to pick it up. Often, it turns out that the customer has chosen a carrier that doesn't normally serve your DC, causing delays while its dispatcher rearranges routes to accommodate the pickup. Your customers aren't obligated to choose a carrier from your DC's preferred carrier list, of course. But make sure they understand that using an unfamiliar company can cause delays of up to two days.
Out of stocks. An order comes in and the DC goes to fill it, only to find itself short of one of the SKUs. But because the customer has specified that the DC ship only complete orders, the entire shipment is held up. Or a customer that normally orders five cartons suddenly orders 50 with no advance notice, causing delays of a week or more while the DC awaits replenishments. To avoid delays, encourage customers to accept partial orders and to provide advance notice of unusually large orders.
Congested docks and clogged aisles. DCs that process incoming freight, outbound shipments and returns in the same dock space risk blocking the paths of the forklifts trying to load shipments. Similarly, operations that use a lot of floor space for accumulating coordinated shipments risk running short of space needed for cross-docking operations. Keep aisles and paths clear.
Most of the traps described so far mainly affect outbound shipments, causing delays in a DC's efforts to get shipments out the door. There are others that affect mainly inbound shipments. Here are some common "inbound" traps:
Unrealistic delivery expectations. The longer the supply chain, the higher the risk of delay—your inbound shipment could miss the departure date for an ocean sailing, be bumped to the next flight, or get held up in customs. And contrary to popular belief, an airfreight shipment from Southeast Asia to the East Coast doesn't arrive overnight; it typically takes eight calendar days door to door. Let everyone in your organization know what's realistic to expect.
Unfamiliar foreign trade practices. Missteps by first-time importers can lead to lengthy delays. Consider the case of a DC that ordered product manufactured in Malaysia under Incoterms, Delivered Duty Paid. Under DDP, the seller hired the forwarder/carrier to deliver the goods, so the buyer didn't bother to check to see which forwarder the seller had chosen. As it turned out, the seller selected a forwarder that did not hold the DC's power of attorney to clear the goods through U.S. Customs, which meant the goods had to be handed over to a different broker for customs clearance and delivery. Because the delivery wasn't scheduled with the broker, the goods were stowed in a corner until someone realized the shipment was overdue. Keep a close watch on international shipments and get outside assistance, if necessary.
Data woes
While everybody accepts that moving material from point A to point B takes time, most assume that information flow is instantaneous. But that's not always true. For all our lightning fast digital transmission capabilities, plenty of people still communicate via phone, fax and even mail and then spend hours or days waiting for callbacks. Here are some other traps to watch for:
Hierarchical approval processes. The typical corporation builds multiple layers of approval into its purchasing process, sometimes even requiring signoff at the highest levels. While that may reduce its exposure to fraud, it also can lead to serious delays. Take the case of an Indianapolis DC that was caught by surprise when demand took off for an item manufactured in Taiwan. With orders pouring in and supplies dwindling, the DC's purchasing agent tried to place an urgent order with the supplier, only to discover that the dollar value exceeded her authorization limit. Her boss, the purchasing manager, was away on business in Frankfurt but had left a number for emergencies. At 2: 30 p.m. Thursday, she called to ask him to send an authorizing fax directly to the factory in Taipei, catching him as he was finishing dinner at 9: 30 p.m. The boss finally got to a fax machine at noon Friday—which was 6: 00 p.m. Friday in Taipei, where the factory was closing for a long holiday. To avoid this trap, designate a backup person to authorize purchases in emergencies.
Bad inventory data. You've invested in bar codes to eliminate data entry errors and in RFID tags to ensure inventory locations don't go undetected. But you still run into situations in which the computer says that Item A is in the DC, but it simply can't be found. Don't assume your inventory data is 100-percent accurate. It's unlikely to be perfect unless you've put cycle counting or similar processes in place to ensure it.
Missing information and document discrepancies. There's no room for error when it comes to global trade documents, where the smallest omission or discrepancy can lead to lengthy delays and failure to be paid. The information on the advance shipping notice or container contents list (both of which must be submitted well before the sailing or wheels-up) must reflect exactly what arrives at the destination port or airport. Data on other documents—purchase orders, bills of lading, letters of credit, and so forth—must match up as well. Companies that participate in the Customs-Trade Partnership Against Terrorism (C-TPAT) have the added responsibility of complying with that program's information requirements or risk being bounced from Customs'"EZ-Pass"lanes. Prepare your documents carefully.
Follow the money
However irksome they may be, problems that halt the flow of materials or data generally surface quickly. The customs broker calls with the bad news. The warehousing software notifies the supervisor that an item is out of stock. Whatever the problem, the DC manager can start taking steps to resolve it.
That's not necessarily true of the velocity traps that can disrupt the flow of cash. Days, weeks or months may go by before the shipper or receiver hears about the problem, which only lengthens the delay. Here are some common cash flow-related traps:
Failure to communicate. Lack of communication between the credit department and the DC can result in serious delays. Take the case of a retail store that hit a stone wall in its attempts to order replenishments from its DC. The retail store placed a new order for $3,300 from the DC at a time when it was already using $28,775 of its $30,000 credit line. But the order never reached the DC's order management system. Instead, the company's credit department put it on indefinite credit hold until the retailer reduced its balance. In a desperate bid to free up some credit, the retail store returned some slow-moving product, paying a hefty restocking charge in the process (a move that benefited neither party). A quick phone call could have resolved the matter and prevented the delays.
Lax returns management. For some types of merchandise, return rates run as high as 35 percent, which could mean a lot of stuff for the DC to manage, sort, store and move. Not only do those returns tie up cash, but they also impose a burden on the DC to keep its returns records up to date so it can properly credit customers' accounts.
Failure to update records. There's no substitute for a regular audit of records. Take the case of a hardware DC whose supplier suddenly halted deliveries. The supplier, a highly profitable regional hardware company, had recently bought out a competitor, becoming a national hardware company overnight. In the ensuing reorganization, the supplier consolidated the accounts receivable functions and moved them to a new location. The DC somehow missed the notice advising it of the supplier's new bill-to address, and its managers were shocked to learn that the supplier had stopped delivering hardware because the DC owed more than 120 days' worth of outstanding payments. This trap could have been easily avoided by conducting a regular audit of all bill-to addresses.
It doesn't take a hurricane, fire or earthquake to snarl a supply chain. The smallest miscue or oversight can disrupt the flow of material, information and cash, causing velocity to plummet. Review your operation to determine where it might be vulnerable. Then eliminate the traps and watch your DC's velocity soar.
Electric vehicle (EV) sales have seen slow and steady growth, as the vehicles continue to gain converts among consumers and delivery fleet operators alike. But a consistent frustration for drivers has been pulling up to a charging station only to find that the charger has been intentionally broken or disabled.
To address that threat, the EV charging solution provider ChargePoint has launched two products to combat charger vandalism.
The first is a cut-resistant charging cable that's designed to deter theft. The cable, which incorporates what the manufacturer calls "novel cut-resistant materials," is substantially more difficult for would-be vandals to cut but is still flexible enough for drivers to maneuver comfortably, the California firm said. ChargePoint intends to make its cut-resistant cables available for all of its commercial and fleet charging stations, and, starting in the middle of the year, will license the cable design to other charging station manufacturers as part of an industrywide effort to combat cable theft and vandalism.
The second product, ChargePoint Protect, is an alarm system that detects charging cable tampering in real time and literally sounds the alarm using the charger's existing speakers, screens, and lighting system. It also sends SMS or email messages to ChargePoint customers notifying them that the system's alarm has been triggered.
ChargePoint says it expects these two new solutions, when combined, will benefit charging station owners by reducing station repair costs associated with vandalism and EV drivers by ensuring they can trust charging stations to work when and where they need them.
New Jersey is home to the most congested freight bottleneck in the country for the seventh straight year, according to research from the American Transportation Research Institute (ATRI), released today.
ATRI’s annual list of the Top 100 Truck Bottlenecks aims to highlight the nation’s most congested highways and help local, state, and federal governments target funding to areas most in need of relief. The data show ways to reduce chokepoints, lower emissions, and drive economic growth, according to the researchers.
The 2025 Top Truck Bottleneck List measures the level of truck-involved congestion at more than 325 locations on the national highway system. The analysis is based on an extensive database of freight truck GPS data and uses several customized software applications and analysis methods, along with terabytes of data from trucking operations, to produce a congestion impact ranking for each location. The bottleneck locations detailed in the latest ATRI list represent the top 100 congested locations, although ATRI continuously monitors more than 325 freight-critical locations, the group said.
For the seventh straight year, the intersection of I-95 and State Route 4 near the George Washington Bridge in Fort Lee, New Jersey, is the top freight bottleneck in the country. The remaining top 10 bottlenecks include: Chicago, I-294 at I-290/I-88; Houston, I-45 at I-69/US 59; Atlanta, I-285 at I-85 (North); Nashville: I-24/I-40 at I-440 (East); Atlanta: I-75 at I-285 (North); Los Angeles, SR 60 at SR 57; Cincinnati, I-71 at I-75; Houston, I-10 at I-45; and Atlanta, I-20 at I-285 (West).
ATRI’s analysis, which utilized data from 2024, found that traffic conditions continue to deteriorate from recent years, partly due to work zones resulting from increased infrastructure investment. Average rush hour truck speeds were 34.2 miles per hour (MPH), down 3% from the previous year. Among the top 10 locations, average rush hour truck speeds were 29.7 MPH.
In addition to squandering time and money, these delays also waste fuel—with trucks burning an estimated 6.4 billion gallons of diesel fuel and producing more than 65 million metric tons of additional carbon emissions while stuck in traffic jams, according to ATRI.
On a positive note, ATRI said its analysis helps quantify the value of infrastructure investment, pointing to improvements at Chicago’s Jane Byrne Interchange as an example. Once the number one truck bottleneck in the country for three years in a row, the recently constructed interchange saw rush hour truck speeds improve by nearly 25% after construction was completed, according to the report.
“Delays inflicted on truckers by congestion are the equivalent of 436,000 drivers sitting idle for an entire year,” ATRI President and COO Rebecca Brewster said in a statement announcing the findings. “These metrics are getting worse, but the good news is that states do not need to accept the status quo. Illinois was once home to the top bottleneck in the country, but following a sustained effort to expand capacity, the Jane Byrne Interchange in Chicago no longer ranks in the top 10. This data gives policymakers a road map to reduce chokepoints, lower emissions, and drive economic growth.”
"Shrink" is the retail industry term for the loss of inventory before it can be sold, whether through theft, damage, fraud, or simple book-keeping errors. In the ongoing effort to reduce those losses, Switzerland-based retail tech company Sensormatic Solutions has expanded the scope of its Shrink Analyzer application to shine a light into previously unmonitored parts of brick-and-mortar stores where goods tend to go missing.
The newly enhanced, cloud-based application can now integrate radio-frequency identification (RFID) and electronic product code (EPC) data from overlooked parts of the building, like employee entrances, receiving doors, "buy online, pick up in store" (BOPIS) doors, or other high-risk areas selected by a store. It then integrates that data into Sensormatic's analytics engine to provide insights into when, where, and how shrink occurs to help users strengthen their loss-prevention strategies, the company says.
Those expanded capabilities allow the platform to provide enhanced "shrink insight" at locations beyond the store's main exit, Sensormatic says. For example, strategically placed RFID scanners at employee exits can reduce internal theft while providing item-level evidence for theft investigation efforts. Likewise, monitoring online-order pickup doors can help retailers both improve in-store e-commerce fulfillment accuracy and identify employee theft events, according to Sensormatic.
A few days before Christmas as I was busy preparing for the holiday, I received a text message from my bank asking if I had attempted to purchase a $244 Amtrak ticket in Orange County, California. Considering that I had the card in my possession and that I lived thousands of miles away from the attempted purchase location, I promptly replied "No." Almost immediately, a second message informed me that my card was locked and to contact my bank.
I'd like to say this was an isolated incident, but in 2024, I had to replace the same card four times. Luckily, it just took a quick trip to my local bank to replace the compromised card, but it was still an unwanted hassle.
Fraud is a never-ending issue facing not just consumers but businesses as well—no one is immune, it seems. In its latest industry report, "Occupational Fraud 2024: A Report to the Nations," the Association of Certified Fraud Examiners (ACFE) estimated that businesses lose 5% of their revenues to fraud each year. This report focused specifically on three basic types of occupational fraud: asset misappropriation, corruption, and financial misstatement. But what about other types of fraud?
The media often report on big organized theft rings stealing goods from trailers, trains, or containerships, or on bands of thieves breaking into warehouses or retail stores—but there are so many other ways in which fraudsters wreak havoc.
For instance, another area where fraud is rampant is consumer returns in the retail industry. Software company Appriss Retail, in collaboration with business management consultancy Deloitte, recently published its "2024 Consumer Returns in the Retail Industry" report. It states that "total returns for the retail industry amounted to $685 billion in merchandise in 2024." That might seem like a drop in the bucket compared to the $5 trillion in sales U.S. retailers racked up last year, but as the report's authors note in the executive summary, "the amount of fraud and abuse remains a significant issue that should be addressed. Fraudsters and abusers are often becoming adept at circumventing retailers' controls across all channels."
So what can businesses do? According to the ACFE study, internal controls (i.e., surprise audits, management reviews, hotlines or other reporting mechanisms, fraud training, and formal fraud risk assessments) are the best defense against occupational fraud.
When it comes to consumer returns fraud, Appriss Retail's report concludes that while retailers continue to adapt and refine their fraud prevention strategies, it's a delicate balancing act. The trick is for "retailers to implement solutions that have [a] minimal impact on the consumer experience," the report noted. "Brand loyalty can be fragile and competition continues to grow, so holding onto consumers is often a key to long-term success."
Then there's security and asset protection. Last October, I attended a session at the Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals' EDGE 2024 conference that focused on security and safety. In that session, Lee Ambrose, vice president of business development for Remote Security Solutions (RSS), discussed advanced strategies and technologies for violence prevention. But he also touched on asset/transit protection and specific solutions that can help companies discourage theft.
As an example, Ambrose cited his company's transit surveillance unit (TSU)—a portable monitoring device that can be installed on trailers to protect in-transit freight. According to the company's website, the TSU uses AI (artificial intelligence) detection, security cameras, and two-way communication to deter criminal activity, providing real-time detection and notification when unauthorized persons attempt to enter the trailer. It claims the device has a deterrence rate of 98%.
In the end, sometimes there is only so much a company can do to mitigate fraud/theft. But we are fortunate to have resources we can turn to if we need help. It's an uphill battle, but one that we will keep on fighting.
Most retail, wholesale, and manufacturing businesses are focused on fundamentally restructuring their supply chains to stay ahead of economic uncertainty. That’s according to results of the second annual State of Supply Chain report from supply chain solutions platform provider Relex Solutions, released Tuesday.
Relex surveyed nearly 600 professionals from retail, consumer packaged goods (CPG), and wholesale businesses across seven countries and found that 60% said they are overhauling their supply chains due to tariff uncertainty and market volatility.
Respondents said they are grappling with unpredictable consumer demand, escalating trade tensions, and unreliable supplier networks. More than half (52%) said demand volatility is their biggest challenge, forcing them to rethink inventory strategies in real time as shifting spending habits disrupt supply chains. In addition, 47% of businesses pointed to global trade disruptions and rising tariffs as a growing threat—with tariff volatility fueling concerns over higher costs and sourcing bottlenecks—and43% said they struggle with a lack of real-time data and visibility, making it harder to adapt to sudden shifts in demand, labor shortages, and transportation delays.
To counter those challenges, companies said they are making “bold operational shifts,” according to the study. Many are expanding their supplier networks, moving sourcing closer to home, and accelerating automation investments. Among retailers, 62% said they are addressing cost pressures through a combination of efficiency improvements and price adjustments, while 50% said they are actively broadening supplier bases to safeguard against economic and geopolitical instability.
“Supply chains are in a pressure cooker—between tariffs, demand shifts, and unpredictable disruptions, the outdated and traditional way of operating isn’t sustainable,” Dr. Madhav Durbha, Relex Solutions’ group vice president of CPG & Manufacturing, said in a statement announcing the findings. “Companies that lean into AI, automation, and supplier diversification will not only weather this volatility but emerge stronger. The ones that don’t risk falling behind.”
The full report, Relex State of Supply Chain 2025: Retail and CPG Dynamics, is slated for release in March. The report was conducted by market research firm Researchscape in January 2025.